Hi Charles, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 07:31:12AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 05:44:55PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > > Internally, we would need to adjust, but I'm quite sure that we would > > manage. Actually, the lack of a DPL might make everybody feel more > > enabled/empowered to solve problems that are usually deferred to the > > DPL, which could be a good thing. > > without DPL, there would be no DPL delegations. I have a question for you > related to delegations. > > When a delegate is completely inactive as a delegate, do you think that his > delegation should be renewed ? >
In general, I'd say no. I'm keen on ensuring that the team has the input into who should be on that team, but I think keeping people as delegates who are inactive will hide the strength of the team. I like the idea of people still being around who have had knowledge is useful attribute, but if people aren't actively working in a team, and there isn't a prospect of them returning any time soon, the delegation shouldn't be renewed. Neil --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
