On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:30:44 +0200, news.cistron.nl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi I am trying to get RAID 1 working on Debian 3.0 2.2 kernel.
>
> I used the patch from:
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/kernel-patch-2.2.20-raid
>
> I followed the custom build kernel tutorial at:
> http:
Hi I am trying to get RAID 1 working on Debian 3.0 2.2 kernel.
I used the patch from:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/kernel-patch-2.2.20-raid
I followed the custom build kernel tutorial at:
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
selected the RAID settings from menuconfi
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:32:56PM -0400, Scott Mohnkern wrote:
> We're seeing something quite strange. Periodically, logging to messages
> just "stops" then it restarts.
>
>
> Anyone know what causes this?
Maybe. Debian rotates logs by default, and klogd can't do much during
the rotation. B
We're seeing something quite strange. Periodically, logging to messages
just "stops" then it restarts.
Anyone know what causes this?
Scott Mohnkern
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 11:12, Adrian Zimmer wrote:
> As to lspci, I did take your advice but the results seemed to tell
> me nothing useful. Here they are is. Maybe, you will see something
> interesting:
>
> >From 2.2.20-idepci
>
> 00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Accton Technology Corporation EN
As to lspci, I did take your advice but the results seemed to tell
me nothing useful. Here they are is. Maybe, you will see something
interesting:
>From 2.2.20-idepci
00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Accton Technology Corporation EN-1216 Ethernet Adapter
(rev 11)
Subsystem: Accton Techn
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 09:35, Adrian Zimmer wrote:
> No, no; ifconfig says the interface is up and running with both
> kernel images. Obviously *a* tulip module is installed (one way
> or the other). Happens to be two different ones.
>
> I compiled tulip in to 2.4.18 whereas I don't know how t
No, no; ifconfig says the interface is up and running with both
kernel images. Obviously *a* tulip module is installed (one way
or the other). Happens to be two different ones.
I compiled tulip in to 2.4.18 whereas I don't know how the prepackaged
2.2.20-idepci worked. I'd kinda like to tr
Adrian Zimmer wrote:
> with 2.2.20 I get
>
> eth0: Accton EN1217/EN2242 (ADMtek Comet) rev 17 at 0xc6022000, 00:D0:59:24:04:C0,
> IRQ 11.
> eth0: MII transceiver #1 config 3000 status 786d advertising 01e1.
>
> whereas with 2.4.18 I get
>
> eth0: ADMtek Comet rev 17 at 0x1c00, 00:D0:59:24:04:
Thanks, I had already seen in dmesg and ifconfig that the ethernet
was configured. There is a difference that I had not thought
consequential:
with 2.2.20 I get
eth0: Accton EN1217/EN2242 (ADMtek Comet) rev 17 at 0xc6022000, 00:D0:59:24:04:C0, IRQ
11.
eth0: MII transceiver #1 config 3000 sta
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:46, Adrian Zimmer wrote:
> I have version 2.2.20 (idepci downloaded) running OK (at runlevel 2).
>
> I have version 2.4.18 (compiled myself under 2.2.20) running sort-of OK
> (again runlevel 2).
>
> One difference is that my self-configured/compiled version isn't est
I have version 2.2.20 (idepci downloaded) running OK (at runlevel 2).
I have version 2.4.18 (compiled myself under 2.2.20) running sort-of OK
(again runlevel 2).
One difference is that my self-configured/compiled version isn't establishing a
network connection. Here are my thoughts as to w
"Shango" == Shango Oluwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shango> Why, if 2.4.x is more recent & secure, is my Debian 3
Shango> (woody) CD distribution built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
and in response to several good explanations "Shango" asks:
Shango> Is kernel 2.4.21 considered safe f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 09:12:42PM +0100, Shango Oluwa wrote:
> Why, if 2.4.x is more recent & secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD
> distribution built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
Cause 2.4 wasn't out long enough to be well tested before Woody came out.
- --
El Sun, 06 Jul 2003 21:12:42 +0100 Shango Oluwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Why, if 2.4.x is more recent & secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD distribution
> built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
Obviously you haven't looked at the latest security issues in 2.4.X kernels.
BTW; the default 2.4.18-bf2.4 at
On Sunday 06 July 2003 23:18, Shango Oluwa wrote:
> - I have also considered LRP but that distribution seems to be
> crumbling and unsupported
The guy who did the LRP just recently gave up, so you aren't likely to see
anything new from that thing soon.
--
Got Backup?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Nicos wrote:
Mostly because the 2.4 series had some serious (as in "don't use for
production machines") problems when Woody was locked.
Understood.
Is kernel 2.4.21 considered safe for a production machine now?
I'm configuring an internet router and have been advised to use 2.4.21
- I have also c
On Sunday 06 July 2003 22:12, Shango Oluwa wrote:
> Why, if 2.4.x is more recent & secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD
> distribution built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
Mostly because the 2.4 series had some serious (as in "don't use for
production machines") problems when Woody was locked.
--
Got Backup
Greetings all,
I have been thinking deep thoughts about this:
Why, if 2.4.x is more recent & secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD distribution
built with kernel 2.2.20 ?
I am a new user and this might be a naive question, but why?
why?
Shango
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by A
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:44:57 -0700
Eric Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a web page that kindof summarizes the differences between 2.2 > > and 2.4 on
>a laptop.
>
> http://www.milagrosoft.com/products/software/debian-woody.html
I will give this a try at the weekend! Thanks very
Keith O'Connell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with my laptop which I would appreciate some guidance with. It is a
>Dell Inspiron 3700 (hardly cutting edge now!)
>
> I installed Woody on it with the default 2.2 kernel and the various packages I want
>and it runs fine. I then use dselect to
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 10:29:34 -0400
Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> > I have a problem with my laptop which I would appreciate some guidance with. It is
>a Dell Inspiron 3700 (hardly cutting edge now!)
> >
> > I installed Woo
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> I have a problem with my laptop which I would appreciate some guidance with. It is a
>Dell Inspiron 3700 (hardly cutting edge now!)
>
> I installed Woody on it with the default 2.2 kernel and the various packages I want
>and it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 September 2002 12:44 pm, Amir Tal wrote:
> On Monday 09 September 2002 16:26, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> > installation I realized that the kernel is still v
On Monday 09 September 2002 16:26, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
> How can I upgrade to ver 2.4.19. I know I can do this by editing my
> /etc/apt/sources.list file with
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:26:14PM -0400, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
> How can I upgrade to ver 2.4.19. I know I can do this by editing my
> /etc/apt/sources.list f
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: upgrading kernel 2.2 to 2.4.19
>Hello
>=20
>I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
>installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
>How can I upgrade to ver 2.4.19. I know I can do this by e
Hello
I just finished net installing Debian
3.0 on my pc. But after installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
How can I upgrade to ver
2.4.19. I know I can do this by editing my /etc/apt/sources.list file with the location for the the new kernels. Can somebody
tell me wh
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:07:07PM +, Soren Andersen wrote:
>Hello,
>
Can't help with your problem but I know how you feel, as do most of us
who have had some blasted bit of kit refuse to work, wasted aeons on
out of date howto's etc.
To be fair to Linux, it starts from a nearly hopeless posit
r resolution at boot-up.
Knowledgeable ATI users amongst this List readership if they are any,
might be able to do a kind deed if they'd share with me what they've
done to use the framebuffer device capabilities introduced around
kernel 2.2. The basic task as I now understand it is to ed
Sorry, that should have been
modprobe 8390
insmod io=0x260 irq=5 ne
-David Nusinow
krmt1984
on I've got to
> live with kernel 2.2.x with it's poor non-autodetecting ne driver.
>
> Maybe I've got slack with Mandrake 8 and it's wizzy kudzu (why
> doesn't Debian use that?), but I'm used to "modprobe ne".
>
> $ modprobe ne
> device no
> >Does anyone have any tips to getting a no-name ISA NE?000 clone working
> >with Sid? I does work fine as I rebooted to Mandrake and used it...
> Is it a PNP card? If so you need to use the isapnp tools. Otherwise the
> card should have jumpers on it and you can set them to whatever IO and IR
Does anyone have any tips to getting a no-name ISA NE?000 clone working
with Sid? I does work fine as I rebooted to Mandrake and used it...
Is it a PNP card? If so you need to use the isapnp tools. Otherwise the
card should have jumpers on it and you can set them to whatever IO and IRQ
yo
Is this an ISA card? Do you have isapnp configured?
Hm
Brooks
> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2001 03:49 PM
> To: Debian Users
> Subject: ne driver in kernel 2.2
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:49:18PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> Does anyone have any tips to getting a no-name ISA NE?000 clone working
> with Sid? I does work fine as I rebooted to Mandrake and used it...
>
Is this a pre-packaged kernel, or did you build it from scratch?
Either way, try this ou
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:49:18PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
|
| Okay, until I get kernel 2.4.x working to my satisfaction I've got to
| live with kernel 2.2.x with it's poor non-autodetecting ne driver.
...
| Does anyone have any tips to getting a no-name ISA NE?000 clone working
| wi
Hi,
Okay, until I get kernel 2.4.x working to my satisfaction I've got to
live with kernel 2.2.x with it's poor non-autodetecting ne driver.
Maybe I've got slack with Mandrake 8 and it's wizzy kudzu (why doesn't
Debian use that?), but I'm used to "modprobe n
NewBie Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, I am porting a Network driver from Redhat 6.2 to Debian. And also
>from kernel2.2 to 2.4. Since the GCC is not changed till RH6.2 version,
>I need to change only the kernel 2.2 to 2.4 changes.
>
>I followed the following links
Hi, I am porting a Network driver from Redhat 6.2 to
Debian. And also from kernel2.2 to 2.4. Since the GCC
is not changed till RH6.2 version, I need to change
only the kernel 2.2 to 2.4 changes.
I followed the following links to port kernel2.2 to
kernel2.4. But the driver does not work. Can I
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:04:24 -0600, you wrote:
>
>It tells you exactly which upgrades you need. In my case for a 2.4.1
>kernel I needed -
>modutils 2.4.0
>e2fsprogs 1.19
>on a stock Potato box.
you need to update pppd too
Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chandler.u-net.com
Thanks kent
This Proggie is realy the best i ever saw absolutly great!!!
Thanks alot. That solves also much other problems i have.
cheers,
Raffaele
On Sunday 11 February 2001 17:00, ktb wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 04:36:29PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Yes, ok, i wil
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 04:36:29PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, ok, i will forget rpm.
>
> I tried your way over apt-get all worked fine until the compile process
> started. Here is the output of apt-get:
>
>
> Reading Package Lists...
> Building Dependency Tree...
> Need to g
Hi
Yes, ok, i will forget rpm.
I tried your way over apt-get all worked fine until the compile process
started. Here is the output of apt-get:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 977kB of source archives.
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is e2fsprogs
dpkg-buildpac
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for that help.
>
> I got the modutils rpm from kernel.org and installed it with no probs.
>
> Now i downloaded the e2fs source files from the depian ftp. I got 3 files.
> The main file, a diff file and a .dsc fil
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 02:21:15PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use the stable (ptotato)-Debian release. Now i wan't to upgrade to the
> 2.4.1 kernel (from the 2.2.18). Do i have to look at some special issues or
> can i compile it the same way i did it with the 2.2? Do i need som
Le dim, 11 fév 2001 14:36:24, Sebastiaan a écrit :
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use the stable (ptotato)-Debian release. Now i wan't to upgrade to
> the
> > 2.4.1 kernel (from the 2.2.18). Do i have to look at some special
> issues or
> > can i compile it
Hi,
AFAIK, you only need modutils=>2.4. Search the web for it, I do not know
an official .deb package.
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use the stable (ptotato)-Debian release. Now i wan't to upgrade to the
> 2.4.1 kernel (from the 2.2.18). Do i ha
Hi,
I use the stable (ptotato)-Debian release. Now i wan't to upgrade to the
2.4.1 kernel (from the 2.2.18). Do i have to look at some special issues or
can i compile it the same way i did it with the 2.2? Do i need some special
Progs?
cheers,
Raffaele
--
Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Alec,
Quoth Alec Smith,
> I understand a large portion of the kernel 2.4 networking code was updated
> and/or completely replaced. Under 2.2 I have ipchains configured to do
> basic masquerading for my local LAN. Is there a straightforward guide which
> describes how to do masquerading and
Hi Alec,
anyway take a look on
http://www.sentry.net/~obsid/IPTables/rc.scripts.dir/current/rc.firewall.iptables
and
http://netfilter.kernelnotes.org/
Seeya
At 20:31 28/01/2001 -0200, you wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:24:25 -0500
Alec Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand a large
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:24:25 -0500
Alec Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand a large portion of the kernel 2.4 networking code was updated
> and/or completely replaced. Under 2.2 I have ipchains configured to do
> basic masquerading for my local LAN. Is there a straightforward guide w
I understand a large portion of the kernel 2.4 networking code was updated
and/or completely replaced. Under 2.2 I have ipchains configured to do
basic masquerading for my local LAN. Is there a straightforward guide which
describes how to do masquerading and firewalling with 2.4 after moving up
I apologise for simply barging into this mailing list with this sort of
request, but I am pushed for time (by my boss, so no surprise there)
Tomorrow we get an ADSL line installed. Due to the general cruddiness of
UK telecoms, this only comes with a USB connection. This would be fine,
except that
on Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 05:08:38PM +0300, Dan Pomohaci ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are any programs in Windows to mount an ext2 partition (kernel 2.2)?
> After I installed a potato system with kernel 2.2.12 (formating the
> ext2 partitions) the old Windows ext2fs don
Dan Pomohaci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Are any programs in Windows to mount an ext2 partition (kernel 2.2)?
>After I installed a potato system with kernel 2.2.12 (formating the
>ext2 partitions) the old Windows ext2fs don't work.
I believe http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/
Hi,
Are any programs in Windows to mount an ext2 partition (kernel 2.2)?
After I installed a potato system with kernel 2.2.12 (formating the
ext2 partitions) the old Windows ext2fs don't work.
Thanks,
Dan Pomohaci
hi lists.
i'm just trying to get ready in using netfilter in 2.4 kernel
just want to ask a question ... to any of you who had tried it
1) what's the alternate modules in 2.4 that're 2.2-kernel's ip_masq* modules?
Hallo!
I have a weird problem with Debian 2.2:
Since I updated my system from Debian 2.1 to Debian 2.2, sound doesn't
work anymore.
- Debian 2.1: Sound is fully functional with kernel 2.0.x and kernel
2.2.x (I tested one of my backups to make sure).
- Update to Debian 2.2: Sound through
> If I'm not mistaken, I read that the 2.2.x Kernel and later no longer made
> you add:
>
> append="mem=128M"
>
> ..to lilo.conf to get it to use more than 64MB of RAM (in my case, 128MB).
>
2.2.x is not 100% correct - it became superflous with 2.2.10 or something
like that - at least on my sys
Greetings, once again.
If I'm not mistaken, I read that the 2.2.x Kernel and later no longer made
you add:
append="mem=128M"
..to lilo.conf to get it to use more than 64MB of RAM (in my case, 128MB).
I have 128MB of physical memory, yet it's only picking up 64 megs using
Potato and 2.2.14.
Well I upgraded, finally. And the kernel can't locate all my serial ports
for some reason. I have this (from dmesg):
ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
ttyS02 at 0x03e8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
00 is my mouse, 01 is my modem and 02 is my Palm Pilot cradle
I am working on an important project with a rapidly approaching deadline.
I have a Pentium II running Debian Gnu/Linux 2.1, although I have installed
quite a few packages from potato manually (i.e., by downloading them and saying
dpkg -iGREB ). I am running kernel version 2.0.35, a
custom compil
> I finally broke down and decided to compile a 2.2.13 kernel despite
> the fact that my 2.0.36 kernel continues to work perfectly.
>
Just curious, why did you decide to `upgrade'? I'm trying to decide
whether I should do the same.
--
Matthew Roberts
Gregory T. Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to select "OSS sound modules" first, then the SB16 stuff will
> show up.
You're kidding.
How on Earth is someone supposed to know that, except by asking you
folks? SoundBlaster support wasn't in OSS in 2.0.x.
Thank you very much.
--
Carl
You need to select "OSS sound modules" first, then the SB16 stuff will
show up.
On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 10:42:17PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> I finally broke down and decided to compile a 2.2.13 kernel despite
> the fact that my 2.0.36 kernel continues to work perfectly.
>
> Well, 2.2.13 worked ok
I finally broke down and decided to compile a 2.2.13 kernel despite
the fact that my 2.0.36 kernel continues to work perfectly.
Well, 2.2.13 worked okay, except: I can't install my SoundBlaster 16.
When I select sound support in "make menuconfig" it prompts me only
for *other* sound cards (Ensoni
Hello,
I'm desperate SB 64 PCI user trying to get that card to live.
I've tried alsa 0.3.0pre4, and followed all the instructions for SB PCI
cards, module is loaded, mixer is up but no sound is coming out of speaker.
I'm using kde 1.1.2.
I kindly ask for any help, experience on using alsa on SB
Hi,
It works.
You should update a few packages, especially the user-space nfsd.
Have a look on Documentation/Changes. Up to date is 2.2.13
Ciao,
Holger
--
"I'd love to go out with you, but I'm staying home to work on my
cottage cheese sculpture."
make sure your running 2.1r3 of slink and you should have -no- trouble,
anything earlier *might* be missing a package. some things like lsof i
had to recompile for myself.
nate
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, andreas [iso-8859-1] p?lsson wrote:
andrea >Hello.
andrea >
andrea >I have a Slink system which
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I have a Slink system which runs very fine with the 2.0.38 kernel. No
> problems or shutdowns at all.
Ok.
>
> Now I want to use the 2.2.x kernel because of some features, but I want
> to know first if it is possible to run v2.2.x kern
> "andreas" == andreas pålsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
andreas> The other option is to run Potato, since I just need the
andreas> base and enough tools to compile the 2.2 kernel. But
andreas> this system _must_ be stable and I fear Potato ain't
andreas> really there yet.
ld like
to stay as close to Debian's package-system as I can, instead of
installing a lot of self-compiled stuff.
This would make things _alot_ easier if the system goes down and I have
to re-install everything.
I also looked at the
"http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel
andreas pЕlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a Slink system which runs very fine with the 2.0.38 kernel. No
> problems or shutdowns at all.
> Now I want to use the 2.2.x kernel because of some features, but I want
> to know first if it is possible to run v2.2.x kernel on a Slink system.
>
Hello.
I have a Slink system which runs very fine with the 2.0.38 kernel. No
problems or shutdowns at all.
Now I want to use the 2.2.x kernel because of some features, but I want
to know first if it is possible to run v2.2.x kernel on a Slink system.
And second, which steps do I have to take to
On 19 Nov 1999, Miles Bader wrote:
miles >I'm currently using 2.2.13, but I had the same problems with 2.2.10.
miles >I don't *have* any firewall rules, that I'm aware of -- at least, I
miles >didn't set anything up; however, I'll read the documentation for
miles >`ipmasq' and see if that tells me
aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> check the routing table? 2.2.x handles initialization of routes slightly
> differently, although ive never had any probs going from 2.0 to 2.2 (just
> upgraded 2 machines yesterday.
>
> and what kernel are you using? exactly ? check your firewall rules
> too..
On 18 Nov 1999, Miles Bader wrote:
miles >Hi, I have a problem which is driving me crazy: If I use a 2.2.x kernel
miles >(as opposed to 2.0.36), I can't make any network connections (over my
miles >ppp link) that require tcp. In other works, non-tcp net stuff, like
miles >ping or dns lookup, work
Hi, I have a problem which is driving me crazy: If I use a 2.2.x kernel
(as opposed to 2.0.36), I can't make any network connections (over my
ppp link) that require tcp. In other works, non-tcp net stuff, like
ping or dns lookup, work fine, but telnets just hang.
My system is actually not a compl
I have become quite confused about the interaction of the kernel
versions and the different versions of Samba and smbmount.
I have just upgraded to a 2.2 kernel. 'make menuconfig' gave no choice
by which to enable the Win95 bug workaround. At the same time, smbmount
2.0.5a, which seems to be the
Quoting John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> David Wright writes:
> > BUT as a "server", i.e. an internet-connected box that I dial into, the
> > ARP won't work properly (it won't publish the fact that its interface is
> > accepting packets for the machines dialling in).
>
> Has this bug been report
At 08:17 AM 9/21/99 -0300, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
>On 20 Sep 1999, John Hasler wrote:
>
>> damir writes:
>> > I'm running ppp 2.3.5-2 alongside the 2.2.10 kernel in slink environment.
>>
>> I'm in a mostly potato environment, but that shouldn't matter.
>>
>
>kernel docs says you must use
David Wright writes:
> BUT as a "server", i.e. an internet-connected box that I dial into, the
> ARP won't work properly (it won't publish the fact that its interface is
> accepting packets for the machines dialling in).
Has this bug been reported?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
D
Mario writes:
> kernel docs says you must use ppp 2.3.8 at least (this is from memory).
Yes. I've tried 2.3.8 and 2.3.9.
> last night I tried slink version with 2.2.11 and couldn't connect.
2.3.8 should compile on slink (you might have to edit out the pam stuff).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Subject: pppd (slink version) with kernel 2.2.X
Date: Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 01:36:44PM -0300
In reply to:Mario Olimpio de Menezes
Quoting Mario Olimpio de Menezes([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Hi,
>
> Can I run pppd (slink version) with kernel 2.2.X?
> I
Quoting Mario Olimpio de Menezes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On 20 Sep 1999, John Hasler wrote:
>
> > damir writes:
> > > I'm running ppp 2.3.5-2 alongside the 2.2.10 kernel in slink environment.
> >
> > I'm in a mostly potato environment, but that shouldn't matter.
> >
>
> kernel docs says you must
On 20 Sep 1999, John Hasler wrote:
> damir writes:
> > I'm running ppp 2.3.5-2 alongside the 2.2.10 kernel in slink environment.
>
> I'm in a mostly potato environment, but that shouldn't matter.
>
kernel docs says you must use ppp 2.3.8 at least (this is from memory).
last night I tried slink
damir writes:
> I'm running ppp 2.3.5-2 alongside the 2.2.10 kernel in slink environment.
I'm in a mostly potato environment, but that shouldn't matter.
> I have however compiled ppp in the kernel, and am _not_ using a module.
I've tried it both ways. Sends empty LCP packets.
--
John Hasler
Hi John Hasler; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> Mario writes:
> > Can I run pppd (slink version) with kernel 2.2.X?
>
> You should be able to, yes. I have not been able to get any version of
> pppd to work with 2.2 kernels, but others have.
I'm running ppp 2.3.5
Mario writes:
> Can I run pppd (slink version) with kernel 2.2.X?
You should be able to, yes. I have not been able to get any version of
pppd to work with 2.2 kernels, but others have.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Do with
Hi,
Can I run pppd (slink version) with kernel 2.2.X?
If not, how do I compile the potato version in a pure slink
system? What should be need?
My last try in doing this failed due to some PAM related missing
files. What should I install in order to get it compile fine
Hi Guys,
I am trying to get the not so important word out that the setserial that is
shipped with slink is not exactly right for kernel series 2.2.x. That isn't
to say it won't work with the newer kernels. It will. But it was compiled
with the 2.0.x version of serial.h and so will not be able to d
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 02:06:09PM -0600, Rogerio A. de Paula wrote:
> I upgraded the kernel to 2.2.x version (I tried different ones), but now I
> always get a warning message from mount saying that the compiled version
> of mount is older than the kernel (although I've already recompiled
> mount!
I upgraded the kernel to 2.2.x version (I tried different ones), but now I
always get a warning message from mount saying that the compiled version
of mount is older than the kernel (although I've already recompiled
mount!). Due to that, NFS gets very verbosy and keeps on sending
nfs_warning, nfs_d
- Original Message -
From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: Moving slink to kernel 2.2
> On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 10:59:06AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrot
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 10:59:06AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> We are re-releasing "slink" in a month or so w/ 2.2, new X, new pcmcia, etc.
So potato will stay 'unstable'?
--
Bob Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at
Esmond, R.I., USA Learning..OpenBSD
On 19-Aug-99 Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
>
> I'm currently running slink on a 2.0.36 kernel, but I want to move to
> 2.2.x to support the latest version (0.4.0) of the ALSA drivers. (I have
> Trident 4Dwave-based card.)
>
> I've done some poking around on the website, but I can't seem to find a
>
Hi Raymond. I have kernel 2.2.5 on my slink load and it works just fine.
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
>
> I'm currently running slink on a 2.0.36 kernel, but I want to move to
> 2.2.x to support the latest version (0.4.0) of the ALSA drivers. (I have
> Trident 4Dwave-based c
Hi folks,
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 09:04:37AM -0500, Brian Servis wrote:
> > problem. Slink is "2.2 ready".
> Not according to http://www.debian.org/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2
OK. I'll guiltily rephrase the answer:
I have not encountered any trouble running kern
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
> >
> > I've done some poking around on the website, but I can't seem to find a
> > list of what needs to be upgraded to move to 2.2.
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/slink/#errata
*Just* w
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
