On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:15:46PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > A way around that would be to use time-limited delegations *only*. > Q: What do the candidates think of that idea? If you agree it'd be good, > would do you engage in doing so for the duration of your term? >
I think that there's considerable benefits to this, but also potential drawbacks: > Of course there are drawbacks, for instance: 1) given time-limited > delegations are not (yet) a custom in our project, teams that have been > non time-delegated up to now might feel bad about this in the beginning; > 2) the delegation bookkeeping will increase substantially (having been > there I am aware of the pain, and I can assure that it is far from being > negligible). And these are basically my main concerns :) However, for the Release team, this could be made on a release +6 months basis, as it's around then that RMs are due to change (as the workload has a habit of burning out RMs...) For other teams, it's certainly something that I would explore with them. So I'd give tentative support for the idea. Neil --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
