On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled: > Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was > talking about xserver3.2-xfree86 (built with gcc 3.2), xlibs2.3.1 (built > against glibc 2.3.1), ... because those version numbers are about as > relevant to those packages as the Mesa version number is to xlibmesa.
I agree entirely with Branden: if the changes are irrelevant, why does upstream keep bumping the *major* revision number? -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05736/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
