On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:19:43PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> How long have multiple-IM clients been around now? 6 or 8 years? Even DOS
> had more progress made over the same timespan in terms of usability. I think
> that says more about the utter lack of effort or the impossibility of a
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 06:42:50AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Zbigniew writes:
> > There's a lot of free games attached to childrens' magazines. Most of
> > them are only for Windows, there is no way to play them on linux.
>
> If they are gratis, why do they need to be closed-source?
Maybe it's
Ooops. I guess I wasn't as clear as I could have been.
Editing /etc/default/bootlod to set
BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=yes
Works like a charm.
Miles
Willie Wonka wrote:
[ apologies for the long time since replying ]
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Willie Wonka wrote:
Mumia W. wrote:
AFAIK, that's not the way
I hope so!On 7/25/06, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AMD, a generally Linux friendly company, is acquiring ATI, maker ofmany, if not most, of the graphics adapters used in Apple PowerMacs.ATI has traditionally kept their drivers closed-source. The articlein Linux Watch [1] speculates that t
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:41:57AM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
>
> >Quick poll: how many people here are old enough to read that subject line
> >and think of the IBM Series/360, the mainframe?
> >
> >
> Count me in! My first programming was on an IBM 360 in an "Introduction
>
How do I build a deb package, after successfully compiling from source,
so as dpkg can be aware of it? If anybody have any links or reading
references thatd be great, so i don't feel so lazy.
thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Leonid Grinberg wrote:
Hello,
I am hopefully going to recieve an old i486 machine, and for kicks, I
thought that it would be nice to install Debian. Does anyone know how
I would go about doing this, as well as how much success I should
expect to get? Obviously, Debian no longer supports i486, b
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 18:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:19:43PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > How long have multiple-IM clients been around now? 6 or 8 years? Even
> > DOS had more progress made over the same timespan in terms of usability.
> > I think that says mor
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 14:29, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Hmm, what's the deal with the kopete package version being radically
> > wrong then?
>
> kopete is still just part of kdenetwork package, except that now they
> decided that they want to make swifter development cycle than K
Hi,
does anybody know about a repository which would have %subj% (as up-to-date
as possible)? I am thinking about things like CONFIG_PREEMPT, SWSUSP2,
etc.)
Thanks,
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTE
CJ van den Berg wrote:
> This bug has caused serious data loss on my systems and no end of headaches
> in the last two weeks. I really hope the fix goes into a debian kernel soon
> to save others the pain.
Well, it seems the kernel team has released a new stable version of the
kernel, 2.6.17.7. Ac
Bruno Buys wrote:
How do I build a deb package, after successfully compiling from
source, so as dpkg can be aware of it? If anybody have any links or
reading references thatd be great, so i don't feel so lazy.
thanks!
hi,
You can have a lok there:
Debian List
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Ooops. I guess I wasn't as clear as I could have been.
>
> Editing /etc/default/bootlod to set
> BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=yes
>
> Works like a charm.
>
> Miles
Thanks for clarifying that for me ;-)
Regards
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tire
Bruno Buys wrote:
> How do I build a deb package, after successfully compiling from source,
> so as dpkg can be aware of it? If anybody have any links or reading
> references thatd be great, so i don't feel so lazy.
> thanks!
apt-cache show maint-guide
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1B
Rick Thomas writes:
> ATI has traditionally kept their drivers closed-source.
It will be difficult as the drivers most likely contain third-party "IP".
The chips themselves also probably contain third-party "IP" that may be
subject to extremely restrictive license conditions such that publishing
i
hendrik writes:
> Before that, an IBM 1620...
Someone else who started out on a 1620. I never got to do anything with it
but submit FORTRAN decks, though.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,Here is a scenario...Two servers: both Debian 3.1 stable. Both running bind 9.2.4.1installed by apt-get.One bind runs with -t /var/lib/named (bind's chroot option) while the other does not.
Both name servers are working properly and are performing fine.The chrooted bind will show 0:00 for proce
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I meant in general, the whole genre of multi-IM software.
This is not fair -- the fact one program is crap (and even commercial one)
doesn't mean that similar programs are crap as well. Windows NT is piece of
sh..t, so Linux has to be bad as well :-).
>> I talked about that
Carl Fink wrote:
Quick poll: how many people here are old enough to read that subject line
and think of the IBM Series/360, the mainframe?
Having spent much of my life talking to these big-iron beasts, I did a
bit of a double-take. Actually, though, the correct name for the
mainframe series
Leonid Grinberg wrote:
Hello,
I am hopefully going to recieve an old i486 machine, and for kicks, I
thought that it would be nice to install Debian. Does anyone know how
I would go about doing this, as well as how much success I should
expect to get? Obviously, Debian no longer supports i486, b
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I'm just saying the client-side approach to multi-protocol
> support is ass-backwards in general and usually results in a client that
> whose support of half a dozen clients is the world's least funny joke,
Personally I see it the other way around. My experience with
Paul Johnson wrote:
> How long have multiple-IM clients been around now? 6 or 8 years? Even DOS
> had more progress made over the same timespan in terms of usability.
Hyperbole much, Paul? Let's see, in the start they did what... ICQ and
mayyybe AIM. Now they're up to over a dozen networ
Paul Johnson wrote:
> That contributes to the problem for sure, but I'm not limiting it just to a
> protocol support issue. Memory leaks and terrible UI choices also tend to
> plague the multiprotocol clients (GAIM and Trillian in particular).
Yes, of course, and that would never happen in
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 20:03, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > I meant in general, the whole genre of multi-IM software.
>
> This is not fair -- the fact one program is crap (and even commercial one)
> doesn't mean that similar programs are crap as well. Windows NT is piece of
> sh..t,
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I'm not sure the Soviet Union didn't have help. They were plagued by
> power-hungry party officials and translators that accidentally mistranslate
> morbid but harmless Russian idioms into outward threats. Had Lenin not
> seized power and disposed of Marx, Stalin not have
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 20:59, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > How long have multiple-IM clients been around now? 6 or 8 years? Even
> > DOS had more progress made over the same timespan in terms of usability.
>
> Hyperbole much, Paul? Let's see, in the start they did what... IC
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 20:55, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > I'm just saying the client-side approach to multi-protocol
> > support is ass-backwards in general and usually results in a client that
> > whose support of half a dozen clients is the world's least funny joke,
>
> Perso
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 21:03, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > That contributes to the problem for sure, but I'm not limiting it just to
> > a protocol support issue. Memory leaks and terrible UI choices also tend
> > to plague the multiprotocol clients (GAIM and Trillian in particular
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hendrik writes:
>> Before that, an IBM 1620...
>
> Someone else who started out on a 1620. I never got to do anything with it
> but submit FORTRAN decks, though.
>
> --
> John Hasler
Most of the people who complain loudest about the difficulties of
prin
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:15:07PM -0400, Leonid Grinberg wrote:
> I am hopefully going to recieve an old i486 machine, and for kicks, I
> thought that it would be nice to install Debian. Does anyone know how
> I would go about doing this, as well as how much success I should
> expect to get?
It
Hi folks,
I ran "debian-31r0a-amd64-netinst" CD installer to install Debian. The
installation went throught without problem. But the onboard LAN card
can't be detected. Neither can I select the right driver from the
list.
Motherboard - ASUS
Model - A8N-VM-UAYGZ
After booting and login as root
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:16:26PM -0700, Jeff wrote:
> Having spent much of my life talking to these big-iron beasts, I did a
> bit of a double-take. Actually, though, the correct name for the
> mainframe series was IBM *System*/360.
I actually never worked on a 360. My University had an S/3
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I'm not sure the Soviet Union didn't have help. They were plagued by
> power-hungry party officials and translators that accidentally
> mistranslate morbid but harmless Russian idioms into outward threats.
> Had Lenin not seized power and disposed of Marx, Stalin not have eve
Paul Johnson wrote:
> So SMTP unifying email is a bad thing? That's what it sounds like you're
> arguing to me.
No, that would be what your strawman is telling you.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
---
El Miércoles, 26 de Julio de 2006 02:15, Leonid Grinberg escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I am hopefully going to recieve an old i486 machine, and for kicks, I
> thought that it would be nice to install Debian. Does anyone know how
> I would go about doing this, as well as how much success I should
> expect
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 22:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > So SMTP unifying email is a bad thing? That's what it sounds like you're
> > arguing to me.
>
> No, that would be what your strawman is telling you.
So are you going to explain why I'm wrong, or do we just take the Ult
Stephen Liu wrote:
Hi folks,
I ran "debian-31r0a-amd64-netinst" CD installer to install Debian. The
installation went throught without problem. But the onboard LAN card
can't be detected. Neither can I select the right driver from the
list.
Motherboard - ASUS
Model - A8N-VM-UAYGZ
After boot
Russell L. Harris wrote:
Most of the people who complain loudest about the difficulties of
printing in Linux never had to depend upon an IBM line printer, the
input to which was in the form of 80-column punched cards. ;-) And most
of them never knew the utter rapture of owing your very own Epson
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 July 2006 22:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> So SMTP unifying email is a bad thing? That's what it sounds like you're
>>> arguing to me.
>> No, that would be what your strawman is telling you.
> So are you going to explain why I'm wrong, or
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 22:49, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 22:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >>> So SMTP unifying email is a bad thing? That's what it sounds like
> >>> you're arguing to me.
> >>
> >> No, that would be what your strawma
Yodel!
[cc:s appreciated]
We're facing a problem here with konquerors acl behaviour:
changing from SuSE's 3.4.something to Debian backport 3.5.0 or also
http://deb.stosberg.net/'s 3.5.3 backports, acl behaviour on file copying
has annoyingly changed to also copy the acl. Old (and "correct" -
How can I turn off printing of the job identification cover sheet in
CUPS on a freshly-installed Etch system?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
