Hello Michelle,
Am 18:48 2002-12-04 -0800 hat Michelle Storm geschrieben:
>We are on a network with a cable modem connected to a switch, and then
>the computers are all connected to the switch. The problem is that each
>computer is on a different IP (and I was told different subnets), so
>that wh
Hello Michelle,
Am 18:48 2002-12-04 -0800 hat Michelle Storm geschrieben:
>We are on a network with a cable modem connected to a switch, and then
>the computers are all connected to the switch. The problem is that each
>computer is on a different IP (and I was told different subnets), so
>that wh
also sprach Michelle Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.05.0348 +0100]:
> I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a
> friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable.
If you have a switch, you're likely not going to need the cross-over
cable. It's meant to connect two systems
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:45:36AM -0800, Ben Hartshorne wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:46:52PM -0800, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> >
> > --- Michelle Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a
> > > friends WinXP box. I have a cross-ove
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:46:52PM -0800, Shawn Lamson wrote:
>
> --- Michelle Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a
> > friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable. I need to know what I
> > have
> > to change on my computer (if a
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:49:56PM -0800, Michelle Storm wrote:
> > So, let me make sure I have this clear.
> > My Current system: Linux dragon 2.4.19-k7 #1 Tue Nov 19 03:01:13 EST 2002 i686 AMD
>Athalon GNU/Linux
> >
> > On Linux Box:
> > -
> > 1) if I don't already have it installed
> So, let me make sure I have this clear.
> My Current system: Linux dragon 2.4.19-k7 #1 Tue Nov 19 03:01:13 EST 2002 i686 AMD
>Athalon GNU/Linux
>
> On Linux Box:
> -
> 1) if I don't already have it installed. Install the package: iproute
> 2) do from #: ip addr add 192.168.0.20 brd
> Use RFC1918 addresses; they are intended for use in private networks.
> So, if no-one connected to the switch is using 192.168.20.0/24 (it's
> way too huge, but oh well), you can use addresses from that network.
Before we eliminated the computer we used as a gateway. We all had ip's
assigned, we
--- Michelle Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a
> friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable. I need to know what I
> have
> to change on my computer (if anything) so that they can see each
> other.
> Even if I just ftp to an IP
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:48:58PM -0800, Michelle Storm wrote:
> I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a
> friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable. I need to know what I have
> to change on my computer (if anything) so that they can see each other.
> Even if I just
I want to be able to transfer a LOT of data from my linux box to a
friends WinXP box. I have a cross-over cable. I need to know what I have
to change on my computer (if anything) so that they can see each other.
Even if I just ftp to an IP assigned on his box.
What's the easiest way?
We are on a
David Teague wrote:
> > Network edition for DirecPC. Unfortunately it costs $199 US and I
> > have no experience with whether it works or not:
> > http://www.helius.com/DirecPC/
>
> Is this "Network edition for DirecPC" new? You are sure about the
> price?
Hi David,
I sent that link. Click on
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> > Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux?
> > (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see
> > http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need
> &
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux?
> > (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see
> > http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need
> > windows 95
Seth R Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Satelites have more latency than other services -- so, ftp would run very
> nice and quick and all, but something such as quake would be
> painfully slow.
Latency is definately a problem (those satellites are a LONG way from
you), and remember that the s
Satelites have more latency than other services -- so, ftp would run very
nice and quick and all, but something such as quake would be painfully slow.
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 05:30:00AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux?
> (thats the satellite int
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux?
> (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see
> http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need
> windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work with
> linux) I can't get c
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux?
> (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see
> http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need
> windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work with
> linux) I can't get c
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux?
> (thats the satellite inter-net connection. see
> http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need
> windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work with
> linux
Has anyone tried using direct-pc with Linux?
(thats the satellite inter-net connection. see
http://www.pdmnet.com/direcpdm.htm) They say you need
windows 95 (but so do alot of isp's that work with
linux) I can't get cable modem, or asdl where I live,
and this service is in the
20 matches
Mail list logo
