On Fre, 2003-02-07 at 03:31, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled: > > > > Anyway, we're discussing the xlibmesa packages here, and you're still > > dodging the question how it's meaningful for those. > > Branden already answered you, and so did I. The significance lies in > the major version. It's obviously meaningful to Mesa, if they continue > to bump *major* versions, it must mean they're doing something pretty > ... well, major, right?
Sure, major for _Mesa_. Not for users of the xlibmesa package. I'm not going to rehash the explanations Marcelo has given in this thread. > > > > Well, I am trying to get work done, with packages that have a > > > > relationship to those in question, and I think it's unnecessarily > > > > hard, for no good reason. > > > > > > What's hard about it? > > > > It breaks every time the name changes. > > So depend on the virtual libgl1/libglu1. I have explained why that doesn't fit my needs. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
