On 2011-08-23 11:33, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:32:22 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Are there any objections to installing the alternative slave link for >> vendor implemntations of libglx.so as >> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux/libglx.so ... > I'd prefer an explicit override directory over abusing 'linux'.
OK, just opened wishlist bug #638965 against xserver-xorg-core. http://bugs.debian.org/638965 Until this explicit override directory gets implemented and for squeeze-backports (which needs newer versions of nvidia-graphics-drivers for supporting newer GPUs), would you agree if I use modules/linux for now? That way the first of the diversions can be eliminated and we can go back to the other question "How to reorganize the mesa packages to avoid diversions when installing a vendor libGL.so.1". Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e53947c.2080...@abeckmann.de
