Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
Daniel B. wrote:
Can dhcpd be configured to pass on (to DHCP clients on a local,
private (NATted) network) the DHCP server machine's current domain
name server addresses (given to the machine by PPP (etc.))?
What happens when your server's current name serv
Daniel B. wrote:
Can dhcpd be configured to pass on (to DHCP clients on a local,
private (NATted) network) the DHCP server machine's current domain
name server addresses (given to the machine by PPP (etc.))?
What happens when your server's current name server changes before the
Can dhcpd be configured to pass on (to DHCP clients on a local,
private (NATted) network) the DHCP server machine's current domain
name server addresses (given to the machine by PPP (etc.))?
I see how to hard-code name servers in /etc/dhcpd.conf with the
domain-name-servers statement.
Ho
Chris Davies wrote:
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to find which domain name server owns a given domain
name?
I have a friend that got a domain name as a present and he asked me
to help him point it in to the right address (it's pointing somewhere
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to find which domain name server owns a given domain
> name?
> I have a friend that got a domain name as a present and he asked me
> to help him point it in to the right address (it's pointing somewhere
> else at t
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:55:28 +
Chris Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a way to find which domain name server owns a given domain name? I
> > don't want to lookup the IP address but rather where the name i
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to find which domain name server owns a given domain name? I
> don't want to lookup the IP address but rather where the name is defined.
What do you mean by "owns"? Do you mean the authoritative name
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:51:36 Micha Feigin wrote:
> Is there a way to find which domain name server owns a given domain name? I
> don't want to lookup the IP address but rather where the name is defined.
>
> I tried dig but it shows the name server defined in resolv
Micha Feigin wrote:
Is there a way to find which domain name server owns a given domain name? I
don't want to lookup the IP address but rather where the name is defined.
whois(1)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Is there a way to find which domain name server owns a given domain name? I
don't want to lookup the IP address but rather where the name is defined.
I tried dig but it shows the name server defined in resolv.conf and not the
actual owner
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:01:38 -0200
Antonio Felipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Antonio,
> WARNING: rejecting 'localhost' as a name server, because it is not a
> He's working fine, but I want to correct this error.
> Have anyone see this error before? Any
Hi!
My squid (2.5.9-10sarge2) is sending this error:
WARNING: rejecting 'localhost' as a name server, because it is not a numeric IP
address
He's working fine, but I want to correct this error.
Have anyone see this error before? Any suggestions?
Thks!
[]s
Antonio
--
To UNS
*
This communication, including attachments, is
for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary,
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, copying, disclosure
tmxrr: res_search(emailme.net.au.) failed (errno=110, h_errno=2)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Deferred: Name server: emailme.net.au.: host
name lookup failure
closemaps: closing host (NULL)
closemaps: closing dequote (NULL)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
> does `host hypothetical.recipient.address` work ?
>
Yes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host ozemail.com.au
ozemail.com.au has address 203.102.166.18
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does /etc/resolv.conf have ?
does `host hypothetical.recipient.address` work ?
--
Rick Nelson
* Knghtbrd assigns 3 to Chris
* variable wonders who else is named chris besides me
variable - you. =>
* Knghtbrd waits for variable to dramatically say "I feel SO used!"
Knghtbrd: :)
* variable
he original message was received at Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:00:29 +1000
from robert [192.168.0.7]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Transcript of session follows -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Deferred: Name server: emailme.net.au.: h
Robert S wrote:
Sep 8 18:04:36 debian sm-mta[3550]: i8883aUu003545:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (1000/1000), delay=0
0:00:40, xdelay=00:00:40, mailer=esmtp, pri=120440, relay=recipient.com.au.,
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Name server: recipient.co
m.au.: host
L PROTECTED]> (1000/1000), delay=0
0:00:40, xdelay=00:00:40, mailer=esmtp, pri=120440, relay=recipient.com.au.,
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Name server: recipient.co
m.au.: host name lookup failure
My /etc/mail/sendmail.mc:
divert(-1)dnl
divert(0)dnl
define(`_USE_ETC_MAIL_')dnl
include(`/usr
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:20:08PM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:33:23PM -0500, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> [...]
> > BIND 9, unlike previous version, is actually quite stable and secure. I'd
> > recommend transitioning to that rather than to other DNS servers, because
> >
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:33:23PM -0500, Skylar Thompson wrote:
[...]
> BIND 9, unlike previous version, is actually quite stable and secure. I'd
> recommend transitioning to that rather than to other DNS servers, because
> (AFAIK) it is much more full-featured than any other OSS DNS server.
[...]
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:26:58AM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
> [This list is migthy verbose, so please respond both to the list and myself
> directly.]
>
> I'm about to transition the DNS server from one Debian stable machine to
> another. The current configuration is a chroot hack on top of th
[This list is migthy verbose, so please respond both to the list and myself
directly.]
I'm about to transition the DNS server from one Debian stable machine to
another. The current configuration is a chroot hack on top of the normal
bind package.
I'm thinking this transition would be a great time
Keith O'Connell wrote:
Hi,
I want build a firewall into an old PC. I also want to use it to gather mail from various ISP accounts and serve it out to a local group of 5 users. I want the 5 users to be able to mail each other within the local network. I dont *need* this, I just *want* to do this t
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:38:49AM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want build a firewall into an old PC.
Hi Keith,
look for 'firestarter'.
I also want to use it to gather mail from various ISP accounts
look for 'fetchmail' and 'procmail'
and serve it out to a local group of 5 users
Hi,
I want build a firewall into an old PC. I also want to use it to gather mail from
various ISP accounts and serve it out to a local group of 5 users. I want the 5 users
to be able to mail each other within the local network. I dont *need* this, I just
*want* to do this to see how it all work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 26 January 2002 12:52 am, Joe Wise wrote:
> I'm trying to get my box to resolve DNS. I thought that I had correctly
> configured the name server, but I guess not. Any help as to where the DNS
> should be stored?
>
> J
I'm trying to get my box to resolve DNS. I thought that I had correctly
configured the name server, but I guess not. Any help as to where the DNS
should be stored?
Joe
On 3 Aug 2001, Santiago Canez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to install a caching-only nameserver on my system.
>
> apt-get install bind
>
In my humble opinion, Daniel J. Bernstein's djbdns is a much better bet
than BIND, especially in your case.
djbdns is a suite of DNS tools that includes dnscach
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 03:13:28PM -0700 Santiago Canez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to install a caching-only nameserver on my system.
>
> apt-get install bind
>
> Is this all that is needed? Will the default configuration from this
> installation suffice? Any other files that need to be edited?
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 03:13:28PM -0700, Santiago Canez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to install a caching-only nameserver on my system.
>
> apt-get install bind
>
> Is this all that is needed? Will the default configuration from this
> installation suffice? Any other files that need to be edited?
on Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 03:13:28PM -0700, Santiago Canez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to install a caching-only nameserver on my system.
>
> apt-get install bind
>
> Is this all that is needed? Will the default configuration from this
> installation suffice? Any other files that
Hi,
I want to install a caching-only nameserver on my system.
apt-get install bind
Is this all that is needed? Will the default configuration from this
installation suffice? Any other files that need to be edited?
Thanks
SC
On 09-Mar-2001 MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Stefan Srdic (on Thu, 08 Mar 2001 09:32:22PM -0700):
>> I still consider myslef a newbie when it comes to Linux, I've been using
>> Linux for less then one year. Anyway, I found out that my system is
>> running pump to configure my host via DHCP. Wher
also sprach Stefan Srdic (on Thu, 08 Mar 2001 09:32:22PM -0700):
> I still consider myslef a newbie when it comes to Linux, I've been using
> Linux for less then one year. Anyway, I found out that my system is
> running pump to configure my host via DHCP. Where would I find
> information on pump
MaD dUCK wrote:
also sprach Phil Brutsche (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 10:27:54PM -0600):
The problem that I am encountering is that whenever I reboot, my ISP's
DHCP server re-assigns the nameserver IP addresses, even though the
IP's of my ISP's DNS servers are static!!
if you are using dhcpcd as
also sprach Phil Brutsche (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 10:27:54PM -0600):
> > The problem that I am encountering is that whenever I reboot, my ISP's
> > DHCP server re-assigns the nameserver IP addresses, even though the
> > IP's of my ISP's DNS servers are static!!
if you are using dhcpcd as your dhcp c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I've recently learned how-to configure BIND as an DNS caching-only
> server. So far the DNS caching server configuration of BIND has proven
> to be awesome!! That combined with a few TCP/IP
I've recently learned how-to configure BIND as an DNS caching-only server.
So far the DNS caching server configuration of BIND has proven to be awesome!!
That combined with a few TCP/IP tweaks in the /proc filesystem and this
Penguin flys :-D
Throughout my testing I've only encountered one pr
Get above message on one of my machines with eth0 connection.
How to fix??
Thanks in advance,
dave
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 11:39:06AM -0800, Jay Kelly wrote:
> Im running bind and apache on the same box. I use to host my web but have
> moved it over to another hosting co. I have removed the entry in named.conf
> but when I try to open the url I stll am getting it from my apache server
> and not
Hello all,
Im running bind and apache on the same box. I use to host my web but have
moved it over to another hosting co. I have removed the entry in named.conf
but when I try to open the url I stll am getting it from my apache server
and not the new host co. I have also changed the name servers ov
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:00:56PM -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
hi,
> Hehe, I feel like I just stepped into the star ship ent:) What is a CORBA
> and what is an orb?
:D
ehm yeah how to say it shortly and clearly..
CORBA is what is called a middle ware, a service layer that lays between
differen
Hello Bruno,
> each CORBA object can conenct through the orb to other objects, it has
Hehe, I feel like I just stepped into the star ship ent:) What is a CORBA
and what is an orb?
> several ways to get the reference on that other object the simplest
> beeing asking a nameserver for it (the
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 06:07:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe, i believe it has something to do with the corba link to gnome programs.
> I might be wrong, please correct me :-)
nope you are correct,
each CORBA object can conenct through the orb to other objects, it has
several ways to
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:03:32PM -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
> Hello All,
> Does anyone know what this gnome-name-server is?
> I did an apt-get install of panel or gnome and suddenly
> I am running gnome-name-server?
>
> Could anyone explain what it is?
Maybe, i believe it h
Hello All,
Does anyone know what this gnome-name-server is?
I did an apt-get install of panel or gnome and suddenly
I am running gnome-name-server?
Could anyone explain what it is?
Thanks a lot!
D. Ghost
Unusual System Events
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Oct 28 16:02:02 ghost
gnome-name-server[24518
: Host unknown (Name server: loonys.net: host not found)
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
- --TAA19157.941221685/mail.enterprise.net
The original message was received at Fri, 29 Oct 1999 19:28:03 +0100 (GMT/BST)
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [194.72.195.66]
- The following addresses had per
Shaleh writes:
> the new PPPd will handle this. The initial support is there.
Support is also there in the pppconfig in unstable: it will set up "dynamic
dns" for you (it is also a bit broken at the moment: don't try to set up
both pap and chap accounts).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John H
>
> it means you need to setup your ppp dialer ( /etc/ppp/ppp-on )
> to use dynamic ip instead of static...
>
No silly.
The IP while assigning IPs also gives out DNS via ppp, not dhcp. until
recently ppp did not know how to accept this dns info.
ppp does all the IP work. The problem is gett
They want me to use a dynamically assigned name server.
> I don't know how to configurea Linux to do that. (They want me to
> use a dynamically assigned ip but that's the rule for Linux ppp.)
>
> Would some kind soul help me?
>
> --David
> David Teague, [EMAIL P
Short term:
on a system with working dns do a whois on the ISP. Use the name servers
listed there.
Long term:
the new PPPd will handle this. The initial support is there. Read some docs,
play around.
Hi
I have an ISP that says they provide full service for $4.95/month,
unlimited time. Of course, they have all the usual fine print.
MY PROBLEM: They want me to use a dynamically assigned name server.
I don't know how to configurea Linux to do that. (They want me to
use a dynamically ass
hm, sorry for the annoyance, but this mail has bounced. perhaps eric is
not knowing that his mail-address is not working and can investigate
further with the knowledge of this message.
hafi
Original Message
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: moira.debian.org
any sense to me, either...
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 21 15:34:57 1999
> From: sawitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Matthew Wade Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Help! My computer thinks it is a name server
>
> On Fri, 21 May 1999, Matthew Wade Robert
The IP is: 165.91.194.118
It doesn't make any sense to me, either...
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 21 15:34:57 1999
> From: sawitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Matthew Wade Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Help! My computer thinks it is a name se
On Fri, 21 May 1999, Matthew Wade Roberts wrote:
> For some reason, my Debian box (lehi.tamu.edu) thinks it is the name
> server. For instance:
>
> % nslookup yahoo.com
> Server: lehi
> Address: 0.0.0.0
>
> *** lehi can't find yahoo.com: No response from
For some reason, my Debian box (lehi.tamu.edu) thinks it is the name
server. For instance:
% nslookup yahoo.com
Server: lehi
Address: 0.0.0.0
*** lehi can't find yahoo.com: No response from server
Here is my resolv.conf:
---
domain tamu.edu
nameserver 128.194.
Torsten Landschoff writes:
> Hmm, what about putting the ip-up-script which does this in
> /usr/doc/ppp/examples and put a link to it into the README or manpage?
That would not violate policy, but it also would not help the new user
much.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the publi
On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 12:09:29AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Have ip-up call a setuid program to specifically edit resolv.conf or
> > named.conf, if they exist.
>
> This is the obvious way to do it, but there is a policy question about
> messing with these files.
Hmm, what about putting
Michael Beattie writes:
> Have ip-up call a setuid program to specifically edit resolv.conf or
> named.conf, if they exist.
This is the obvious way to do it, but there is a policy question about
messing with these files.
> Just an Idea. I'd have a go at it.. Anyone object? I'll have a go at the
On 17 Nov 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
> > The canonical way would be to pass them to /etc/ppp/ip-up.
>
> Yes, of course. The questions is what to do with it after that.
Have ip-up call a setuid program to specifically edit resolv.conf or
named.conf, if they exist. it coul
Marc Haber writes:
> The canonical way would be to pass them to /etc/ppp/ip-up.
Yes, of course. The questions is what to do with it after that.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Carey Evans writes:
> It's probably RFC 1877, "PPP IPCP Extensions for Name Server
> Addresses", which was written by someone at Microsoft.
Thanks. I don't know when I'll find time to do anything with the
information, though.
> Once you've got the addr
On 17 Nov 1998 22:45:37 +1300, you wrote:
>Once you've got the addresses, what do you plan to do with them?
The canonical way would be to pass them to /etc/ppp/ip-up.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I see no reason why it couldn't be implemented. I don't know if this part
> of the IPCP negotiation is documented anywhere,
[snip]
It's probably RFC 1877, "PPP IPCP Extensions for Name Server
Addresses", which was written by someone
Marc Haber writes:
> Is this [pppd's inability to receive 'dynamic' dns ip's] an implementation
> restriction? Can it be implemented? Is this part of the IPCP negotiation
> documented?
I see no reason why it couldn't be implemented. I don't know if this part
of the IPCP negotiation is documented
On 16 Nov 1998 10:03:29 -0600, you wrote:
>Martin Bialasinski writes:
>> The pppd simply has no mean to prozess this information.
>
>Yes. It can send them, but can't receive them.
Is this an implementation restriction? Can it be implemented? Is this
part of the IPCP negotiation documented?
Greet
Martin Bialasinski writes:
> No. BTW: this is not about descovering them [dns addresses]. They get
> transmitted during IPCP negotiation (IIRC).
You do.
> The pppd simply has no mean to prozess this information.
Yes. It can send them, but can't receive them.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (
>> "EGS" == Eric G Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
EGS> On my amiga there is an option such that when I ppp connect, the
EGS> addresses of the name servers are automatically discovered so I
EGS> don't have to enter them manually. Is there such an option for
EGS> linux ppp?
No. BTW: this is no
Hi,
On my amiga there is an option such that when I ppp connect, the
addresses of the name servers are automatically discovered so I don't
have to enter them manually. Is there such an option for linux ppp?
This would be useful since I sometimes have to connect to different ISPs
which have diffe
Erik Eriksson wrote:
>
> resolv.conf file, i.e you must write the IP address of the domain name server,
> but what if you don't have any? We reach Internet through a proxy, shall I
> use
> its IP address instead?. Thanks for help.
If you access Internet, you must ha
Hello all,
I have one PC at work with debian installed, where I would like to use ftp (we
have a fast connection). In the manual it is described how to configure the
resolv.conf file, i.e you must write the IP address of the domain name server,
but what if you don't have any? We
I recently installed debian on my home machine.
I was wondering if someone could give me some pointers, location of help or
actual advice, on how to set up a nameserver.
I have only one machine and I connect to the internet via ppp and an ISP.
I want to use my machine to develop some web appli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://home.eznet.net/~seth>
Thanx
and may God Bless you
Seth R
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:21:57 GMT
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name
ew web pages other then the ones at those places... and it's the same
> with ftp... any suggestions?
>
> Fizz
Here is my /etc/resolv.conf
The first name server is my own DNS server for my network.
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 204.254.251.3
nameserver 198.6.1.1
nameserver 192
I finaly got ppp working but now I can't get it to telnet anywhere except
for the places in /etc/hosts file, I did set the DNS in the resolv.conf
and well it still wouln't let me go to anywhere else... it wouln't let me
view web pages other then the ones at those places... and it's the same
with f
77 matches
Mail list logo
