On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:59:09AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Here is one more detail proposal to write each entry of
> debian/changelog. What do you think about this?
>
> Currently, we wrote each entries in debian/changelog to to file
> oriented, for example:
>
> * debian/control:
> - Change all references to libstdc++5-dev to be
> libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, allowing libstdc++5-3.3-dev to satiffy
> the dependency, and thus allowing gcc3.2 to be removed.
> (Closes: #194136)
> - New xlibmesa-drm-src package. (Closes: #139817)
>
> But our work will be changeset oriented, so I think that it will
> probably be better to write each entry in debian/changes to changeset
> oriented. For example:
>
> * Use external Xft, Xrender and Xcursor libraries [ISHIKAWA Mutsumi]
> - patch #058, #059, #060: new;
> - patch #909: remove (reimplemented as above patches);
> - xlibs{,-dbg,-dev}.*, shlibs*: drop Xrender and Xcursor related entry
> - debian/control: add Build-Depends: libxrender-dev, libxcursor-dev
>
> On each entry would describe:
> - Short title of changeset.
> - some more short descriptions
> - bug close entry (if needed)
> - some more detail document pointer (if needed)
> - (Committed revision of this changeset for more detail)?
>
> Perhaps debian/changelog will be clear to describe
> `this release contains what kind of changes.'I agree entirely. The current format is just a holdover from when I needed to be able to hand-revert changes on a file-by-file basis. Revision control makes that unnecessary. Thanks! -- G. Branden Robinson | One man's "magic" is another man's Debian GNU/Linux | engineering. "Supernatural" is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] | null word. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
