On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:29:36AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:31:24PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > Branden already answered you, and so did I. The significance lies in > > the major version. It's obviously meaningful to Mesa, if they > > continue to bump *major* versions, it must mean they're doing > > something pretty ... well, major, right? > > Internal rewrites with no visible changes to the developer and > (hopefully) visible changes to the end-user.
If they don't want people to interpret that as "major", they shouldn't bump the major version number when they do it. :) -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If existence exists, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | why create a creator? http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
msg05722/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
