Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2004 12:49:05 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251292: www.debian.org: tidy reports trimming empty <dd> 
for security pages (some more)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 20:15:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 27 13:15:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BTRHQ-0001XW-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 13:15:08 -0700
Received: from bertol (lns-th2-4f-81-56-240-158.adsl.proxad.net [81.56.240.158])
        by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D79111745
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 May 2004 22:15:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nico by bertol with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BTRHM-000197-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 22:15:04 +0200
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:15:03 +0200
From: Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: tidy reports trimming empty <dd> for security pages 
(some more)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.58
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v"
Content-Disposition: inline


--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi,

looking at:
   http://people.debian.org/~alfie/tidy/en
there are still warnings about empty <dd>

it seems to by a more wide bug as template/security.wml used
<isvulnerable> tag to display whether a fix is available or not, maybe
we should use the <fixed> tag.

here is a patch for this.

Regards


Nicolas Bertolissio

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--=20

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="security.wml.diff"

--- security.wml        2004-05-22 21:06:41.000000000 +0200
+++ security.new.wml    2004-05-27 22:04:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
        <dd><moreinfo/></dd>
 "/>
 #<ifneq "{#securitybody#}" "" "
-<ifneq "<isvulnerable/>" "no" "
+<ifneq "<fixed/>" "no" "
 <dt><gettext domain="security">Fixed in</gettext>:</dt>
        <dd>{#securitybody#}</dd>
 "/>

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--

--Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAtkxHPnQ0OX3ZAY0RAnSHAJ4lf/J2ZOYIEuMF1J5/YrZD0bKfAQCgnpvf
x06W1ln7sXatVvq09YwZ1K0=
=Ze79
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251292-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2004 16:12:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 28 09:12:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (localhost) [200.96.105.186] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BTjZu-0007LV-00; Fri, 28 May 2004 08:47:26 -0700
Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1BTjbW-0000mh-69; Fri, 28 May 2004 12:49:06 -0300
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 12:49:05 -0300
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#251292: www.debian.org: tidy reports trimming empty <dd> for 
security pages (some more)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:15:03PM +0200, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote:
> looking at:
>    http://people.debian.org/~alfie/tidy/en
> there are still warnings about empty <dd>
> 
> it seems to by a more wide bug as template/security.wml used
> <isvulnerable> tag to display whether a fix is available or not, maybe
> we should use the <fixed> tag.

Thanks for the report.  I committed a variant of your patch, as
well as some others which should eliminate all of the empty <dd>s.

-- 
Matt Kraai            [EMAIL PROTECTED]            http://ftbfs.org/

Reply via email to