Nicolas George (12024-07-18):
> I want to display a desktop and applications running on a Debian box on
> the screen and keyboard of a ChromeBook. Over LAN+WLAN mostly, but if it
> can also work more remotely in degraded mode it would be nice.
>
> I see various options to try: VNC with a native An
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 15:33:40 +0300, Anssi Saari wrote:
> I've mostly used VNC and x2go for Windows-to-Linux and Linux-to-Linux.
>
> VNC was and is:
> - Solid and we actually use it at work too.
> - Limited in the number of mouse buttons at some point to five, minor
> but annoying. At the tim
Nicolas George writes:
> Would perchance somebody here have already investigated a similar need
> and be able to tell which solutions are the most promising in terms of
> reliability and user experience.
I've mostly used VNC and x2go for Windows-to-Linux and Linux-to-Linux.
VNC was and is:
- So
Op 18-07-2024 om 23:20 schreef Nicolas George:
Hi.
I want to display a desktop and applications running on a Debian box on
the screen and keyboard of a ChromeBook. Over LAN+WLAN mostly, but if it
can also work more remotely in degraded mode it would be nice.
I see various options to try: VNC wi
Xiyue Deng (12024-07-18):
> I have been using Chrome Remote Desktop[1] for a few years, and it has
> been very reliable. Everything is handled through a web page so you
> need not install anything in the Android subsystem. Recently (about a
> year actually) it added support for pipewire so sound
Nicolas George writes:
> Hi.
>
> I want to display a desktop and applications running on a Debian box on
> the screen and keyboard of a ChromeBook. Over LAN+WLAN mostly, but if it
> can also work more remotely in degraded mode it would be nice.
>
> I see various options to try: VNC with a native
On 4/28/20 8:46 AM, Steve Keller wrote:
What are best practices to create a remote terminal? I see to ways:
Create a local terminal emulator and run ssh to the remote host in
that or call ssh to run the terminal emulator on the remote host,
i.e.
xterm -e ssh -X or ssh -X xterm
Hi,
28 avr. 2020 à 21:04 de russ...@rlharris.org:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Steve Keller wrote:
>
>> What are best practices to create a remote terminal? I see two ways:
>>
> Do not overlook the marvelous package "screen".
>
Or even better: tmux :)
Best regards,
l0f4r0
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Steve Keller wrote:
What are best practices to create a remote terminal? I see two ways:
Do not overlook the marvelous package "screen".
On Tue 28 Apr 2020 at 13:43:16 (-0400), Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2020, Steve Keller wrote:
> > What are best practices to create a remote terminal? I see to ways:
> > Create a local terminal emulator and run ssh to the remote host in
> > that or call ssh to run the terminal emulator on the
On Tue 28 Apr 2020 at 19:09:48 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Steve Keller wrote:
> > > xterm -e ssh -X or ssh -X xterm -ls
>
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I would absolutely prefer the first one, unless you have a specific
> > reason to use the latter
>
> I agree. But why the -X i
On Apr 28, 2020, Steve Keller wrote:
> What are best practices to create a remote terminal? I see to ways:
> Create a local terminal emulator and run ssh to the remote host in
> that or call ssh to run the terminal emulator on the remote host,
> i.e.
>
> xterm -e ssh -X or ssh -X
Hi,
Steve Keller wrote:
> > xterm -e ssh -X or ssh -X xterm -ls
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> I would absolutely prefer the first one, unless you have a specific
> reason to use the latter
I agree. But why the -X in the first one ?
Is there more desired than a shell session ?
Have a n
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Steve Keller wrote:
> xterm -e ssh -X or ssh -X xterm -ls
>
> What are pros and cons? I see one: The latter will produce more
> overhead as it runs the X11 protocol through the ssh tunnel.
I would absolutely prefer the first one, unless y
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 07:35 Dan Ritter wrote:
> Tom Browder wrote:
> > My remote server hosted with Dedispec has serious problems and they have
> > offered me access via KVM.
> >
> > What do I need on my end to use that access to fix my remote host from my
> > home network?
> >
> > All the refer
Tom Browder wrote:
> My remote server hosted with Dedispec has serious problems and they have
> offered me access via KVM.
>
> What do I need on my end to use that access to fix my remote host from my
> home network?
>
> All the references I see are access to VMs running on a local network.
KVM
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 06:52:57AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
>My remote server hosted with Dedispec has serious problems and they have
>offered me access via KVM.
>What do I need on my end to use that access to fix my remote host from my
>home network?
>All the references I see
Hello!
Thanks for all the replies; indeed the first option I found when
searching for alternatives was AnyDesk; however it falls under the same scope as
TeamViewer, of limiting free usage (as in "free beer") for "personal usage"
while charging for "commercial" use.
As much as I do
On 17.04.2019 18:35, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> At work, we have several computers that are located at different
> locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by
> usual
> means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> At work, we have several computers that are located at different
> locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by
> usual
> means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
> Therefore, we hav
Le 17/04/2019 à 15:35, Francisco M Neto a écrit :
Greetings!
At work, we have several computers that are located at different
locations throughout the country. Some of them are highly inaccessible by usual
means, and it requires a certain planning to reach them to have direct access.
Th
On 2017-07-13, Sam Smith wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 06:27 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> On 2017-07-11, Sam Smith wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> But what the heck? KDM with XDMCP was a feature. And it just worked.
>>> Maybe I missed something, but am I seriously reduced to using this
>>> complete "run X as se
On 07/11/2017 06:27 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2017-07-11, Sam Smith wrote:
[...]
But what the heck? KDM with XDMCP was a feature. And it just worked.
Maybe I missed something, but am I seriously reduced to using this
complete "run X as setuid root so I can run startx as a normal user so I
ca
On 2017-07-11, Sam Smith wrote:
[...]
> But what the heck? KDM with XDMCP was a feature. And it just worked.
> Maybe I missed something, but am I seriously reduced to using this
> complete "run X as setuid root so I can run startx as a normal user so I
> can run x11vnc to use my desktop" hack
Sam Smith composed on 2017-07-10 22:12 (UTC-0500):
...
> But what the heck? KDM with XDMCP was a feature. And it just worked.
> Maybe I missed something, but am I seriously reduced to using this
> complete "run X as setuid root so I can run startx as a normal user so I
> can run x11vnc to use my
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 10:47 -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> In the days I used MS Windows, I had a suite of progs that allowed
> me, when run on both boxes, to see the desktop of one box in a window
> on the other, and mouse and keyboard actions in that window would act
> on the remote box.
>
> Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:45:16PM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:02:52 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> > Ron was not completely clear here. Only the 'professional' versions of
> > Windows have the standard RDP server, but all versions
If your concern is about file access or sharing, or some basic controls,
here are some tools apart from vnc and ssh:
1. TeamViewer
2. Webmin (worth giving a try)
3. Creating FTP server on your system.
Happy computing!
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:02:52 +
Joe wrote:
> Ron was not completely clear here. Only the 'professional' versions of
> Windows have the standard RDP server, but all versions since about 2000
> have had 'remote assistance', which is an RDP connection to the
> logged-on local user's desktop, with
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:26:26 +0100
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:47:07AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> > In the days I used MS Windows, I had a suite of progs that allowed
> > me, when run on both boxes, to see the desktop of one box in
you mean something like xrdp?
mj
On 16-2-2016 14:47, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
In the days I used MS Windows, I had a suite of progs that allowed
me, when run on both boxes, to see the desktop of one box in a window
on the other, and mouse and keyboard actions in that window would act
on the
>> In the days I used MS Windows, I had a suite of progs that allowed
>> me, when run on both boxes, to see the desktop of one box in a window
>> on the other, and mouse and keyboard actions in that window would
>> act on the remote box.
>
> You want the whole desktop, or a couple of graphical prog
L'octidi 28 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Renaud OLGIATI a écrit :
> In the days I used MS Windows, I had a suite of progs that allowed me,
> when run on both boxes, to see the desktop of one box in a window on the
> other, and mouse and keyboard actions in that window would act on the
> remote box.
>
> Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:47:07AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> In the days I used MS Windows, I had a suite of progs that allowed
> me, when run on both boxes, to see the desktop of one box in a window
> on the other, and mouse and keyboard actions
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
From man cups-browsed:
3. Broadcast local queues with the CUPS protocol.
yes, but the next line says
Note that 2. and 3. are only to allow communication with legacy CUPS
servers (1.5.x or older) on the remote machine(s)
that seems apply to
On Wed 24 Dec 2014 at 20:40:53 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
>
> >It is impossible for a Wheezy client to discover the queues on a 1.7
> >CUPS server without the help of cups-browsed on the server. Please read
> >the documentation.
>
>My experience proves th
On Thursday 25 December 2014 15:40:18 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > I did reply. I said both.
>
>In case I became blind, I looked for the word "both" in all your posts.
>I found it only once: in your last post !!!
https://lists.debian.org/201412242151
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Lisi Reisz wrote:
I did reply. I said both.
In case I became blind, I looked for the word "both" in all your posts.
I found it only once: in your last post !!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Thursday 25 December 2014 14:32:21 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > No, but you have not explained why you dislike my solution so much that
> > you are not even willing to try it! You may, of course, have a very good
> > reason, but you have not explained it.
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, Lisi Reisz wrote:
No, but you have not explained why you dislike my solution so much that you
are not even willing to try it! You may, of course, have a very good reason,
but you have not explained it. ;-)
hi Lisi,
what you call "solution" was "do the setup to get what yo
On Thursday 25 December 2014 09:58:02 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2014, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Have you tried enabling server and client on all computers involved and
> > using CUPS to print? This is what I do, and I have no problem.
>
>hi Lisi,
>I suppose that's the case for mo
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Have you tried enabling server and client on all computers involved and using
CUPS to print? This is what I do, and I have no problem.
hi Lisi,
I suppose that's the case for most debian users, I think that you could say
the
same thing for almost a
On Wednesday 24 December 2014 19:40:53 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
> >> . . .
> >>
> cups-browsed needs to be correctly set up on the server for the client
> >>>
> >>> to be able to see the advertised queues. > > "listen 192.168.1.12"
> >>
> >> should not be the
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
. . .
cups-browsed needs to be correctly set up on the server for the client
to be able to see the advertised queues. > > "listen 192.168.1.12"
should not be the least bit necessary.
. . .
It is impossible for a Wheezy client to discover the queues on a 1.7
On Sun 21 Dec 2014 at 23:25:38 +, Brian wrote:
> This may or may not be significant for the printing process.
It would be useful to see the server log. If you do post it please do
not truncate or edit the beginning of it before sending.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists
On Sun 21 Dec 2014 at 20:46:55 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
>
> >On Sat 20 Dec 2014 at 22:03:50 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> >> I think that a so mature OS as Debian should provide the same
> >> facility.
> >
> >It does.
>
>the experience proves that
On Sunday 21 December 2014 21:59:10 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 21 December 2014 19:46:55 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > > On Sat 20 Dec 2014 at 22:03:50 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > >> I think that a so mature OS as Debian should provide the same
> > >> facility.
> > >
> > > It does.
> >
>
On Sunday 21 December 2014 19:46:55 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > On Sat 20 Dec 2014 at 22:03:50 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> >> I think that a so mature OS as Debian should provide the same
> >> facility.
> >
> > It does.
>
> the experience proves that it does not: otherwise, why nobody co
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Go into CUPS web interface. Go to Administration -> printers -> click on the
printer that you want -> click on the administration drop down menu and alter
the server settings to give you what you want.
hi Lisi,
what I want is to get, when I print 1 p
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
On Sat 20 Dec 2014 at 22:03:50 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
I think that a so mature OS as Debian should provide the same
facility.
It does.
the experience proves that it does not: otherwise, why nobody could
explain the problem I described and s
On Sat 20 Dec 2014 at 22:03:50 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
>
> >. . .
> >This shows you have the android correctly set up for printing.
>
> not exactly: I said that I didn't have anything to setup: just launching the
> application and wait for 10 seconds
On Saturday 20 December 2014 21:03:50 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
> > . . .
> > This shows you have the android correctly set up for printing.
>
> not exactly: I said that I didn't have anything to setup: just launching
> the application and wait for 10 seconds.
>
On Saturday 20 December 2014 21:03:50 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
> > . . .
> > This shows you have the android correctly set up for printing.
>
> not exactly: I said that I didn't have anything to setup: just launching
> the application and wait for 10 seconds.
>
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Brian wrote:
. . .
This shows you have the android correctly set up for printing.
not exactly: I said that I didn't have anything to setup: just launching the
application and wait for 10 seconds.
I think that a so mature OS as Debian should provide the same
facilit
On Sat 20 Dec 2014 at 16:25:40 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> I have a HP photosmmart printer connected via USB to my Debian desktop.
> On my android tablet,the "printershare" application found it immedialty,
> without providing it any information (just: "look on the wifi network"). and
> the ins
On 20 November 2013 13:57, Darac Marjal wrote:
>>
>> Flik is the ICS (internet chess server, or xboard server), not a client.
>
> Ah, OK. So Flik rather than Lizard is the server. I think I
> misunderstood there. In that case you want to make Lizard the client.
>
> Hmm. I don't know of a program l
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:38:53PM -0200, Beco wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 12:57, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
>
>
> >> [Fox] -> ssh -> [Lizard] -> xboard-protocol -> [Flik] <-
> >> xboard-protocol <- [netizens]
> >
> > One possibility might be to use "screen" or "tmux" to provide a
> > detachable co
On 20 November 2013 12:57, Darac Marjal wrote:
>> The obvious solution is to install a DE. The machine is too old and
>> slow. I don't want to install a DE unless necessary.
>
> This is probably the easiest question to answer. If you do "ssh -X
> lizard", then SSH will set up what is known as "X f
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:33:21PM -0200, Beco wrote:
> Hello fellows,
>
> I find it hard to ask exactly what I need as solution, and so, to
> avoid XY problem I'll openly discuss the main objective here.
>
> So, I have this hobby, chess, and I've being developing since 94 a
> chess engine (Xadre
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:23:09PM +0100, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > But at some point the daemon is going to need to write a file to disk.
> > > That data will get cached at that time. Or are you saying that mysql
> > > is using or should using O_DIRE
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > But at some point the daemon is going to need to write a file to disk.
> > That data will get cached at that time. Or are you saying that mysql
> > is using or should using O_DIRECT and avoid the cache explicitly?
>
> No - although that might help
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:18:18AM +0100, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > Jumping back in (late) in this thread...
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > > # free -m
> > > > total used free sharedbuffers
> > > > cached
> > > > Mem: 7986 791
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> Jumping back in (late) in this thread...
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > # free -m
> > > total used free sharedbuffers cached
> > > Mem: 7986 7913 73 0224 6133
> > > -/+ buffers/cache: 1554
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:24:47 +0100
"Karl E. Jorgensen" wrote:
>
> >
> > > # free -m
> > > total used free sharedbuffers cached
> > > Mem: 7986 7913 73 0224 6133
> > > -/+ buffers/cache: 1554 6431
> >
Jumping back in (late) in this thread...
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 19:51 +0100, Bob Proulx wrote:
> J. Bakshi wrote:
> > Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > > J. Bakshi wrote:
> > > > I have been provided a muscular linux server to use as a Mysql server
> > > > in our organization. The server is located jus
J. Bakshi wrote:
> Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > J. Bakshi wrote:
> > > I have been provided a muscular linux server to use as a Mysql server
> > > in our organization. The server is located just beside the web server
> > > and within the same network. This dedicated server has 8GB RAM, i5
> > > pr
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:36:30 +0530
"J. Bakshi" wrote:
> `
>
> Is it possible to suggest something to tweak the server / mysql to get
> a fast remote mysql box ?
>
Almost certainly, but it's more likely that people who use mysql very
intensively will be better able to hel
On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:36:38 +0100
"Karl E. Jorgensen" wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 08:13 +0100, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been provided a muscular linux server to use as a Mysql server
> > in our organization. The server is located just beside the web server
> > an
2012/4/5 J. Bakshi :
> I have been provided a muscular linux server to use as a Mysql server
> in our organization. [...]
> The BIG hitch is; when we connect with this box the web sites become
> too slow.
Is this in direct comparison to some other database or server, or is it
more of a black and
Hi
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 08:13 +0100, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been provided a muscular linux server to use as a Mysql server
> in our organization. The server is located just beside the web server
> and within the same network. This dedicated server has 8GB RAM, i5 processors
> and
2012/4/5 J. Bakshi :
> Hello,
>
> I have been provided a muscular linux server to use as a Mysql server
> in our organization. The server is located just beside the web server
> and within the same network. This dedicated server has 8GB RAM, i5 processors
> and running mysql as service. No apache,
On 08/15/2011 03:57 PM, Darac Marjal wrote:
Hi all,
I am experiencing an odd problem displaying remote (i.e. SSH forwarded)
X and wonder if I can pick your collective brains.
The situation is as follows: I am logged into my laptop, rocky. The
laptop is running Wheezy and Xorg detects the chipse
On 2011-08-15, Darac Marjal wrote:
> I am experiencing an odd problem displaying remote (i.e. SSH forwarded)
> X and wonder if I can pick your collective brains.
>
> The situation is as follows: I am logged into my laptop, rocky. The
> laptop is running Wheezy and Xorg detects the chipset as:
>
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:55:44 -0400, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Is there an open source remote assistance server software similar to go
> meeting? If yes, is there one you could recommend?
Wikipedia has a big comparison chart :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_conferencing_software
Thanks for the reply.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 02:58:18 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> is it
>> possible that I keep both the old RSA host key and add the new one?
>> because for the time being, I need them both.
>
> If the key has changed then the old key is no more. You might as well
> remove it, sin
T o n g wrote:
> - The host that I'm trying to connect to is my test machine, is it
> possible that I keep both the old RSA host key and add the new one?
> because for the time being, I need them both.
If the key has changed then the old key is no more. You might as well
remove it, since it is
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:34:29 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>- The host that I'm trying to connect to is my test machine, is it
>>possible that I keep both the old RSA host key and add the new one?
>>because for the time being, I need them both.
>
> I highly doubt it.
Found the solution:
In , T o n g wrote:
>- The host that I'm trying to connect to is my test machine, is it
>possible that I keep both the old RSA host key and add the new one?
>because for the time being, I need them both.
I highly doubt it.
>- I remember that it is possible to answer yes and have ssh automatically
michal krajcirovic schrieb:
> Hello,
> I have a simple network architecture in which the need to remotely log
> on apache2. On servers running the same sites for which requests are
> sent via loadbalancers. And I want to periodically (eg every minute) the
> logs "send" to a central log server.
>
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 11:10:29AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:26:31PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>>> I wonder about the latest comment on this thread. Examine why you don't
>>> want the secret key on the
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:03:52AM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I'm trying to do some kernel development remotely which requires reboots and
> the occasional kernel panic on start which is very annoying since then I need
> to
> wait a few days until I get to the computer or someone knowledged enou
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 11:10:29AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:26:31PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > I wonder about the latest comment on this thread. Examine why you don't
> > want the secret key on the build server and why you woul
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:26:31PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> At work I want to add signing to our automatic build system. In
>> theory it's a simple application of `gpg` at the end of building to
>> get a detached signature would do, but I'm weary of sticking the
>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:26:31PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> At work I want to add signing to our automatic build system. In
> theory it's a simple application of `gpg` at the end of building to
> get a detached signature would do, but I'm weary of sticking the
> secret key on the build serv
On Saturday 06 December 2008, Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: Remote signing of large files':
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> Please don't CC me on replies, unless I request one. It is against
>> debian-* list policy.
>
>Sure, and
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:21:12PM +0200, subscriptions wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:26:31PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > I'd feel a bit more safe if the signing could be done on a separate
> > server. However, the built files are large and I don't want to
> > introduce a bottle ne
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Please don't CC me on replies, unless I request one. It is against debian-*
> list policy.
Sure, and ditto!
> On Friday 2008 December 05 15:49, you wrote:
>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>> On Thursday 04 December 2008, "Magnus Therning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:26:31PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I'd feel a bit more safe if the signing could be done on a separate
> server. However, the built files are large and I don't want to
> introduce a bottle neck by transfering all files back and forth over
> the network.
The above
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:26:31PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> At work I want to add signing to our automatic build system. In
>> theory it's a simple application of `gpg` at the end of building to
>> get a detached signature would do, but I'm weary of sticking the
>> secr
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:26:31PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> At work I want to add signing to our automatic build system. In
> theory it's a simple application of `gpg` at the end of building to
> get a detached signature would do, but I'm weary of sticking the
> secret key on the build serv
Please don't CC me on replies, unless I request one. It is against debian-*
list policy.
On Friday 2008 December 05 15:49, you wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 December 2008, "Magnus Therning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote
> > about 'Remote signing of large files':
> >>
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2008, "Magnus Therning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about 'Remote signing of large files':
>> I'd feel a bit more safe if the
>> signing could be done on a separate server. However, the built files
>> are large and I don't want to introduce
On Thursday 04 December 2008, "Magnus Therning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Remote signing of large files':
>I'd feel a bit more safe if the
>signing could be done on a separate server. However, the built files
>are large and I don't want to introduce a bottle neck by transfering
>all files
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Karpiniec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>> At work I want to add signing to our automatic build system. In
>> theory it's a simple application of `gpg` at the end of building to
>> get a detached signature would do, but I
Hi Magnus,
Magnus Therning wrote:
> At work I want to add signing to our automatic build system. In
> theory it's a simple application of `gpg` at the end of building to
> get a detached signature would do, but I'm weary of sticking the
> secret key on the build servers. I'd feel a bit more safe
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:09:58 +0200
Dexter Filmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still searching for a way to knock ports from any mobile so I don't need
> to have a computer with my favorite knocking client around...
Not exactly what you want, but have you considered ostiary?
http://ingles.h
Am Freitag, 19. September 2008 16:24:32 schrieb Andrei Popescu:
> On Fri,19.Sep.08, 16:17:11, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> > Extra paranoia: forward a different port than 22, lets say (inet) to
> > 22 (lan/vm) and conf the client script to connect to that port. reduces
> > port 22 attacks a great de
On Fri,19.Sep.08, 16:17:11, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> Extra paranoia: forward a different port than 22, lets say (inet) to 22
> (lan/vm) and conf the client script to connect to that port. reduces port 22
> attacks a great deal.
Security by obscurity, but what the heck... (I was already doing
Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2008 20:03:08 schrieb Andrei Popescu:
> On Wed,10.Sep.08, 19:50:04, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> > I use a virtual machine for support and have my router forward ssh there.
> > Something simple with fluxbox or even no X at all, should fit a 32MB VM
> > and come up within a bli
Chris Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There isn't anything "scary technical" other than installing the OpenVPN
> software on the Windows PC, telling it to run as a Service, and then
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where did you get this [Windows]? OP was talking about [Lenny]
1 - 100 of 535 matches
Mail list logo
