On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:32:22 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi all, > > since I didn't get any feedback, yet, I'm asking again. > > Are there any objections to installing the alternative slave link for > vendor implemntations of libglx.so as > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux/libglx.so > and leave > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so > undiverted? > According to the source code and my tests, the linux subdirectory is > always searched first for modules and therefore suitable to install > "override modules". > I'd prefer an explicit override directory over abusing 'linux'.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110823093350.gb24...@coloquinte.cristau.org
