Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-04 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:48:35 +0100 (BST), Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why not try a tabbed window manager? It seems to me that grouping > > Because it doesn't answer the question. :) It would solve his problem though, which was my obj

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-02 Thread Micha Feigin
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:01:32PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Does this exist? > > Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? > I can't really understand what you want, but could it be multi-gnome-terminal (although latest version of gnome terminal also has tabs, but not as good).

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-02 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I highly recommend reading this article: > http://www.igs.net/~tril/fvwm/ . It may or may not help you with your > problem; but it is very entertaining, explains many of the good points > of fvwm and provides many sample configurations. http://www.xwi

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-02 Thread Jon Dowland
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 14:17:46 +1000, Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have no idea how to make a nice session with pretty themed panels! I highly recommend reading this article: http://www.igs.net/~tril/fvwm/ . It may or may not help you with your problem; but it is very entertaining

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-02 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the pointers though - and when I figure out how to scroll > back through screens scrollback buffer, I might even use that more > often. At least, it's useful to run stuff on remote hosts, so solved a > real problem there... Hit Ctrl-A ESC,

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - reading about 10% of the nearly 8000 lines of 'man fvwm' That's your own lookout. I never said it was going to be easy. :) Indeed, many of the screenshots listed at the main site have accompanying .fvwm2rc files for you to see. [..snip..] > So

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 12:33, Thomas Adam wrote: > --- Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone know how to get the icons of here?: > > > > > http://www.fvwm.org/screenshots/desktops/Klaus_Umbach-1280x1024/screenshot.png > > http://www.fvwm.org/screenshots/desktops/ > > I believe

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone know how to get the icons of here?: > > http://www.fvwm.org/screenshots/desktops/Klaus_Umbach-1280x1024/screenshot.png > http://www.fvwm.org/screenshots/desktops/ I believe they're icons distributed with ROX-filer. A persual of the screens

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
Anyone know how to get the icons of here?: http://www.fvwm.org/screenshots/desktops/Klaus_Umbach-1280x1024/screenshot.png http://www.fvwm.org/screenshots/desktops/ This desktop looks awesome, but I can't find the icons at kde-look, and I've spent over half an hour looking. tia zen -- To UNSUB

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm thinking of changing though. I do like the GNOME virt. desktop > pager, panels, and the fact that my Epiphany (gnome's mozilla) windows > are remembered across reboots. That's a function of gnome-session. Fvwm allows for you to do exactly what

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So FVWM is good, by the sound of it? Very: http://www.fvwm.org has lots of information, screenshots, etc. > That's exactly what I would like to do. Are you implying that, if I run > fvwm, I can run multiple virtual desktops (which the gnome pag

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 11:15, Thomas Adam wrote: > --- Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm thinking of changing though. I do like the GNOME virt. desktop > > pager, panels, and the fact that my Epiphany (gnome's mozilla) windows > > are remembered across reboots. > > That's a fun

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 10:20, Thomas Adam wrote: > --- Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 03:02, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > > try the same tests with gvim in its own window. > > > > try the same tests with mc in gnome-terminal. > > > > > > It's an issue with th

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 03:02, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > try the same tests with gvim in its own window. > > > try the same tests with mc in gnome-terminal. > > > > It's an issue with the way gnome-terminal handles a redraw, that's > all. > > This

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 03:02, Thomas Adam wrote: > > try the same tests with gvim in its own window. > > try the same tests with mc in gnome-terminal. > > It's an issue with the way gnome-terminal handles a redraw, that's all. This is true. I have tried many test, and xterm is fine. I just can't

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Will Trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > try the same tests with vim at a console . > try the same tests with vim in rxvt or xterm. rxvt and xterm use more or less the same -xrm's and so the same techniques. > try the same tests with gvim in its own window. > try the same tests with mc

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Will Trillich
On Thu, Jul 01 at 02:27PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 14:20, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > It gets laggy. Inconsistently. When using vim inside > > gnome-terminal. > > For example, in the topmost line (again in vim, with > gnome-terminal at 87x98 chars) it is really noticeab

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd love to swap gnome-terminal for xterm, but I can't live without > tabs... I've started using screen recently. It's way cool. It doesn't have tabs, but the functionality provided by tabs is there: you can have multiple shells running in the same

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not try a tabbed window manager? It seems to me that grouping Because it doesn't answer the question. :) Although had he been using a proper window manager such as Fvwm, he could have used the FvwmTabs module[1] to swallow rxvt's, xterms, etc. --

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:22:41 +0200, Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:46:13PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:01:32PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > >> Does this exist? > >> Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? > >> Am

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-07-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:22, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:46:13PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:01:32PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > >> Does this exist? > >> Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? > >> Am I the only one going crazy j

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-06-30 Thread Magnus Therning
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:46:13PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: >On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:01:32PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> Does this exist? >> Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? >> Am I the only one going crazy just trying to edit files? > >And you don't just use xterm (ins

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-06-30 Thread Marc Wilson
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:01:32PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Does this exist? > Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? > Am I the only one going crazy just trying to edit files? And you don't just use xterm (instead of the disaster that is gnome-terminal) because...? -- Marc

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-06-30 Thread Simon Kitching
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:27, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 14:20, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > It gets laggy. Inconsistently. When using vim inside gnome-terminal. > > For example, in the topmost line (again in vim, with gnome-terminal at > 87x98 chars) it is really noticeable, and

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-06-30 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 14:20, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > It gets laggy. Inconsistently. When using vim inside gnome-terminal. For example, in the topmost line (again in vim, with gnome-terminal at 87x98 chars) it is really noticeable, and the CPU hits 100% just holding the cursor key down. It really

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-06-30 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 13:18, John Summerfield wrote: > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > >Does this exist? > > > >Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? >^^ > I don't understand. > >Am I the only one going crazy just trying to edit files?

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-06-30 Thread Cameron Hutchison
Once upon a time John Summerfield said... > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > >Does this exist? > > > >Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? > > > > > ^^ > I don't understand. > > According to dictionary.com, > 1 entry found for perform

Re: fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-06-30 Thread John Summerfield
Zenaan Harkness wrote: Does this exist? Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? ^^ I don't understand. According to dictionary.com, 1 entry found for performant?. Main Entry: performant Function:

fast, tabbed, gnome/wm- compliant terminal

2004-06-30 Thread Zenaan Harkness
Does this exist? Will gnome-terminal ever return to being performant? Am I the only one going crazy just trying to edit files? tia zenaan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]