My all time fav for file level backups is BackupPC. De-duplicates files in the
compressed pool.
Glenn
On September 19, 2023 12:18:36 p.m. ADT, gene heskett
wrote:
>On 9/19/23 08:59, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> Compared to the setup required for amanda, that sounds very inviting. Am
On 9/19/23 08:59, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Compared to the setup required for amanda, that sounds very inviting. Amanda
has a very steep learning curve just because it is so versatile I'm still
waiting on stuff, so no more actual progress.
I used Amanda many years ago and was quite pleased
> Compared to the setup required for amanda, that sounds very inviting. Amanda
> has a very steep learning curve just because it is so versatile I'm still
> waiting on stuff, so no more actual progress.
I used Amanda many years ago and was quite pleased with it, but I must
say I&#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 13, 2020 8:52 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Right, that routine is to establish whether you have a tape
> problem or a hardware problem.
OK. I'm almost positive I have a hardware problem. But the p
ghe2001 wrote:
> On Friday, November 13, 2020 7:51 PM, Dan Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > It doesn't ring a bell, but did you do the diagnostic steps of:
> >
> > - get a dump of what's on the problem tape now, confirm which
> > part is good
> >
> > - write a different file to a new tape
> > -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 13, 2020 7:51 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> It doesn't ring a bell, but did you do the diagnostic steps of:
>
> - get a dump of what's on the problem tape now, confirm which
> part is good
>
>
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:08:24 +
ghe2001 wrote:
> The problem is that my Quantum LTO-5 drive (4 or 5 years old) is
> writing for a while, then failing. It reads, does 'mt' things, and
> amcheck just fine.
Have you cleaned the drive lately? (Or is that still necessary? It's
been a while since
ghe2001 wrote:
> I know this is way OT, but the amanda-users list isn't working, not for me
> anyway, and this list is full of knowledgeable people.
>
> The problem is that my Quantum LTO-5 drive (4 or 5 years old) is writing for
> a while, then failing. It reads, d
had to run one of the two, I'd prefer xinetd. However, I
> > suggest you use SSH for all your machines. It's tedious to set up,
> > but once set up it is stable and more secure. Then you might
> > (depending on what other services it manages) be able to take
> > xinetd
gt; it. This file is managed by netbase and look what I've found:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946138
>
> > what tells:
> > # systemctl status inetd.service
> > # systemctl status xinetd.service
> > ?
>
> xinetd not found.
> And now
prefer xinetd. However, I suggest
you use SSH for all your machines. It's tedious to set up, but once set
up it is stable and more secure. Then you might (depending on what
other services it manages) be able to take xinetd off entirely.
amanda-common requires inetd, so you can't take it off
gi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946138
what tells:
# systemctl status inetd.service
# systemctl status xinetd.service
?
xinetd not found.
And now the old amanda xinetd config is... gone, thanks!
Thanks,
Andrea.
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 21:50:32 +0100
Andrea Borgia wrote:
> ERROR: mononoke: selfcheck request failed: Connection refused
> ERROR: flyingraspi: selfcheck request failed: Connection refused
> Client check: 3 hosts checked in 13.274 seconds. 2 problems found.
> (brought to you by
Andrea Borgia writes:
[...]
> Restarting inetd:
> * flyingraspi: no errors
> * mononoke and clarisse, both show the following entry in daemon.log:
> inetd[1719886]: amanda/tcp: unknown service
I got the same today's morning.
I found that in /etc/services was only:
--8<---
Hi.
I run backups with Amanda every weekend and today it failed, completely.
What changes have happened, if any, were due to package upgrades, I
haven't touched amanda, ssh or inetd in a long while according to my
diary. Certainly not in the last week!
Amanda Tape Server Host
> the right direction. From the emailed backup report, it looks as if
> > its crashed the instant amanda touches it. But the amanda tool's own
> > logs don't show any errors. But the network is gone, stopping the
> > backup. So are all my ssh -Y logins, but they loo
its crashed
> the instant amanda touches it. But the amanda tool's own logs don't show
> any errors. But the network is gone, stopping the backup. So are all
> my ssh -Y logins, but they look as if the keyboard isn't sending if
> already logged in, but starting anothe
down, count to 10, back up, slow reboot,
culminating in the usual xfce4 login screen.
Probably with the 2 SSD's unmounted, I need to attack /etc/fstab and fix
that. They were mounted and usable when amanda came calling.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defe
On Friday 06 September 2019 13:39:43 Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:30:30 +0100
>
> Tixy wrote:
> > Is the problem being talked about here different to amanda usr-merge
> > bug 939411 [1] which I saw that mentioned in another thread [2] ?
> >
> >
9 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > >> I could very easily see amanda itself breaking from usrmerge,
> > > >> if
> >
> > it
> >
> > > >> contains programs that try to invoke commands using their full
> > > >> paths (e.g
On Fri 06 Sep 2019 at 11:39:43 (-0600), Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:30:30 +0100
> Tixy wrote:
>
> > Is the problem being talked about here different to amanda usr-merge
> > bug 939411 [1] which I saw that mentioned in another thread [2] ?
> >
>
Gene writes:
> Firewall rule? I haven't run iptables on any of these machines since
> forever but with systemd taking over, I've no clue how to disable it
> if it is running. htop see's nothing that looks like iptables, has it
> been renamed?
Iptables is not a daemon. It is a tool for installin
On Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:30:30 +0100
Tixy wrote:
> Is the problem being talked about here different to amanda usr-merge
> bug 939411 [1] which I saw that mentioned in another thread [2] ?
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939411
> [2] https://lists.debian.
On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 13:12 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 06 September 2019 11:52:15 Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> > Le 06/09/2019 à 16:39, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> > > On Friday 06 September 2019 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >> I could very easil
On Friday 06 September 2019 11:58:15 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:52:15PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Le 06/09/2019 à 16:39, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> > > On Friday 06 September 2019 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > I could very eas
On Friday 06 September 2019 11:52:15 Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 06/09/2019 à 16:39, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> > On Friday 06 September 2019 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >> I could very easily see amanda itself breaking from usrmerge, if it
> >> contains programs
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:52:15PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 06/09/2019 à 16:39, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> > On Friday 06 September 2019 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
> > > I could very easily see amanda itself breaking from usrmerge, if it
> > >
Le 06/09/2019 à 16:39, Gene Heskett a écrit :
On Friday 06 September 2019 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
I could very easily see amanda itself breaking from usrmerge, if it
contains programs that try to invoke commands using their full paths
(e.g. /bin/rm -f ...).
Why would that break ? Old
On Friday 06 September 2019 10:20:14 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:06:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > I don't have a good reason to object to the usr merge, but its
> > causing amanda to crash the systems that have ha
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:06:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> I don't have a good reason to object to the usr merge, but its causing
> amanda to crash the systems that have had this modification.
This is the part where you show us the error messages from t
Greetings all;
I don't have a good reason to object to the usr merge, but its causing
amanda to crash the systems that have had this modification.
I am trying tonight, an exclude scheme that should stop the crashing if
indeed that is what is doing it. But if it works, that means your 3
On Monday 03 September 2018 01:24:35 Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:46:44AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 September 2018 06:27:01 Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Amanda is not good for the situation you describe.
> >
> > No its not ideal
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:46:44AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 02 September 2018 06:27:01 Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Amanda is not good for the situation you describe.
>
> No its not ideal in some cases,, which is why I wrote a wrapper script
> for the make a back
; > I would really be in a position to do so in all cases. For example,
> > Amanda configuration is in /etc/amanda -- what if /etc was what I needed
> > to restore? Similarly, I gather there are files under /var/lib/amanda --
> > what happens if /var is damaged?
> >
&g
would really be in a position to do so in all cases.
> > For example, Amanda configuration is in /etc/amanda -- what if /etc
> > was what I needed to restore? Similarly, I gather there are files
> > under /var/lib/amanda -- what happens if /var is damaged?
> >
> >
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 04:09:22PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> I recently messed up some files and decided to resort to the backup to
> recover them. I was able to do so, but the process left me wondering if
> I would really be in a position to do so in all cases. For example,
Hello
I use Amanda for daily backups on Stretch. I found it not too difficult
to set up once I got my head around its virtual tape concept.
Recently, prompted by not very much, I have started to question whether
having these backups really put me in a position to restore the machine
if I need
Kamil Jońca wrote:
> "Always" I have encrypted amand backup with gpg.
> Recently, after upgrade amanda to version 1:3.5-2 I noticed that amanda
> 'does not work' - it hangs for (near) infinity; no files in holding
> directory etc.
> As googling gives me no u
"Always" I have encrypted amand backup with gpg.
Recently, after upgrade amanda to version 1:3.5-2 I noticed that amanda
'does not work' - it hangs for (near) infinity; no files in holding
directory etc.
As googling gives me no useful results, I assumed that it is rather
som
Hello!
Since the upgrade from Jessie to Stretch, I have noticed occasional
misbehaviour in my amanda setup. I didn't change anything in my hardware
or software configuration that might have caused it. (Famous Last
Words...)
The most recent occurrence was last night, and it was typical of
nstalled Jessie and tried to use Amanda to restore my backups
> > > of my stuff, I'd be hosed right now because my current /etc/amanda
> > > and its subdirectories would be gone. Is this correct? Amanda
> > > would not be able to recover in this situation, right?
>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:39:12PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> I'm going to suggest that amanda is not the best solution for
> you in this situation.
I was actually starting to think the same thing myself as I was writing
my original mail last night, but I do intend to expand my setup
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:49:19PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2017 11:51:27 Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> > I'd assume that if I suffered a disk failure, replaced the disk,
> > re-installed Jessie and tried to use Amanda to restore my backups of
> >
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:51:27AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> A while back I installed Amanda for backups. I have a pretty simple
> setup at the moment which I may expand later. At the moment only one
> machine, running Jessie, is backed up by Amanda.
>
> My main PC is both th
On Friday 24 March 2017 11:51:27 Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Hello
>
> A while back I installed Amanda for backups. I have a pretty simple
> setup at the moment which I may expand later. At the moment only one
> machine, running Jessie, is backed up by Amanda.
>
> My main PC is b
Hello
A while back I installed Amanda for backups. I have a pretty simple
setup at the moment which I may expand later. At the moment only one
machine, running Jessie, is backed up by Amanda.
My main PC is both the Amanda server and the machine Amanda is backing
up. Recently I started to
I have an Amanda installation on a Debian server. Amanda works with
virtual tapes (i.e. directories). During the upgrade from Debian 6
(Squeeze) to Debian 7 (Wheezy) Amanda was upgraded from version 2.6.1p2
to version 3.3.1. Since then it seems to me that the tapechanger doesn't
work an
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 05:04:53PM +, michael wrote:
> I just noticed a "amanda" dir in
>
> /[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /tmp;ls -alt|head
> total 1831672
> drwxrwxrwt 24 rootroot 135168 Feb 27 16:50 ./
> {}
> drwx--S--- 2 backup backup 4096
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:40 -0500, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> michael wrote:
>
> > I just noticed a "amanda" dir in
> >
> > /[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /tmp;ls -alt|head
> > total 1831672
> > drwxrwxrwt 24 rootroot 135168 Feb 27 16
michael wrote:
> I just noticed a "amanda" dir in
>
> /[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /tmp;ls -alt|head
> total 1831672
> drwxrwxrwt 24 rootroot 135168 Feb 27 16:50 ./
> {}
> drwx--S--- 2 backup backup 4096 Feb 27 12:29 amanda/
>
> which I d
I just noticed a "amanda" dir in
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /tmp;ls -alt|head
total 1831672
drwxrwxrwt 24 rootroot 135168 Feb 27 16:50 ./
{}
drwx--S--- 2 backup backup 4096 Feb 27 12:29 amanda/
which I didn't recognise. I see that it's some backup s
> P=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> r(NULL,75,"
> 501 Could not read config file /etc/amanda/amindexd/amanda.conf!
> 220 masatran AMANDA index server (2.5.1p3) ready.
> ")
> ...
This is nmap trying to talk to amindexd (part of the amanda-ser
5.STABLE11
10082/tcp open amandaidx?
10083/tcp open amidxtape?
Port10082-TCP:V=4.20
I=7
D=4/17
Time=46240C90
P=i686-pc-linux-gnu
r(NULL,75,"
501 Could not read config file /etc/amanda/amindexd/amanda.conf!
220 masatran AMANDA index server
On Thursday 15 December 2005 14:49, jpg wrote:
>Been reading docs and working on understanding amanda for about two
> weeks now and finally got it up and running with a tape
> jukebox/library; SORTOF.
>
>I can load/unload/label tapes in the library, and got a valid
> 'c
Been reading docs and working on understanding amanda for about two weeks
now and finally got it up and running with a tape jukebox/library; SORTOF.
I can load/unload/label tapes in the library, and got a valid 'changer.conf',
'disklist', etc.
However cannot get amanda and th
More diagnostics.
when crontab line is "* * * 7 * echo [`whoami`]"
running the job prints "[backup]"
if line == "echo `mt -f /dev/nst0 status`"
output == "mt: /dev/nst0: Permission denied"
command line:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo [`whoami`]
[backup]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo `mt -f /dev/nst0 sta
emy's crontab entry:
> 45 0 * * 2-6 /usr/sbin/amdump DailySet1
Mine (the script's a trivial wrapper for the command
"/usr/sbin/amdump $1"
It works from CL and from cron on last month's (gentoo) system):
11 1 * * 1,3,6 /var/backups/amanda-scripts/amdump-
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:45:48AM -0700, Glenn English wrote:
> Amanda is installed and commands and scripts are working well from the
> command line (I did have to add the sbins to backup's path to run the
> amanda utilities).
>
> But when I run a shell script as a cro
Amanda is installed and commands and scripts are working well from the
command line (I did have to add the sbins to backup's path to run the
amanda utilities).
But when I run a shell script as a cron job as user backup, access to
the tape drive is denied -- /dev/nst0 is root:tape, permis
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 14:27 -0700, Glenn English wrote:
> Does anybody here use amanda?
I'm running Amanda on a woody system, all runs fine.
> On my spanky new Sarge system, apt-get's amanda-server simply doesn't
> work. It gets installed as user:group backup:backup
Does anybody here use amanda?
On my spanky new Sarge system, apt-get's amanda-server simply doesn't
work. It gets installed as user:group backup:backup, and amdump won't
run unless the user is amanda. Among other things.
Compiling from source (from amanda.org) doesn't
Quoting Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hopefully there are some amanda users out there. I sent this to the
> amanda users list, but haven't gotten any replies, so, here is the
> result of an amcheck. What is the possible problem with the system?
> Why is ex
Hopefully there are some amanda users out there. I sent this to the
amanda users list, but haven't gotten any replies, so, here is the
result of an amcheck. What is the possible problem with the system?
Why is expecting a new tape? Is there a way to reset the device and
make it think
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been using taper for backups for some time now, but just read an
interesting article about Amanda. Is anyone using Amanda and is it
better than taper?
Thanks for your opinions,
Curtis
I've used both taper and amanda... Wasn't taper the ncurses GUI th
Curtis Vaughan said on Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:57:37AM -0700:
> I have been using taper for backups for some time now, but just read an
> interesting article about Amanda. Is anyone using Amanda and is it
> better than taper?
Never used taper, but I have been using AMANDA for a while,
I have been using taper for backups for some time now, but just read an
interesting article about Amanda. Is anyone using Amanda and is it
better than taper?
Thanks for your opinions,
Curtis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Hello List :
afbackup is better than amanda
i find a good backup tools for my servers.but i dont know what is tools that have
EASILY CONFIG and EASILY MANAGE???
--
Trust & Unique ...
Axacheng's PGP Public Key http://www.navigation.idv.tw/pgpkey
--
To UN
I've got an IP masquing firewall with an amanda backup server on the
inside and a mail server on the outside. I want to add the mail
server to my backups, but masquing moves the connection to a high
port number, which the amanda client doesn't like:
FAILED [mailserver: [host firewall:
After years of recomending to people that they build amanda from source,
instead of
trying to us the Debian packages, I find myslef trying to do just that.
So, how is this suposed to work? I'm failing like this:
amandad: debug 1 pid 16259 ruid 34 euid 34 start time Sun Feb 3 13:35:48
, except that it can't
> Stan> see itself, as far as Amanda is concerned.
> Stan>
> Stan> Sugestions?
>
> Bill> Did you make sure that the host was listed in the
> Bill> $HOME/.amandahosts file (probably best if you put both the FQDN
> Bill> and the n
Stan> I'm trying to set up a Debian machine (potato with 2.4.9
Stan> kernel) as an Amanada tapehost to replace a HP-UX
Stan> machine.
Stan>
Stan> At the moent it's mostly working, except that it can't
Stan> see itself, as far as Amanda is conce
t the moent it's mostly working, except that it can't
> Stan> see itself, as far as Amanda is concerned.
> Stan>
> Stan> Sugestions?
>
>Did you make sure that the host was listed in the
>$HOME/.amandahosts file (probably best if you put both the FQDN
>
>>> Stan Brown writes:
Stan> I'm trying to set up a Debian machine (potato with 2.4.9
Stan> kernel) as an Amanada tapehost to replace a HP-UX
Stan> machine.
Stan>
Stan> At the moent it's mostly working, except that it can't
Stan> see its
I'm trying to set up a Debian machine (potato with 2.4.9 kernel) as an
Amanada tapehost to replace a HP-UX machine.
At the moent it's mostly working, except that it can't see itself, as far
as Amanda is concerned.
Sugestions?
--
Stan Brown [
OK, so I'm an idiot. The 'port not secure' failure was due to the setuid bit
not being set on amcheck. So never mind. Thanks for listening.
On Thursday 23 August 2001 11:23, Jason Rashaad Jackson wrote:
> I have completely replicated functionality of our old Amanda backup s
x27;t even listed in my /etc/services
file on the client-side, nor is it mentioned in the conf files on the server
side. Jeez.
On Thursday 23 August 2001 11:23, Jason Rashaad Jackson wrote:
> I have completely replicated functionality of our old Amanda backup server
> onto a new machine. Wit
I have completely replicated functionality of our old Amanda backup server
onto a new machine. With the exact same set up and the exact same config
files (changed local information, of course), I get these when amcheck tries
to contact the clients:
ERROR: XX: [addr XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
Stan Brown wrote:
> Mmm, wierd. Have you check the debug files in /tmp/amanda? You did
> build
> --with-debuging, right?
i'm using the amanda from debian..not sure how they built it. but i do have
/tmp/amanda
(didn't know about it before, thanks!) but i
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:59:21PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
>
> Make certain Amanda (the user) is in the group that owns the disk
> devices.
i don't have an amanda user. i do have a 'backup' user which runs the amanda
program according to xinetd:
service aman
hi.
i am messing around with amanda tryin to get it working. and
am unsure why i recieve this error message:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: mail-wa2: [can not access /dev/hda7 (hda7): Permission denied]
ERROR: mail-wa2: [can not access /dev/md0 (md0
Erik> Dear Group, I feel that I have come quite far in setting up
Erik> amanda on my Debian/GNU Linux 2.2 system. I seem to be able to
Erik> connect from client to server, access the tape drive (SCSI
Erik> /dev/nst0) and such.
Erik> However, since I am still testing I have not
Hi Group, I tried to contact the amanda-user mailinglist first, but that
does not seem to be on-line. Hope this is no too off-topic...
I was hoping for some Debian-amanda user who might be able to give me a
suggestion.
- Forwarded message from Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTEC
Have you checked that the rhosts fields are:
1) named '.rhosts'
2) owned byt he user
3) mode 600 (not 644 or 664)
4) That the host you are coming FROM is listing in them
Carl
G'day all,
I am trying to set Amanda on my new PIII potato system.
I discovered it isn't working because the rlogin keeps asking for a
password there is a .rhosts file and the entry is correct. I can rlogin to
my account just not into ~backup. I created a new user called
amanda
tapedev "/dev/nst0"
> >
> > If this doesn't help, e-mail me your amanda.conf file and I'll see if
> > there are any obvious problems. You can also try contacting the
> > amanda mailing list (see http://www.amanda.org).
>
> I think that
amanda.conf file and I'll see if
> there are any obvious problems. You can also try contacting the
> amanda mailing list (see http://www.amanda.org).
I think that both those requirements are present. In any case i'm
sending you both amanda.conf and diklist because i have anothe
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My backup saga continues. I'm now trying to use amanda but i'm not sure
> that i have de definitions of tape correctly.
>
> /proc/scsi/scsi says this:
> Vendor: SONY Model: SDT-5200 Rev: 3.26
> Type: Sequential-Access
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 01:05:50PM -0400, Pete Templin wrote:
> > > ERROR: charlie: [access as backup not allowed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ERROR: alpha: [access as backup not allowed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ERROR: bravo: [access as backup not allowed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > echo
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 03:28:03PM -0400, Pete Templin wrote:
> > A few questions about amanda, for anyone who might be familiar with it:
>
> > ERROR: charlie: [access as backup not allowed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ERROR:
Hi
My backup saga continues. I'm now trying to use amanda but i'm not sure
that i have de definitions of tape correctly.
/proc/scsi/scsi says this:
Vendor: SONY Model: SDT-5200 Rev: 3.26
Type: Sequential-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
And my current a
Howdy all,
I've installed amanda 2.4.0-3 from the Debian 2.1 CDs, and there were no
dependency errors. However, after configuring amanda and running
amcheck, I receive an email report containing these client errors:
-
ERROR: localhost: [can not execute /sbin/dump: No such file or
dire
Max wrote:
>
> I would like to make a floppy that would allow me to boot up my system
> from that floppy and contain all of the Amanda tools that would allow
> me to recover my hard drive file systems in the event something goes
> wrong. Has anyone set up something like this? Any
I would like to make a floppy that would allow me to boot up my system
from that floppy and contain all of the Amanda tools that would allow
me to recover my hard drive file systems in the event something goes
wrong. Has anyone set up something like this? Any pointers would be
greatly
Hi, the amanda lists listed on www.amanda.org seem to be not
available, so I'll ask here.
Basically, all the Amanda docs have to say about this particular tape
drive, as far as the proper settings are concerned are:
define tapetype HP-DAT {
comment "DAT tape drives"
len
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
I am trying to set up amanda on a debian bo system. I got the amanda
packages from bo-unstable, but they depend on a version of netbase >= 3.03
which I can't seem to find. Anyone know where I can get the updated
netbase package?
Thanks
The amanda package on the debian web site in incomplete. Besides
amanda-server and amanda-client, amanda-common is also needed for the
configuration to take place. Can someone put amanda-common on the ftp site
?
Also the packages file in unstable/contrib/binary-i386 is of size 0
bytes. When
I am trying to upgrade to amanda 2.4.0 on my network. One of the amanda
clients is a Debian 1.2 machine. This machine was working relatively
happily as an amanda 2.3 client.
I compiled amanda with --with-user=amanda --with-group=operator ,
which is the asm
I am trying to set up amanda for our network. I have a Debian bo
machine on it. I can't seem to get amanda going. The original
distribution core dumpps while runing configure! It's trying tocheck
for dump =E at the time BTW.
There is a package for
"Stan Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't seem to find a debian package for amanda (backup software from
> University of MD), so I thought I would just build it. Unfortuntely it
> core dumps during configure with the folowing error messag
I can't seem to find a debian package for amanda (backup software from
University of MD), so I thought I would just build it. Unfortuntely it
core dumps during configure with the folowing error message:
checking whether /sbin/dump supports -E for esti
100 matches
Mail list logo
