Bug#805451: marked as done (Bugs/Reporting: please document for each pseudo-header in which addr...@bugs.debian.org it can be used)

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:33:19 +0200 with message-id <26187.35167.456859.239...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #805451, regarding Bugs/Reporting: please document for each pseudo-header in which addr...@bugs.debian.org it can be used

Bug#1028530: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ says tag 'forky' exists, bugs.debian.org says it does not

Control: retitle -1 www.debian.org/Bugs should get tags from BTS Hi, On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 12:13:41 + Simon McVittie wrote: To reproduce: - look at the list of valid tags in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ - see that trixie, trixie-ignore, forky and forky-ignore are in the list - try to tag a b

Processed: Re: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ says tag 'forky' exists, bugs.debian.org says it does not

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 www.debian.org/Bugs should get tags from BTS Bug #1028530 [bugs.debian.org,www.debian.org] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ says tag 'forky' exists, bugs.debian.org says it does not Changed Bug title to 'www.debian.org/Bugs should get t

Bug#1028530: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ says tag 'forky' exists, bugs.debian.org says it does not

Package: bugs.debian.org,www.debian.org Severity: minor To reproduce: - look at the list of valid tags in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ - see that trixie, trixie-ignore, forky and forky-ignore are in the list - try to tag a bug "+ trixie forky" (I tried to do this in #885563) Expec

Bug#1006326: issues connecting to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/soap.cgi (generation of wnpp related pages)

Hello all The code I added to show more info when it fails didn't help, we get the same messages in the build logs. I have tried to use groups of 300 bugs instead of 500, and also groups of 1000 bugs, but it seems it makes no difference. I have looked at the date of the wnpp.data file in www-m

Bug#1006326: issues connecting to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/soap.cgi (generation of wnpp related pages)

c2d 100644 --- a/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl +++ b/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl @@ -40,10 +40,15 @@ while () { my $soap = SOAP::Lite->uri('Debbugs/SOAP')->proxy('https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/soap.cgi') or die "Couldn't make connection to SOAP interface: $

Bug#1006326: issues connecting to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/soap.cgi (generation of wnpp related pages)

Package: www.debian.org User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertag: scripts Severity: normal Dear all Since several days, the script wnpp.pl fails intermittently when trying to connect to bugs.debian.org, and when it fails, we receive the following messages in the webwml build log

bugs.debian.org - ekspansja na rynki zagraniczne

Dzień dobry, analizując branżę w jakiej prowadzą Państwo działania w internecie trafiłem na Państwa stronę bugs.debian.org. Specjalizuję się w zagadnieniach związanych z pozycjonowaniem zagranicznym w wyszukiwarce Google i mogę zaproponować profesjonalną pomoc z opracowaniem strategii wejścia

Re: Kontakt ws. bugs.debian.org.

Dzień dobry, nie tak dawno kontaktowałem się w sprawie Państwa serwisu bugs.debian.org. Czy udało się Państwu zapoznać z moją poprzednią wiadomością?​ Pozdrawiam Michał Szymczak Specjalista SEO/SEM 782 323 344 m.szymc...@icea-grupa.pl www.icea

Kontakt ws. bugs.debian.org.

Dzień dobry, analizując obecną sytuację na rynku e-commerce, trafiłem na Państwa serwis bugs.debian.org.  Niezaprzeczalnie przez ostatnie miesiące można zauważyć zdecydowany wzrost ilości zakupów dokonywanych przez internet. W związku z czym, tak istotna jest odpowiednia strategia mająca na

Bug#805451: Bugs/Reporting: please document for each pseudo-header in which addr...@bugs.debian.org it can be used

Kind of related: I find the "Mail servers' reference card" at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-refcard not helpful at all. I expect a reference card to briefly describe each command that is used in day-to-day operations; instead, the Debian Bugs one just lists (all?) commands and their synop- si

Add Category "Internationalization" to bugs.debian.org/www.debian.org

content, design, scripts, packages, planet, uncategorized I've transformed the list to the format that cont...@bugs.debian.org needs to change the categories, and added "Internationalization" (with tag "international") to the www-team-type set of categories. I'm attachin

Re: Virus on bugs.debian.org

Hi Sebastian El 17/10/16 a las 12:57, Sebastian Nielsen escribió: Virus on bugs.debian.org: https://i.imgur.com/Emx496w.png Anyone should look into that immediately. What you show in the screenshot linked is a warning from Microsoft SmartScreen Filter. I've reproduced the problem

Virus on bugs.debian.org

Virus on bugs.debian.org: https://i.imgur.com/Emx496w.png Anyone should look into that immediately. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Please trigger website full rebuild (bugs.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control does not document "newcomer" tag)

Hi Laura, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > Hi > > El 31/03/16 a las 23:04, Holger Wansing escribió: > I've had a look at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/index and in that file > the newcomer tag is present, but not in server-control Hmm, this statement is correct for localized pages, yes. But not for en

Re: Please trigger website full rebuild (bugs.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control does not document "newcomer" tag)

Hi El 31/03/16 a las 23:04, Holger Wansing escribió: > Ping ? > I've had a look at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/index and in that file the newcomer tag is present, but not in server-control I've had a look at the Makefile and I don't understand it very well, but it seems that index is built base

Please trigger website full rebuild (bugs.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control does not document "newcomer" tag)

Ping ? Holger Wansing wrote: > > I have committed the fix yesterday, but it is still not visible on the > website. > Could someone trigger a full rebuild of the website, please? > This seems to be needed, to get the fix onto the webpages. -- ===

Bug#805120: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control does not document "newcomer" tag)

Hi, ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > Hi, > > ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > > > reassign 805120 www.debian.org > > Bug #805120 [bugs.debian.org] bugs.debian.org: > > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-contr

Bug#805120: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control does not document "newcomer" tag)

Your message dated Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:23:23 +0200 with message-id <20160327212323.0ab0380b5bd79234cf35e...@wansing-online.de> and subject line "newcomer" tag not documented (Re: Processed: reassign 805120 to www.debian.org) has caused the Debian Bug report #805120, regarding

Bug#805451: Bugs/Reporting: please document for each pseudo-header in which addr...@bugs.debian.org it can be used

mail to -d...@bugs.debian.org? https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing says that I can, but https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#pseudoheader does not mention it. Can I use Control: when I mail n...@bugs.debian.org? https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#control it documents in which address

Re: bugs.debian.org flowcharting

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Rooster Cogburn wrote: > Webdev crew, I am real interested in how y'all flowchart the bugs on the > packages. I was thinking of writing a little app that does something > similar and I liked what y'all were doing there. It appears to be a > combination of perl an

bugs.debian.org flowcharting

Webdev crew, I am real interested in how y'all flowchart the bugs on the packages. I was thinking of writing a little app that does something similar and I liked what y'all were doing there. It appears to be a combination of perl and imagemagick but that was just my intuition. If you could provi

Processed: reassign 720346 to bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 720346 bugs.debian.org Bug #720346 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Rewrite rule not working for packages starting with [0-9]*- Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'bugs.debian.org'. Ignoring request

Bug in bugs.debian.org rewrite rule

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html lists some packages with missing man pages. I noticed that all packages there are linked to bugs.debian.org/ which doesn't seem to work for packages starting with a number followed by a dash, like 386-co

Processed: reassign 705024 to bugs.debian.org, affects 705024

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 705024 bugs.debian.org Bug #705024 [www.debian.org] [www.debian.org] Bug control: affects documentation - "the package list of package" Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'bugs.debian.org'

Processed: user www.debian....@packages.debian.org, reassign 683616 to bugs.debian.org ..., affects 351746 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user www.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to www.debian@packages.debian.org (was taf...@debian.org). > reassign 683616 bugs.debian.org Bug #683616 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Please document usage of usertags on bugs

Re: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical has terrible handling of bugs filed against source packages

Hi Peter, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> peter green wrote: >>> Of the pages linked from http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical >> [...] >>> debian/all.html does not show bugs against source packages >>> debian/m

Re: Bug#650999: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical has terrible handling of bugs filed against source packages

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > peter green wrote: > > Of the pages linked from http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical > [...] > > debian/all.html does not show bugs against source packages > > debian/main.html does not show bugs against source packages >

Re: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical has terrible handling of bugs filed against source packages

Hi bugs.debian.org maintainers, peter green wrote: > Of the pages linked from http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical [...] > debian/all.html does not show bugs against source packages > debian/main.html does not show bugs against source packages > debian/source.html does not show

Bug#639532: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy")

Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:35:44 +0200 with message-id <20110910213544.9f6dcca5.li...@wansing-online.de> and subject line Re: Bug#639532: bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy" has caused the Debian Bug report #639532, regarding bugs.debian

Bug#639532: bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 10/09/2011 02:38, Holger Wansing a écrit : >>> If you're willing to accept the few remarks (modifying bts_severities >>> and taking care of the translated pages) […] you could fix you own bug > Done. > Works well so far. Thanks for taking care

Re: bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy"

[French and japanese translators in CC. Sorry if you receive this twice.] Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: > > If you're willing to accept the few remarks (modifying bts_severities > > and taking care of the translated pages), and since you already have > > commit access, I'd be pleased if you could fi

Re: bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy"

Hi, David Prévot wrote: > > The existing bts_tags entity has the disadvantage, that there > > is no possibility to use a different formatting, what would be > > good here. > > I haven't actually test your patch yet, but agree that this list would > look nicer using the formatting, what about do

Processed: Re: bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy"

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # The patches are only related to the website > reassign 639532 www.debian.org Bug #639532 [bugs.debian.org] bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy" Bug reassigned from package 'bugs.debian.or

Re: bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 # The patches are only related to the website reassign 639532 www.debian.org user www.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 639532 bugs thanks bugs.debian.org related bugs are usually submitted against the www.debian.org pseudopackage when they

bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy"

[Bugreport text sent again, because it didn't make it to the list, most likely due to attachments. Please find the patches under http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639532] Package: bugs.debian.org Tags: patch Some of you may remember this issue, see #623524. There is some

Processed: reassign 629645 to bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 629645 bugs.debian.org Bug #629645 [www.debian.org] bugs.debian.org: 404 on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi/search.cgi Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'bugs.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processin

Bug#629645: bugs.debian.org: 404 on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi/search.cgi

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The following link on http://bugs.debian.org/ is broken and shows HTTP 404 Not Found: Searching bug reports You can search bug reports using our HyperEstraier based search engine[1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi/search.cgi -- System

Processed: reassign 78526 to bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # actually this is not a www bug, we won't developer the frontend, we though > don't object to run it once it's finished/done > reassign 78526 bugs.debian.org Bug #78526 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Add a WWW

Re: bugs.debian.org in IPv6

On Friday 14 of May 2010 00:19:01 Simon Paillard wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:44:28AM +0200, Marcin Kucharczyk wrote: > > there is a problem with bugs.debian.org website over IPv6. It's > > unaccessible over IPv6, however it responds to ping6. I ho

Re: bugs.debian.org in IPv6

Hi, On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:44:28AM +0200, Marcin Kucharczyk wrote: > there is a problem with bugs.debian.org website over IPv6. It's unaccessible > over IPv6, however it responds to ping6. I hope you will solve this problem. lindberg.debian.org in the only bugs.debian.org backen

bugs.debian.org

Hello, there is a problem with bugs.debian.org website over IPv6. It's unaccessible over IPv6, however it responds to ping6. I hope you will solve this problem. Regards Marcin Kucharczyk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Processed: reassign 351746 to bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 351746 bugs.debian.org Bug #351746 [www.debian.org] Document usertag explanation and user categories on a separate page with links from server-control and server-request Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to &#x

XSS in bugs.debian.org

Package: debbugs Version: n/a Severity: important Tags: security Hi! Am Samstag, den 01.11.2008, 17:47 +0100 schrieb Moritz Naumann: > I just realized there's a cross site scripting issue on bugs.debian.org, > which you migth like to fix. > > http://bugs.d

XSS in bugs.debian.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I just realized there's a cross site scripting issue on bugs.debian.org, which you migth like to fix. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=%22%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(%27Oops.%27)%3C/script%3E%3Cx%20y=%22 I know it's not y

Bug#494583: marked as done (www.debian.org: bugs.debian.org deadlink for pseudo-packages)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:25:14 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#494583: www.debian.org: bugs.debian.org deadlink for pseudo-packages has caused the Debian Bug report #494583, regarding www.debian.org: bugs.debian.org deadlink for pseudo-packa

Re: Bug#465131: html syntax error in "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=375127" and some other pages

On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 14:10 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Package: bugs.debian.org > > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:33:24PM +0100, Roland Eggner wrote: > > > reportbug-ng_0.2007.10.30 refuses to display some bugr

Serif used as a default font-family in bugs.debian.org?

Hi, List items in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ are displayed with serif because serif is specified as a default font-family in the root html element in http://bugs.debian.org/css/bugs.css like this: html { color: #000; background: #fefefe; font-family: serif; margin: 0

Bug#494583: www.debian.org: bugs.debian.org deadlink for pseudo-packages

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor >From >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=www.debian.org;dist=unstable http:///pseudo-packages";>list of other pseudo-packages. Rather than; http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages";>list of other pseudo-packages

Re: OUTAGE: bugs.debian.org

On Mon,04.Aug.08, 22:15:47, Mark Whitis wrote: > reportbug simply aborts, without a helpful error message, after trying to > lookup existing bugs. Going to bugs.debian.org in a web browser also > fails. apt-listbugs was not working either, but seems to be ok now. Regards, Andrei -

OUTAGE: bugs.debian.org

reportbug simply aborts, without a helpful error message, after trying to lookup existing bugs. Going to bugs.debian.org in a web browser also fails. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: html syntax error in "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=375127" and some other pages

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Package: bugs.debian.org > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:33:24PM +0100, Roland Eggner wrote: > > reportbug-ng_0.2007.10.30 refuses to display some bugreports due to this > > html syntax error: > > There seems to be

Re: html syntax error in "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=375127" and some other pages

Package: bugs.debian.org On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:33:24PM +0100, Roland Eggner wrote: > reportbug-ng_0.2007.10.30 refuses to display some bugreports due to this html > syntax error: There seems to be indeed a bug here, so let's submit it as one ;) > $ diff -ru orig fixed >

html syntax error in "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=375127" and some other pages

reportbug-ng_0.2007.10.30 refuses to display some bugreports due to this html syntax error: $ diff -ru orig fixed diff -ru orig/bug=375127 fixed/bug=375127 --- orig/bug=375127 2008-02-10 21:29:08.0 +0100 +++ fixed/bug=3751272008-02-10 21:29:54.0 +0100 @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ T

Processed: Re: Bug#458939: allow search engines to index http://bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 458939 bugs.debian.org Bug#458939: allow search engines to index http://bugs.debian.org Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `bugs.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#458939: allow search engines to index http://bugs.debian.org

reassign 458939 bugs.debian.org thanks On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:40:12PM +, Jason Spiro wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Please allow search engines to index http://bugs.debian.org. This can > be done by deleting the file http://bugs.debian.org/rob

Bug#458939: allow search engines to index http://bugs.debian.org

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Please allow search engines to index http://bugs.debian.org. This can be done by deleting the file http://bugs.debian.org/robots.txt. Cheers, -- Jason Spiro: corporate trainer, web developer, IT consultant. I support Linux, UNIX, Windows, and more

Re: XSS vulnerability on bugs.debian.org

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, T-Ping T-Ping wrote: > > I saw that someone named Fugitif had found an XSS vulnerability on > > bugs.debian.org that is still unpatched. > > Here is an example XSS for this bug: > > http://bugs.debian.or

Re: XSS vulnerability on bugs.debian.org

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, T-Ping T-Ping wrote: > I saw that someone named Fugitif had found an XSS vulnerability on > bugs.debian.org that is still unpatched. > Here is an example XSS for this bug: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=";>alert("XSS") Ah; one

XSS vulnerability on bugs.debian.org

I saw that someone named Fugitif had found an XSS vulnerability on bugs.debian.org that is still unpatched. Here is an example XSS for this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=";>alert("XSS") -- ___ Get your fr

Re: Why, oh why, will bugs.debian.org not accept an update to my BT

On Thursday 11 October 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Content-Description: Undelivered Message > > > > > From: "Peder Chr. Nørgaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: nvidia-glxfailstoinstall > > ^^ > > This isn't

Re: Why, oh why, will bugs.debian.org not accept an update to my BT

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Content-Description: Undelivered Message > > From: "Peder Chr. Nørgaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: nvidia-glxfailstoinstall ^^ This isn't going to work. Don Armstrong -- There is no such thing as "socia

Re: Why, oh why, will bugs.debian.org not accept an update to my BT

mail to > > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can > delete your own text from the attached returned message. > > The Postfix program > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43] said: 550 >

Why, oh why, will bugs.debian.org not accept an update to my BT

tached below. For further assistance, please send mail to If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The Postfix program <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43] said: 550

Processed: reassign 320027 to bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > reassign 320027 bugs.debian.org Bug#320027: Bugs: Should be simpler, and an 'Advanced Search' option should be available Bug reassigned from package `ww

Processed: reassign 416348 to bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5 > reassign 416348 bugs.debian.org Bug#416348: debian-www: request server documentation doesn't show the usertags feature Bug reassigned from package `www.deb

Bug#351746: usertags docs missing on bugs.debian.org

also this page in the wiki, http://wiki.debian.org/bugs.debian.org/usertags While you could probably just add those links to the bugs.d.o pages, I think it would be better if that content was managed through wml so it was in the same place and translated, etc. Then the page in the wiki could be a

Processed: reassign 296683 to bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > reassign 296683 bugs.debian.org Bug#296683: Missing caracter set for bugs.debian.org? Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `bugs.debian.org'. > End o

Bug#296683: Missing caracter set for bugs.debian.org?

Hi Bas, Il Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:43:05AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw ha scritto: > Hi Giuseppe! [...] > You can find it on merkel: /org/bugs.debian.org/cgi-binbugreport.cgi > > It should be in CVS somewhere too, I think, but iirc the CVS version is > not really up to date. Thanks, I

Bug#296683: Missing caracter set for bugs.debian.org?

Hi Giuseppe! You wrote: > Bug report pages are not served with correct character set from the web > server. > For example http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261755 show > a strange maintaner name. Hmm, it seems the maintainer name (taken from the Packages file, I pres

Bug#296683: Missing caracter set for bugs.debian.org?

Package: www.debian.org Bug report pages are not served with correct character set from the web server. For example http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261755 show a strange maintaner name. Is the source that generate those pages available in order to try to contribute a patch

Re: Source of bugs.debian.org web interface?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:24:38AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > Hello Matt > > On 2005-02-16 Matt Kraai wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 02:59:35AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > > > I don't like the current bugs.debian.org web interface and would > >

Re: Source of bugs.debian.org web interface?

hi again, On 2005-02-17, Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2005-02-17, Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> RSS or XML output or are the bugs stored somewhere as files or in LDAP >> so that I can access them myself from e.g. people.debian.org? > > there is a bts2ldap g

Re: Source of bugs.debian.org web interface?

hi Christian, On 2005-02-17, Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RSS or XML output or are the bugs stored somewhere as files or in LDAP > so that I can access them myself from e.g. people.debian.org? there is a bts2ldap gateway, see http://people.debian.org/~aba/bts2ldap/ bye, - mic

Re: Source of bugs.debian.org web interface?

Hello Matt On 2005-02-16 Matt Kraai wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 02:59:35AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > > I don't like the current bugs.debian.org web interface and would > > like to write an alternative bug viewer. > > > > (Not a replacement for the l

Re: Source of bugs.debian.org web interface?

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 02:59:35AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > I don't like the current bugs.debian.org web interface and would > like to write an alternative bug viewer. > > (Not a replacement for the lynx-compatible official one just something that > some people might

Source of bugs.debian.org web interface?

Hello I don't like the current bugs.debian.org web interface and would like to write an alternative bug viewer. (Not a replacement for the lynx-compatible official one just something that some people might prefer. With colors, tables and javascript, you know...) Is there a way to ge

bugs.debian.org and SPAM [Fwd: Sorunsuz Yaþaman ýn Keyfi ...]

Hi, I have just created this e-mail yesterday (2 nov), in order to report a bug about the "mount" package. Anyways, just 24h after, i have recieved a spam on this virgin e-mail adress. Last months, i had to trash my previous used address, too much spammed, and i think the bugs reports i've m

Bug#272077: www.debian.org: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ not working correctly

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:41:50AM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > with the links: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=248853 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=272040 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=

Bug#272077: www.debian.org: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ not working correctly

Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2004-09-17 Severity: normal Right now I see the line: # mozilla-firefox-locale-gl: 248853 272040 3270 with the links: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=248853 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no

Bug#225416: marked as done (404 link in bugs.debian.org/)

an bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2003 17:43:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 29 11:43:53 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dom1

Bug#172702: 172702@bugs.debian.org Savings of over 50% on Ultram

Cialis + lots of other medications http://kczd.rroot5.com/v95/index.php?id=v95

Bug#172702: 172702@bugs.debian.org cialis available, fda approved

FDA Approved drugs available now, cialis, ultram, xanax, valium and many more http://jsrr.rroot5.com/v95/index.php?id=v95";>here

Bug#200187: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: Search forms should use labels for input controls)

system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2003 01:06:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 05 20:06:30 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from d2fe6d74.vfroppongi.bias.ne

Processed: Re: Bug#200187: bugs.debian.org: Search forms should use labels for input controls

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 200187 www.debian.org Bug#200187: bugs.debian.org: Search forms should use labels for input controls Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contac

Bug#195590: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: Documentation error on web pages)

Your message dated Sun, 1 Jun 2003 01:20:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#195590: bugs.debian.org: Documentation error on web pages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Processed: Re: Bug#195590: bugs.debian.org: Documentation error on web pages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 195590 www.debian.org Bug#195590: bugs.debian.org: Documentation error on web pages Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#193519: marked as done (how to separate multiple tags in the Tags: header to submit@bugs.debian.org?)

ontact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 06:52:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 01:52:48 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#193519: how to separate multiple tags in the Tags: header to submit@bugs.debian.org?

Package: www.debian.org Version: 20030516 Severity: wishlist explains: | You can set tags on a bug as you are reporting it. For | example, if you are including a patch with your bug report, | you may wish to set the patch tag. This is not requ

Bug#193106: bugs.debian.org: what defaults on /Bugs page?

>> However, the results produced act like all the "Include severity" >> boxes were checked. So why aren't they initially checked when the >> user encounters them? C> Because it would produce a most vomitously long URL. Not checking any of C> the include/exclude boxes is a useful edge case, and is

Bug#193106: bugs.debian.org: what defaults on /Bugs page?

On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:58:24AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > >> On http://www.debian.org/Bugs/: > >> * Include severity: critical grave serious important normal minor wishlist > >> fixed > >> * Exclude severity: critical grave serious important normal minor wishlist > >> fixed > > >> Things t

Bug#193106: bugs.debian.org: what defaults on /Bugs page?

>> On http://www.debian.org/Bugs/: >> Additional settings (which you may leave untouched, the defaults will work): >> * Include severity: critical grave serious important normal minor wishlist >> fixed >> * Exclude severity: critical grave serious important normal minor wishlist >> fixed >> Thi

Processed: Re: Bug#193106: bugs.debian.org: what defaults on /Bugs page?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 193106 www.debian.org Bug#193106: bugs.debian.org: what defaults on /Bugs page? Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#165039: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: Should indicate preference for reportbug over bug)

trator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2002 14:56:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 16 09:56:39 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from trickle.cc.mcgill.ca [132.206.27.

Bug#165040: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: Typo in /Bugs/Reporting)

trator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2002 14:58:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 16 09:57:59 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from deluge.cc.mcgill.ca [132.206.27.50] by ma

New features(lots) for http://bugs.debian.org -- Inclusion/exclusion/reversal

, use the default list(which is shown above for allowed values). Then, apply the exclude list to the list from step 1. Some example urls: 1: http://bugs.debian.org/src:xfree86&pend-inc=pending&sev-inc=important Show all important open bugs on source package xfree86. 2: http://bugs.de

Re: bugs.debian.org

ing rewrite > rules): > >RewriteEngine on >RewriteRule ^/Bugs/db/pa/l([^/]+).html$ http://bugs.debian.org/$1 >RewriteRule > ^/Bugs/db/[[:digit:]][[:digit:]]/([[:digit:]][[:digit:]][[:digit:]]+).html$ > http://bugs.debian.org/$1 Good work! =)

Re: bugs.debian.org

view, I don't know about > > > reportbug) that is now broken due to this. I have received one report > > > already. > > > > I'll see if I can set up some rewrite rules to new locations. However, it > > might not be possible for most things. &

Re: bugs.debian.org

> > > > > > That address (http://$1/) does not work properly, some links are > > > > > > broken > > > > > > (e.g. /Bugs/db/ix/maintainers.html). > > > > > The translation you are reading isn't synchronized with the English > > > > > version, > > > > > which no longer contains the broken links. >

Re: bugs.debian.org

On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 07:19:36PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > > > > That address (http://$1/) does not work properly, some links are > > > > > broken > > > > > (e.g. /Bugs/db/ix/maintainers.html). > > > > The translation you are reading isn't synchronized with the English > > > > versio

  1   2   >