Bug#248024: marked as done (changelogs should have a Content-type: test/plain; charset=utf-8)

2004-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2004 23:42:41 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#250698: marked as done (Broken Link in Installing Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 For Intel x86)

2004-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2004 23:40:27 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#248439: still pending?

2004-05-28 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 01:20:27AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:14:05PM -0300, Matt Kraai wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > You tagged 248439 as pending, saying that you'd fixed it in CVS. > > Does the working copy on packages.debian.org need to be updated? > > Actually th

Bug#248439: marked as done (packages.debian.org should strip spaces from package searches)

2004-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 01:20:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line still pending? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#248439: still pending?

2004-05-28 Thread Matt Kraai
Howdy, You tagged 248439 as pending, saying that you'd fixed it in CVS. Does the working copy on packages.debian.org need to be updated? -- Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/

Bug#197043: marked as done (www.debian.org: install: release_notes: Misleading instructions for upgrade to woody)

2004-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2004 19:57:52 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#250798: marked as done (www.debian.org: small patches for events/2004/0623-linuxtag.wml)

2004-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2004 21:43:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#250798: www.debian.org: small patches for events/2004/0623-linuxtag.wml has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#251292: marked as done (www.debian.org: tidy reports trimming empty for security pages (some more))

2004-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2004 12:49:05 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#251292: www.debian.org: tidy reports trimming empty for security pages (some more) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Re: [Patch] l10n tag is not described in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer

2004-05-28 Thread Matt Kraai
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 10:55] : > > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian > >

Re: [Patch] l10n tag is not described in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer

2004-05-28 Thread Matt Kraai
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote: > I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian > BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this: > > Index: Developer.wml > ===

Re: Please update lessoften

2004-05-28 Thread Matt Kraai
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 11:06:31AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote: > Bonjour, Howdy, > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:30:24AM -0300, Matt Kraai wrote: > > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:31:12AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote: > > > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 21:27:32 -0300, Matt Kraai wrote: > > > [...] > > > >

Re: [Patch] l10n tag is not described in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer

2004-05-28 Thread Frédéric Bothamy
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 10:55] : > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian > > BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this: > > Don't fo

Su correo fue bloqueado al ser enviado a la direccion tm_webmaster@telefonicamoviles.com

2004-05-28 Thread roble
Esta direccion de correo no permite la recepcion de archivos adjuntos como your_picture.pif

Re: Please update lessoften

2004-05-28 Thread Pierre Machard
Bonjour, On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:30:24AM -0300, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:31:12AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 21:27:32 -0300, Matt Kraai wrote: > > [...] > > > Yes, I reenabled the lessoften script a few days ago. Thanks for > > > notifyi

Re: [Patch] l10n tag is not described in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer

2004-05-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian > BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this: Don't forget Bugs/server-refcard.wml Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTEC

бродячие собаки

2004-05-28 Thread Iroquoian B. Bunch
Самое эффективное средство защиты от бродячих и агрессивных собак. http://www.DAZER2.ru/?dt=bytp8 (095) 258-0083 летевшего бекаса, по направлению