Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:59:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2002 14:56:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 16 09:56:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from trickle.cc.mcgill.ca [132.206.27.51]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 181pbD-0004EC-00; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:56:39 -0500
Received: from rna.mcgill.ca (rna.McGill.CA [132.206.27.47])
by trickle.cc.mcgill.ca (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9GEuSLG015128
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fundus.biomed.mcgill.ca ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [132.206.111.117])
by rna.mcgill.ca (8.12.2/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g9GEuREb005469
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:56:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:56:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert Funnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs.debian.org: Should indicate preference for reportbug over bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Message-Flag: Avoid Outlook viruses: Switch to Pine! www.washington.edu/pine/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: bugs.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-16
Severity: minor
On the page http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting the two programmes
bug and reportbug are referred to in the same way. From reading the
bug reports for them both, and using them both, it seems that bug is
not really being maintained and that reportbug is clearly preferable.
It would save new users time (would have saved me time :-) if either
(1) bug were not mentioned, or (2) reportbug were identified as
preferable.
- Robert
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux fundus 2.2.17 #1 Thu Jun 29 13:33:28 EDT 2000 alpha
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 165039-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2002 23:00:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 01 17:00:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it (smtp1.cp.tin.it) [212.216.176.221]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Id4H-0004pL-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 17:00:05 -0600
Received: from scrooge.duckburg.org (62.211.23.64) by smtp1.cp.tin.it (6.5.029)
id 3DDD77D50037ED3B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:59:43
+0100
Received: by scrooge.duckburg.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4CE0D83FEF; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:59:39 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:59:39 +0100
From: Davide Puricelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Operating-System: Linux scrooge.duckburg.org 2.4.19-scrooge3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,SUBJ_MISSING,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Hi, the page was updated, thanks for your report.
Best Regards,
--
Davide Puricelli, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.debian.org
Undergraduate Student of Computer Science at University of Bologna
PGP key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
