On 29.04.2019 10:35, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Emanuel Berg (2019-04-29 05:30:30)
>> With apt pinning [1], in /etc/apt/preferences ,
>> I have learned that one can have certain packs
>> from another release than the rest of the
>> system, seemlessly (?) with apt-get and the
>> other tools,
On 2019-04-29, Tixy wrote:
> Hi bw
>
> On Sun, 2019-04-28 at 18:52 -0400, bw wrote:
>> In-Reply-To: <20190428235815.09cfe...@tag.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>
>
> All your mails to the list seem to be a little broken. The first line
> of each email starts with a line like the above and your replies aren't
Curt wrote:
> Maybe that lead-in violates some RFC, although you'd think what's in the
> header's in the header and what ain't ain't and ne'er the twain shall
> meet.
>
> At any rate, bw threads fine here, so it must be you (or me).
It's you -- or rather bw's MUA, I'm afraid. :-)
His mails don't
On Sun 28 Apr 2019 at 21:54:46 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Björn Persson wrote:
> > Brian wrote:
> > > brian@futro:~$ uname -a
> > > Linux futro 4.9.0-7-686 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.110-3+deb9u1 (2018-08-03) i586
> > > GNU/Linux
> >
> > That's an older Linux than I got. Perhaps I could try that pac
On 12/04/19 13:00, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 12 Apr 2019 at 18:04:45 (+0200), Pétùr wrote:
I use neomutt with emacs.
I would like to quickly save and kill a buffer in emacs. This is to
avoid typing C-x C-s and, then, C-x C-c when sending an email. I want
one shortcut to save and kill the buffe
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 09:08 +0100, Thomas Pircher wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > Maybe that lead-in violates some RFC, although you'd think what's
> > in the
> > header's in the header and what ain't ain't and ne'er the twain
> > shall
> > meet.
> >
> > At any rate, bw threads fine here, so it must be y
Hi list,
since a few days, Oracle's virtalbox repo¹ seems broken. Does one of you have a
working URL?
Thanks, Martin
1) https://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian
Tixy wrote:
> I'm guessing the archive is falling back to threading by
> matching the subject line, as with Curt's MUA?
The Debian list admins will have a more authoritative answer then mine,
but I searched a bit about "possible follow-ups" in and this [1] old
posting by the author of MHonArc conf
On 2019-04-29, Thomas Pircher wrote:
> Curt wrote:
>> Maybe that lead-in violates some RFC, although you'd think what's in the
>> header's in the header and what ain't ain't and ne'er the twain shall
>> meet.
>>
>> At any rate, bw threads fine here, so it must be you (or me).
>
> It's you -- or r
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:09:06 +0200
Martin wrote:
>Hi list,
>
>since a few days, Oracle's virtalbox repo¹ seems broken. Does one of you have
>a working URL?
>
>
>Thanks, Martin
>
>
>1) https://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian
>
I have always used a direct URL to manually download my cop
In-Reply-To: <1556516871.1480.1.ca...@yxit.co.uk>
>
>All your mails to the list seem to be a little broken.
You are right, they are, but it's not alpine mail's fault. It's because I
am replying through the list archive link through the browser, with a
hacked script to try and rewrite the header
On Mon 29 Apr 2019 at 05:30:30 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote:
> With apt pinning [1], in /etc/apt/preferences ,
> I have learned that one can have certain packs
> from another release than the rest of the
> system, seemlessly (?) with apt-get and the
> other tools, for example like this for
> w3m-el-
Well it sounds like she would feel right at home here in Chicago. Perhaps
encourage her to consider a new home base besides Finland (?).
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019, 8:03 PM Tomas Ukkonen
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Ava Max artist should be investigated. She's song "Sweet But Psycho" and
> others tells that people
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:45:19 -0700
Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:09:06 +0200
> Martin wrote:
>
> >Hi list,
> >
> >since a few days, Oracle's virtalbox repo¹ seems broken. Does one of you
> >have a working URL?
> >
> >
> >Thanks, Martin
> >
> >
> >1) https://download.virtualbo
On Mon 29 Apr 2019 at 10:38:40 (+0200), Pétùr wrote:
> On 12/04/19 13:00, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 12 Apr 2019 at 18:04:45 (+0200), Pétùr wrote:
> > > I use neomutt with emacs.
> > >
> > > I would like to quickly save and kill a buffer in emacs. This is to
> > > avoid typing C-x C-s and, the
I saw this may be ten days ago, and it said some thing about not authorized. My
fear was, that this was somehow related with the new (The Oracle JDK License
has changed for releases starting April 16, 2019) Java license policy, where
you need an account to get any (production ready) JDK update.
[ I often skim the debian-user list, but when I'm away on vacation or
at a conference I'll miss things unless I'm directly CC:ed ]
Thomas wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Chris XX wrote:
>> I was trying to Verify the authenticity of Debian CDs on your website, but I
>> don't see instructions that will guide me th
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:56:35 +0200
Martin wrote:
> I saw this may be ten days ago, and it said some thing about not authorized.
> My fear was, that this was somehow related with the new (The Oracle JDK
> License has changed for releases starting April 16, 2019) Java license
> policy, where you
Hi,
i wrote in https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/04/msg00214.html
> > > SHA512SUMS.sign [...] SHA512SUMS [...] debian-9.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso
john doe wrote:
> > $ sha512sum -c --ignore-missing
> > The '--strict' option could also be used.
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> If you're happy for me
I had just bought a new camera, a cannon with more capable glass than my
now elderly nikon with its very flaky usb socket. Wheezy was never
aware the camera was even plugged in, but I'd just installed a modified
stretch the linuxcnc folks are testing to a test machine, so I took it
to that mac
Greetings earthlings!
I am running an old Jessie I refuse to let go of, on an
amd64. # uname -a
Linux debian.localdomain 3.16.0-7-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.59-1 (2018-10-03)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Here is the apt-get update output error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-up
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:31:18PM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/InRelease Unable to find
> expected entry 'main/source/Sources' in Release file (Wrong sources.list
> entry or malformed file)
There is no more jessie-updates
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 15:31 -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> -snip-
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
>
> deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free
>
> deb-src http://sec
Hello!
On Sat, 2019-04-27 at 18:56 +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> I haven't seen anything on this topic lately
>
> I noticed when I ran apt-get upgrade that synaptic was updated.
>
> Does this mean it is now generally available, or just that my manual
> install updated?
Yes. As I men
Greetings!
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 05:30 +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> But is there a way to find out/confirm from
> which release is a certain pack?
You're looking for apt-cache policy.
Example:
==
$ apt-cache policy gnome-core
gnome-core:
Installed: 1
apt-show-versions script are useful as well.
apt-show-versions is a package itself.
Toni Mas
Missatge de Francisco M Neto del dia dl., 29
d’abr. 2019 a les 23:10:
>
> Greetings!
>
>
> On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 05:30 +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> > But is there a way to find out/confirm from
> > whic
Thank you guys!
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:36:24PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> This could have been communicated or handled a bit more > smoothly.
Can I safely assume you are referring to how the organization handled it, and
not my email?
All best,
--
"In our age there is no such thing a
Hi,
I got warning message that "/var is almost full." Knowing that being
full on a hard drive is never good, I want to resolve this.
>From command line: /var# du -h --max-depth=1
1.8G./lib
4.0K./local
2.7M./tmp
16K ./lost+found
44K ./snap
6.3G./cache
4.0K./opt
56K
Esteban L writes:
> >From command line: /var# du -h --max-depth=1
> 1.8G ./lib
> 4.0K ./local
> 2.7M ./tmp
> 16K ./lost+found
> 44K ./snap
> 6.3G ./cache
> 4.0K ./opt
> 56K ./spool
> 4.0K ./mail
> 8.2M ./backups
> 139M ./log
> 8.2G .
>
> So, my backups seems to be causing the main
Opps corrected!
#1 cause of my problems is bad eyes!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Finney
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: System warning that "/var" is almost full
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:35:18 +1000
Esteban L writes:
> > From command line: /var# du -h --max-depth=1
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
