Neil McGovern dijo [Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 08:03:10PM +0100]:
> > 2. a team that works well but not in a sustainable way, and how a DPL
> > can help bringing sustainability;
>
> A little bit of a stab in the dark here, but I'm going to *guess* the
> DebConf team, simply because the huge amount
Neil McGovern dijo [Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 03:42:14PM +]:
> On the specific case, I remember when I wound up the accounts for
> DebConf 7 that the surplus was earmarked as a donation to DebConf 8.
> More specifically, there was a Debian seed fund of 10k USD to help with
> the cash flow and then 8
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2014.
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Monday, March 31st, 2014
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Sunday, April 13th, 2014
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
Hi Josselin,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:57:59AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> What is your stance on disruptive members in the committee?
I would prefer TC to work with each other constructively, but I also
recognise that this isn't always possible when it comes to a
controversial decision. O
Hi,
On 30/03/14 at 19:34 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:21:06AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > Raphael Hertzog writes:
> >
> > > assume that a package maintainer is active but is doing a bad job
> > > regarding our standards (things like ignoring problems in stable, bre
Hi,
On 28/03/14 at 18:15 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ questions for candidate below, see "Q:" ]
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:25:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > There are also good reasons for not keeping them in the team: they might
> > be perceived as "badge collectors" by the re
Hi Josselin,
On 28/03/14 at 10:57 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi Neil & Lucas,
>
> the DPL has limited powers on the member list of the technical
> committee. Especially §6.2.5 says that he can agree with the committee
> to dismiss one of the members.
>
> What is your stance on disruptive m
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 07:55:54PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:03:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Do you think it's appropriate for these organizers to use Debian's name in
> > seeking local sponsorship without consulting the DPL?
> Sorry for not being clearer, b
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:25:02AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:32:26AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> >On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 15:29 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >> Because as long as we document it, it's very hard to claim that
> >> "non-free" is not part of Debia
Hi Enrico,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:26:01AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> 1. a team that works well and in a sustainable way, and how a DPL can
> bring thankfulness and appreciation;
I think that most of our teams work well and are sustainable. The level
of sustainability can sometimes teete
Hi Steve,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:03:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do you think it's appropriate for these organizers to use Debian's name in
> seeking local sponsorship without consulting the DPL?
>
Sorry for not being clearer, but no. I think that a central repository
and/or sponsors
Hi Brian,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:54:50PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> I know this has been raised in elections past, but any thoughts on the
> current one-year DPL terms, and unlimited terms allowed? If thoughts
> are geared toward change do you have any plans to actively try to
> change the st
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 28/03/14 at 09:26 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
>> 2. a team that works well but not in a sustainable way, and how a DPL
>> can help bringing sustainability;
>> 3. a team that does not work well, and how a DPL can address the
>> problem.
> I don't think that it'
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:21:06AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
> > assume that a package maintainer is active but is doing a bad job
> > regarding our standards (things like ignoring problems in stable, breaking
> > backwards compatibility for no good reason, not packag
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:15:46PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> A way around that would be to use time-limited delegations *only*.
> Q: What do the candidates think of that idea? If you agree it'd be good,
> would do you engage in doing so for the duration of your term?
>
I think that there
Hi Charles,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 07:31:12AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 05:44:55PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> >
> > Internally, we would need to adjust, but I'm quite sure that we would
> > manage. Actually, the lack of a DPL might make everybody feel more
>
Hi Enrico,
On 28/03/14 at 09:26 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here's my question to the candidates[1]:
>
> Please name three teams in Debian:
>
> 1. a team that works well and in a sustainable way, and how a DPL can
> bring thankfulness and appreciation;
I think that DSA is a pre
17 matches
Mail list logo
