On Tue 15 Oct 2024 at 17:43:30 (-0400), Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 4:20 PM David Wright  wrote:
> > On Tue 15 Oct 2024 at 20:33:09 (+0100), debian-user wrote:
> > > If I click on either of the bookworm-backports links above (either http
> > > or https) my browser takes me to http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ and in
> > > the dists/ directory I see [DIR] bookworm-backports/
> >
> > dists will take you to the Packages files, whereas you want
> > pool for the .deb files themselves. Or just go to:
> >
> >   https://packages.debian.org/index
> >
> > where you can tell which .deb belongs to what suite.
> >
> > > Is that what you're looking for?
> >
> > That's getting hard to discern. AIUI the OP got the latest firmware
> > in the end (202600 bytes), but as that doesn't fix the problem,
> 
> Correct.
> I got the firmware from the Ubuntu Live USB stick - where wireless
> works on the laptop.
> Reboot into Debian and wifi is broken again.
> Then I reverted that set of firmware and got the latest from
> backports, but that does not fix the problems with wifi either.
> 
> I also got the latest linux-image-amd64 from backports -- but again,
> wifi is still mostly broken in Debian.
> "mostly broken" because as long as the laptop in within about 6 feet
> of the AP wifi works.  Take the laptop into a different room & there's
> no indication I can see (but what do I know?) that wifi quit working
> but I can't ping anything else on the subnet -- not even the AP.  And
> getting the list of available SSIDs is hit or miss - mostly miss with
> having to wait minutes before any of "my" SSIDs shows up on the list
> again.
> 
> & for the heck of it, I've booted up a live image of Mint; it's the
> same deal as Ubuntu, wifi just works.
> So getting this realtek card to work correctly all the time is a
> solved problem.  At least in ubuntu/mint, so what magic do I need to
> get it working in Debian???
> 
> > perhaps a whole kernel would be better.
> 
> What's the difference between linux-image-[version #]-amd64 and a whole 
> kernel?

Nothing, as long as there's a version number there. (There's
a version-less package that depends on the latest version,
which is a trick to make APT aware of a kernel upgrade.)

I'm only skimming the thread as, with my old hardware devices,
I tend not to see these problems. Looking back at your post of
14 Oct 2024 13:55:25, I see that you have indeed installed the
backported kernel. I also see that your firmware listed there is
under /lib/firmware/ instead of /lib/firmware/rtw88/, but
presumably you've corrected that if needed.

Whether there's a difference in the drivers between Debian and
ubuntu/mint, IDK. There may be clues in the web posts on the
topic of this card elsewhere.

> > Much of the rest of the
> > thread seems to be about working out how to use Debian's tools
> > for finding and installing packages.
> 
> yes - there is much puzzlement on my part why a seemingly simple "find
> the latest software offered" task is turning out to be a non-trivial
> task.
> Horrors.. I can't just point-n-click my way thru the [synaptics] GUI,
> I need to actually read and understand the documentation.

I don't use synaptic, so I don't know how easy it is to add backports.
Joe seemed to find it trivial.

> ... and what has me thinking there's a bug lurking there somewhere is
> me installing something from backports back in Debian 9.  _without_
> having to read anything other that what to put in the
> /etc/apt/sources.list to say where the backports repository is and
> everything Just Working.

It's always been recommended that you remove backported software when
you do your final upgrade on an older Debian version, just before you
dist-upgrade to a newer version.

Cheers,
David.

Reply via email to