Your message dated Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:48:14 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229070: Link on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2003 17:43:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 29 11:43:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dom12-199.menta.net (arpella.jsalvata.atg.com) [62.57.115.199]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ab1E1-0004Ej-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:30:41 -0600
Received: from jordi by arpella.jsalvata.atg.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 1Ab1Dy-0006Zd-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:30:38 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jordi Salvat i Alabart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 404 link in bugs.debian.org/
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:30:38 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jordi Salvat i Alabart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level:
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
The link with text "Bug Tracking System Howto" in
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/index.en.html points to
http://people.debian.org/~moshez/bts-howto.html, which is a 404.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux arpella 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229070-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2004 17:48:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 23 09:48:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ak5Pm-0006by-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:48:18 -0800
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
id 1Ak5Pk-00046y-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:48:16 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ak5Pi-0005BK-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:48:14 +0000
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:48:14 +0000
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#229070: Link on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ broken
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:03:35PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:59:22PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > On german page of http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ the link
> > "Fehlerdatenbank-Howto" to
> > http://people.debian.org/~moshez/bts-howto.html is broken.
>
> This was reported (but on the wrong package) a while ago, and I
> contacted Moshe then to ask him to restore the page. He hasn't responded
> yet.
OK, I've removed the link now. Moshe, if you ever restore it then please
contact us to have the link put back.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
