In days of yore (Tue, 16 Apr 2024), Jamie thus quoth:
> Look this is a kernel bug and Debian needs to
> fix this! Don't give me any of this crap about upstream
> this is a bug with the Debian Kernel!
Pay attention, because I am now in Support Mode as a former Principal
Technical Account Manager f
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:05:29AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > It has been known to happen that drivers implement workarounds for issues
> > in the hardware itself, so that hardware bugs do not get tripped (or are
> > tripped less often).
>
> 🙂
>
> You make it sound like it's a rare occurren
> It has been known to happen that drivers implement workarounds for issues
> in the hardware itself, so that hardware bugs do not get tripped (or are
> tripped less often).
🙂
You make it sound like it's a rare occurrence, but it's actually
quite common. Most of it is discrete so you'll rarely b
In days of yore (Tue, 16 Apr 2024), Sirius thus quoth:
> In days of yore (Mon, 15 Apr 2024), Jamie thus quoth:
> > So there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card
> > driver.
Doing some reading turned up a Proxmox thread about the issues with these
Int
In days of yore (Mon, 15 Apr 2024), Jamie thus quoth:
> So there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card
> driver.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/05480/ethernet-products.html
notes that MSI interrupts may be problematic on some systems. Worth
diggin
So there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card
driver.
I am running Debian 12 Bookworm.
You will get the message "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" and then
the network card just stops working.
This is a built in NIC on the computer
The computer is a is a HP Prodesk 600 G4 M
David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-19 14:35, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > So I could drop down to a 2-port NIC, using 3 total and not
> > having any spares, but I already have this setup, and it's been
> > running nicely since 2014. I spent about $250 on it, including
> > some parts I had lying around
On 2021-01-19 14:35, Dan Ritter wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
card in it, as well as the 1 gig port on the motherboard. Each
is completely independent, so I have:
- one connection to the p
David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
> > card in it, as well as the 1 gig port on the motherboard. Each
> > is completely independent, so I have:
> >
> > - one connection to the public Internet
>
On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig
David Christensen wrote:
> One feature of link aggregation is increased throughput -- two physical
> connections can work together as one logical connection that is twice as
> fast.
With the caveat that this does not increase the throughput of a single
flow.
> But the killer feature is redun
On 2021-01-19 04:47, mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
Yes, and more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_aggregation
One
mick crane wrote:
> What is the purpose of remote power switch ?
It can turn on and off a set of wall outlets, to which other
computers are attached. In other words, if the firewall is
running, I can power-cycle several other machines.
-dsr-
> What is the purpose of remote power switch ?
Probably to turn on the popcorn machine when you're not at home.
Stefan
On 2021-01-19 15:06, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Mick,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
There is no
Hi Mick,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
There is no strong connection be
On 2021-01-19 14:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 12:47 +, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4
> connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
>
> mick
>
Yes,
but d
mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
card in it, as
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
You can even put one connection (ak
Hi.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
They call them "ports" usually. Such things exist for a long time in a
server world, but are infrequent in consumer one.
> Can you h
On 1/19/21 2:47 PM, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
>
I don't know what the purpose is one network c
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 07:05:49AM -0400, BELAHCENE Abdelkader wrote:
> I have a trouble with my network card (extern card)
> lspci gives:
> 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02)
> m
Le 21/05/2019 à 13:05, BELAHCENE Abdelkader a écrit :
Hi,
I have a trouble with my network card (extern card)
What do you mean by "extern card" ? It looks like an internal PCIe card.
lspci gives:
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111/8168/8411 P
Hi,
I have a trouble with my network card (extern card)
lspci gives:
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02)
mii-tool enp4s0
SIOCGMIIPHY on 'enp4s0' failed: No such device
ifconfig enp4s0
enp4s0:
On 05/29/2017 07:12 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 04:29:35AM -0700, Wei-Shun Lo wrote:
>> Dear Debian,
>
>> Is it possible to include below driver in the kernel for network
>> installation?
>> Many cards are using this driver.
>
>> https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl88
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 04:29:35AM -0700, Wei-Shun Lo wrote:
> Dear Debian,
>
> Is it possible to include below driver in the kernel for network
> installation?
> Many cards are using this driver.
>
> https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl8812AU_8821A
Dear Debian,
Is it possible to include below driver in the kernel for network installation?
Many cards are using this driver.
https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux
Best regards,
Ralic
On 21/04/17 22:27, Siebrand Klein wrote:
Dear Debian-users list,
I have a computer with one Intel I218-LM and two Intel I210 network
adapters.
The I210's are found correctly, but the I218 isn't.
Can anyone give me some advice on how to get the I218 up and running? I
found some (old) information t
Dear Debian-users list,
I have a computer with one Intel I218-LM and two Intel I210 network
adapters.
The I210's are found correctly, but the I218 isn't.
Can anyone give me some advice on how to get the I218 up and running? I
found some (old) information that a newer version of the e1000e kerne
>
> Well, after some time, I have returned to this matter.
>
> I have done one more test that I think is is conclusive. As I said, this
> Debian GNU/Linux firewall PC has two network cards:
>
> * eth0: RealTek RTL8139 (to the ADSL router)
> * eth1: VIA Rhine II (to the local network)
>
> The proble
Hi, Dan.
On 17/01/16 18:33, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> That is, it seems that the communication notebook <---> router works
>> well regardless of the type of negotiation on the notebook side.
>>
>> But when I reconnect the firewall to the router, I lose again the link,
>> regardless of whether on the f
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 05:07:20PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi, Dan.
>
> Thanks for your reply.
...
> That is, it seems that the communication notebook <---> router works
> well regardless of the type of negotiation on the notebook side.
>
> But when I reconnect the firewall to the router
Hi, Dan.
Thanks for your reply.
On 17/01/16 09:56, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> In fact, I tested it with a new TP-Link card with the same Realtek
>> chipset and I have observed the same behavior.
>>
>> Any idea what could be the problem?
> Disable autonegotiation on both sides; set it to full duplex
>
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 04:24:15PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>
> In fact, I tested it with a new TP-Link card with the same Realtek
> chipset and I have observed the same behavior.
>
> Any idea what could be the problem?
Disable autonegotiation on both sides; set it to full duplex
100.
If th
Hi, John.
Thanks for your reply.
On 16/01/16 17:13, John Hasler wrote:
>> Any idea what could be the problem?
> Hardware.
Do you mean to some problem with the motherboard?
Best regards,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Daniel Bareiro writes:
> Any idea what could be the problem?
Hardware.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Hi all!
Yesterday I had a power outage in my workplace and when the power was
restored, I noticed I did not have Internet access.
In reviewing the DSL router, I saw the "Ethernet" LED representing the
connection to the computer behind it, a PC firewall with Debian Jessie,
was turned off.
Apparen
On 10/11/14 12:50 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Am 10.11.2014 01:33, schrieb Gary Dale:
On 09/11/14 03:30 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Could you post the contents of your /etc/default/networking?
Specifically, it should have either no explicit settings (everything
commented out) or the following s
Am 10.11.2014 01:33, schrieb Gary Dale:
> On 09/11/14 03:30 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Could you post the contents of your /etc/default/networking?
>> Specifically, it should have either no explicit settings (everything
>> commented out) or the following settings (which are default):
>>
>> CONF
On 09/11/14 03:30 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Am 09.11.2014 21:13, schrieb Gary Dale:
You're right. Here's my default.xml (I only changed the addresses):
root@TheLibrarian:/home/garydale# cat /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml
default
Howeve
Am 09.11.2014 21:13, schrieb Gary Dale:
> You're right. Here's my default.xml (I only changed the addresses):
>
> root@TheLibrarian:/home/garydale# cat /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml
>
>default
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> However when I removed the link t
On 09/11/14 02:34 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Am 09.11.2014 19:48, schrieb Gary Dale:
This IP seems oddly familiar... Did you recently install libvirt?
Because that's the default IP for libvirt's default internal bridged
network (virbr0). Normally, that shouldn't interfere with the standard
brid
Am 09.11.2014 19:48, schrieb Gary Dale:
>> This IP seems oddly familiar... Did you recently install libvirt?
>> Because that's the default IP for libvirt's default internal bridged
>> network (virbr0). Normally, that shouldn't interfere with the standard
>> bridge (different interface name), but ma
On 09/11/14 05:09 AM, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
Hi
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:57:41PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working
properly for many years.
My /etc/network/interfaces is:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet manual
auto
On 09/11/14 05:27 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Am 08.11.2014 23:57, schrieb Gary Dale:
For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working
properly for many years.
My /etc/network/interfaces is:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet manual
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
Am 08.11.2014 23:57, schrieb Gary Dale:
> For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working
> properly for many years.
>
> My /etc/network/interfaces is:
>
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
> iface eth0 inet manual
> auto br0
> iface br0
Hi
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:57:41PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working
> properly for many years.
>
> My /etc/network/interfaces is:
>
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
> iface eth0 inet manual
> auto
For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working
properly for many years.
My /etc/network/interfaces is:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet manual
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
address 192.168.1.14
netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcast
Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2012 schrieb Yuwen Dai:
> Dear all,
>
> I downloaded the latest Wheezy AMD64 version DVD iso image, trying to
> install it on a HP notebook with a RTL8169 NIC. When the installer
> detects network, it hangs. I could switch to other ttys and open a
> busybox shell, but it
uilt netinst
> images from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ to see if
> the latest is still a problem.
>
> Bob
Hi Bob,
Thank you for the links. It appears that this is a known bug:
#679795
Installation freezes when detecting network card Ralink corp. RT5390
Realte
Yuwen Dai wrote:
> I downloaded the latest Wheezy AMD64 version DVD iso image, trying to
> install it on a HP notebook with a RTL8169 NIC. When the installer
> detects network, it hangs. I could switch to other ttys and open a
> busybox shell, but it's useless, the installation could not resume
Dear all,
I downloaded the latest Wheezy AMD64 version DVD iso image, trying to
install it on a HP notebook with a RTL8169 NIC. When the installer
detects network, it hangs. I could switch to other ttys and open a
busybox shell, but it's useless, the installation could not resume
any more. I t
Got this working.
The problem was local APIC was not enabled in the bios. Once enabled
everything started to fall in place.
thanks all for your inputs and help
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:03:16 +0100, Bhasker C V wrote:
> I have a old PC (AMD athelon 3000+) which has an onboard network card
>
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:03:16 +0100, Bhasker C V wrote:
> I have a old PC (AMD athelon 3000+) which has an onboard network card
> (gige-tg3) kernel 3.5.0 debian squeeze.
Have you tried with Debian stock kernel (2.6.32) or the backported one
(3.2)? :-?
> 03:16.0 Ethernet contro
Olà,
Il 16/08/2012 10:03, Bhasker C V ha scritto:
Hi,
---cut---
Has anyone encountered this before
I have tried hpet=none (just to score off the hpet IRQ and this card IRQ
clash)
I have tried pci=biosirq
Another poss
Hi,
I have a old PC (AMD athelon 3000+) which has an onboard network card
(gige-tg3) kernel 3.5.0 debian squeeze.
03:16.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105/VT6106S
[Rhine-III] (rev 86)
When I do an ifconfig eth1 up (eth0 is another external card) I get
this error
; Windows Environment Administrator
> Desk: 601-487-5241
> Cell: 601-213-6524
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stan Hoeppner [mailto:s...@hardwarefreak.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:44 PM
> To: Bill McLain
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject:
On 5/16/2012 6:44 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 5/16/2012 4:03 PM, Bill Mclain wrote:
>
>> Can anyone assist me with getting drivers and installing a Dynex DX-PCIGB
>> network card? I also have a USB Netgear Wireless n300 adapter as an
>> alternative but I cannot
On 5/16/2012 4:03 PM, Bill Mclain wrote:
> Can anyone assist me with getting drivers and installing a Dynex DX-PCIGB
> network card? I also have a USB Netgear Wireless n300 adapter as an
> alternative but I cannot get it to install either. Thanks and any info I did
> not provide
All,
Can anyone assist me with getting drivers and installing a Dynex DX-PCIGB
network card? I also have a USB Netgear Wireless n300 adapter as an alternative
but I cannot get it to install either. Thanks and any info I did not provide
just let me know and I will get it to you.
Bill
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:27:50 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 21 mar 12, 15:14:14, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> Nah, yours is too verbose for this matter ;-). Indeed, the extra
>> information (-v) can be omited as we just wanted to know what card it
>> was.
>
> In which case -nn is very useful.
T
On Mi, 21 mar 12, 15:14:14, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Nah, yours is too verbose for this matter ;-). Indeed, the extra information
> (-v) can be omited as we just wanted to know what card it was.
In which case -nn is very useful.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and de
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:37:09 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Bijoy Lobo wrote:
>> > I have 2 cards on my system. I had no errors while Expert Install of
>> > Debian netinstall. even lspci shows me 2 ethernet controllers,
>> > However I cannot bring the 2nd interface up.
>>
>> Show us
On 21/03/12 11:49, Bob Proulx wrote:
But why did you stop at five lines? Aren't most network devices going
to print more lines than that? And it misses the "kernel driver in
use" line which is useful information.
I see, in my case, 5 was enough to show everything :)
Can't leave off the '-A
Alberto Fuentes wrote:
> for the shake of completesness
I commend your thoroughness. But...
> lspci -v | grep -A5 -i eth
But why did you stop at five lines? Aren't most network devices going
to print more lines than that? And it misses the "kernel driver in
use" line which is useful informati
On 21/03/12 01:37, Bob Proulx wrote:
Ahem... 'lspci | grep -i eth' is good but 'lspci -v' is paragraph
formatted and so finding that with grep is more trouble. You need a
"paragraph grep" of which there are many different programs and
techniques. Perl is always available these days so perhaps
Hello guys,
Thanks alot. I sloved the problem. It was the older kernel which didnt have
support for my Atheros Card. I did a modprobe and it fixed the problem
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > Bijoy Lobo wrote:
> > > I have 2 cards on my system. I had no
Camaleón wrote:
> Bijoy Lobo wrote:
> > I have 2 cards on my system. I had no errors while Expert Install of
> > Debian netinstall. even lspci shows me 2 ethernet controllers, However I
> > cannot bring the 2nd interface up.
>
> Show us the output of these two commands:
>
> lspci -v | grep -i ethe
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:11:39 +0530, Bijoy Lobo wrote:
> I have 2 cards on my system. I had no errors while Expert Install of
> Debian netinstall. even lspci shows me 2 ethernet controllers, However I
> cannot bring the 2nd interface up.
Show us the output of these two commands:
lspci -v | grep -
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Bijoy Lobo wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> I have 2 cards on my system. I had no errors while Expert Install of
> Debian netinstall. even lspci shows me 2 ethernet controllers, However I
> cannot bring the 2nd interface up.
>
> ifconfig eth1 tells me no such interface
> i
Hello all
I have 2 cards on my system. I had no errors while Expert Install of Debian
netinstall. even lspci shows me 2 ethernet controllers, However I cannot
bring the 2nd interface up.
ifconfig eth1 tells me no such interface
ifconfig -a show me only eth0 and lo
--
Thanks and Regards
Bijoy Lo
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:04:14 +0700, logb wrote:
> Is there anyone know how to test PPS (packet per second) of a nic? I
> tried to googled it, only found how to test the bandwidth using iperf or
> netperf. None found for PPS.
>
> Any hint are welcome.
I found an article on the matter:
Benchmark
On 30/01/11 05:04, logb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there anyone know how to test PPS (packet per second) of a nic?
> I tried to googled it, only found how to test the bandwidth using
> iperf or netperf. None found for PPS.
>
> Any hint are welcome.
>
> TIA.
>
Maybe you could use a "ping -f "
With
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:34, logb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there anyone know how to test PPS (packet per second) of a nic?
> I tried to googled it, only found how to test the bandwidth using
> iperf or netperf. None found for PPS.
>
> Any hint are welcome.
>
> TIA.
>
> --
> -- logb - monkey.org f
Hello,
Is there anyone know how to test PPS (packet per second) of a nic?
I tried to googled it, only found how to test the bandwidth using
iperf or netperf. None found for PPS.
Any hint are welcome.
TIA.
--
-- logb - monkey.org fans - logb.dagdigdug.com -
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 07:51:00AM -0400, chris chalifoux wrote:
> hi i was wondering will 512AN_MMWW2 it is a min pci exprress card and i was
> wondering will it woork ?
> thank you chris
Please ask on the debian-user@lists.debian.org list, as copied.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
4096R: 0xD3524C51 /
days ago without too
many problems (see my post with subject Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 (was:Re:
AM3 socket Asus M4A87TD EVO ...).
But today when I booted my USB stick to install amd64 Debian, the
installer failed to detect my network card. Boot disk was created using
the two step procedure listed here
(see my post with subject Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 (was:Re:
AM3 socket Asus M4A87TD EVO ...).
But today when I booted my USB stick to install amd64 Debian, the
installer failed to detect my network card. Boot disk was created using
the two step procedure listed here (Squeeze section):
http
M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 (was:Re:
AM3 socket Asus M4A87TD EVO ...).
But today when I booted my USB stick to install amd64 Debian, the
installer failed to detect my network card. Boot disk was created using
the two step procedure listed here (Squeeze section):
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEeePC/HowTo
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:19:50 +
Martin Sewell wrote:
> I'd be most grateful for any advice on how to get the following working
> with Debian 2.6.18-6-486.
>
> Belkin 54g Wireless Desktop Network Card
> model no. F5D7000
> version 1133uk
We need the chipset inform
I'd be most grateful for any advice on how to get the following working
with Debian 2.6.18-6-486.
Belkin 54g Wireless Desktop Network Card
model no. F5D7000
version 1133uk
Many thanks
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:06 AM, 中和刘 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
> user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
> hope I can get the mac address of the user according to its IP
> address, is it possible? tha
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: how to get the mac address(network card physical
>address) of a remote computer by its IP address?
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:16:34 +0200
>
>>On Wed, Nov 19, 20
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:06:13 +0800
"中和刘" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
> user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
> hope I can get the mac address of the user according to its IP
> address, is it possible
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 中和刘:
>>
>> when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
>> user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
>> hope I can get the mac address of the user according to its IP
>> addr
中和刘:
>
> when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
> user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
> hope I can get the mac address of the user according to its IP
> address, is it possible? thanks
No, it's not possible. Ethernet frames aren't routed
On 11/19/08 07:16, Aioanei Rares wrote:
[snip]
Well, if the visitor uses DHCP, then his IP will change at some point, so
one cannot
tell the MAC if one knows the IP...however, there are tools like wireshark
that can help you with MAC's.
How, if IP packets don't contain the source MAC?
--
Ron
On 11/19/08 07:27, 中和刘 wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/19/08 07:06, 中和刘 wrote:
when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
hope I can get the mac addr
中和刘 wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/19/08 07:06, 中和刘 wrote:
when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
hope I can get the mac address of the user acc
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/19/08 07:06, 中和刘 wrote:
>>
>> when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
>> user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
>> hope I can get the mac address of the user acco
2008/11/19 Aioanei Rares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:06 PM, 中和刘 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
>> user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
>> hope I can get the mac address of t
On 11/19/08 07:06, 中和刘 wrote:
when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
hope I can get the mac address of the user according to its IP
address, is it possible? thanks
IP packets don't contain the MAC a
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:06 PM, 中和刘 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
> user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
> hope I can get the mac address of the user according to its IP
> address, is it possible? th
when a user visit my website, it's easy to get the ip address of the
user, but i think IP address is not as stable as mac address, so I
hope I can get the mac address of the user according to its IP
address, is it possible? thanks
--
Welcome to visit my home page http://www.starliu.com
[It's only
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Ashour Malaeb wrote:
> > I have a HP Proliant ML150 G5 Server. I installed debian server on it but
> > the debian could not recognize the network card. I was trying to install
> it
> > manually but the problem is that the package in th
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have a HP Proliant ML150 G5 Server. I installed debian server on it but
> the debian could not recognize the network card. I was trying to install
it
> manually but the problem is that the package in the CD is ".src.rpm" so I
> was trying to
On Fri,10.Oct.08, 19:31:07, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> It occurred to me, that the subject of the message below, could have
> osbcured what the message was about, so I am reposting, with (hopefully) a
> more descriptive Subject field content.
How about providing the information as suggeste
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:12:14 +0800 (WST)
From: Bret Busby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Users List
Subject: NX5000 network card problem
Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:20:14 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hello.
I have an
1 - 100 of 820 matches
Mail list logo
