On 2023-04-22 12:13 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> There are many signs of a new kernel version in the latest updates:
> linux-libc-dev, linux-source, linux-kbuild all show an upgrade
> available from 5.10.162-1 to 5.10.178-2.
>
> Conspicuously absent are any of the linux-image packages; the most
> r
There are many signs of a new kernel version in the latest updates:
linux-libc-dev, linux-source, linux-kbuild all show an upgrade
available from 5.10.162-1 to 5.10.178-2.
Conspicuously absent are any of the linux-image packages; the most
recent ones are 5.10.162-1. I figured they might just be d
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 05:06:02PM -0500 or thereabouts, Douglas Allan Tutty
wrote:
[ ,,,]
> I hope this helps to clear things up.
Thanks Doug -- It does indeed.
--
Regards
Stephen
+
The Public is merely a multipl
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:44:26 -0500, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I dist-upgraded to Etch today, and all went well. Congrats to the
> "Team"! What is the difference between the following deb names
> (besides kernel version) ?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude show linux-image-2.6.18-3-
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:44:26PM -0500, Stephen wrote:
> I dist-upgraded to Etch today, and all went well. Congrats to the "Team"!
>
> What is the difference between the following deb names (besides kernel
> version)
> ?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude show linux-image-2.6.18-3-686
>
I dist-upgraded to Etch today, and all went well. Congrats to the "Team"!
What is the difference between the following deb names (besides kernel version)
?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude show linux-image-2.6.18-3-686
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude show kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
I re
what's the bug?
The gdb (gnome debugger) does not work correctly.
Describe here:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/74691
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=513751
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
jdaues wrote:
Currently, I am using Debian Etch with kernel version 2.6.18-3-686. This
kernel has a bug that affects me in a rather annoying manner. This bug
is fixed in 2.6.20. Since etch is frozen, I am assuming that 2.6.20 will
not be in the final release of etch, correct? Can one estimate
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:39:51PM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> Don't new kernel versions come out after release, with the updates?
> Also, once Etch is stable, before Lenny is stable, won't a 2.6.20 end up
> in testing at some point?
>
Yes. But the origin
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas Allan Tutty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 4:40 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: kernel versions in releases.
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 02:36:46PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrot
> course, the bug would need to be rather serious for them consider such a
> thing this late in the release cycle.
>
Don't new kernel versions come out after release, with the updates?
Also, once Etch is stable, before Lenny is stable, won't a 2.6.20 end up
in testing at some
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:53:08AM -0700, jdaues wrote:
> Currently, I am using Debian Etch with kernel version 2.6.18-3-686. This
> kernel has a bug that affects me in a rather annoying manner. This bug
> is fixed in 2.6.20. Since etch is frozen, I am assuming that 2.6.20 will
> not be in the f
Currently, I am using Debian Etch with kernel version 2.6.18-3-686. This
kernel has a bug that affects me in a rather annoying manner. This bug
is fixed in 2.6.20. Since etch is frozen, I am assuming that 2.6.20 will
not be in the final release of etch, correct? Can one estimate when
2.6.20 wi
[ Hi. This is not relevant to either debian-testing or debian-devel, so
I have redirected to debian-user].
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:38:10PM +0200, carlopmart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to deploy several xen servers under Debia nEtch next week, and
> I have one doubt. Which is the difference
Hello
Eric Dickner (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> --- Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Did you compile the kernel yourself? In that case
>> the headers you need
>> should be in the kernel source tree.
>>
> Yeah, I did. The instructions from kernel.org told me
> not to keep the
Eric Dickner wrote:
Since there is no kernel_version_2.4.27 (as far as I know)
available will I have to DOWNgrade my kernel to 2.4.18
in order to compile modules?
ejd
Hello,
there is no need to downgrade. Recompile your kernel and set
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y
Regards,
John Peters
__
--- Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Did you compile the kernel yourself? In that case
> the headers you need
> should be in the kernel source tree.
>
> best regards
> Andreas Janssen
>
Yeah, I did. The instructions from kernel.org told me
not to keep the source there a
Hello
Eric Dickner (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have the 2.4.27 kernel running and needed a
> kernel_headers_ to compile a native kernel
> module (modem driver). The latest headers package
> offered for 2.4.x was 2.4.18 which is what I
> installed.
>
> I was able to compile the object but w
--- Eric Dickner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A foolish question.
Proper version package is in "unstable", something
that I will have to get used to, apparently.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://prom
I have the 2.4.27 kernel running and needed a
kernel_headers_ to compile a native kernel
module (modem driver). The latest headers package
offered for 2.4.x was 2.4.18 which is what I
installed.
I was able to compile the object but when I go to
"insmod" it into the kernel I am told that the versi
Try this: http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=2949 or this
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/799
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 the mental interface of
Tony Middleton told:
> Forgive me if this is a silly question but I have looked on the
> Debian site and via Google and can't find an answer.
>
> I use an old Pentium MMX 200 machine as a mail server using the
> 2.4.24-586tsc Kernel. I've been looking
Forgive me if this is a silly question but I have looked on the Debian
site and via Google and can't find an answer.
I use an old Pentium MMX 200 machine as a mail server using the
2.4.24-586tsc Kernel. I've been looking at moving to 2.6.3 but the
586tsc version isn't available. Is this inten
Bill Goudie wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:13:28PM +0300, Ogulla, Alphonse wrote:
> > I'm using Woody and kernel versions 2.4.18-686, 2.4.21 & 2.6.0. The
> > system boots up and functions well when powering up from either of the
> > 2.4 kernels but ocassional
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:13:28PM +0300, Ogulla, Alphonse wrote:
> I'm using Woody and kernel versions 2.4.18-686, 2.4.21 & 2.6.0. The
> system boots up and functions well when powering up from either of the
> 2.4 kernels but ocassionally fails to boot when changing from 2.6
Hi all.
I'm using Woody and kernel versions 2.4.18-686, 2.4.21 & 2.6.0. The system
boots up and functions well when powering up from either of the 2.4 kernels
but ocassionally fails to boot when changing from 2.6.0 to 2.4.21. In this
case, the system fails to mount the root fi
it understands the kernel version. Later in the script it loops
through the entries in /etc/modules and calls modprobe.
Couldn't this script use uname -r and then load /etc/modules-
where version comes from the uname -r output?
This I think would make everything work better you could ha
Craig Dickson wrote:
> Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> What does pre17 mean as in 2.2.19pre17 ?
>>
> It means "preview 17" -- the 17th pre-release of 2.2.19. The real 2.2.19
> would be just 2.2.19.
>
> You will also see things like "2.4.7-ac3", which refers to a version
> of 2.4.7 modified by Alan Cox (a
dman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:54:17PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
(snip)
| What does pre17 mean as in 2.2.19pre17 ?
It means that is is release #17 of the pre-2.2.19 releases. It is
like a beta/test release of the 2.2.19 kernel. Kernel 2.2.19 is newer
(better) than 2.2.19pre17, howe
Paul Scott wrote:
> What does pre17 mean as in 2.2.19pre17 ?
It means "preview 17" -- the 17th pre-release of 2.2.19. The real
2.2.19 would be just 2.2.19.
You will also see things like "2.4.7-ac3", which refers to a version of
2.4.7 modified by Alan Cox (ac). Alan is one of the core kernel
deve
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:54:17PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
| Some basic questions - either direct answers or what fine manual to read
| would be appreciated. I want to learn as much as I can about Linux but
| I also want to get this blasted LT WinModem installed so I can do my
| learning from
Some basic questions - either direct answers or what fine manual to read
would be appreciated. I want to learn as much as I can about Linux but
I also want to get this blasted LT WinModem installed so I can do my
learning from my GNU Linux system.
What does pre17 mean as in 2.2.19pre17 ?
Wha
David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:18:39AM +0200, Robert Epprecht wrote:
> > > I have a potato system, upgraded to r3, but not yet replaced the kernel.
> > > I'd like to compile a 2.2.19 kernel. Being on a slow modem connectio
Quoting ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:18:39AM +0200, Robert Epprecht wrote:
> > I have a potato system, upgraded to r3, but not yet replaced the kernel.
> > I'd like to compile a 2.2.19 kernel. Being on a slow modem connection
> > I don't want to download the whole source bu
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:18:39AM +0200, Robert Epprecht wrote:
> I have a potato system, upgraded to r3, but not yet replaced the kernel.
> I'd like to compile a 2.2.19 kernel. Being on a slow modem connection
> I don't want to download the whole source but got patch-2.2.18.bz2 and
> patch-2.2.19
I have a potato system, upgraded to r3, but not yet replaced the kernel.
I'd like to compile a 2.2.19 kernel. Being on a slow modem connection
I don't want to download the whole source but got patch-2.2.18.bz2 and
patch-2.2.19.bz2. I'm not clear how to apply this patches without
messing up with th
Thus spake Ron Stordahl on Fri, May 19, 2000 at 05:31:15PM CDT
>
> Here is what puzzles me. I have the impression that I am using the CD just
> to load a basic system, to give me the capability to proceed further with an
> http install, as such I would have thought that either way I would end up
Could you indicate theURL wher you got the iso image from?
Ron Stordahl wrote:
> I am experimenting with installs of frozen potato and this is a puzzle (to
> me):
>
> Using a CD ISO image I downloaded of potato about a month ago I do a CD Boot
> to install the base system, then I select http for
I am experimenting with installs of frozen potato and this is a puzzle (to
me):
Using a CD ISO image I downloaded of potato about a month ago I do a CD Boot
to install the base system, then I select http for the access method. Doing
so I end up with Kernel version 2.2.14.
Using a new ISO image I
Does anyone know what the difference between the Slackware 2.0.0 kernel,
and the Debian kernel 2.0.32 ?
Any info would be appreciated.
Ian Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not too much breaks from 2.0.0 to 2.0.27. If you do so
and then you later experience difficulties with the
/proc filesystem or any of the process utilities like
top or ps, that would be the most likely cause.
Note the Debian kernel packaging system is much different, though --
if you want to a
Right now, I'm running Debian 1.1 - stable (no updates or anything installed).
I'd like to install the kernel sources in order to build a custom kernel. If
I'm running version 2.0.0 of the kernel and I download and try to use the
2.0.27 version (from Debian 1.2) what, if any, problems might I
Here are several related questions. I'm running a 1.1 system upgraded
from 0.93. All base and devel packages are the latest available in the
'unstable' tree; I'm not completely up to date with the 'Incoming'
directory. So I have gcc-2.7.2-8 and libc5/libc5-dev 5.2.18-6. I'm
using kernel 1.2.13,
43 matches
Mail list logo
