On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:09:16PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > The offender would appear to be libgnomeprint-data (and hence > libgnomeprint15, and hence large quantities of GNOME). I'm not familiar > with why it might be doing this, so I haven't filed a bug.
I don't claim to understand the packaging system, but does this make any sense? Package: libgnomeprint-data Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 1516 Maintainer: Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: gnome-print Version: 0.35-4 Replaces: libgnomeprint6, gnome-print Depends: libgnomeprint-bin (>= 0.32-1), gs, gsfonts-x11 Recommends: gsfonts Description: The GNOME Print architecture - data files This package contains fonts and locale files needed by gnome-print. Why does it depend on gsfonts-x11, but only recommend gsfonts? Or is that OK, because gsfonts-x11 itself depends on gsfonts? Or does that mean that it doesn't need the Recommends: line at all? Actually, it's supposed to be the other way around, isn't it? Depend on gs and gsfonts, recommend gsfonts-x11. 'Cept gs itself only recommends gsfonts... I'm soooooo confused. :) -- Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
