staticsafe staticsafe.ca> writes:
>
> On 4/17/2014 20:43, Amit wrote:
> > Name or service not known (-2)
>
> Sounds like you have/had DNS issues. Perhaps the resolver(s) in
> /etc/resolv.conf were unresponsive?
>
Thanks.
I think I may have found the issue. nt
Kumar Appaiah alumni.iitm.ac.in> writes:
[snip]
>
> > Apr 17 17:36:22 test ntpdate[709]: Can't find host 2.debian.pool.ntp.org:
> > Name or service not known (-2)
> > Apr 17 17:36:22 test ntpdate[709]: no servers can be used, exiting
> > Apr 17 17:36:45 tes
On 4/17/2014 20:43, Amit wrote:
> Name or service not known (-2)
Sounds like you have/had DNS issues. Perhaps the resolver(s) in
/etc/resolv.conf were unresponsive?
--
staticsafe
https://asininetech.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:43:28AM +, Amit wrote:
> Have a minimal debian system and installed ntpdate. Time seems to be set
> correctly but getting these messages:
>
> $ journalctl -b | grep ntp
> Apr 17 17:36:22 test ntpdate[709]: Can't find host 0.debian.pool.ntp.org:
&
Hello,
Have a minimal debian system and installed ntpdate. Time seems to be set
correctly but getting these messages:
$ journalctl -b | grep ntp
Apr 17 17:36:22 test ntpdate[709]: Can't find host 0.debian.pool.ntp.org:
Name or service not known (-2)
Apr 17 17:36:22 test ntpdate[709]: Can&#
Leonardo Cuyar Morales put forth on 4/18/2011 9:13 AM:
> I installed ntpdate pkg in squeeze but the command don't work
The most common cause of this is that ntpdate won't execute if ntpd is
running and thus holding the socket. For example:
[root@greer]~$ ntpdate tick.wustl.edu
18
open /etc/default/ntpdate and change the NTP_SERVERS variable with your ntp
server .
After launch with "ntpdate-debian" .
2011/4/18 Estelmann, Christian
> Check the config of your ntp-server. Is your client-IP allowed to access
> the server?
> Is there any firewall between y
Check the config of your ntp-server. Is your client-IP allowed to access
the server?
Is there any firewall between your client and your server? ntp uses port
123 udp. Is the ntp-server pingable?
Am 18.04.2011 16:57, schrieb Leonardo Cuyar Morales:
I'm in root session.
There's no an error messa
Op 18-04-11 15:37, Estelmann, Christian schreef:
> What do you mean with "don't work"? Any error messages?
>
> You have to run ntpdate as root.
> snb01:~# /usr/sbin/ntpdate ntp0.rrze.uni-erlangen.de
> 18 Apr 15:36:36 ntpdate[2968]: adjust time server 131.18
What do you mean with "don't work"? Any error messages?
You have to run ntpdate as root.
snb01:~# /usr/sbin/ntpdate ntp0.rrze.uni-erlangen.de
18 Apr 15:36:36 ntpdate[2968]: adjust time server 131.188.3.220 offset
-0.000236 sec
Am 18.04.2011 16:13, schrieb Leonardo Cuyar Morale
I installed ntpdate pkg in squeeze but the command don't work
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7803587.4980.1303136015546.JavaMail.root@zimbra
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:42 PM, David Baron wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> So .. I got rid of ntpdate altogether, installed the ntp daemon instead. I
> still get the error messages, now with /usr/sbin/ntpdate does not exist (of
> course). So I still need to find the original cron
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:42:02 David Baron wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010 23:02:11 David Baron wrote:
> > > > I have no cron running ntpdate that I know of and there is no ntpdate
> > > > entry in anacrontab. I run it in an rc.local type script on bootup.
>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:42:02PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010 23:02:11 David Baron wrote:
> > > > I have no cron running ntpdate that I know of and there is no ntpdate
> > > > entry in anacrontab. I run it in an rc.local type script on bootu
On Saturday 12 June 2010 23:02:11 David Baron wrote:
> > > I have no cron running ntpdate that I know of and there is no ntpdate
> > > entry in anacrontab. I run it in an rc.local type script on bootup.
> > > Period. This run works.
> > >
> > > The on
> > I have no cron running ntpdate that I know of and there is no ntpdate
> > entry in anacrontab. I run it in an rc.local type script on bootup.
> > Period. This run works.
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is an obsolete webmin entry but I have not
> > ru
> > I have no cron running ntpdate that I know of and there is no ntpdate
> > entry in anacrontab. I run it in an rc.local type script on bootup.
> > Period. This run works.
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is an obsolete webmin entry but I have not
> > ru
On 06/10/2010 10:38 AM, David Baron wrote:
> I get these periodically through the day:
>
> Cron /usr/sbin/ntpdate -s 216.200.93.8 (failed)
> From: Cron Daemon
> To: r...@dovidhalevi.homelinux.net
>
> command failed with exit status 1
Woah! Cron should NOT be running
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:38:00 +0300
David Baron wrote:
> I get these periodically through the day:
>
> Cron /usr/sbin/ntpdate -s 216.200.93.8 (failed)
> From: Cron Daemon
> To: r...@dovidhalevi.homelinux.net
>
> command failed with exit status 1
>
> I have no
I get these periodically through the day:
Cron /usr/sbin/ntpdate -s 216.200.93.8 (failed)
From: Cron Daemon
To: r...@dovidhalevi.homelinux.net
command failed with exit status 1
I have no cron running ntpdate that I know of and there is no ntpdate entry in
anacrontab. I run it in an
2010/5/14 Rob Owens :
>
> Not sure. But do you think you should be running the ntp daemon instead
> of using ntpdate in cron?
>
> -Rob
I think that's indeed the way to go, yes.
--
Frank Van Damme
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation.
Q: Why is it bad?
A: No,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:28:05PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> The initial ntpdate run from /etc/init.d succeeds.
>
> However, as of recent upgrades or site changes, a cron run of ntpdate fails:
>
> Cron ... /usr/sbin/ntpdate -s 216.200.93.8 (failed)
> ...
> command fail
2010/5/13 David Baron :
> The initial ntpdate run from /etc/init.d succeeds.
>
> However, as of recent upgrades or site changes, a cron run of ntpdate fails:
>
> Cron ... /usr/sbin/ntpdate -s 216.200.93.8 (failed)
> ...
> command failed with exit status 1
>
> I assu
The initial ntpdate run from /etc/init.d succeeds.
However, as of recent upgrades or site changes, a cron run of ntpdate fails:
Cron ... /usr/sbin/ntpdate -s 216.200.93.8 (failed)
...
command failed with exit status 1
I assume that the IP shown is not available. I cannot find where this cron
f this is the error, howclockfirst.sh is trying to read a one day + three
hours locatime date. This ostensiblty fails (it takes the time, not the date).
>
> - Make sure /etc/default/ntp contains "NTPD_OPTS='-g'" so that you
> can handle large clock offsets.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:50:23PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Even more. I get a bootup error message failing to set date (and time)
> to ... the following day + 3 hours!!
You may have a bad system clock. That does happen on some older
hardware or if a CMOS battery goes bad. I'd do the following
>>>Has been happening quite a bit lately:
>>>Problem with ntpdate. If and when it finally works, get a change of 10,800
>seconds ... that is 30 minutes.
>>>The dovecot IMAPd server is unreadable. Restarting it yields a complaint
>>>about 10,800 seconds of
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:08:54PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> >>Has been happening quite a bit lately:
>
> >>Problem with ntpdate. If and when it finally works, get a change of 10,800
> >seconds ... that is 30 minutes.
>
> >>The dovecot IMAPd serve
On Thu,11.Jun.09, 16:08:54, David Baron wrote:
> OK, time to fix this. Since my system comes up with the "correct" time zone
> but three hours later, it must be interpreting the stored (hw) time as GMT
> and
> adding the three hours (gmt+2 + daylight savings).
>
> How to fix this?
If you onl
>>Has been happening quite a bit lately:
>>Problem with ntpdate. If and when it finally works, get a change of 10,800
>seconds ... that is 30 minutes.
>>The dovecot IMAPd server is unreadable. Restarting it yields a complaint
>>about 10,800 seconds of time, killin
>Has been happening quite a bit lately:
>Problem with ntpdate. If and when it finally works, get a change of 10,800
>seconds ... that is 30 minutes.
>The dovecot IMAPd server is unreadable. Restarting it yields a complaint
>about 10,800 seconds of time, killing itself now! Rest
The current chrony initscript looks for a defaultroute at startup. If one
is found it puts chronyd online. The ip-up script is only used with PPP.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:59:50 -0400
Daryl Styrk wrote:
...
> I've had nothing but great results with chrony. Aside from an issue of
> chrony falling back to 127.127.1.1 when it cannot connect to a ntp server..
> Which happens often with my laptop as I move around during the day.. I
> fixed tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 05:07:08PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Has been happening quite a bit lately:
>
> Problem with ntpdate. If and when it finally works, get a change of 10,800
> seconds ... that is 30 minutes.
>
> The dovec
Has been happening quite a bit lately:
Problem with ntpdate. If and when it finally works, get a change of 10,800
seconds ... that is 30 minutes.
The dovecot IMAPd server is unreadable. Restarting it yields a complaint about
10,800 seconds of time, killing itself now! Restarting it again works
Thanks Rick.
That was the problem of firewall.
~Anup
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "anup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: ntpdate[5498]: no server suitable for synchronizatio
pt as fallows.
202.234.64.222
124.10.47.8
152.118.24.8
And run the ntpdate command, But still i am facing the same
problem and got the following Error.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# ntpdate -ud 152.118.24.8
18 Jun 10:08:55 ntpdate[8675]: ntpdate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 11
09:10:21 EDT 2004 (1)
Lo
I assume you are in Asia. If so, run the following script and
examine the output. Pick three hosts that look best and use them in
place of "3.asia.pool.ntp.org".
Script:
cut here---
for i in 0 1 2 3
do
host $i.asia.pool.ntp.org
done | while read x
echo
On 06/16/07 07:35, Michael Marsh wrote:
On 6/16/07, anup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to setup NTP client inside my network using public time
server.
I used " ntpdate -ud 3.asia.pool.ntp.org " it gives the following error
messaage..
[...]
16 Jun 15:20:26 ntpdate[
On 6/16/07, anup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to setup NTP client inside my network using public time server.
I used " ntpdate -ud 3.asia.pool.ntp.org " it gives the following error
messaage..
[...]
16 Jun 15:20:26 ntpdate[5498]: no server suitable for synchronizati
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:29:33PM +0530, anup wrote:
> I am trying to setup NTP client inside my network using public time server.
> I used " ntpdate -ud 3.asia.pool.ntp.org " it gives the following error
> messaage..
>
> 202.234.64.222: Server dropped: no data
Can
I am trying to setup NTP client inside my network using public time server.
I used " ntpdate -ud 3.asia.pool.ntp.org " it gives the following error
messaage..
# ntpdate -ud 3.asia.pool.ntp.org
16 Jun 15:20:21 ntpdate[5498]: ntpdate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 11
09:10:21 EDT 2004 (1
; servers in your /etc/ntp.conf and your /etc/default/ntpdate files,
> and mention all three as trusted in your firewall DMZ.
>
You may find one here, as well :
http://ntp.isc.org/bin/view/Servers/WebHome
--
Franck Joncourt
http://www.debian.org
http://smhteam.info/wiki/
GPG server : pgpkey
On Mar 11, 2007, at 9:18 AM, David Baron wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007, debian-user-digest-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had a problem with the more recent ntpdate from Sid?
Fix, Workaround?
Cannot find suitable server.
Works for me just fine with these NTP servers.
I have not
on Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:33:14PM -0800 Paul Johnson wrote:
> David Baron wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> to gmane.linux.debian.user:
>
> > Has anyone had a problem with the more recent ntpdate from Sid?
> > Fix, Workaround?
>
> Have you tried u
On Saturday 10 March 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Has anyone had a problem with the more recent ntpdate from Sid?
> > > Fix, Workaround?
> > >
> > > Cannot find suitable server.
> >
> > Works for me just fine with these NTP servers.
>
David Baron wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
to gmane.linux.debian.user:
> Has anyone had a problem with the more recent ntpdate from Sid?
> Fix, Workaround?
Have you tried using chrony instead?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:59:07PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/10/07 12:34, David Baron wrote:
> > Has anyone had a problem with the more recent ntpdate from Sid?
> > Fix, Workaround?
> >
> > Cannot find suitable server.
>
> Works for me just fine with th
On 03/10/07 12:34, David Baron wrote:
> Has anyone had a problem with the more recent ntpdate from Sid?
> Fix, Workaround?
>
> Cannot find suitable server.
Works for me just fine with these NTP servers.
Occasionally, though, it fails when I have router issues.
>
>
# Th
Has anyone had a problem with the more recent ntpdate from Sid?
Fix, Workaround?
Cannot find suitable server.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ubuntu users'.
I'm sorry for this abuse.
If it manually works, maybe you can add more lines to your
/etc/network/if-up/ntpdate file in order to track down where the
probleme comes from.
Inserting echos and log_daemon_msg into the ntpdate script wasn't that useful and the results co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Franck Joncourt wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Rolf Bode-Meyer wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>&
On Feb 17, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Franck Joncourt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf Bode-Meyer wrote:
Hi!
Hi,
I currently try to figure out if ntpdate is called on boottime in my
system or not.
It *should* be called when the network interfaces come up (ifup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf Bode-Meyer wrote:
> Hi!
Hi,
> I currently try to figure out if ntpdate is called on boottime in my
> system or not.
>
> It *should* be called when the network interfaces come up (ifup),
> therefore the /etc/network/if-up.d/
Hi!
I currently try to figure out if ntpdate is called on boottime in my
system or not.
It *should* be called when the network interfaces come up (ifup),
therefore the /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate is present. And it's indeed
called when I manually call ifup -a after booting--an entry i
On 18.10.06 16:42, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/18/06 14:36, harm wrote:
> > i think i should read those /usr/share/doc files more often :p
> >
> > however, ntpdate is only started once (on bootup) and it never needs to
> > resync afterwords ? since its not in ps aux
Dave Dawson writes:
> but if you are using dialup, you could run a crontab every day to execute
> ntpdate instead
Or you could install Chrony, which does what Ntp does and works fine with
dialup.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:08:02PM +, David Dawson wrote:
> but if you are using dialup, you could run a crontab every day to execute
> ntpdate instead
Better still is chrony. It polls ntp sources when you're online,
skewing the system time instead of jumping it like n
harm wrote:
> in good old sarge there was a script in /etc/init.d/ that would check the
> clock with the ntp server(s) in /etc/default/ntpdate. But how does it
> works in Etch, since the init.d script is gone ? Of course i can execute
> ntpdate ntp.xs4all.nl but if i want it to sync
hose /usr/share/doc files more often :p>> however, ntpdate is only started once (on bootup) and it never needs to> resync afterwords ? since its not in ps aux...
Of course it's not listed in "ps aux" because it's not a continuous runner like ntp.I put this in my root cr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/06 14:36, harm wrote:
> i think i should read those /usr/share/doc files more often :p
>
> however, ntpdate is only started once (on bootup) and it never needs to
> resync afterwords ? since its not in ps aux...
Of course it
apt-get install ntp i will just asume that wil sync every Xtime. Lets read the manpage now, ok :)thnxOn 10/18/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:36:08PM +0200, harm wrote:
> i think i should read those /usr/share/doc files more often :p>> h
From another of those pesky /usr/share/doc files:
che:/usr/share/doc/ntpdate# cat README.Debian
...
Note that ntpdate is *not* really intended to be used by hosts with
good network connectivity. The "ntp" package, which provides a
persistent daemon that does a better job of keeping s
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:36:08PM +0200, harm wrote:
> i think i should read those /usr/share/doc files more often :p
>
> however, ntpdate is only started once (on bootup) and it never needs to
> resync afterwords ? since its not in ps aux...
>
If you want something to resy
i think i should read those /usr/share/doc files more often :p however, ntpdate is only started once (on bootup) and it never needs to resync afterwords ? since its not in ps aux...
On 10/18/06, Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to /usr/share/doc/ntpdate/changlog.Deb
According to /usr/share/doc/ntpdate/changlog.Debian.gz:
* npdate is no longer started from an init script but instead by ifup
(closes: #56499, #245338, #312576)
* Run ntpdate from ifup in the background (closes: #321759, #375280,
#382543)
The script is now in /etc/network/if-up.d
in good old sarge there was a script in /etc/init.d/ that would check the clock with the ntp server(s) in /etc/default/ntpdate. But how does it works in Etch, since the init.d script is gone ? Of course i can execute ntpdate
ntp.xs4all.nl but if i want it to sync every 24hrs should i put it in
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 13:02, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 05.04.06 18:46, David Baron wrote:
> > There was a kernel bug to this effect but apparently not relevant to my
> > configuration. When ntpdate cannot access a ntp server, the time gets
> > placed two (thr
On 05.04.06 18:46, David Baron wrote:
> There was a kernel bug to this effect but apparently not relevant to my
> configuration. When ntpdate cannot access a ntp server, the time gets
> placed two (three with daylight time) hours fast. I am two hours later
> than Grenwich. It does n
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 08:46, David Baron wrote:
> If I keep trying until it succedes, then time gets set correctly.
Why use ntpdate when chrony synchronizes your clock via NT Pand isn't a pain
in the ass about it?
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTE
There was a kernel bug to this effect but apparently not relevant to my
configuration. When ntpdate cannot access a ntp server, the time gets placed
two (three with daylight time) hours fast. I am two hours later than
Grenwich. It does not matter if the hwclock is set utc or local.
If I keep
e German PTB (compareable to
> "time.gov") and offering a very accurate time (atomic-clock).
According to man ntpdate, all you need to do is specify the server as
the last argument to ntpdate on the command line.
Man goes on to say that you could get cron to run ntpdate every so
often, but w
Michael Przysucha writes:
> I have a very unstable hw-clock and need to synchronize it every apx. 60
> minutes to avoid differences of more than 20 sec.
I suggest that you install either chrony or ntp-simple. They will take
care of your clock for you.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
ain.
Regards,
Rabbie.
-Original Message-
From: Maurits van Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 5:31 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ntpdate inside Debian vservers
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:42:31AM +1000, Rabbie Zalaf wrote:
> I have a few
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:42:31AM +1000, Rabbie Zalaf wrote:
> I have a few vservers running on my box and all of the vservers times are
> off (way off I might add).
I have a virtual host with Bytemark. Maybe what they have to say
about setting the time helps you:
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/supp
:~#
and when I try to use ntpdate:
ccs1:~# ntpdate au.pool.ntp.org
26 Oct 16:41:28 ntpdate[21956]: step-systime: Operation not
permitted
ccs1:~#
Obviously I already am root when I perform either of these commands.
My real server’s date/time is perfect and ntpdate works fine there. Its
bit of a stressful
weekend). COmmenting out a bunch of modules helped my problems,
thanks much for that help folks.
I notice now that bootup is stalling on ntpdate. Here's what I see on
bootlog...
Tue Oct 4 21:13:32 2005: Running ntpdate to synchronize clockError :
Temporary failure in name
oot, bit of a stressful
weekend). COmmenting out a bunch of modules helped my problems,
thanks much for that help folks.
I notice now that bootup is stalling on ntpdate. Here's what I see on
bootlog...
Tue Oct 4 21:13:32 2005: Running ntpdate to synchronize clockError :
Temporary failure in
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:36:41AM -0400, jmr_071769 wrote:
> hello again with a debian question.
>
> i'd like to be able to have a few machines 'apt-get update' themselves
> at a random time near/around midnight. how can i go about this with
> another easy script?
>
I almost forgot, in my previo
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:36:41AM -0400, jmr_071769 wrote:
> hello again with a debian question.
>
> i'd like to be able to have a few machines 'apt-get update' themselves
> at a random time near/around midnight. how can i go about this with
> another easy script?
>
A random time around midnight
jmr_071769 wrote:
hello again with a debian question.
i'd like to be able to have a few machines 'apt-get update' themselves
at a random time near/around midnight. how can i go about this with
another easy script?
tia!
-jeff
See my message in debian-user archives with the subject
"My local
jmr_071769 wrote:
> hello again with a debian question.
>
> i'd like to be able to have a few machines 'apt-get update' themselves
> at a random time near/around midnight. how can i go about this with
> another easy script?
>
> tia!
>
> -jeff
>
hello again with a debian question.
i'd like to be able to have a few machines 'apt-get update' themselves
at a random time near/around midnight. how can i go about this with
another easy script?
tia!
-jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004, Pigeon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 08:30:29PM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:04:46AM +0200, Christian Schnobrich wrote:
> > > IIRC, ntpdate (and ntpd and chrony) will not set your clock if it is off
> > > by too muc
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 08:30:29PM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:04:46AM +0200, Christian Schnobrich wrote:
> > IIRC, ntpdate (and ntpd and chrony) will not set your clock if it is off
> > by too much. I think by default it is 1 hour (3600 sec) f
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:47:50PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Best not to run ntpdate to step the clock while ntpd is running or
> confusion would result. So stop ntpd first and start it again
> afterward.
...in fact, you have to stop ntpd, or else ntpdate won't work.
--
Pige
eference (such as system logs)
somewhere, ntp is overkill.
Ntpdate and Chrony, used to sync the system up once a day to a high stratum
(> 2) timeserver are a better idea for most people, and much better for the
whole time keeping structure.
For those, Chrony looks like it is simpler to set up, and
* Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040408 09:05]:
>
> I occasionally hear someone say that chrony is better than ntpd, but
> I've never heard the reasons why.
I tried setting up ntp and found it difficult, but tried setting up
chrony and found it easy. Since I'm just running a few boxes at h
At 2004-04-08T03:04:46Z, Christian Schnobrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, and... everybody suggests chrony as a far superior and more stable
> solution than ntpd.
More stable? In what way? Not once in the years that I've used ntpd have I
ever had problems with it.
I occasionally hear som
Chris Horn wrote:
> cc: me on your reply, as I'm not subscribed)!
> Running '/etc/init.d/ntpdate start' does not fix the problem.
What do the logs say in /var/log/syslog?
I suspect you have a firewall in the way.
Try running ntpdate interactively.
/etc/init.d/ntp sto
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:04:46AM +0200, Christian Schnobrich wrote:
> IIRC, ntpdate (and ntpd and chrony) will not set your clock if it is off
> by too much. I think by default it is 1 hour (3600 sec) for all three of
> them.
ntpdate just adjusted my clock which was off by 3602 second
On Thursday 08 April 2004 03:04 am, Christian Schnobrich wrote:
>I can merely point you to the (quite exhaustive) documentation you get
>when installing ntp-doc. As quick fix, you may manually set the time to
>something that's reasonably close and re-run ntpdate.
Sorry, this jus
e -u && date
> Wed Apr 7 22:16:37 UTC 2004
> Wed Apr 7 18:16:37 EDT 2004
[..]
> Running '/etc/init.d/ntpdate start' does not fix the problem. Please help (and
> cc: me on your reply, as I'm not subscribed)!
IIRC, ntpdate (and ntpd and chrony) will not set your
/New_York
>
># l /etc/localtime
>lrwxr-xr-x1 root root 30 Apr 7 18:11 /etc/localtime ->
> /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Eastern
>
># cat /etc/timezone
>US/Eastern
>
>Running '/etc/init.d/ntpdate start' does not fix the problem. Please help
> (and
imezone
US/Eastern
Running '/etc/init.d/ntpdate start' does not fix the problem. Please help (and
cc: me on your reply, as I'm not subscribed)!
--
Chris Horn
703.413.1100 x5193
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:02:15PM -0700, Nate Duehr wrote:
> >Surely "ntp-simple" is a "real" NTP client. I mean, it's *the* NTP
> >software package (i.e., the official reference implementation of the
> >NTPv4 protocol). The "-simple" part just mean
On Mar 3, 2004, at 5:12 PM, Kevin Buhr wrote:
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Get a real NTP client? chrony didn't screw up...
Surely "ntp-simple" is a "real" NTP client. I mean, it's *the* NTP
software package (i.e., the official reference implementation of the
NTPv4 protocol). The "-
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Get a real NTP client? chrony didn't screw up...
Surely "ntp-simple" is a "real" NTP client. I mean, it's *the* NTP
software package (i.e., the official reference implementation of the
NTPv4 protocol). The "-simple" part just means it doesn't include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:39:53PM -0900, Greg Madden wrote:
> I use ntp-simpl. This is a leap year, 29 days in February, but ntp is
> short by one day. I can adjust the date manually but when ntp runs it
> sets me back a day. Is there away to tell n
to a single NTP server, that server may be
misconfigured (or may have handled the leap year incorrectly).
To see if this is the case, install the "ntpdate" package if you
haven't already. Try setting the correct date and time manually, then
run:
ntpdate -q time.windows.com ntp.gci.
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
