> > message:
> >
> > "Please insert disk labeled: Debian GNU/Linux 12.8.0 _Bookworm_
> > Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 with firmware 20241109-11:05 in drive
↑↑↑
> > /media/cdrom"
> >
> > I do not have such a CD. I installed from
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Joe wrote:
The file /etc/apt/source.list should look something like this, maybe
with other commented lines (my installation was from a netinstall
image, not a DVD):
***
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux t
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:51:50 +0100 (CET)
Roger Price wrote:
Hello Roger,
>I checked /etc/apt/sources.list, and the top entry for the cdrom is
>uncommented, as are the http entries.
In Synaptic, go to Settings/Repositories, and untick (uncheck) the
CD/DVD entries, click Done. You'll probably pr
; "Please insert disk labeled: Debian GNU/Linux 12.8.0 _Bookworm_
> > Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 with firmware 20241109-11:05 in drive
> > /media/cdrom"
> >
> > I do not have such a CD. I installed from a USB stick.
> >
> > I tried to continue and receiv
x 12.8.0 _Bookworm_
> Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 with firmware 20241109-11:05 in drive
> /media/cdrom"
>
> I do not have such a CD. I installed from a USB stick.
>
> I tried to continue and received the message "Failed to fetch cdrom
> Debian GNU/Linux 12.8.0 _Bookworm_
led: Debian GNU/Linux 12.8.0 _Bookworm_ Official
amd64 DVD Binary-1 with firmware 20241109-11:05 in drive /media/cdrom"
Did you install from a DVD copied to the USB stick.
I downloaded debian-12.8.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso from
https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/ and "dd"ed it to a USB st
Bookworm_ Official
> amd64 DVD Binary-1 with firmware 20241109-11:05 in drive /media/cdrom"
>
> I do not have such a CD. I installed from a USB stick.
>
> I tried to continue and received the message "Failed to fetch cdrom Debian
> GNU/Linux 12.8.0 _Bookworm_ Offici
I tried using synaptic to load packages in my new Debian 12.8. After I
specified many packages, I clicked on "Apply" and received the message:
"Please insert disk labeled: Debian GNU/Linux 12.8.0 _Bookworm_ Official
amd64 DVD Binary-1 with firmware 20241109-11:05 in drive /med
nel/MainlineBuilds>
See also <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Debugging>
I assume that you have properly tried the same firmware versions on
Debian and Ubuntu (for Intel wifi range of supported firmware versions
is hardcoded in kernel driver, so it depends on kernel version).
You may ask peopl
.debian.org/index
> >
> > where you can tell which .deb belongs to what suite.
> >
> > > Is that what you're looking for?
> >
> > That's getting hard to discern. AIUI the OP got the latest firmware
> > in the end (202600 bytes), but as that d
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:57:31 -0700
Xiyue Deng wrote:
> To see packages versions available in all your repositories, you can
> use `apt policy':
>
> ,
> | $ apt policy firmware-realtek
> | firmware-realtek:
> | Installed: 20230210-5
> | Candidate: 2
t; Is that what you're looking for?
>
> That's getting hard to discern. AIUI the OP got the latest firmware
> in the end (202600 bytes), but as that doesn't fix the problem,
Correct.
I got the firmware from the Ubuntu Live USB stick - where wireless
works on the laptop.
Reboot
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 1:45 PM Charles Curley wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:27:23 -0400
> Lee wrote:
>
> > # backports so I can get the latest Realtek wifi drivers
> > deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main non-free-firmware
> > deb-src
r me :(
>
> > If backports is not in your apt sources, then add the following lines:
>
> Backports _is_ in my /etc/apt/sources.list. Unless there's a typo,
> but I'm not seeing it..
>
> root@laptop:/home/lee# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> #deb cdrom:[Debian GN
ke you to the Packages files, whereas you want
pool for the .deb files themselves. Or just go to:
https://packages.debian.org/index
where you can tell which .deb belongs to what suite.
> Is that what you're looking for?
That's getting hard to discern. AIUI the OP got the late
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:27:23 -0400
> Lee wrote:
>
> > # backports so I can get the latest Realtek wifi drivers
> > deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main
> > non-free-firmware deb-src https://deb.debian.org/debian
> >
Charles Curley writes:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:27:23 -0400
> Lee wrote:
>
>> # backports so I can get the latest Realtek wifi drivers
>> deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main non-free-firmware
>> deb-src https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:27:23 -0400
Lee wrote:
> # backports so I can get the latest Realtek wifi drivers
> deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main non-free-firmware
> deb-src https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main
> non-free-firmware
The only thing
ut I'm not seeing it..
root@laptop:/home/lee# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 12.7.0 _Bookworm_ - Official amd64
NETINST with firmware 20240831-10:38]/ bookworm contrib main
non-free-firmware
deb https://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main non-free-firmware
deb-src https://d
On 15/10/2024 00:55, Lee wrote:
$ apt search linux-image | grep installed
To check kernel version use
uname -a
I'm not seeing an updated realtek firmware in backports:
$ apt search realtek
apt policy firmware-realtek
or at least
apt list -a firmware-realtek
Anything e
On 2024-10-14, Lee wrote:
> $ ls -l rt*| grep 8822
Check if your firmware is in /lib/firmware/rtw88/ and not in
/lib/firmware/
This is what I have
# ls -l /lib/firmware/rtw88/
total 740
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20290 5 sept. 23:30 rtw8703b_fw.bin
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 23074 5 sept. 23
backports.debian.org
deb https://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm-backports main contrib
non-free non-free-firmware
deb-src https://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm-backports main contrib
non-free non-free-firmware
# apt install -t bookworm-backports firmware-realtek
# export PATH=$PATH:/usr/sbin
# update
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:31 PM Joe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:47:14 +0100
> Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:30:22 +0100
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > Hello Joe,
> >
> > >In Synaptic, there is a Repositories menu entry under Settings, where
> > >new entries can be made and existin
On Mon 14 Oct 2024 at 10:29:30 (-0600), Charles Curley wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:39:13 -0400 Lee wrote:
>
> > At least the laptop still boots.
> >
> > I booted from the Ubuntu USB stick and copied
> > rtw8822c_fw.bin.zst
> > rtw8822c_wow_fw.bin.zst
>
> This is why I suggested the backp
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:30:22 +0100
Joe wrote:
Hello Joe,
>In Synaptic, there is a Repositories menu entry under Settings, where
>new entries can be made and existing ones disabled, matching the
>commenting in sources.list.
Yes there is.
Yet I /still/ find it easier to create the repos in a tex
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 1:00 PM Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 9:17 AM Charles Curley wrote:
> > [...]
> > Booting UEFI vs. BIOS should not be relevant here.
>
> Isn't UEFI booting supposed to prevent loading firmware from unsigned sources?
> Which is what I
ning hci_ver=0a hci_rev=000c
> lmp_ver=0a lmp_subver=8822
> [ 14.240224] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8822cu_fw.bin
> [ 14.304422] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8822cu_config.bin
> [ 14.460342] rtw_8822ce :02:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
> [ 14.50
loading rtl_bt/rtl8822cu_config.bin
[ 14.460342] rtw_8822ce :02:00.0: enabling device ( -> 0003)
[ 14.507966] rtw_8822ce :02:00.0: WOW Firmware version 9.9.4,
H2C version 15
[ 14.517252] rtw_8822ce :02:00.0: Firmware version 9.9.15, H2C version 15
[ 14.765861] rtw_8822ce
On 14/10/2024 22:39, Lee wrote:
reboot and it looks like the 9.9.15 firmware loads but wifi is still broken 🙁
Try to install newer kernel from bookworm-backports
apt update
apt install linux-image-amd64/bookworm-backports
I do not use synaptic, so I can not tell you what button acts like
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:39:13 -0400
Lee wrote:
> At least the laptop still boots.
>
> I booted from the Ubuntu USB stick and copied
> rtw8822c_fw.bin.zst
> rtw8822c_wow_fw.bin.zst
This is why I suggested the backport rather than copying in the file.
Please back these changes out, then try th
probe.d but none have
> > fix my wi-fi problem.
> > One post I saw said their laptop worked when they tried Ubuntu Live. Same
> > here!
> >
> > My laptop is set to do a UEFI boot [?? I really don't know the proper
> > terms].
> > Is there a "
laptop worked when they tried Ubuntu Live. Same
> here!
>
> My laptop is set to do a UEFI boot [?? I really don't know the proper terms].
> Is there a "proper" place to get firmware from or should I just get it off the
> Ubuntu USB stick?
> And once I get the fi
On October 14, 2024 8:53:17 AM CDT, Lee wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 9:17 AM Charles Curley wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 07:09:22 -0400
>> Lee wrote:
>>
>> > My laptop is set to do a UEFI boot [?? I really don't know the proper
>> > term
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 09:53:17 -0400
Lee wrote:
> Looks like no.
> I added
> deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main
> non-free-firmware to /etc/apt/sources.list, fired up Synaptic Package
> Manager & hit Reload. The "New in repository" shows sev
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 9:17 AM Charles Curley wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 07:09:22 -0400
> Lee wrote:
>
> > My laptop is set to do a UEFI boot [?? I really don't know the proper
> > terms]. Is there a "proper" place to get firmware from or should I
&
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 07:09:22 -0400
Lee wrote:
> My laptop is set to do a UEFI boot [?? I really don't know the proper
> terms]. Is there a "proper" place to get firmware from or should I
> just get it off the Ubuntu USB stick?
> And once I get the firmware, what do I
UEFI boot [?? I really don't know the proper terms].
Is there a "proper" place to get firmware from or should I just get it off the
Ubuntu USB stick?
And once I get the firmware, what do I have to do to get Debian to use
that instead of
the most probably broken firmware it's using n
kamaraju kusumanchi writes:
> My machine is rebooting randomly. To find out what is going on, I
> looked at dmesg and found these errors. How can I fix them? If you
> need extra information, please let me know which command I need to run
> and I will provide its output.
There may be hints as to
kamaraju kusumanchi composed on 2024-10-13 11:39 (UTC-0400):
> This command gives
> % sudo inxi -GSxxz
> System:
> Kernel: 6.1.0-17-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 12.2.0
>Desktop: KDE Plasma v: 5.27.5 tk: Qt v: 5.15.8 wm: kwin_x11 dm: LightDM
>Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (b
information, please let me know which command I need to run
> > and I will provide its output.
> >
> > rajulocal@hogwarts /var/log % sudo dmesg| grep -i failed
> > [ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19
> > [ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:0
e its output.
>
> rajulocal@hogwarts /var/log % sudo dmesg| grep -i failed
> [ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19
> [ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load
> nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2)
> [ 4570.639457] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed
provide its output.
> rajulocal@hogwarts /var/log % sudo dmesg| grep -i failed
> [ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19
> [ 4570.638966] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: firmware: failed to load
> nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2)
> [ 4570.639457] nouveau :02:00.0: firmwar
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 11:46 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 11:00 PM kamaraju kusumanchi
> wrote:
> >
> > Do I have the correct driver packages installed? Do I have the correct
> > firmware installed? Do I need any non-free packages to fix th
ill provide its output.
>
> rajulocal@hogwarts /var/log % sudo dmesg| grep -i failed
> [ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19
> [ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load
> nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2)
> [ 4570.639457] nouveau :02:00.0: f
[ 4568.756357] nouveau :02:00.0: msvld: init failed, -19
[ 4570.638966] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load
nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2)
[ 4570.639457] nouveau :02:00.0: firmware: failed to load
nouveau/nv98_fuc084 (-2)
[ 4570.639462] nouveau :02:00.0: Direct firmware load for
nouveau
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 6:26 AM Curt wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-22, Reid wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry I irked you so much Curt, but you don't have to be rude.
>
> I'm Curt.
Let's be serious. You be Frank and I'll be Earnest.
On 2024-04-22, Reid wrote:
>
> I'm sorry I irked you so much Curt, but you don't have to be rude.
I'm Curt.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:02:09PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> >> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
> >> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
> > but perhaps without all the decepti
>> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
>> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
>> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
> but perhaps without all the deception crap, unless you really mean
> to impugn the developers' motives.
Yu
ents - where were they - under the /firmware
> directory?
Thank you for the very helpful reply Andrew.
I always use Debian's "Graphical Installer" option.
I'm not sure what Calamares is, but will look into it.
However, I will also re-word what I now believe to be the primary
- Original message -
From: Curt
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
>
>> How can you be taken seriously when you can't even wrap your lines
>> according to our venerable guidelines?
>> Get a popular setting going, buddy.
>>
>> And, though it's true I extolled Proust recently, being succinct
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:31:03AM -0700, Reid wrote:
> Debian's policy change on non-free-firmware has made much of the Debian.org
> website very misleading, and some Debian OS installers have become very
> Free Software UNfriendly and deceptive. The following is my experience,
>
On 2024-04-22, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> I endure this on many other mailing lists unrelated to Debian,
> particularly from groups.io that have a Web interface.
It's a violation of Debian mailing list posting rules, guidelines, and
tips.
It irks me that in certain cases these guidelines are evoke
* On 2024 22 Apr 09:39 -0500, Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
> > You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
> > release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
> > not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy",
On 2024-04-22, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
>
>> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
>>> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
>>> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
>>> not what the Debian.or
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
>> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
>> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
>> not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We
On 2024-04-21, Reid wrote:
> You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
> release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is
> not what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We
> Are / What We Do" pages are current
On Sun Apr 21, 2024 at 9:58 PM BST, Reid wrote:
> If the Installers are not ALL going to give users the choice to opt-in
> or opt-out of non-free components, then those above-mentioned
> promotional pages really need to be updated so as to not be misleading
> users.
I'm sure the Debian WWW team wo
tional pages really need to be
> updated so as to not be misleading users.
I'm saying that _this hasn't changed_ between Bullseye and Bookworm.
Reading the release notes or the installation guide has been very
strongly recommended practice for a _very_ long time; and the
_documented_
On Sun 21 Apr 2024 at 21:59:21 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> > Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
>
> Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
but perhaps without all the deception crap, un
> Do you have any suggestion as to which list would be better to contact?
> Original: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html
Maybe `reportbug debian-installer`?
Stefan
s
>> of the new policy on the download pages.
>
> Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
> extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
> It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
inent warnings
>> of the new policy on the download pages.
>
> Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
> extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
> It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
do you think the debian gods are listening
ges.
Agreed. It should be easy to adjust the installation process with an
extra step whether to include/install non-free-firmware or not.
It's also an opportunity to raise awareness of the problem.
Stefan
You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of
release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is not
what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We Are /
What We Do" pages are currently promoting Debian as.
That's not
omatically installing 29 non-free components with neither
> permission nor warning is not Free Software friendly).
Did you look through the installation guide, reading which before
installing Debian is _highly recommended_?
Out of Bookworm's installation guide:
Section 2.2 "Devices Requirin
Debian's policy change on non-free-firmware has made much of the Debian.org
website very misleading, and some Debian OS installers have become very Free
Software UNfriendly and deceptive. The following is my experience, and the
reasons why I believe Debian must re-word their promotiona
On Mon 22 Jan 2024 at 00:05:08 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 21/01/2024 23:33, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > The repair:
> >
> > wget
> > http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb
> >
> > sudo dpkg
On 21/01/2024 23:33, Geert Stappers wrote:
The repair:
wget
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb
sudo dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html
On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 17:33:57 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote:
> [7.854942] iwlwifi :02:00.0: reporting RF_KILL (radio disabled)
> [7.860452] iwlwifi :02:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio.
> [8.356275] iwlwifi :02:00.0 wlp2s0: renamed from wlan0
Run rfkill and, if i
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Here on a laptop does `ip link` see a WIFI device,
> but `nmcli device` does not.
>
> How to make NetworkManager aware of a WIFI device?
>
Have the firmware for WIFI card ins
On 2023-12-06 17:20:16, Sven Joachim wrote:
Maintainer uploads to (old)stable are staged in proposed-updates, so you
would have to enable bookworm-proposed-updates to install the new
version of firmware-nvidia-gsp.
I missed the non-free-firmware for bookworm-updates and
bookworm-proposed
On 2023-12-06 15:24 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I have tried to upgrade to 12.3, but apparently the dependencies
> of the new nvidia-kernel-dkms version cannot be fulfilled.
> firmware-nvidia-gsp (= 525.147.05) is missing. I tried several
> repositories.
Note that Debian 12.3
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:45:41PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 2023-12-06 15:55:58, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> >
> > Which ones?
> >
>
> ftp.de.debian.org
> ftp2.de.debian.org
> deb.debian.org
>
> > That package is in the non-free-firmwa
On 2023-12-06 15:55:58, Michael Kjörling wrote:
Which ones?
ftp.de.debian.org
ftp2.de.debian.org
deb.debian.org
That package is in the non-free-firmware component; are you bringing
that in?
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/firmware-nvidia-gsp
There is still the old version
On 6 Dec 2023 15:24 +0100, from harald.dun...@aixigo.com (Harald Dunkel):
> I have tried to upgrade to 12.3, but apparently the dependencies
> of the new nvidia-kernel-dkms version cannot be fulfilled.
> firmware-nvidia-gsp (= 525.147.05) is missing. I tried several
> repositories.
Hi folks,
I have tried to upgrade to 12.3, but apparently the dependencies
of the new nvidia-kernel-dkms version cannot be fulfilled.
firmware-nvidia-gsp (= 525.147.05) is missing. I tried several
repositories.
Hopefully I am not too blind to find the bug report (the new
version fixes a CVE, ie
would have thought you'd have firmware-ath9k-htc installed to
> run that device. You could download it from:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=firmware&searchon=names&suite=sid§ion=all
> by means of your old installation if necessary.
>
> Package firmwa
001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>
> >From above outut i figure out my adapter is:
> Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0cf3:9271 Qualcomm Atheros Communications AR9271
> 802.11n
I would have thought yo
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Marco M. wrote:
> Am 01.11.2023 um 13:59:51 Uhr schrieb Martin:
>
> Do you have USB NICs?
> Does your computer has an Ethernet NIC (wired)?
>
> Then use them for installing the packages.
I have one computer with wifi connection to internet.
The problem i
Am 01.11.2023 um 13:59:51 Uhr schrieb Martin:
> The problem is that my wifi receiver is not recognized by installer.
Do you have USB NICs?
Does your computer has an Ethernet NIC (wired)?
Then use them for installing the packages.
> My wifi adapter is TP-LINK TL-WN722N
Relevant is the USB-ID/PC
Hello,
I am currently using Sid version of Debian - in /etc/apt/sources.list i have:
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
non-free-firmware
non-free and non-free-firmware I have because of drivers I need for my machine
(most acute is wifi receiver, but i guess for
ve been
>> routine
>> for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU installed,
>> and
>> whether or not a firmware-brand-graphics .deb exists and is installed
>> for it.
> It would be useful to give an example of these messages, as well as a
> li
unning a GUI) lend themselves better toward a server installation
than to a workstation setup.
> It turns out you need free firmware to use wifi? But I can use wifi, but
> only with some DE. I just can't use it just from the start without DE.
"Non-free" firmware. Often readily dist
#x27;t see it helping.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=initramfs-tools-core;dist=unstable
The way I see it, it's not a bug. Initramfs-tools is not responsible for
deciding what firmware a specific device or machine needs. It is only
reporting that a module to be included lists
d_modname\\>" /proc/modules
> "${CONFDIR}/modules"; then
> echo "W: Possible missing firmware
> /lib/firmware/${firmware} for module
> fi
Mostly gibberish to this non-programmer. Comment out what, 3 lines? 1? 2? The
one
I'm loo
all goes wrong.
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
4322/23580 18%
if grep -q "^$kmod_modname\\>" /proc/modules
"${CONFDIR}/modules"; then
echo "W: Possible missing firmware
/lib/firmware/${firmware} for module
fi
ve been
>> routine
>> for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU installed,
>> and
>> whether or not a firmware-brand-graphics .deb exists and is installed
>> for it.
> It would be useful to give an example of these messages, as well as a
> l
ve been
>> routine
>> for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU installed,
>> and
>> whether or not a firmware-brand-graphics .deb exists and is installed
>> for it.
> It would be useful to give an example of these messages, as well as a
&
Hi Vladimir,
As you've found, Debian doesn't yet distribute firmware for the Cirrus
CS35L41, although there is an open bugreport to add support for it
that you can subscribe to:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031912
The recommended symlinks to create after installin
Hi,
What did you try to accomplish?
install debian bookworm on Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6
What has happened (wrongly) instead?
a) multiple errors in boot log saying 'failed to load
cirrus/cs35l41...wmf', and after fix attempt 'invalid magic' and 'Cannot
Initialize Firmwa
grep MODULES /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
> # MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ]
> MODULES=dep
> #
>
> These many per transaction $SUBJECT initrd construction messages have been
> routine
> for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU instal
| list ]
MODULES=dep
#
These many per transaction $SUBJECT initrd construction messages have been
routine
for a long time in Bullseye and Bookworm regardless of active GPU installed, and
whether or not a firmware-brand-graphics .deb exists and is installed for it. Is
there something that can be
omething like
>Detected ethernet HW, renamed to eth0 (succeed)
>then... :
>Failed to load mt7821 firmware (lots of this)
>hardware init failed
>[ loaded modules]
>[ stack trace ]
>
>rfkill
>wiphy
>ieee802
>
>
>Any ideas or workaround for this?
There's a bug i
he installer (Net or DVD) tries to detect the HW, the
> installer
> >stops blank.
> >
> >The last thing I see in dmesg is something like
> >Detected ethernet HW, renamed to eth0 (succeed)
> >then... :
> >Failed to load mt7821 firmware (lots of this)
>
On Wed 29 Mar 2023 at 09:39:01 (-0600), Ismael Farfán wrote:
> I tried with these 2 installers:
> 7da925a34f6f7ab6e39ad64514139afb debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> 547c0e2f85ec04ffec6d08a1e84c64e6
> debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-netinst.iso
>
> both con
escribió:
>
> > Could it be Debian hasn't got your firmware in any of its installations?
> > That points at very new firmware.
> >
> >
> The issue is that the installation should continue anyway and get packages
> from the DVD, instead the installer hangs ther
El mié, 29 mar 2023 a la(s) 10:33, Jude DaShiell (jdash...@panix.com)
escribió:
> Could it be Debian hasn't got your firmware in any of its installations?
> That points at very new firmware.
>
>
The issue is that the installation should continue anyway and get packages
from the
Could it be Debian hasn't got your firmware in any of its installations?
That points at very new firmware.
-- Jude "There are four boxes to be used in
defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and amo. Please use in that
order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Ismael Far
I tried with these 2 installers:
7da925a34f6f7ab6e39ad64514139afb debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-DVD-1.iso
547c0e2f85ec04ffec6d08a1e84c64e6
debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-netinst.iso
both contain firmware-misc-nonfree_20230117-2_all.deb
which is, I guess, where it's trying to loa
1 - 100 of 998 matches
Mail list logo
