The real problem is that your lilo.conf file makes reference
to an /initrd.img file which may not exist. The warning can
be skipped and means that your kernel was compiled with DEVFS_FS
support and you are not using it.
--
Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key-ID: 0xB29396EB
http://people.flu
Michael Bonert wrote:
I'm having some probs with lilo:
# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.4_cobalamin.1.0_i386.deb# install of a custom kernel
===
{SNIP}
You already have a LILO configuration in /etc/lilo.conf
Install a boot block using the existing /etc/lilo.conf? [Yes
I'm having some probs with lilo:
# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.4_cobalamin.1.0_i386.deb# install of a custom kernel
===
{SNIP}
You already have a LILO configuration in /etc/lilo.conf
Install a boot block using the existing /etc/lilo.conf? [Yes] yes
Testing lilo.co
Roscoe Joao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's a catch, anyway: knoppix gives you a complete RAM based
> working environment, so you must to sure that you're working in the
> real HD filesytem (find the right partition, mount it read/write, and
> maybe, chroot to it) to make all this work.
Mou
I'm still kind of newbie, so, please, be careful about by tips, but
maybe this will help:
Grub and lilo are alike in the sense that both (can) install code to the
Master Boot Record to (be loaded by the bios at startup and) automate
the boot process. Such boot code would not be affected by unin
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:00:31AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I also tried uninstalling grub using dselect. I assume that the grub that I
> uninstalled was a debian grub, not the one that is booting my system.
Hi, Paul.
The bootstrappers are managed unlike the rest of the system. Simple
I know this isn't a knoppix list, but it's debian based, and I'm not having much luck
at other places. Hope you can help :)
I made a new computer (yay), and proceeded install the Fedora Core. After playing with
it for a little while, I thought "No, I don't think so", and did a hard disk install
Hi all.I haven't had problems before on other machines with make-kpkg.
Just used it to upgrade the kernel to 2.4.22 on a machine at work, and have
had a horrible time.
I get the message: "fsck ext3 No such file or directory while trying to
open /dev/hdb2" which is my root directory. Then
* J F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030924 21:53]:
> But when I run lilo, it
> says:
> # sudo su
> # lilo -C /mnt/hda1/etc/lilo.conf
> Fatal. Sorry, don't know how to handle device 0xf000
>
> How can I use Knoppix to fix LILO boot?
I don't know, if this will fix your problem, but you might try to use
chr
I am doing this from memory, so I stand to be
corrected. But...
You must chroot to the root directory that has the
problem and the /etc with lilo.conf.
Lilo does that with the -r option: so try
lilo -r /mnt/hda1
Regards,
Hugo
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shop
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:02:02PM -0400, J F wrote:
>
> Any way, I can reboot using the Knoppix CD
> as a rescue disk
> and then edit /mnt/hda1/etc/lilo.conf .
> But when I run lilo, it
> says:
> # sudo su
> # lilo -C /mnt/hda1/etc/lilo.conf
> Fatal. Sorry, don't know how to handle device 0xf00
J F wrote:
Repost with modifications, first one did make
it to the list:
I did an aptitude and did an update,
and a few "g" keystrokes to download and install.
Aptitude said something like:
Warning, it was deleting modules for old
version of kernel.
Now the system won't reboot.
THe screen says:
FIxed.
I pressed the ALT key to go
to boot from linux.old selection in the lilo
boot menu. Then went in and downloaded
a new kernel (for Athlon K7) and matching modules.
Sorry, if you see my original posting several times,
it is taking a full day to see my posting show up??
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Subject:
LILO problems, no boot, can I use Knoppix rescue to fix?
Repost with modifications, first few tries did make
it to the debian user list. Maybe an overzealous
spam filter again:
I did an aptitude and did an update,
and a few "g" keystrokes to download and install.
Aptitude said
Repost with modifications, first few tries did make
it to the debian user list. Maybe an overzealous
spam filter again:
I did an aptitude and did an update,
and a few "g" keystrokes to download and install.
Aptitude said something like:
Warning, it was deleting modules for old
version of kernel
Repost with modifications, first one did make
it to the list:
I did an aptitude and did an update,
and a few "g" keystrokes to download and install.
Aptitude said something like:
Warning, it was deleting modules for old
version of kernel.
Now the system won't reboot.
THe screen says:
LILO 22.5
I did an aptitude and did an update,
and a few "g" keystrokes to download and install.
It said: warning, it was deleted modules for old
version of kernel.
Now the system won't reboot.
This is from a Knoppix CD install.
Any way, I can reboot using the Knoppix CD
and edit /mnt/hda1/etc/lilo.conf .
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 05:19
> To: Jefferson Cowart
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Lilo Problems
>
>
> Jefferson Cowart wrote:
>
> >I've installed a new server (woody 3.0r1 + proposed updates
> + security
> >updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:23:24AM -0700, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> I've installed a new server (woody 3.0r1 + proposed updates + security
> updates) on a system that is running with root on sda3. Lilo seems to be
> having problems as on boot it output
* Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030806 02:48]:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:23:24AM -0700, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> > Please CC me on any responses as I'm not subscribed to this list.
>
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/mail-responses.html
> Either set Mail-Followup-To: yourself or don'
Thanks for the help everyone. I ended up getting the answer from the
LILO developer. His answer is below. The problem stems from the fact
that the version of LILO in stable can't handle the bios booting from a
disk other than the first one, without telling lilo what the bios boot
order is. In my sy
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 19:23, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
> I've installed a new server (woody 3.0r1 + proposed updates + security
> updates) on a system that is running with root on sda3. Lilo seems to be
> having problems as on boot it outputs and L followed by 01 01 01 and on
> and on. i.e. "L
I've installed a new server (woody 3.0r1 + proposed updates + security
updates) on a system that is running with root on sda3. Lilo seems to be
having problems as on boot it outputs and L followed by 01 01 01 and on
and on. i.e. "L 01 01 01 01..." Any clues what the problem is? I'm able
to get in u
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> Sorry I mis-typed the rescue line. My root is /dev/sda3 and I type
> "rescure root=/dev/sda3". Below is my lilo.conf file with comments
> removed. In addition I've included my /etc/fstab file and the output of
> df -h to show my /boot partition is small and at the
On Wed, August 06 at 2:46 AM EDT
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please CC me on any responses as I'm not subscribed to this list.
>
>http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/mail-responses.html
>Either set Mail-Followup-To: yourself or don't request it.
Paul - for future reference - wha
Jefferson Cowart wrote:
I've installed a new server (woody 3.0r1 + proposed updates + security
updates) on a system that is running with root on sda3. Lilo seems to be
having problems as on boot it outputs and L followed by 01 01 01 and on
and on. i.e. "L 01 01 01 01..." Any clues what the problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:11:31AM -0400, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> Paul - for future reference - what if one requests CC's because it
> sometimes takes hours (12 or more) for one to see posts on the lists due
> to listserv (or whatever handles this) being
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2002 19:13 schrieb prover:
> I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS.
>
> WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
> EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
>
> CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
>
> THANK YOU.
Hi Thomas,
Didn't you read the Answer to an earlier message of you?
AM
Subject: Re: Help! Lilo Problems with NT and Debian Linux
> Am Montag, 3. Juni 2002 17:50 schrieb Sebastian Canagaratna:
>
> > Any suggestion for safely recovering so that I can boot up into
> > WIndows, and also chose linux from the menu rather than always
> > use a flop
Am Montag, 3. Juni 2002 17:50 schrieb Sebastian Canagaratna:
> Any suggestion for safely recovering so that I can boot up into
> WIndows, and also chose linux from the menu rather than always
> use a floppy to boot into linux?
Hello,
I think you can use M$ fdisk /mbr to reinstall the masterboo
Hi:
I am running sid and kernel 2.4.8. I had copied /bootsect.lnx
into c:\ so that I would be given a choice to boot into NT or linux.
After I installed kernel 2.4.8 and I chose linux, I would get LI
and the machine would hang up. So whenever I used to linux I had to
boot from a floppy disk
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:51:23PM -0500, Peter McConnell wrote:
>
> As a new debian User ie 48 hours I am having trouble with the
> configuration of lilo.
> I installed a 2.2r3 version of debian and imediately down loaded the
> 2.4.16
> binary.
> The configuration tool said I am going to add a n
"Greg C. Madden" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 14:51, Peter McConnell wrote:
> > As a new debian User ie 48 hours I am having trouble with the
> > configuration of lilo.
> > I installed a 2.2r3 version of debian and imediately down loaded the
> > 2.4.16
> > binary.
>
> You can't run that kerne
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 14:51, Peter McConnell wrote:
> As a new debian User ie 48 hours I am having trouble with the
> configuration of lilo.
> I installed a 2.2r3 version of debian and imediately down loaded the
> 2.4.16
> binary.
You can't run that kernel without significant upgrades to some oth
As a new debian User ie 48 hours I am having trouble with the
configuration of lilo.
I installed a 2.2r3 version of debian and imediately down loaded the
2.4.16
binary.
The configuration tool said I am going to add a new block for your to
lilo but you will have to add initrd=/initrd to lilo.conf
Kent West wrote:
Sam Varghese wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 05:03:59PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to configure LILO to allow me to boot from my FAT
partition (Windows 98) and my Linux partition, but for some reason
the only thing it'll boot from is Linux. If I try to run a
Sam Varghese wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 05:03:59PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to configure LILO to allow me to boot from my FAT partition
(Windows 98) and my Linux partition, but for some reason the only thing it'll
boot from is Linux. If I try to run a boot loader from DO
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 05:03:59PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to configure LILO to allow me to boot from my FAT partition
> (Windows 98) and my Linux partition, but for some reason the only thing it'll
> boot from is Linux. If I try to run a boot loader from DOS to configure it,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to configure LILO to allow me to boot from my FAT partition
(Windows 98) and my Linux partition, but for some reason the only thing it'll
boot from is Linux. If I try to run a boot loader from DOS to configure it,
the only partition it'll find is the Windows
Put an entry like this:
# Boot Win98
other=/dev/sda2
label=dos(2)
alias=2
You also need entries for prompt, and delay (and I'd suggest timeout and
single-key).
prompt # Needed so you can choose what to boot.
single-key # Allows you to use number aliases without hitting enter.
delay=100 #
I'm trying to configure LILO to allow me to boot from my FAT partition
(Windows 98) and my Linux partition, but for some reason the only thing it'll
boot from is Linux. If I try to run a boot loader from DOS to configure it,
the only partition it'll find is the Windows one.
Does anyone know wha
Dan Ryan wrote:
I am completely new to debian and linux for that matter and I was just
installing it on one of my other computers. Now I want to make it a dual
boot system. The only problem is I can't use X because I dont have a
supported video card. So... how do I edit lilo.conf from the star
hi,
are you sure that lilo is installed? lilo.conf is in /etc
dpkg -l | grep lilo.
on my system this is the output.
ii lilo 21.7.5-5 LInux LOader - The Classic OS loader can loa
if you don't get anything similar the run apt-get install lilo.
hope that helps
regards
I am completely new to debian and linux for that matter and I was just installing it on one of my other computers. Now I want to make it a dual boot system. The only problem is I can't use X because I dont have a supported video card. So... how do I edit lilo.conf from the starting command prompt?
On Sat Feb 24 13:11:40 2001 Robert Waldner wrote...
>
>(quoting modified for readability)
>On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:59:52 EST, "Stan Brown" writes:
>>Now on to the good new. I made the changes to /etc/lilo.conf you
>>sugested, and reran /sbin/lilo (no errors). Then I rebooted. I
>>now ger "LI" and th
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:59:52PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
> On Sat Feb 24 11:53:25 2001 ktb wrote...
> >
> >
> >OK I don't know if this will work but lets clean this up a bit and try a
> >couple things. First comment out the lines for the "image=/vmlinuz.old"
> >section and comment out "lba32" a
(quoting modified for readability)
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:59:52 EST, "Stan Brown" writes:
>Now on to the good new. I made the changes to /etc/lilo.conf you
>sugested, and reran /sbin/lilo (no errors). Then I rebooted. I
>now ger "LI" and the system hangs there. I have tried this both
>with LBA on,
On Sat Feb 24 11:53:25 2001 ktb wrote...
>
>
>OK I don't know if this will work but lets clean this up a bit and try a
>couple things. First comment out the lines for the "image=/vmlinuz.old"
>section and comment out "lba32" and run /sbin/lilo, post any error
>messages. Have you tried upgrading y
> On Fri Feb 23 22:33:51 2001 ktb wrote...
> >Post the output of -
> ># rdev
> >
> >and your /etc/lilo.conf
> >
> >Any error messages when you run /sbin/lilo?
> >kent
> >
>
>On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 10:00:36AM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
> Script started on Sat Feb 24 05:58:00 2001
> debian_test:~# r
On Fri Feb 23 22:33:51 2001 ktb wrote...
>
>>
>> If I try to boot from the hard didk, I get the following:
>>
>> L 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 and it continures till i hit the
>> power
>> swithc.
>>
>> More sugestions?
>
>Post the output of -
># rdev
>
>and your /etc/lilo.conf
On Fri Feb 23 22:33:51 2001 ktb wrote...
>
>>
>> If I try to boot from the hard didk, I get the following:
>>
>> L 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 and it continures till i hit the
>> power
>> swithc.
>>
>> More sugestions?
>
>Post the output of -
># rdev
>
>and your /etc/lilo.conf
On Fri Feb 23 23:48:07 2001 Lute Mullenix wrote...
>
>On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:34:24PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
>>
>> This seems to have been done by the installer. I booted from the
>> floppy, looked
>> at /etc/lilo.conf (which had all the correct settings for my config as
>> dar as
On Sat Feb 24 00:06:54 2001 David Raeker-Jordan wrote...
>
>> This seems to have been done by the installer. I booted from the
>> floppy, looked
>> at /etc/lilo.conf (which had all teh correct setings for my confg as
>> dar as I
>> can tell), and ran lilo just on general principles
> This seems to have been done by the installer. I booted from the
> floppy, looked
> at /etc/lilo.conf (which had all teh correct setings for my confg as
> dar as I
> can tell), and ran lilo just on general principles.
>
> I alos watched the boot messages, and went back
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:34:24PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
>
> This seems to have been done by the installer. I booted from the
> floppy, looked
> at /etc/lilo.conf (which had all the correct settings for my config as
> dar as I
> can tell), and ran lilo just on general princi
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:34:24PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
> On Fri Feb 23 18:57:36 2001 ktb wrote...
> >
> >On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 05:42:13PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
> >> I am trying to install "stable" On an HP Vectra P200, with a 20G IDE disk.
> >>
> >> All of the install goes well, untill I
On Fri Feb 23 18:57:36 2001 ktb wrote...
>
>On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 05:42:13PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
>> I am trying to install "stable" On an HP Vectra P200, with a 20G IDE disk.
>>
>> All of the install goes well, untill I reboot. Then, I get a continuois
>> stream of
>> "40 ";s streaming acr
> > I am trying to install "stable" On an HP Vectra P200, with
> > a 20G IDE disk.
> > BTW, the BIOS thinks this is onl an 8G disk, which may
> > be part of the problem?
> >
>
> You might be able to upgrade your bios in order to see all 20G's.
And if there's no BIOS upgrade available, I *think* y
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 05:42:13PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
> I am trying to install "stable" On an HP Vectra P200, with a 20G IDE disk.
>
> All of the install goes well, untill I reboot. Then, I get a continuois
> stream of
> "40 ";s streaming across teh screen while the hard disk ling _and_ the
I am trying to install "stable" On an HP Vectra P200, with a 20G IDE disk.
All of the install goes well, untill I reboot. Then, I get a continuois stream
of
"40 ";s streaming across teh screen while the hard disk ling _and_ the floppy
light
flash!
I can boot from the boot floppy OK.
I set up a
I thought it was odd that you had Windows on the secondary controller. I
didn't think it would work that way, but assumed it was already. I
thought you made some changes to lilo and then it stopped working...
Oh well, it's working now so that's all that matters !
Hall
> thanks lot for your help
line in my
> config file.
>
> Good luck
> Hall
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rogelio E. Castillo Haro,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Hall Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 1:49 PM
> Subject: Re:
> Primary master (hda) with Debian, just installed las weekend
> Secondary master (hdc) with Win98 already installed and
working...(sic)
> Well I install Debian on my primary disk and tell lilo to install at
the
> MBR (unsafe I know)
> Now when I select to boot win98 it appears:
> Loading win
> L?
Hi,
I've two disks
Primary master (hda) with Debian, just installed las weekend
Secondary master (hdc) with Win98 already installed and working...(sic)
Well I install Debian on my primary disk and tell lilo to install at the
MBR (unsafe I know)
Now when I select to boot win98 it appears:
Loading
I upgraded to sid a month or so ago, and i
remember it asked me something about lilo, and replacing it with the debian boot
loader, i said yes, but now after i compiled a new kernel, and ran lilo i get :
LI
i know that means a geometry missmatch etc... but
what i wanna know is which progra
i got it working. i just had to turn on the welcome message and an "alias",
and it started working like i'm used to . . .
luke
From: Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: luke b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LILO problems . . .
Date: Mon,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 08:18:43PM -0500, luke b wrote:
> I am having problems with lilo. When my computer boots, I have no
> opportunity to type my other kernel labels. It just says "LILO", and I am
> unable to type anything. Lilo is in my MBR. Please help . . .
Does it say
prompt
timeou
Hi Luke:
You did try to hit the shift key as soon as you saw
lilo? That should pause lilo, then you can hit tab
and that will show all choices loaded in lilo.conf
hth Dean
luke b wrote:
>
> I am having problems with lilo. When my computer boots, I have no
> opportunity to type my other ker
TECTED]
X-Originating-IP: [206.146.40.218]
From: "luke b" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: LILO problems . . .
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:18:43 CDT
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2000 01:18:43.0370 (UTC)
FILETIME=[125410A0:01C01157]
Resent-Message-ID: <
You need to edit /etc/lilo.conf the default file has really good comments just
read them and do the right thing.
-- Original Message --
From: "luke b" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:18:43 CDT
>I am having problems with lilo. When my computer
I am having problems with lilo. When my computer boots, I have no
opportunity to type my other kernel labels. It just says "LILO", and I am
unable to type anything. Lilo is in my MBR. Please help . . .
_
Get Your Private
You were referring to System.map for the error messages, not the /boot/map
file used to load the system.
* Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> with that. Can a system boot up without a map file? It seems like it can.
Yes, you experienced it :-)
> But like your problem, I always thought you needed the map file. I know my
Only if you want more informative error messages in case of a kernel
> Ok I guess I have to spend more time to ask specific questions..
> sigh
>
> You said
> "I simply copied /boot/* and /home/* to the new drive, and ran lilo on
> it."
>
> You didn't say if you updated the /etc/fstab file.
yes, /boot, /home, and the swap partition are updated to reside on the n
Subject: Re: LILO problems with new HD
Date: Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 01:21:46AM -0700
In reply to:Lev Lvovsky
Quoting Lev Lvovsky([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> hehe, sorry, I post under the assumption that ppl's balls are in working
> order ;-D.
>
> /boot is hda1.
I don't know if we have similiar problems or not. With my system it can't
find the map file, but it still boots up, so I'm not sure what the deal is
with that. Can a system boot up without a map file? It seems like it can.
But like your problem, I always thought you needed the map file. I know
> > I've recently discovered problems with the drive that had the /boot and
> > /home partitions of my Debian box, so I decided to go out and get a new
> > HD
> > in transferring the files, I simply copied /boot/* and /home/* to the new
> > drive, and ran lilo on it. It gave me the message
Subject: LILO problems with new HD
Date: Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 09:48:08PM -0700
In reply to:Lev Lvovsky
Quoting Lev Lvovsky([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
>
> I've recently discovered problems with the drive that had the /boot and
> /home partitions of my Debian
Hello,
I've recently discovered problems with the drive that had the /boot and
/home partitions of my Debian box, so I decided to go out and get a new HD
in transferring the files, I simply copied /boot/* and /home/* to the new
drive, and ran lilo on it. It gave me the message that lilo wa
tf wrote:
>hey all
>
>I just expanded the 2.2.6 kernal into /usr/src. I have only the base system
> installed, but am getting debs and
>throwing them into a windows directory. among them was "make". so I got to
> the "make menuconfig" step and I got
>an error (sorry can't
hey all
I just expanded the 2.2.6 kernal into /usr/src. I have only the base system
installed, but am getting debs and
throwing them into a windows directory. among them was "make". so I got to
the "make menuconfig" step and I got
an error (sorry can't remember which one). I thought I'd fi
If 2 drives are swaped, /etc/fstab will also need to be changed to
reflect
changes in system.
Andrew
---
Andrei S. Ivanov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UIN 12402354
http://members.tripod
On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 02:06:50PM -0500, Christopher Fury wrote:
> I've had debian 2.0 running on my machine for a while now, but I finally
> decided it
> was time to load up windows so I could play some games. :) I went out
> and bought
> a new hard drive, and I want to boot windows off of it.
I've had debian 2.0 running on my machine for a while now, but I finally
decided it
was time to load up windows so I could play some games. :) I went out
and bought
a new hard drive, and I want to boot windows off of it.
I've tried several lilo configurations, but I can't seem to make my
windows
On Thu, Aug 21, 1997 at 10:44:08PM -0700, Mike Schmitz wrote:
> make the "boot" line in /etc/lilo.conf read
> boot=/dev/hda - or sda for SCSI
> and run lilo
Urgh. That's the wrong solution. It is unnecessary in 95% of cases to put
LILO in the MBR, and it just makes things more confusing later
On Aug 22, Paul Lange wrote
> Joy. I've installed Debian 1.3.1 fresh on a 486/66 with ~4 megs of ram.
> This machine is to be a router for home, but right after the install when I'm
> to reboot and see how my system goes, I get this as an error message when LILO
> won't load:
>
> 3FA:
>
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 12:03:40PM -0600, Harrison, Shawn wrote:
>
> /dev/sda1 <== New SCSI Disk, Linux filesystem, bootable
> /dev/hda1 <== Old 9GB Disk, hda1 currently holds old copy of filesystem.
> /dev/hda2 <== Windoze partition on old disk, bootable.
>
> I included my lilo.conf below. I'm
/dev/sda1 <== New SCSI Disk, Linux filesystem, bootable
/dev/hda1 <== Old 9GB Disk, hda1 currently holds old copy of filesystem.
/dev/hda2 <== Windoze partition on old disk, bootable.
I included my lilo.conf below. I'm sure that I'm either doing something
dumb, or just not considering an obvious
Hi all,
I recently switched my filesystem over to a SCSI Hard Drive, and
now I want to use my old 9GB Drive for storage and for holding a small
Windows partition. After I set this up in lilo.conf and tried to boot to
Windows, my machine hung right at the message "Loading Windows". I have
I have compiled a new kernel, I run "make zdisk" to make a boot-disk
and that works just fine. But I can't make my hard-drive boot-able.
When init is about to start I get an oops, 'unable to handle kernel
paging request...'. I have also tried make-kpkg but I get the same
error.
lilo.conf points to
On Mon, Nov 17, 1997 at 11:23:19AM -0700, Robert Goodwin wrote:
> I'm having a bit of a problem getting my OS loader to boot Linux using
> LILO. I downloaded some instructions from www.windows-nt.com/multiboot on
> this but they aren't working correctly although it seems like they should.
>
> w
> --
> interzone:/etc# /sbin/lilo
> Warning: /dev/hdd is not on the first disk
> Warning: BIOS drive 0x82 may not be accessible
> Warning: BIOS drive 0x82 may not be accessible
> Warning: BIOS drive 0x82 may not be accessible
I struggled thru this myself recently. I finally had lilo booting NT.
Hi there,
I'm having a bit of a problem getting my OS loader to boot Linux using
LILO. I downloaded some instructions from www.windows-nt.com/multiboot on
this but they aren't working correctly although it seems like they should.
what I've done is first installed LILO in the superblock of my l
On Aug 22, Paul Lange wrote
> Joy. I've installed Debian 1.3.1 fresh on a 486/66 with ~4 megs of ram.
> This machine is to be a router for home, but right after the install when I'm
> to reboot and see how my system goes, I get this as an error message when LILO
> won't load:
>
> 3FA:
>
Joy. I've installed Debian 1.3.1 fresh on a 486/66 with ~4 megs of ram.
This machine is to be a router for home, but right after the install when I'm
to reboot and see how my system goes, I get this as an error message when LILO
won't load:
3FA:
Yup. That's it. That on a line. Then
95 matches
Mail list logo