Arbol One wrote:
> I'd like to upgrade from JDK-17 to JDK-21.
> Since I am new to, well, Linux in general, I'd like to know from anyone
> who'd done this upgrade if this would be OK under Debian 12 (No
> free-firmwarepackages please).
> Any advice would be much ap
I'd like to upgrade from JDK-17 to JDK-21.
Since I am new to, well, Linux in general, I'd like to know from anyone
who'd done this upgrade if this would be OK under Debian 12 (No
free-firmwarepackages please).
Any advice would be much appreciated.
--
*/ArbolOne ™/*
Usi
On 01/02/14 06:47 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
update-alternatives --display java
[root@localhost frank]# update-alternatives --display java
java - status is manual.
link currently points to
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc19.i386/jre/bin/java
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-
On 02/02/14 01:43, Frank McCormick wrote:
> When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I
> get this warning when it's being configured:
>
>
> update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format
> already installed by
On 01/02/14 12:51 PM, Slavko wrote:
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:23:49 +0400 Reco napísal:
Hi.
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:43:13 -0500
Frank McCormick wrote:
When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves
open-jdk I get this warning when it's being configured:
u
On 01/02/14 12:23 PM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:43:13 -0500
Frank McCormick wrote:
When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I
get this warning when it's being configured:
update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary f
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:23:49 +0400 Reco napísal:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:43:13 -0500
> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> > When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves
> > open-jdk I get this warning when it's being configured:
>
Hi.
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:43:13 -0500
Frank McCormick wrote:
> When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I
> get this warning when it's being configured:
>
>
> update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format
&g
When ever I update my Debian Sid installation and it involves open-jdk I
get this warning when it's being configured:
update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-7, but binary format
already installed by openjdk-6
Is this something to be concerned about or is it just inform
On Thursday 10 February 2011 07:00:36 Greg Madden wrote:
> I can select whichever one I want, from the multiple entries:
> 1. /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre
> 2. /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.4/jre
>
> Or run without java, for my use.
Thanks, Greg. :-) That is very helpful. I shall install with
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 09:29:17 pm Lisi wrote:
> The release notes for LibreOffice recommend Java jdk instead of Java gcj.
> I have Java gcj installed. Can I just aptitude install jdk? Or
> must/should I aptitude purge Java gcj first, and then aptitude install jdk?
>
>
The release notes for LibreOffice recommend Java jdk instead of Java gcj. I
have Java gcj installed. Can I just aptitude install jdk? Or must/should I
aptitude purge Java gcj first, and then aptitude install jdk?
Thanks,
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 04:38:41 Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2010-03-17, Jianhua Shao wrote:
> > I run debian testing in my box, which means, all update source in
> > source.list are from 'testing'
> > distribution. I want to compile Android manually, which n
On 2010-03-17 05:41, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Ron Johnson :
Go directly to upstream?
Why? dpkg (or any other packaging tool) is just no worth?
I don't like mixed Stable/Testing systems: too much conflict.
And building a JDK from source just takes too long.
--
Obsession
> Ron Johnson :
> Go directly to upstream?
Why? dpkg (or any other packaging tool) is just no worth?
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+261 34 29 155 34 / +261 33 11 207 36
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On 2010-03-17, Jianhua Shao wrote:
> I run debian testing in my box, which means, all update source in
> source.list are from 'testing'
> distribution. I want to compile Android manually, which needs
> sun-java5-jdk, but there is no such
> package in 'testing'
On 2010-03-17 03:57, Jianhua Shao wrote:
I run debian testing in my box, which means, all update source in
source.list are from 'testing'
distribution. I want to compile Android manually, which needs
sun-java5-jdk, but there is no such
package in 'testing' distribution, only
> Jianhua Shao :
> What is the best way to handle such problem?
- get the package source from a "stable" repository
- rebuild it on your target "testing" box
Soem help:
http://www.google.com/search?q=debian+rebuild+package
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administra
I run debian testing in my box, which means, all update source in
source.list are from 'testing'
distribution. I want to compile Android manually, which needs
sun-java5-jdk, but there is no such
package in 'testing' distribution, only sun-java6-jdk is out there.
Maybe, I could
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 06:03:48PM -0300, Pablo Augusto wrote:
> hello,
>
> im new in at linux administration,
> i have to install java (1.5 [jre or jdk] ) and tomcat 5.5.25
>
> Can anyone help me? Any goot step-step guide?
Hm no real idea about tomcat and the requirements but
hello,
im new in at linux administration,
i have to install java (1.5 [jre or jdk] ) and tomcat 5.5.25
Can anyone help me? Any goot step-step guide?
I just try search at google bur not sucess.
Thanks in advanced
jdk 1.2 works in sarge,
When I run it in etch, I get the following message:
Can't load library
"/mnt/sarge/home/zhou/sw/jdk1.2.2/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so", because
/mnt/sarge/home/zhou/sw/jdk1.2.2/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol
__libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file
with all due respect, and bearing in mind that I don't use backports,
this really looks more like a mistake or transition in the backports
packages.
Anooshiravan Merat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:57:27AM +1000, Tony Maher wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> yes i think it is a (minor) bug but being new to debian was unsure
> about correct place to report bug.
I'm not sure about backport bugs, but probably the place to report it
is in the debian bug tracking system. It's
Hello Andrew,
yes i think it is a (minor) bug but being new to debian was unsure
about correct place to report bug.
We have found java1.5 is ok and sufficient for our needs.
cheers
--
> sun-java6-demo: Depends: sun-java6-jre (= 6-00-2~bpo.1) but
> > 6-06-1~bpo40+1 is to be installed
> > sun-java6-jdk: Depends: sun-java6-jre (= 6-00-2~bpo.1) but
> > 6-06-1~bpo40+1 is to be installed
> > sun-java6-jre: Depends: sun-java6-bin (= 6-06-1~bpo40+1) but
1~bpo40+1
> (which is version i386 uses) but the rest of amd64 sun-java5 packages are
> 6-00-2~bpo.1
>
> apt-get -s install -f sun-java6-jre sun-java6-jdk sun-java6-doc
> sun-java6-demo sun-java6-bin
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
>
Hello,
I am trying to install java6 from etch backports on an amd64 machine.
Problem is that sun-java6-jre (machine independent) is version
6-06-1~bpo40+1
(which is version i386 uses) but the rest of amd64 sun-java5 packages are
6-00-2~bpo.1
apt-get -s install -f sun-java6-jre sun-java6-jdk sun
You can also use apt-get instead.
apt-get remove --purge sun-java5-jdk
apt-get install sun-java5-jdk [although the newer one is 6, if you
need the class Console]
You won't have to confirm anything, apt will do it for you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On 03/01/2008, Steven Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im new to Debian but have several years Fedora experience. I have a
> fresh Debian installation (Debian 40r4 net install) to which I am
> trying to add sun-java5-jdk_1.5.0-10-3_i386.deb using dpkg -i.The
> problem starts when I'm asked t
Im new to Debian but have several years Fedora experience. I have a
fresh Debian installation (Debian 40r4 net install) to which I am
trying to add sun-java5-jdk_1.5.0-10-3_i386.deb using dpkg -i.The
problem starts when I'm asked to agree to the license. At the bottom
of the license text is a
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 12:25:31AM +0530, Souvik Chakravarty wrote:
> i am absolutely new to linux..so can any one tell me the procedure to
> install jdk 1.5 in linuxspecially the path
The only 'jdk' I see in aptitude is 'sun-java5-jdk', version 1.5.0-10-3.
Use y
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 12:25:31AM +0530, Souvik Chakravarty wrote:
> i am absolutely new to linux..so can any one tell me the procedure to
> install jdk 1.5 in linuxspecially the path
>
You can add the non-free repository to your /etc/apt/sources.list and
then run:
aptitude update
Souvik Chakravarty([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> i am absolutely new to linux..so can any one tell me the procedure to
> install jdk 1.5 in linuxspecially the path
I don't know what version you are using ;-( so
do, on whatever version you are running.
apti
Souvik Chakravarty wrote:
i am absolutely new to linux..so can any one tell me the procedure to
install jdk 1.5 in linuxspecially the path
I typically download it from java.com, and then extract it to
/usr/local, and then symlink to any needed executables to /usr/local/bin.
I also
i am absolutely new to linux..so can any one tell me the procedure to
install jdk 1.5 in linuxspecially the path
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
>
> I test on stable and testing.
>
> I do :
>
> fakeroot make-jpkg jd
2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
I test on stable and testing.
I do :
fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
I've this :
"""
/home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.b
Hi,
I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
I test on stable and testing.
I do :
fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
I've this :
"""
/home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 419: /etc/mailcap:
Permission denied
/home/stephan
Hi!
* Albretch Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051107 03:10]:
> Well, I noticed the site wasn't online to begin with ;-)
> sh-3.00# ping http://non-us.debian.org
> ping: unknown host http://non-us.debian.org
> do they have such thing as mirrors?
Please read
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386
> - stat (2 No such file or directory)
> W: Couldn't stat source package list http://non-us.debian.org
> unstable/non-US/non-free Packages
> (/var/lib/apt/lists/non-us.debian.org_debian-non-US_dists_unstable_non-US_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
>
> - stat (2 No such f
Well, I noticed the site wasn't online to begin with ;-)
sh-3.00# ping http://non-us.debian.org
ping: unknown host http://non-us.debian.org
do they have such thing as mirrors?
Thansk
Albretch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
hi,
and my /etc/apt/sources.list (without the totally commented out sections)
looks like this:
// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# /etc/apt/sources.list for Knoppix
# If you want to do a "full upgrade", you should first
# upgrade the Packages from Debian/unstable (KD
s)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
E: Invalid record in the preferences file, no Package header
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: symlink errors while installing java (Sun's jdk)
Date:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:20:36PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> while installing java on an external drive using knoppix I got symlink
> errors each time a symlink was tried out:
>
> ./jdk-1_5_0_05-linux-i586.bin > file 2>&1
>
> after spacin
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:20:36PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> while installing java on an external drive using knoppix I got symlink errors
> each time a symlink was tried out:
>
> ./jdk-1_5_0_05-linux-i586.bin > file 2>&1
>
Have you considere
Hi *,
while installing java on an external drive using knoppix I got symlink
errors each time a symlink was tried out:
./jdk-1_5_0_05-linux-i586.bin > file 2>&1
after spacing out of the License Agreement and starting the installation I
got a total of actually 4 symlink errors
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 06:42:02PM -0700, Randall J. Parr wrote:
> I am trying to install the Sun JDK 1.5.0_04 on sarge (moving on to testing)
> and
> it fails as below.
>
> # sh jdk-1_5_0_04-linux-i586.bin ...
> ...
> Creating jdk1.5.0_04/jre/lib/javaws.jar
>
I am trying to install the Sun JDK 1.5.0_04 on sarge (moving on to
testing) and it fails as below.
# sh jdk-1_5_0_04-linux-i586.bin
...
...
Creating jdk1.5.0_04/jre/lib/javaws.jar
Creating jdk1.5.0_04/jre/lib/deploy.jar
dirname: too many arguments
Try `dirname --help' for
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 05:17:38PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Look at what's in xfree86-common ...
Okay. There are no binaries in there, but what is there is still completely
irrelevant to Java.
I think I shall file a bug against jdk1.1 and jikes. (First I'll check the
dependencies.)
--
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 07:30:50PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> Fighting further with my server, I note that removing xfree86-common
> would also remove everything Java-related. Um, why? I have (and
> need) Java on the system so my organization's web developer can use
> JSP. JSP do not require a gr
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 19:30:50 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> Fighting further with my server, I note that removing xfree86-common would
> also remove everything Java-related. Um, why? I have (and need) Java on
> the system so my organization's web developer can use JSP. JSP do not
> require a graphic
Fighting further with my server, I note that removing xfree86-common would
also remove everything Java-related. Um, why? I have (and need) Java on
the system so my organization's web developer can use JSP. JSP do not
require a graphical interface.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:15:23PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> I believe you need to drop the ".class".
Color me stupid. I should have remembered that. (I haven't thought about
Java for a couple years, but even so.)
Thanks.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Dueling Modems
> "Carl" == Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carl> I started to learn Java back when I was running Slink. I didn't
Carl> get past chapter 3 of the book, but everything worked.
Carl> Why not now?
Carl> I install Jikes. I start Sun's tutorial and enter
Carl> HelloWorldApp.java per the
oups indicates that the class file needed
> is by default installed where it can't actually be used. (??) So I
> uninstall Jikes and install Sun's JDK.
Huh? Don't know what Google's smoking here. Note that jikes and the
JDK are NOT equivalent. Jikes only provide
java HelloWorldApp.class
And get
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
HelloWorldApp/class
Whoops. Quick search via Google Groups indicates that the class file needed
is by default installed where it can't actually be used. (??) So I
uninstall Ji
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:32:31PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> opennms wants to start; but, now, it tells me that I need jdk 1.4.0.
>
> Where can I find this deb?
>
> What do you think?
Don't know about the deb but just go to sun's web site and download
I want to run opennms on my woody.
Months ago, I was told that I needed tomcat4. Found it last weekend and
installed it.
Then, opennms is available for mdk and rpm; so, I hunted around and
found alien. Thanks, Colin.
opennms wants to start; but, now, it tells me that I need jdk 1.4.0.
Where
> > This is probably a stupid question, but shouldn't libraries be built
> > with backwards compatibility in mind?
>
> The world isn't perfect, and sometimes mistakes were made and need to
> be
> corrected. When the soname (the bit at the end of the library
> filename)
> is cha
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 02:57:08PM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
> > > I had the same problem, so i linked
> > > libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 ->
> > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
> >
> > While this may happen to work most of the time, it isn't reliable. I
> > recommend not doing this when you can find t
> > as root:
> >
> > cd /usr/lib/
> > ls libstdc++* | grep so
> >
> > For me this brings up:
> >
> > libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so
> > libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so
> > libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
> > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
> > libstdc++.so.3
> > libstdc++.so.3.0.2
> >
> > I had the same pro
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:51:22PM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
> as root:
>
> cd /usr/lib/
> ls libstdc++* | grep so
>
> For me this brings up:
>
> libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so
> libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so
> libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
> libstdc++.so.3
> libstd
This worked great thanks and also a big thanks to you Timothy for your post
:-)
Awesome,
G.
-Original Message-
From: Angus D Madden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 22 March 2002 2:20 p.m.
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Installation of JDK
Lawrence, Gareth, Fri
> The error message I get is
>
> "Error: failed /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so,
> because
> libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file
> or
> directory"
as root:
cd /usr/lib/
ls libstdc++* | grep so
For me this brings up:
libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.1
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:25:28PM +1200, Lawrence, Gareth wrote:
> "Error: failed /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so, because
> libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory"
See http://packages.debian.org/, under "Search the contents of
pac
Lawrence, Gareth, Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:25:28PM +1200:
> Greetings All,
>
> having major troubles installing JDK on Debian - any suggestions would be
> appreciated.
>
> The error message I get is
>
> "Error: failed /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/client
Greetings All,
having major troubles installing JDK on Debian - any suggestions would be
appreciated.
The error message I get is
"Error: failed /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so, because
libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
director
eed a browser who has jdk 1.1.4
> plugged in. So I try with netscape (because quite standard) and
> installed jdk1.1-dev jdk1.1-native jdk1.1-native-dev
> and also ibm-jdk1.1-installer in combination with
> ibm-jdk-l118-linux-x86. Now I want to know who to get it plugged in in
>
Hi,
For my banking program in belgium, i need a browser who has jdk 1.1.4
plugged in. So I try with netscape (because quite standard) and
installed jdk1.1-dev jdk1.1-native jdk1.1-native-dev
and also ibm-jdk1.1-installer in combination with
ibm-jdk-l118-linux-x86. Now I want to know who to get
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:43:23AM -0600, Deva Seetharam wrote:
> Hi,
> i would like to install JDK 1.3 on my machine.
> is there a java debian package available?
>
> i see that javasoft has tarball available.
> what do i need to do/know to convert that tarball into .deb f
Paul Mackinney wrote:
Deva Seetharam muttered:
Hi,
i would like to install JDK 1.3 on my machine.
is there a java debian package available?
i see that javasoft has tarball available.
what do i need to do/know to convert that tarball into .deb format?
thanks,
deva
The 1.4 beta I've
The way I did it was to install the tarball from java.sun.com (into
/usr/local/jdk) and then use java-compiler-dummy and
java-virtual-machine-dummy. These are packages the satisfy dependencies
for jvm/javac and also act as wrapper scripts for whatever version of
java you have installed. You also
Deva Seetharam muttered:
> Hi,
> i would like to install JDK 1.3 on my machine.
> is there a java debian package available?
>
> i see that javasoft has tarball available.
> what do i need to do/know to convert that tarball into .deb format?
>
> thanks,
> deva
>
T
Hi,
i would like to install JDK 1.3 on my machine.
is there a java debian package available?
i see that javasoft has tarball available.
what do i need to do/know to convert that tarball into .deb format?
thanks,
deva
Get free
I was getting the 1.3 JDK with the following line in my
/etc/apt/sources.list:
deb ftp://ftp.informatik.hu-berlin.de/pub/Java/Linux/debian woody non-free
but it seems that that directory has disappeared. Any idea what
happened to it? There's a version for potato, but the woody one is
[Sorry if this is a duplicate - I'm resending it, my original reply
seems to have been eaten by net ghosts.]
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:48, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> Question: dselect wants to install something to give me Java VM to go
> with jikes (e.g., kaffe, jdk1.1). Should I just override th
Aaron Maxwell muttered:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:48, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> > Question: dselect wants to install something to give me Java VM to go
> > with jikes (e.g., kaffe, jdk1.1). Should I just override this and
> > install jikes by itself? Is there a graceful way to tell dselect that
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:48, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> Question: dselect wants to install something to give me Java VM to go
> with jikes (e.g., kaffe, jdk1.1). Should I just override this and
> install jikes by itself? Is there a graceful way to tell dselect that
> Java VM is already installed?
Craig: Yes, I knew you meant the 'Q' key. My favorite thing about
dselect is that I haven't had to learn how to use dpkg :-)
dman: Yes, I understand jikes is just a compiler, but I'll try it with
your recommendation. I've noticed that javac is kind of s l o w.
Thanks! Paul
--
Paul Mackinney
[EM
Craig Dickson wrote:
> You can try forcing your selections with the X key, but I find this
> often doesn't work.
Uh, that's the Q key. Oops.
Craig
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 09:48:46AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
| dman muttered:
| > On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
| >
| > | I use 'javac' to compile .java to .class, 'java' to run .class files.
| > | I've heard that gcj is only 1.0 compatible. Any know of a jdk1
forcing your selections with the X key, but I find this
often doesn't work. dselect is an annoying program. I only use it
because I dislike the available alternatives even more (deity, aptitude,
etc.).
Alternatively, if you ditch the Sun jdk non-package and install the
Blackdown j2sdk .deb, then
rror sites, I was able to successfully configure
> | my sources.list file and persuade apt to work.
>
> Yeah, the Blackdown people signed an NDA with Sun in order to port the
> Sun jdk to Linux. I think now Sun has decided to actually distribute
> a Linux JDK directly from their website s
igure
| my sources.list file and persuade apt to work.
Yeah, the Blackdown people signed an NDA with Sun in order to port the
Sun jdk to Linux. I think now Sun has decided to actually distribute
a Linux JDK directly from their website so they use the Blackdown
people's work.
| I use 'javac&
Pascal THIVENT muttered:
> Hi,
>
> the blackdown JDK is available as debian package on
> http://www.blackdown.org.
> Just choose download and select your ftp mirror...
>
> You could choose to install the IBM developer kit for Java on
> http://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:59:57PM -0400, Bob Koss wrote:
| >>>>> "rio" == rio Brito writes:
|
| rio> On Aug 12 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
| >> I added the above to sources.list, did a apt-get update, but
| >> when I apt-cache search, all I see i
>>>>> "rio" == rio Brito writes:
rio> On Aug 12 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
>> I added the above to sources.list, did a apt-get update, but
>> when I apt-cache search, all I see is jdk 1.1.x. I don't see
>> 1.3.x anywhere.
>>
On Aug 12 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
> I added the above to sources.list, did a apt-get update, but when I
> apt-cache search, all I see is jdk 1.1.x. I don't see 1.3.x
> anywhere.
>
> What am I doing wrong?
apt-get install j2re1.3
Ho
>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> personally I'm using blackdown jdk version 1.3.1 . It is
>> supplied as a debian package. I added this to my sources.list :
>> deb ftp://ftp.oleane.net/pub/j
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 03:02:45PM +0200, Kalle Hasselström wrote:
| On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:21:35PM +0200, Olivier Bourgeois wrote:
| > Le Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:12:25 +0200
| > Kalle Hasselström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ecrit :
| >
| > > What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:21:35PM +0200, Olivier Bourgeois wrote:
> Le Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:12:25 +0200
> Kalle Hasselström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ecrit :
>
> > What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are there any packages at all of sun's
> > jdk, or is it not free enoug
Hi,
the blackdown JDK is available as debian package on
http://www.blackdown.org.
Just choose download and select your ftp mirror...
You could choose to install the IBM developer kit for Java on
http://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/dklx130/dklx130-p.
You just have to create an account (it's
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Olivier Bourgeois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. August 2001 12:22
An: Kalle Hasselström
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: jdk 1.3
>Hi,
>personally I'm using blackdown jdk version 1.3.1 . It is supplied a
Le Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:12:25 +0200
Kalle Hasselström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ecrit :
> What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are there any packages at all of sun's
> jdk, or is it not free enough?
>
Hi,
personally I'm using blackdown jdk version 1.3.1 . It is supplied as a
deb
What packages supply jdk 1.3? Are there any packages at all of sun's
jdk, or is it not free enough?
--
BOFH excuse #38:
secretary plugged hairdryer into UPS
--
Kalle Hasselström, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgptGkVKGaiY9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I could have sworn this was just on the list -- but I couldn't find
it in the archive ... mea culpa for not saving it.
Can the java SDK (1.3.1) be installed in unstable? ... I downloaded
the official sun linux binary ... unpacked it, updated alterntives and
and exported the class paths ... all I g
Hank Marquardt wrote:
> Can the java SDK (1.3.1) be installed in unstable? ...
Yes. I have it working.
> I downloaded
> the official sun linux binary ... unpacked it, updated alterntives and
> and exported the class paths ... all I get are complaints about libs
> missing (libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.
There are JDK debs at
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/java/debian/dists/woody/non-free/binary-i386/
--
___ ___
/ _ | / _ \ Ari Pollak - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.aripollak.com
/ __ |/ ___/
/_/ |_/_/ A man needs a good memory after he has lied.
Guy Geens wrote:
>
> There was site posted on this list for Debian packages for 1.3.1 just
> a couple of days ago. This version works fine for me.
H indeed. Like a charm. Thanks Guy!
Cheers,
-- Christian.
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
