On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:52:38 -0800
David Hoff Jr wrote:
> I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
> to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
> being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried
> using "link
* David Hoff Jr [25-02/13=Th 15:52 -0800]:
> I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
> to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
> being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried using
> "link
I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried using
"links -enable-cookies dailycaller.com", but to no avail. Is there a
solution
; > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to
> a
> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems;
> stuttering,
> >> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). The
Lee writes:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM Richmond wrote:
>>
>> Richmond writes:
>>
>> > Richmond writes:
>> >
>> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
>> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get pla
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM Richmond wrote:
>
> Richmond writes:
>
> > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
> >> so
Have you tried a LIVE-version of another Linux distribution? It will be
interesting to compare.
вс, 7 апр. 2024 г. в 22:30, Richmond :
> Richmond writes:
>
> > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> >> b
Richmond writes:
> Richmond writes:
>
>> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
>> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
>> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
>> clear u
Richmond writes:
> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
> clear up after a minute or two, or be reduced.
>
When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
clear up after a minute or two, or be reduced.
When playing from nvlc however I get no such
On 8/4/23 19:26, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 15:56:07 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
entry?
http
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 15:56:07 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> > > Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
> > > entry?
> >
> > https://www.debian.or
On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
entry?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html#_the_hostname_resolution
I'm sure there ar
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:48:30 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 13:21, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > > > * "localh
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:05:11PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
> show mea link to the doc that explains that please
> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
There's not "the doc", but many of them. For starters, rfc5735 [1]
tells us that the whole subnet 127.0.0.0/8 is available for
loopback purposes (I've
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 07:48:54 (+0800), jeremy ardley wrote:
> On 3/8/23 07:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > > > > Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
> > > > >
> > > > Tr
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
> entry?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html#_the_hostname_resolution
I'm sure there are others, but this was the first one I
On 8/2/23 16:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
for.
https://www.debian.org/do
On 8/2/23 16:26, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
versi
On 8/2/23 17:02, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version that
On 8/2/23 17:02, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version that
On 3/8/23 07:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
for.
https://www.debian.org/d
> On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > > Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
> > >
> > True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
> > for.
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-r
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
> > > > No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
> > > > version that suits y
On 8/2/23 15:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:14:41PM +0100, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
Either deleted, or not provided by Armbian in the first place. In any
case, it's not immediately relevant to this thread's issue, so long
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version that suits you.
ok, same cat in full:
gene@bpi52:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
On 8/2/23, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
>
>> On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
>> > No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a
>> > censored
>> > version that suits you.
>> >
>> ok, same cat in full:
>> gene@bpi52:~$ cat /etc/hosts
>> 127
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:14:41PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
Either deleted, or not provided by Armbian in the first place. In any
case, it's not immediately relevant to this thread's issue, so long as
the web service doesn't redirect to
Gene,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 02:05:48PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> this is a blatent attack by chrome
You've absolutely no evidence to suggest that, and other people
have already pointed out they are unable to replicate your issues.
Like almost every thread you start or derail here this is
ove
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 13:07:13 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to repr
On 8/2/23 13:21, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for
On 8/2/23 09:42, Stefan Monnier wrote:
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
his end. I'm still leaning toward an edited /etc/hosts file.
My guess is that his Chrome runs in a kind of container
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > * "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
> > >
> [...]
> >
> > It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
his end. I
> It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
> problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
> his end. I'm still leaning toward an edited /etc/hosts file.
My guess is that his Chrome runs in a kind of container that doesn't
have access to the host
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> * "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
>
> In the case of the latter, are you wanting to use the localhost scheme to
> access the resource called 80 (now, you're going to say "There is no
> protocol called localhost" and I think that Ch
On 01/08/2023 10:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
I think this comes down to an amb
On Tuesday 01 August 2023 05:33:55 am gene heskett wrote:
> Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
> to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
> cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
> klipper..
>
> FF has
On 1/8/23 20:54, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/1/23 06:26, Bret Busby wrote:
On 1/8/23 17:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a
browser to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so
localhost:80 cannot be used for troubleshooting or for ru
On 8/1/23 06:26, Bret Busby wrote:
On 1/8/23 17:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
F
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 08:13:50AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/1/23 06:16, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:33 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Maybe direct this to the appropriate arena. Debians default browser is
> > Firefox, if there is no issue with FF means
On 8/1/23 06:16, Phil Wyett wrote:
On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:33 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a
browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer wi
t;
> FF has no such problems.
On my system, with this package:
ii google-chrome-stable 115.0.5790.110-1 amd64 The web browser from
Google
and with Help -> About Google Chrome showing this version string:
Version 115.0.5790.110 (Official Build) (64-bit)
I cannot reproduce your re
On 1/8/23 17:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
FF has no such problems.
Cheers, Gen
On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:33 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a
> browser
> to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
> cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
> klipper..
>
> FF has n
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
FF has no such problems.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:40:24PM +0300, Reco wrote:
[...]
> Squid can do it. It was called SSL Bump in old (pre 3.4) Squid, now they
> renamed it to SSL Peek and Splice - [1].
Thanks!
- -- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (G
Hi.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:49:04AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 07:35:51PM -0700, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > You should note that HTTP-proxy based systems will not be able to do any
> > inspection or modification of traffic for sites using HTTPS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:52:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018 08:49:04 +0200
> wrote:
[... proxy as SSL endpoint...]
> > I don't know whether privoxy or squid can do that (I'd love to know,
> > mind you, but days are so short).
>
>
On Thu, 17 May 2018 08:49:04 +0200
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 07:35:51PM -0700, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > You should note that HTTP-proxy based systems will not be able to do any
> > inspection or modification of traffic for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 07:35:51PM -0700, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
[...]
> You should note that HTTP-proxy based systems will not be able to do any
> inspection or modification of traffic for sites using HTTPS.
This is true... and then it's not :-)
If
davidson writes:
> On Tue, 15 May 2018, davidson wrote:
>
>> I have a problem: The more frequently I browse a web site, the more I
>> notice all the things I hate about its web pages.
>>
>> And I seem to have a partial solution to this problem: I can make XSLT
>> stylesheets[1] that will transfor
On Tue, 15 May 2018, davidson wrote:
I have a problem: The more frequently I browse a web site, the more I
notice all the things I hate about its web pages.
And I seem to have a partial solution to this problem: I can make XSLT
stylesheets[1] that will transform a web page A, as received from a
preprocessing) into the web browsing activity.
>
> I would like to launch a web browser[3], browse pages at domain X, and
> know that when I go to http://X/page, or https://X/page, etc, the
> browser will render not the page served from the remote site, but will
> render instead t
On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:52:16 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:58:04AM +, davidson wrote:
> > I would like to launch a web browser[3], browse pages at domain X, and
> > know that when I go to http://X/page, or https://X/page, etc, the
> &
On 15.05.2018 05:58, davidson wrote:
> Do I want a local proxy server that I can instruct to apply
> appropriate transformations to documents received from certain
> domains? This seems sensible, but I haven't examined too deeply what
> is available along these lines, and I would rather not spend t
Hi.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:58:04AM +, davidson wrote:
> I would like to launch a web browser[3], browse pages at domain X, and
> know that when I go to http://X/page, or https://X/page, etc, the
> browser will render not the page served from the remote site, but will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:58:04AM +, davidson wrote:
> I have a problem: The more frequently I browse a web site, the more I
> notice all the things I hate about its web pages.
[...]
I think you're looking for a HTTP proxy.
Cheers
- -- t
-B
(and
preliminary preprocessing) into the web browsing activity.
I would like to launch a web browser[3], browse pages at domain X, and
know that when I go to http://X/page, or https://X/page, etc, the
browser will render not the page served from the remote site, but will
render instead that page as
On 09/16/2015 09:29 AM, muntasimulha...@tutamail.com wrote:
Hi,
I couldn't find the package "midori" in Debian 8 jessie. I searched in
Debian Packages archive, and found that Midori web browser was there
in Squeeze, Wheezy, and it's here in Sid; but not in jessie. Why
mid
Hi,
I couldn't find the package "midori" in Debian 8 jessie. I searched in Debian
Packages archive, and found that Midori web browser was there in Squeeze,
Wheezy, and it's here in Sid; but not in jessie. Why midori is not available
for jessie?
With thanks,
Muntasim Ul Haque
Mihamina Rakotomandimby writes:
> On 07/01/2015 09:21 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Hi ... As web browser, Midori was claimed to be light, but I see almost no
>> difference with Firefox. Please any advice for a *really* light one,
>> suitable for that old machine?
>
>
Ralph Katz writes:
> On 07/11/2015 08:55 PM, David Wright wrote:
>> Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):
>>
>>> I simply want to speed up the natural process through which the machine
>>> itself gets back to working normally as before, like someone that breaths
>>> with difficulty
On 07/11/2015 08:55 PM, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):
>
>> I simply want to speed
>> up the natural process through which the machine itself gets back to working
>> normally as before, like someone that breaths with difficulty after a
>> tremendous scare
Quoting Rodolfo Medina (rodolfo.med...@gmail.com):
> I simply want to speed
> up the natural process through which the machine itself gets back to working
> normally as before, like someone that breaths with difficulty after a
> tremendous scare and it takes time to get breathing normally again.
s it starts working normally again.
> >
> > Then, to try to recover it, I do:
> >
> > $ sync
> >
> > , but this is not enough. Is there any command to get the processor back
> > soon in its speed such as it was before opening
it, I do:
>
> $ sync
>
> , but this is not enough. Is there any command to get the processor back
> soon in its speed such as it was before opening the web browser?
> Apologises for not having the right technical terms...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
t the processor back
> soon
> in its speed such as it was before opening the web browser? Apologises
> for not
> having the right technical terms...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodolfo
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
>
there any command to get the processor back soon
in its speed such as it was before opening the web browser? Apologises for not
having the right technical terms...
Thanks,
Rodolfo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> Hi all the listers.
>
> I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I installed
> openbox as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and think I'll be using
> it for good, so simple fast and essential as it is. As web browser, Midori
s:
> >
>
> A problem with the opera web browser, that causes me to avoid using
> recent versions, and to avoid updating, and, to recommend against
> installing it, is the inclusion of the malware named speed dial, and,
> the obsession of the opera staff, with preventing users
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:52:36PM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 07/02/2015 02:25 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >Displaying images or not has very few things related to the browser heavyness
> >and celerity/velocity. What the OP asked for is a lightweitght browser
> >(memory footprint)
2015-07-02 18:44 GMT+02:00 Rodolfo Medina :
> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:18:48 + (UTC)
> > Glyn Astill wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > From: Andrew M.A. Cater
> >> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >> >Sent: Wednesda
writes:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:18:48 + (UTC)
> Glyn Astill wrote:
>
>>
>> > From: Andrew M.A. Cater
>> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> >Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2015, 19:15
>> >Subject: Re: Light web browser for old PC
>
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:18:48 + (UTC)
Glyn Astill wrote:
>
> > From: Andrew M.A. Cater
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2015, 19:15
> >Subject: Re: Light web browser for old PC
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09
On 2015-07-01, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all the listers.
>
> I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I installed openbox
> as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and think I'll be using it for
> good, so simple fast and essential as it is. As web
On 07/02/2015 02:25 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Displaying images or not has very few things related to the browser heavyness
and celerity/velocity. What the OP asked for is a lightweitght browser
(memory footprint) and potentially velocity in rendering pages (CPU cycle
usage).
I thought downloadi
Mihamina Rakotomandimby writes:
> On 07/02/2015 03:52 AM, Wilko Fokken wrote:
>> In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
>> I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
>> through simple menu buttons:
>>
>> [View]--> [Images]--> { [Show images]
> From: Andrew M.A. Cater
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2015, 19:15
>Subject: Re: Light web browser for old PC
>
>
>On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:52:03AM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
>> On 07/01/2015 09:21 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote
On 02/07/2015, Wilko Fokken wrote:
> In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
> I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
> through simple menu buttons:
>
A problem with the opera web browser, that causes me to avoid using
rec
On 07/02/2015 03:52 AM, Wilko Fokken wrote:
In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
through simple menu buttons:
[View]--> [Images]--> { [Show images] || [Cached Images] || [No Images] }
(Any of th
On 01/07/15 16:21, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all the listers.
>
> I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I installed openbox
> as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and think I'll be using it for
> good, so simple fast and essential as it is. As
In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
through simple menu buttons:
[View]--> [Images]--> { [Show images] || [Cached Images] || [No Images] }
(Any of the three options can be made the default, to be
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:52:03AM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 07/01/2015 09:21 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >Hi ... As web browser, Midori was
> >claimed to be light, but I see almost no difference with Firefox. Please any
> >advice for a *really* light one,
tial as it
> is. As web browser, Midori was claimed to be light, but I see almost
> no difference with Firefox. Please any advice for a *really* light
> one, suitable for that old machine? Or maybe the problem is actually
> the in the heavier and heavier web pages in themselves?
>
On 07/01/2015 09:21 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Hi ... As web browser, Midori was
claimed to be light, but I see almost no difference with Firefox. Please any
advice for a *really* light one, suitable for that old machine?
Most browsers rely on the redering engine.
On that field you mostly have
tial as it
> is. As web browser, Midori was claimed to be light, but I see almost
> no difference with Firefox. Please any advice for a *really* light
> one, suitable for that old machine? Or maybe the problem is actually
> the in the heavier and heavier web pages in themselves?
Maybe
Hi all the listers.
I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I installed openbox
as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and think I'll be using it for
good, so simple fast and essential as it is. As web browser, Midori was
claimed to be light, but I see almo
I have, in the last hour or so, had a Rekonq crash, which I assume is
due to javascript possibly having been temporarily enabled, and not
remembered to disable the javascript after a particular action.
I note that an unexplained popup existed, when I saw the Rekonq crash
(I came back to the compute
er on your other system? Is something preventing you from
doing that?
>
> So, as the system (Debain 6 LTS) is incapable of having consistemt
> interfaces across different systems, I will have to wait until the
> next time that I have a system crash on this system, before providing
>
ain 6 LTS) is incapable of having consistemt
interfaces across different systems, I will have to wait until the
next time that I have a system crash on this system, before providing
the "before and after" stuff, providing that, when the system crashes,
it goes back to the way that it was
On 2015-02-12, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am running Debian 6 LTS, with the GNOME Desktop Manager (if that is
> what it is named).
>
> I have three web browsers open; Arora, Konqueror and Rekonq.
>
> Each of the web browsers, is used for different reasons.
>
> None of them, appear to have pr
Hello.
I am running Debian 6 LTS, with the GNOME Desktop Manager (if that is
what it is named).
I have three web browsers open; Arora, Konqueror and Rekonq.
Each of the web browsers, is used for different reasons.
None of them, appear to have provision for saving sessions.
In accessing a parti
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:05:55PM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> >>You might take a look at Xombrero, although it's not in Debian.
> >>It's
> >>based on Webkit and has the capability built-in to use a Javascript
> >>whitelist. See https://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/xombrero
> >
On 10/23/2013 08:27 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 24/10/13 11:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 19:58 -0400, Doug wrote:
>>> I looked at Qupzilla's website, and tried to download the Mandriva
>>> version, that being closest to pclos. But I could just move between
>>> "Download" and
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 11:27 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> NOTE: Qupilla is lightest when your DE is QT-based e.g. KDE/Razor etc.
> If you run GNOME or other GTKx-based DE's it will pull in library/ies
> you won't use for anything else.
For my installs it doesn't matter, pro-audio software does u
JFTR
The Arch build port uses this link, when building from tarball instead
of git:
https://github.com/QupZilla/qupzilla/tarball/v1.4.4
If I should build for Debian I would use the github releases link:
https://github.com/QupZilla/qupzilla/archive/v1.4.4.tar.gz
I guess both are the same, but you
On 24/10/13 11:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 19:58 -0400, Doug wrote:
>> I looked at Qupzilla's website, and tried to download the Mandriva
>> version, that being closest to pclos. But I could just move between
>> "Download" and "Mandriva" but nothing else happens--no download, no
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 02:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 19:58 -0400, Doug wrote:
> > I looked at Qupzilla's website, and tried to download the Mandriva
> > version, that being closest to pclos. But I could just move between
> > "Download" and "Mandriva" but nothing else happe
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 19:58 -0400, Doug wrote:
> I looked at Qupzilla's website, and tried to download the Mandriva
> version, that being closest to pclos. But I could just move between
> "Download" and "Mandriva" but nothing else happens--no download, no
> nothing. Thought I'd at least try it out,
1 - 100 of 604 matches
Mail list logo