Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 180156 + upstream
Bug#180156: xutils: xon calls program hostname in wrong way
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:37:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 11:17:06AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was
> > > talking about
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 11:17:06AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was
> > talking about xserver3.2-xfree86 (built with gcc 3.2), xlibs2.3.1 (built
> > against glibc
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:32:32PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:54, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:44:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > So depend on the virtual libgl1/libglu1.
> > >
> > > I have explained why that doesn't fit my needs.
> >
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:29:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The major version number used by Mesa is not the same as the one used by
> > XFree86, except by coincidence.
>
> So the Mesa version needs to be engraved in the package name, n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 180195 + pending
Bug#180195: Wrong link in XFree86(1)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 180157 + upstream
Bug#180157: xserver-xfree86: Apparent bug in glx/DRI driver with
glPushAttrib/glPopAttrib
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 180156 + upstream
Bug#180156: xutils: xon calls program hostname in wrong way
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
severity 180187 important
merge 180187 180107
thanks
Severity of the former changed in order to merge with the latter.
Cheers,
jwb
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 11:17:06AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was
> > talking about xserver3.2-xfree86 (built with gcc 3.2), xlibs2.3.1 (built
> > against glibc
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:32:32PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:54, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:44:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > So depend on the virtual libgl1/libglu1.
> > >
> > > I have explained why that doesn't fit my needs.
> >
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:29:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The major version number used by Mesa is not the same as the one used by
> > XFree86, except by coincidence.
>
> So the Mesa version needs to be engraved in the package name, n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 180195 + pending
Bug#180195: Wrong link in XFree86(1)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1
Severity: minor
XFree86(1) mentions in the "SEE ALSO" section "XF86Config(5x)" which
doesn't exist. It's XF86Config-4(5x).
--
bli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 180157 + upstream
Bug#180157: xserver-xfree86: Apparent bug in glx/DRI driver with
glPushAttrib/glPopAttrib
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
"Married and Lonely people are hoping for someone to save them"
How have you been? You would not
believe what I found but it is true. There is a site for people to talk, chat,
see each others pictures, and even meet each other as close as next door
that I found.But that's not the best part, here
is
come and see marriedbutalwayslonely!
How have you been? You would not
believe what I found but it is true. There is a site for people to talk, chat,
see each others pictures, and even meet each other as close as next door
that I found.But that's not the best part, here
is why it's so unbelievable,
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:58:46AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > > Version: 4.2.1-5
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > X serve
severity 180187 important
merge 180187 180107
thanks
Severity of the former changed in order to merge with the latter.
Cheers,
jwb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was
> talking about xserver3.2-xfree86 (built with gcc 3.2), xlibs2.3.1 (built
> against glibc 2.3.1), ... because those version numbers are about as
> relevant to t
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > Version: 4.2.1-5
> > Severity: important
> >
> > X server crashes with SEGV, sometimes interactively but more often when left
> > ru
On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 00:57, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:29:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > > How is a major version number relevant for any
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1
Severity: minor
XFree86(1) mentions in the "SEE ALSO" section "XF86Config(5x)" which
doesn't exist. It's XF86Config-4(5x).
--
bli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:29:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > How is a major version number relevant for anything? For example, how
> > > > is it relevant for XFree
"Married and Lonely people are hoping for someone to save them"
How have you been? You would not
believe what I found but it is true. There is a site for people to talk, chat,
see each others pictures, and even meet each other as close as next door
that I found.But that's not the best part, here
is
come and see marriedbutalwayslonely!
How have you been? You would not
believe what I found but it is true. There is a site for people to talk, chat,
see each others pictures, and even meet each other as close as next door
that I found.But that's not the best part, here
is why it's so unbelievable,
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:58:46AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > > Version: 4.2.1-5
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > X serve
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
The X server crashes when I am away from the computer. The problem is
likely something in xscreensaver, but I have never personally seen it
happen. The symptom is I leave my desk after work, and when I come back
later, gdm has
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was
> talking about xserver3.2-xfree86 (built with gcc 3.2), xlibs2.3.1 (built
> against glibc 2.3.1), ... because those version numbers are about as
> relevant to t
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > Version: 4.2.1-5
> > Severity: important
> >
> > X server crashes with SEGV, sometimes interactively but more often when left
> > ru
On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 00:57, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:29:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > > How is a major version number relevant for any
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:29:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > How is a major version number relevant for anything? For example, how
> > > > is it relevant for XFree
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
The X server crashes when I am away from the computer. The problem is
likely something in xscreensaver, but I have never personally seen it
happen. The symptom is I leave my desk after work, and when I come back
later, gdm has
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm working on implementing and testing Scheme OpenGL bindings. Today
I encountered a puzzling bug in some new code; after some confusion, I
traced it back to what appears to be a bug in the XFree86 implementation
of GL.
The b
Package: xutils
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
Hello,
The "xon" calls "hostname --version".
The mistake is that xon does not anticipate that "hostname --version" prints
its information to stderr (instead of stdout).
May I also suggest a bit more error handling?
e.g. when someone uses "xon -de
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm working on implementing and testing Scheme OpenGL bindings. Today
I encountered a puzzling bug in some new code; after some confusion, I
traced it back to what appears to be a bug in the XFree86 implementation
of GL.
The b
Hi, Branden,
Thanks for the quick response.
> Are you using xlock with a particular mode, or just -mode random?
I'm using -mode random. If you'd like me to try limiting it to any
particular mode, or avoiding it completely, please let me know.
Best regards,
Markus
***
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:54, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:44:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > So depend on the virtual libgl1/libglu1.
> >
> > I have explained why that doesn't fit my needs.
>
> I must have missed it. Message-ID?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, for example.
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > How is a major version number relevant for anything? For example, how
> > > is it relevant for XFree86?
> >
> > It isn't, hence no other packages built from the xfree86 sour
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:55, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:50:11PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Shared library packages carry part of the soname in their names so that
> > multiple versions can be installed simultaneously. This does not seem
> > to be the case here as 3 is n
tag 180107 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-5
> Severity: important
>
> X server crashes with SEGV, sometimes interactively but more often when left
> running xlock.
This usually happens because one of the
Package: xutils
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
Hello,
The "xon" calls "hostname --version".
The mistake is that xon does not anticipate that "hostname --version" prints
its information to stderr (instead of stdout).
May I also suggest a bit more error handling?
e.g. when someone uses "xon -de
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:50:11PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Shared library packages carry part of the soname in their names so that
> multiple versions can be installed simultaneously. This does not seem
> to be the case here as 3 is not related to the soname. In the event that
> the mesa versi
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:29:36AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:31:24PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > Branden already answered you, and so did I. The significance lies in
> > the major version. It's obviously meaningful to Mesa, if they
> > continue to bump
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > How is a major version number relevant for anything? For example, how
> > is it relevant for XFree86?
>
> It isn't, hence no other packages built from the xfree86 source package
> bear a version number in their name. What's your p
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:44:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > So depend on the virtual libgl1/libglu1.
>
> I have explained why that doesn't fit my needs.
I must have missed it. Message-ID?
--
G. Branden Robinson|It was a typical net.exercise -- a
Debian GNU/Linux
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 180107 + moreinfo
Bug#180107: xserver-xfree86: ATI Radeon 7500: SEGV at random times, esp in xlock
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Hi, Branden,
Thanks for the quick response.
> Are you using xlock with a particular mode, or just -mode random?
I'm using -mode random. If you'd like me to try limiting it to any
particular mode, or avoiding it completely, please let me know.
Best regards,
Markus
***
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:54, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:44:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > So depend on the virtual libgl1/libglu1.
> >
> > I have explained why that doesn't fit my needs.
>
> I must have missed it. Message-ID?
<1044553668.1137.14.camel@thor>, fo
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > How is a major version number relevant for anything? For example, how
> > > is it relevant for XFree86?
> >
> > It isn't, hence no other packages built from the xfree86 sour
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 16:55, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:50:11PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Shared library packages carry part of the soname in their names so that
> > multiple versions can be installed simultaneously. This does not seem
> > to be the case here as 3 is n
tag 180107 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-5
> Severity: important
>
> X server crashes with SEGV, sometimes interactively but more often when left
> running xlock.
This usually happens because one of the
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:50:11PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Shared library packages carry part of the soname in their names so that
> multiple versions can be installed simultaneously. This does not seem
> to be the case here as 3 is not related to the soname. In the event that
> the mesa versi
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:44:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > So depend on the virtual libgl1/libglu1.
>
> I have explained why that doesn't fit my needs.
I must have missed it. Message-ID?
--
G. Branden Robinson|It was a typical net.exercise -- a
Debian GNU/Linux
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:29:36AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:31:24PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > Branden already answered you, and so did I. The significance lies in
> > the major version. It's obviously meaningful to Mesa, if they
> > continue to bump
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > How is a major version number relevant for anything? For example, how
> > is it relevant for XFree86?
>
> It isn't, hence no other packages built from the xfree86 source package
> bear a version number in their name. What's your p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 180107 + moreinfo
Bug#180107: xserver-xfree86: ATI Radeon 7500: SEGV at random times, esp in xlock
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 03:31, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> >
> > Anyway, we're discussing the xlibmesa packages here, and you're still
> > dodging the question how it's meaningful for those.
>
> Branden already answered you, and so did I
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 06:04, chris horn. wrote:
>
> 1. I don't know whether this is the proper forum, so please inform me
> if I'm in the wrong place.
> 2. I believe I have a bug, but don't know where to report it (tips on
> how to find which package a file is a part of would be greatly helpful)
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 03:31, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> >
> > Anyway, we're discussing the xlibmesa packages here, and you're still
> > dodging the question how it's meaningful for those.
>
> Branden already answered you, and so did I
On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 06:04, chris horn. wrote:
>
> 1. I don't know whether this is the proper forum, so please inform me
> if I'm in the wrong place.
> 2. I believe I have a bug, but don't know where to report it (tips on
> how to find which package a file is a part of would be greatly helpful)
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: important
X server crashes with SEGV, sometimes interactively but more often when left
running xlock.
-- Package-specific info:
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon
7500]
01:05.0 Class 0300: 1002:5157
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do not personally feel that the major version number used by a
> software project is a meaningless detail. At least not in the case of
> Mesa, where they bump the major version number to reflect major new
> developments, like texture and lighting
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: important
X server crashes with SEGV, sometimes interactively but more often when left
running xlock.
-- Package-specific info:
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500]
01:05.0 Class 0300: 1002:5157
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:31:24PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Branden already answered you, and so did I. The significance lies in
> the major version. It's obviously meaningful to Mesa, if they
> continue to bump *major* versions, it must mean they're doing
> something pretty ... well, majo
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do not personally feel that the major version number used by a
> software project is a meaningless detail. At least not in the case of
> Mesa, where they bump the major version number to reflect major new
> developments, like texture and lighting
66 matches
Mail list logo
