Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 01:20:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line still pending?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2004 08:05:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 11 01:05:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BNSGu-00016T-00; Tue, 11 May 2004 01:05:52 -0700
Received: from localhost (host-66-81-182-211.rev.o1.com [66.81.182.211])
        by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i4B85lO0077445
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 May 2004 01:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32)
        id 1BNNAc-0000Ms-Ln
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 10 May 2004 19:39:02 -0700
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 19:39:02 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.debian.org should strip spaces from package searches
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: www.debian.org

----- Forwarded message from Magnus Ihse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

From: Magnus Ihse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Searching on packages with a space gives an error message
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:32:12 +0200
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org

Hi!

If you go to http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages, and enter a search 
term ending in space, like "foo " (without the quotes) in either of the 
two search fields, you get a response like:
  Error: keyword not valid or missing
or
  Error: "foo " is not a valid search request

(Discovered when I by mistake left a trailing space during cut-and-paste.)

This is not particularily user-friendly. A better approach would be to 
chop leading and trailing spaces before processing the search request.

/Magnus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Matt Kraai            [EMAIL PROTECTED]            http://ftbfs.org/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 248439-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2004 23:20:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 28 16:20:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BTqeQ-0005jZ-00; Fri, 28 May 2004 16:20:34 -0700
Received: from p50839e9c.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.158.156] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
        by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
        (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
        id 1BTqeM-0001EV-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 01:20:30 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BTqeK-00050Q-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 01:20:28 +0200
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 01:20:27 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: still pending?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:14:05PM -0300, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Howdy,
> 
> You tagged 248439 as pending, saying that you'd fixed it in CVS.
> Does the working copy on packages.debian.org need to be updated?

Actually this on is fixed (closing with this mail). The other bugs
still wait for a config reload. Hadn't time yet to pester an admin.
(The HP power outage will probably take care of them ;)

[Actually this fix is leading to misleading error messages because
'g++' is now interpreted as search for 'g' which was the cause that
I didn't closed it immeaditly. But on reconsideration this actually
belongs to the other one so I'm closing this one now.]

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Reply via email to