On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 06:35:46PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "BR" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Simple. I find it extremely distressing that such a major piece of our
> > distribution is maintained by a person who, until I pointed out
> > otherwise:
>
> Really ?
>> "BR" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:21:56AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> >> "BR" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Gar, Marillat strikes again.
>>
>> What is your problem Robinson ?
> Simple. I find it extremely dist
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:21:56AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "BR" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Gar, Marillat strikes again.
>
> What is your problem Robinson ?
Simple. I find it extremely distressing that such a major piece of our
distribution is maintained
>> "BR" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gar, Marillat strikes again.
What is your problem Robinson ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gar, Marillat strikes again.
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:21:15PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:09:16PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > The offender would appear to be libgnomeprint-data (and hence
> > libgnomeprint15, and hence large quantities of GNOME). I'm not familiar
>
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:09:16PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> The offender would appear to be libgnomeprint-data (and hence
> libgnomeprint15, and hence large quantities of GNOME). I'm not familiar
> with why it might be doing this, so I haven't filed a bug.
I don't claim to understand the packa
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 01:54:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 08:44:52PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > I don't see why something like gsfonts-x11 should be tethered to all
> > of these packages in debian sid.
>
> Most distressing. There had better be a good reason f
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 08:44:52PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>Does anyone understand why gsfonts-x11 seems to be so deeply
> entrenched in the system after it is installed? I tried to
> apt-get remove it and I get...
>
> apt-get remove gsfonts-x11
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building
Does anyone understand why gsfonts-x11 seems to be so deeply
entrenched in the system after it is installed? I tried to
apt-get remove it and I get...
apt-get remove gsfonts-x11
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
bonobo bo
9 matches
Mail list logo
