Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1089479 [src:xorg] xorg: Supporting rootless builds by default
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1089479: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089479
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hello,
meanwhile I noticed that this mailing list is not for user support. I
addressed myself to the xorg list, but so far, I got the advise to do
the kind of service that Debians maintainers do fine:
https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2019-July/059852.html
https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 868453 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/issues/554
Bug #868453 [xserver-xorg-core] xorg flooded by dbus messages
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/issues/554'.
> thanks
Stopping proc
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 onioncircuits 0.5-2
Bug #909275 [src:xorg-server, src:onioncircuits] xorg-server breaks
onioncircuits autopkgtest: expected string, NoneType found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:xorg-server, src:onioncircuits' to
'onioncircuits'.
No longer marked as f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 868453 2:1.16.4-1+deb8u1+b1
Bug #868453 [xserver-xorg-core] xorg flooded by dbus messages
Marked as fixed in versions xorg-server/2:1.16.4-1+deb8u1.
> found 868453 2:1.19.2-1+deb9u1
Bug #868453 [xserver-xorg-core] xorg flooded by dbus messag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 868843
> https://lists.x.org/pipermail/xorg-devel/2017-July/054127.html
Bug #868843 [src:xorg-server] xorg-server: please make the BUILD_{DATE,TIME}
reproducible
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://lists.x.org/pipermail/xorg-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible
Bug #856662 [xorg] xorg: starting X within X without specifying -vt destroys
current X session
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #856662 [xorg] xorg: starting X within X without specifying -vt destroys
current X session
Adde
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + upstream patch
Bug #834054 [xserver-xorg-core] Xorg: Fatal server error: GLSL compile failure:
Failed to compile VS: 0:13(43): error: `pos' undeclared
Added tag(s) patch and upstream.
--
834054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834054
Deb
26.01.2016, 04:18, Michel Dänzer kirjoitti:
> On 25.01.2016 16:48, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> 21.01.2016, 04:49, Michel Dänzer kirjoitti:
>>> On 21.01.2016 06:55, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ Description: X.Org X server
Package: xserver-xorg-video-all
Architecture: any
On 25.01.2016 16:48, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> 21.01.2016, 04:49, Michel Dänzer kirjoitti:
>> On 21.01.2016 06:55, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ Description: X.Org X server
>>> Package: xserver-xorg-video-all
>>> Architecture: any
>>> Depends:
>>> + xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu [amd64
21.01.2016, 04:49, Michel Dänzer kirjoitti:
> On 21.01.2016 06:55, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>
>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ Description: X.Org X server
>> Package: xserver-xorg-video-all
>> Architecture: any
>> Depends:
>> + xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-any x32],
>> xserver-xorg-video-at
On 21.01.2016 06:55, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ Description: X.Org X server
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-all
> Architecture: any
> Depends:
> + xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-any x32],
> xserver-xorg-video-ati [!hurd-any !s390x],
Any particular reason for usi
Hello again,
I removed slim and added wdm which works without additional packages. So
it seems to be a slim issue.
Best regards
Andreas
--
("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
`o_ o ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
(_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
_..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' .'
(
On 07.05.2015 10:31, jnqnfe wrote:
> I should have scrolled further up the log before sending information
> about the second crash I experienced in my previous message, as there
> were a bunch of additional related entries above the backtrace. You'll
> find them below.
>
> Note, after sending a co
I should have scrolled further up the log before sending information
about the second crash I experienced in my previous message, as there
were a bunch of additional related entries above the backtrace. You'll
find them below.
Note, after sending a copy of the backtrace from the first crash to thi
Another crash, this time it occurred when skipping through a video in
VLC.
I should mention that this is an up-to-date Sid install.
> May 7 02:08:32 testPC gdm-Xorg-:1[12997]: (EE) Backtrace:
> May 7 02:08:32 testPC gdm-Xorg-:1[12997]: (EE) 0: /usr/bin/Xorg
> (xorg_backtrace+0x56) [0x7f044c2ac
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:18:38 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Nice catch, thanks!
>
> (I guess that leads to another question, i.e. should we be building
> xserver-xorg-video-intel with --enable-valgrind by default?
IMHO, yes, we should.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
2014-08-19 15:15 GMT+02:00 maximilian attems :
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:13:04PM +0200, BubuXP wrote:
>>
>> In version 2:2.21.14-1 valgrind was enabled by default, but after a
>> couple of hours version 2:2.21.14-2 was released with "Don't enable
>> valgrind on kfreebsd" in changelog.
>> So I th
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:13:04PM +0200, BubuXP wrote:
> 2014-08-19 12:18 GMT+02:00 Vincent Cheng :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > (Cc-ing debian-x@l.d.o)
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:08 AM, BubuXP wrote:
> > > While compiling upstream snapshots for debian
> > > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0
2014-08-19 12:18 GMT+02:00 Vincent Cheng :
>
> Hi,
>
> (Cc-ing debian-x@l.d.o)
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:08 AM, BubuXP wrote:
> > While compiling upstream snapshots for debian
> > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B7AdLMiZn4FzdGZNV2FpLWhPTkk
> > I found that valgrind is disabled.
> > Is
Hi,
(Cc-ing debian-x@l.d.o)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:08 AM, BubuXP wrote:
> While compiling upstream snapshots for debian
> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B7AdLMiZn4FzdGZNV2FpLWhPTkk
> I found that valgrind is disabled.
> Is this the expected behavior?
> I'm not a programmer, just a po
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 666468 2:1.12.4-2
Bug #666468 {Done: Julien Cristau } [xorg-server]
xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
Bug #666538 {Done: Julien Cristau } [xorg-server]
xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps
Bug #66
On 03/16/2012 06:25 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
reassign 664060 src:linux-2.6 3.2.10-1
affects 664060 + xserver-xorg-video-intel
quit
Hi Rosea,
rosea grammostola wrote:
When I open the big clock window (alt-b) in Ardour3 (downloaded from
ardour.org), Xorg bumps up to 70% MEM and freezes my sys
reassign 664060 src:linux-2.6 3.2.10-1
affects 664060 + xserver-xorg-video-intel
quit
Hi Rosea,
rosea grammostola wrote:
> When I open the big clock window (alt-b) in Ardour3 (downloaded from
> ardour.org), Xorg bumps up to 70% MEM and freezes my system (Thinkpad
> T61)
>
> root 20 0 3082
Cyril Brulebois (28/01/2012):
> Rebased ref, commits from common ancestor:
Killed that tag, replaced with an xsf-tag-generated one.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Cyril Brulebois (20/12/2011):
> configure.ac|4 ++--
> hw/dmx/glxProxy/Makefile.am |2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
No big deal if we don't upload that version..
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Cyril Brulebois (31/08/2011):
> New branch 'people/master' available with the following commits:
> commit 24b2b43e85c1e3f3d242ccab8793bf4ef83cfac4
> Author: Cyril Brulebois
> Date: Sun Jun 5 14:53:08 2011 +0200
>
> render: Replace __inline with inline.
>
> Also remove traces from
Debian FTP Masters (28/08/2011):
> Reject Reasons:
> Unknown distribution `squeeze-backports'.
[…]
> Cannot find target suite squeeze-backports to perform version checks
> xorg-server_1.10.4-1~bpo60+1.dsc: cannot find suite squeeze-backports when
> checking source formats
> Cannot find target sui
On 2011-08-23 11:33, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:32:22 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Are there any objections to installing the alternative slave link for
>> vendor implemntations of libglx.so as
>> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux/libglx.so
...
> I'd prefer an explicit over
Hi all,
since I didn't get any feedback, yet, I'm asking again.
Are there any objections to installing the alternative slave link for
vendor implemntations of libglx.so as
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux/libglx.so
and leave
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
undiverted?
According to the s
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:32:22 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I didn't get any feedback, yet, I'm asking again.
>
> Are there any objections to installing the alternative slave link for
> vendor implemntations of libglx.so as
> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux/libglx.so
> and
On 2011-07-11 19:33, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I very much dislike the idea of using alternatives for configuration
> files.
I understand the concerns regarding alternatives and configuration
files, especially if update-alternatives is buggy when it comes to files
sitting in the place of alternative
On 2011-07-11 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Combining configuration files with slave alternatives makes me nervous.
> I'm not sure what would happen if the system administrator broke the
> symlink (via an editor action, for example) while the alternatives system
> still thinks that it's active; we m
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 17:14:13 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2011-07-08 20:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:47:50 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> since the proprietary nvidia driver does not work with Xorg
> >> autoconfiguration, an xorg.conf is needed to enable
Andreas Beckmann writes:
> In that case, would it be OK to just install a slave alternative
> directly as /etc/X11/xorg.conf?
> The /etc/X11/nvidia.conf would be created only if there was no xorg.conf
> previously (and no xorg.conf.d/*.conf with a 'Driver ".*"' line) and the
> slave link will be
On 2011-07-08 20:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:47:50 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> since the proprietary nvidia driver does not work with Xorg
>> autoconfiguration, an xorg.conf is needed to enable it.
>> I'm planning to use debconf for creating a xorg.conf.d snippet on
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:47:50 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> [resending to debian-x@ instead of just kibi@]
>
> Dear X Team,
>
> since the proprietary nvidia driver does not work with Xorg
> autoconfiguration, an xorg.conf is needed to enable it.
> I'm planning to use debconf for creating a
Debian FTP Masters (18/06/2011):
> Reject Reasons:
> xserver-common_1.10.2-1+wheezy1_all.deb: old version (2:1.10.2-1) in unstable
> <= new version (2:1.10.2-1+wheezy1) targeted at testing-proposed-updates.
> xorg-server_1.10.2-1+wheezy1.dsc: old version (2:1.10.2-1) in unstable <= new
> version
it's known upstream, no patch yet:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36986
OK, thanks for the immediate answer and the corresponding bug report!
denk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
Hi,
d...@post.com (12/05/2011):
> I would like to try out the recently uploaded XServer 1.10.1.901 if
> it resolves some issues for me. As I need the i386-build which was
> not uploaded due to build-failures I tried to build it myself and
> got the same error as buildd (surprisingly ^^). Is the b
Hi,
Christopher Halse Rogers (20/02/2011):
> +xorg-server (2:1.9.99.902-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> +
> + * debian/rules:
> +- Change --disable-builddocs configure flag to --disable-devel-docs to
> + match upstream renaming. Avoids the problem 16-oot-build.diff fixes.
sorry, I didn't
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:03:01PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sedat Dilek (20/02/2011):
> > while playing with xorg-server 1.10-rc2 and building with
> > git-buildpackage, I got these errors:
>
> (debuild|dpkg-buildpackage) -b is what you want.
>
> > Changing in debian/gbp.conf to 'pristine
Sedat Dilek (20/02/2011):
> while playing with xorg-server 1.10-rc2 and building with
> git-buildpackage, I got these errors:
(debuild|dpkg-buildpackage) -b is what you want.
> Changing in debian/gbp.conf to 'pristine-tar = False' (Default:
> True) solves the problem.
Is there anyone of us usin
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while playing with xorg-server 1.10-rc2 and building with
> git-buildpackage, I got these errors:
>
> [ build.log ]
> ...
> dh_clean
> gbp:warn: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found
> fatal: Path 'xorg-server_1.9.99.902+git201
Julien Cristau (28/01/2011):
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:28:20 +, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > +OLD_LIBS=/usr/X11R6
>
> /usr/X11R6/lib?
Yes for the libs aspect. But I figured there might be other stuff
there, so we might want to warn anyway.
> > +if [ -d "$OLD_LIBS" ]; then
> > + echo "The
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:28:20 +, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/xserver-xorg-core.bug.script
> b/debian/xserver-xorg-core.bug.script
> index 1438a95..1b2a5ce 100644
> --- a/debian/xserver-xorg-core.bug.script
> +++ b/debian/xserver-xorg-core.bug.script
> @@ -2,10 +2,13 @@
>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 15:17:39 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ever since etch or so, Xorg upgrades have been a bit of a pain as
> apt/aptitude decide to uninstall driver packages instead of upgrading
> them.
>
The situation looks better now, but I just tried an upgrade and apt
decided
Julien Cristau (03/07/2010):
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 00:04:19 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > > I haven't found the real cause for this problem, but for the time being
> > > you can add to the xserver-xorg-video-all package the following line:
> > > >
> > > Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-
Cyril Brulebois (15/07/2010):
> Changes since xorg-server-2_1.7.7-2:
> Cyril Brulebois (2):
> Upload to unstable.
> configure: quote argument to m4_pattern_forbid.
That one wasn't actually in 2:1.7.7-3. I scratched it from the tag &
the branch, sorry for the noise.
> Julien Cristau (
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 23:56:54 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 00:04:19 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
> > I haven't found the real cause for this problem, but for the time being
> > you can add to the xserver-xorg-video-all package the following line:
> > >
> > B
On Di, 2010-06-29 at 00:04 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2010/6/28 Julien Cristau :
> > ever since etch or so, Xorg upgrades have been a bit of a pain as
> > apt/aptitude decide to uninstall driver packages instead of upgrading
> > them.
>
> ( If you want to be sure that aptitude
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 00:04:19 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2010/6/28 Julien Cristau :
> > ever since etch or so, Xorg upgrades have been a bit of a pain as
> > apt/aptitude decide to uninstall driver packages instead of upgrading
> > them.
>
> ( If you want to be sure that ap
Hello,
2010/6/28 Julien Cristau :
> ever since etch or so, Xorg upgrades have been a bit of a pain as
> apt/aptitude decide to uninstall driver packages instead of upgrading
> them.
( If you want to be sure that aptitude is in the loop you want to write
to aptit...@packages.debian.org too, but we
Hi,
(keeping you Cc'd, not sure you're subscribed)
Pjotr Malienki (07/05/2010):
> After attempting to upgrade from stable (lenny) to testing (squeeze)
> recently, X broke.
in general, please tell us a bit more, see first paragraph of:
http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/XserverDebugging
But
Kurt Roeckx (06/04/2010):
> lafayette is known to have some issues. We've enabled it building
> unstable again to see if they got fixed in the mean time or not.
Alright, thanks for the heads-up.
> I always give such packages back when I see them, and so did this
> for xorg-server too.
Perfect,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:35:51PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just noticed this:
> | LINK msp3430_drv.la
> | gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program collect2)
> | Please submit a full bug report.
> | See for instructions.
> | make[5]: *** [msp3430_drv.la] Error
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Olivier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Julien Cristau
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 15:42:05 +0200, Olivier wrote:
>>>
>>> In Debian Squeeze, is the Xorg configuration by dbus allowed?
>>>
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Olivier wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 15:42:05 +0200, Olivier wrote:
In Debian Squeeze, is the Xorg configuration by dbus allowed?
No. Why do you want that?
I'm testing the development implementation of GIMP, e
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 15:42:05 +0200, Olivier wrote:
>
> > In Debian Squeeze, is the Xorg configuration by dbus allowed?
>
> No. Why do you want that?
>
> I'm testing the development implementation of GIMP, especially with a Wacom
graphi
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 15:42:05 +0200, Olivier wrote:
> In Debian Squeeze, is the Xorg configuration by dbus allowed?
No. Why do you want that?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 18:01 +, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> debian/changelog |6 --
>> debian/x11-common.dirs |1 -
>> 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> New commits:
>> commit 30a7db1bf67a4a5b6e4d146768b9f6deb80579fa
>> Author: Timo Aaltonen
>> Date:
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 18:01 +, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> debian/changelog |6 --
> debian/x11-common.dirs |1 -
> 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit 30a7db1bf67a4a5b6e4d146768b9f6deb80579fa
> Author: Timo Aaltonen
> Date: Tue Mar 30 21:00:45 2010 +0300
Hi everyone,
I gave it a try, related to #567318.
(To make sure: 'try' is apt-get source xorg-xserver; patch ...; debuild
binary; dpkg -i xserver-common_1.7.5-1_all.deb
xserver-xorg-core_1.7.5-1_amd64.deb xserver-xorg-core-dbg_1.7.5-1_amd64.deb
; did I miss some package? and this means that I appl
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:23:23 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> The Symptoms for me are that if gnome-screensaver locks the screen
> X reproducibly segfaults. But if I changed once to another console and
> back (i.e. press Ctrl+Alt+F1, Alt+F7) the problems are gone and
> gnome-screensaver can loc
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:16:18AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You've had problems with Xserver 1.7.4 crashing in some Gamma functions
> when the screensaver starts (bugs #554450, #565773 and #567318). It was
> supposed to be fixed in xserver-xorg-core 1.7.5, but only part of t
Hello,
[added Keith Packard and "my" Debian bug to the addressees]
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:16:18AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You've had problems with Xserver 1.7.4 crashing in some Gamma functions
> when the screensaver starts (bugs #554450, #565773 and #567318). It was
> suppos
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 13:54:58 +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> commit d9a3996682de91cdb33cc36ef4bfe1f209de3bac
> Author: Julien Cristau
> Date: Fri Oct 2 12:07:06 2009 +0200
>
> Make all servers depend on xserver-common (= ${source:Version}).
>
I think I'll revert this, as it prevents ha
-- Julien Cristau skribis:
>On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:19:08 -0300, Luiz Portella wrote:
>
>> After this upgrade my machine did very slow, and xorg take about 100% of CPU
...
>> Why this upgrade don't require upgrade of kernel?
>>
>Because it's not possible to do that.
Julien,
can you put:
**
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:19:08 -0300, Luiz Portella wrote:
> After this upgrade my machine did very slow, and xorg take about 100% of CPU
> at /var/log/Xorg.0.log I read:
>
> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to detect GEM. Kernel 2.6.28 required.
> (EE) intel(0): Failed to become DRM master.
>
> M
>FYI: The status of the xorg source package
>in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
>
> Previous version: 1:7.3+20
> Current version: 1:7.4+4
>
>--
>This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
>new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:39:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Please don't tell people to set that in xorg.conf, since that will just
> get ignored. The option can be set in the desktop's keyboard applet, or
> by reconfiguring the console-setup package.
>
also I think the new entry should live
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:46:09 +, David Nusinow wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/xserver-xorg-core.NEWS b/debian/xserver-xorg-core.NEWS
> index 1048b56..273f558 100644
> --- a/debian/xserver-xorg-core.NEWS
> +++ b/debian/xserver-xorg-core.NEWS
> @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
> +xorg-server (3:1.6.3-2) unstab
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 00:05 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:44:56 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> [two glx patches from master cherry-picked by ubuntu]
>
> > > These patches don't seem to be on Server16Branc
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:44:56 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
[two glx patches from master cherry-picked by ubuntu]
> > These patches don't seem to be on Server16Branch. Should they?
>
> Looks like it. I guess I wasn't aware the 1.6 bra
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:55:49 +, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/debian/patches/178_glx_flush_cache.patch
> > b/debian/patches/178_glx_flush_cache.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..89b18a9
> > --- /dev/nu
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:55:49 +, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/patches/178_glx_flush_cache.patch
> b/debian/patches/178_glx_flush_cache.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..89b18a9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/debian/patches/178_glx_flush_cache.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 515188 531384
Bug#515188: xorg: ati r128 correct resolution cannot be chosen
Bug#531384: X: detects wrong resolution on Inspiron 4000
Merged 515188 531384.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:04 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> with xorg-server 1.6 in unstable, the xprint package is now NBS (not
> built from source), so will get removed from the archive. If you wish
> to reupload it as a separate source package, now is the time. :)
Yeah I got distr
Hi Drew,
with xorg-server 1.6 in unstable, the xprint package is now NBS (not
built from source), so will get removed from the archive. If you wish
to reupload it as a separate source package, now is the time. :)
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 515976
Bug#515976: libxi6 causes kdm using the wrong keyboard-layout
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug#515734: xinit: changes keyboard layout a
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request an unblock hint for xorg-server:
> unblock xorg-server/2:1.4.2-2
>
> This version fixes some parallel build issues in the packaging, and
> cherry-picks 3 bug fixes from upstream.
unblocked
> There'll be at least one further upload before relea
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 09:01:15 +, Brice Goglin wrote:
> commit 9d677543d31d9da34efc4cfa4e9575f49c296021
> Author: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun Jun 22 10:18:13 2008 +0200
>
> Remove obsolete xserver-xorg startup links
>
> diff --git a/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in b/
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:22:53 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> We told many users in the past to remove XaaNoOffscreenPixmaps it if
> they don't care about Compiz because it would disable some acceleration.
> Unless this drawback has been fixed, some people may wonder why their
> performance change
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 18:10:14 +, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>
>> commit 0f12c9da5214fabdf6708fe70f6b1fc003542f47
>> Author: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Sat Jun 14 18:33:12 2008 +0200
>>
>> Add a NEWS entry about 48_xaa_nooffscreenpixmaps.diff
>>
>>
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 18:10:14 +, Brice Goglin wrote:
> commit 0f12c9da5214fabdf6708fe70f6b1fc003542f47
> Author: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat Jun 14 18:33:12 2008 +0200
>
> Add a NEWS entry about 48_xaa_nooffscreenpixmaps.diff
>
Why is this worthy of a notice on upgr
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 08:21:44PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 00:44:35 +, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> > commit 2187535f5d8c9641fc4f9099ba18b774551a1735
> > Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon May 5 20:42:50 2008 -0400
> >
> > * Re-add acciden
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 00:44:35 +, David Nusinow wrote:
> commit 2187535f5d8c9641fc4f9099ba18b774551a1735
> Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon May 5 20:42:50 2008 -0400
>
> * Re-add accidentally removed emulate3buttons question. This should
> prevent
> the ins
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 13:54:36 -0400, Ashish Kapadia wrote:
> I'm currently using Ubuntu 7.10. My investigation seems to suggest
> that the XOrg by default does not support GB18030 locale in the Xlib.
Could you share what makes you think that? I see a zh_CN.gb18030
directory in /usr/share/X11
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 00:14:06 +, David Nusinow wrote:
> @@ -7,7 +7,15 @@ xorg (1:7.3+11) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>* Remove $named from the Should-Start/Stop LSB dependency info of the
> x11-common init script, closes: #463630.
>
> - -- Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 01 Fe
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 16:21:16 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> xserver-xorg (old) Pre-Depends: x11-common (>= 1:7.3+3)
>
> xserver-xorg (new) Pre-Depends: x11-common (>= 1:7.3+3)
>Conflicts: x11-common (<< 1:7.3+11)
>
The Pre-Depends seems unneeded here (at least in the new
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 23:23:46 +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> New commits:
> commit e2c6e698eecab0a7191b65ff68e67b533afa234a
> Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat Mar 8 00:23:14 2008 +0100
>
> Oops, the input ABI hasn't changed since 1.4.
>
Actually, we might have to b
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 00:14:06 +, David Nusinow wrote:
> commit caa744f52131ec4a9858f6a843731bdca22adaf0
> Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon Feb 4 19:06:59 2008 -0500
>
> + Have x11-common conflict with older xserver-xorg and vice-versa. Also
> have xserv
Hi,
so I pushed preliminary work on 1.4.99.901. Almost all patches from the
debian-unstable branch are applied upstream. :)
There are still some issues:
- configure is run with --disable-glx --disable-dri --disable-dri2,
because it needs a new mesa. I hope the situation will be clearer
upstr
On Fri, Feb 8, 2008 at 22:00:46 +, Brice Goglin wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/patches/46_reduce_wakeups_from_smart_scheduler.patch
> b/debian/patches/46_reduce_wakeups_from_smart_scheduler.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..700ad6e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/debian/patches/46_reduce_w
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:26:32AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 00:14:06 +, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> > index e4a90c0..2a8662a 100644
> > --- a/debian/control
> > +++ b/debian/control
> > @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ Description: X
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 00:14:06 +, David Nusinow wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index e4a90c0..2a8662a 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ Description: X Window System (X.Org) infrastructure
> terms are functionally interchangeab
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:49:51 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> Crap, sorry about that. Usually git will yell at me and refuse to push if
> my changes aren't in sync with where I'm pushing. I don't know why that
> didn't happen this time.
>
The upstream-unstable branch and the tag got pushed, not
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:11:47AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:22:43 +, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> > Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.4.1_git20071212-1' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> at 2007-12-13 02:21 +
> >
> > Tagging upload of xorg-server-2_1.4.1_gi
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:22:43 +, David Nusinow wrote:
> Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.4.1_git20071212-1' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> at 2007-12-13 02:21 +
>
> Tagging upload of xorg-server-2_1.4.1_git20071212-1 to unstable.
>
> Changes since xorg-server-2_1.4.1_git20071119-
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:47:23PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 22:42:57 +, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > New commits:
> > commit 578913bb4f7d60fa3f18d39a59aa85e93f7b1416
> > Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon Nov 12 20:36:30 2007 +0100
> >
> >
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
