Hi.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 03:00:59 +1000
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I'm wondering if "apt-get install" could be set up to compile from
> source and install that (sort of automatically), rather than install
> the binary?
apt-get, to my best knowledge, can not be used for this.
There's tool called a
I've never used gentoo sorry.
I'm wondering if "apt-get install" could be set up to compile from
source and install that (sort of automatically), rather than install
the binary?
Due to admining a number of machines for a small non profit human
rights association (and a fe
until newly available updates have been available for at
>>> least a few days before installing them, to avoid nasty surprises.
>> apt-get -s dist-upgrade
> Um... it looks like this actually performs the update?
> I want to see what updates would be applied, but NOT apply
#!/bin/sh
# At least once a day update the index package lists and download
# pending upgrades.
{
apt-get -q update && apt-get -q autoclean && apt-get -q upgrade -d -y &&
apt-get -q dist-upgrade -d -y
} 2>&1 | mailx -s "apt download output" root
exit 0
cool! thanks
Pol
have been available for at
least a few days before installing them, to avoid nasty surprises.
apt-get -s dist-upgrade
Um... it looks like this actually performs the update?
I want to see what updates would be applied, but NOT apply them yet.
That is what the --pretend flag in gentoo does
before installing them, to avoid nasty surprises.
apt-get -s dist-upgrade
Um... it looks like this actually performs the update?
I want to see what updates would be applied, but NOT apply them yet.
That is what the --pretend flag in gentoo does (actually the short
version is 'emerge -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-01-05 01:43, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:31:35PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Friday 03 January 2014 14:16:34 Brian wrote:
>>> The '-s' can be omitted if more than one package is to
>>> installed.
>>
>> i.e., if you
On 1/6/14, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> > Tanstaafl wrote:
>> >> # The primary network interface
...
>> >> network ###.###.###.###
>> >> broadcast ###.###.###.###
>> >
>> > Since you already fixed your issue I'll just comment on your interfaces
>> > file.
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:29:59PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> apt-get -q update && apt-get -q autoclean && apt-get -q upgrade -d -y &&
> apt-get -q dist-upgrade -d -y
>
>
>
> Some fun details that may spark some ideas...
Wow!
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Tanstaafl wrote:
> >> # The primary network interface
> >> #allow-hotplug eth0
> >> auto eth0
> >> iface eth0 inet static
> >> address ###.###.###.###
> >> gateway ###.###.###.###
> >> netmask 255.255.255.0
> >> network ###.###.###.###
> >> broadca
On Du, 05 ian 14, 23:47:32, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> > 3. it's safe to get rid of 'network' and 'broadcast', they are
> > calculated from address and netmask ;)
>
> Actually not. Some home adsl modems and routers these days default to
> 172.XX.. and 10. subnets, and Debian (Linux kernel?) choos
On 1/5/14, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 03 ian 14, 07:29:52, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> # The primary network interface
>> #allow-hotplug eth0
>> auto eth0
>> iface eth0 inet static
>> address ###.###.###.###
>> gateway ###.###.###.###
>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>> network ###.###.###.###
>> broadcast ##
On Vi, 03 ian 14, 07:29:52, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> # The primary network interface
> #allow-hotplug eth0
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address ###.###.###.###
> gateway ###.###.###.###
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network ###.###.###.###
> broadcast ###.###.###.###
Since you already fixed you
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:31:35PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 03 January 2014 14:16:34 Brian wrote:
> > The '-s' can be omitted if more than one package is to installed.
>
> i.e., if you are requesting more than one package, it will tell you
> what it is going to install before doing it
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 09:50:59AM +, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 03 Jan 2014 at 17:21:40 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Carl Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > You might want to look into the debian-reference package. It is also
> > > available on the web at
On Fri 03 Jan 2014 at 17:21:40 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Carl Johnson wrote:
> >
> > You might want to look into the debian-reference package. It is also
> > available on the web at http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/.
>
> It looks
2014-01-03 14:44 keltezéssel, Tanstaafl írta:
> In gentoo, I routinely perform pretend updates to see what updates are
> available, so a process like:
>
> eix-sync
> to synchronizes the local repo with the online one
>
> eix packagename
> shows all available versions o
John Hasler wrote:
> Sven Hartge writes:
>> Depending on which version of Debian you installed, you will rarely
>> get any updates at all. Wheezy (7.x) is stable and only get security
>> updates and major bug fixes via point releases about every two
>> months: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleas
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Tanstaafl writes:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have some questions about how to do certain maintenance tasks in
> > Debian that I do routinely in gentoo.
> ...
> > Is there a decent manual descr
Brian wrote:
> Tanstaafl wrote:
> > eix packagename
> > shows all available versions of that package, and what repo they
> > reside in (stable, testing, etc)
>
>apt-cache
Typo: apt-cache show
> and
>apt-cache policy
>
> > emerge --pretend -vuDN world
> > results in a list of all avai
On Friday 03 January 2014 14:16:34 Brian wrote:
> The '-s' can be omitted if more than one package is to installed.
i.e., if you are requesting more than one package, it will tell you
what it is going to install before doing it anyway. You need the -s
for one package, because if you have only a
On 1/3/14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 07:29 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> (Debian and FreeBSD being the top contenders)
>
> There's a Debian BSD port too:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD
> For servers likely Debian stable is the best way to go, but I don't have
> exper
"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
>> emerge --pretend -vuDN world
Welcome to another former gentoo hand.
If you have X running:
I'm pretty sure, though have never used it, that there is a little
tool on you desktop menus somewhere. With a name like
`Software updates', p
Tanstaafl writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I have some questions about how to do certain maintenance tasks in
> Debian that I do routinely in gentoo.
...
> Is there a decent manual describing basic maintenance tasks like this?
You might want to look into the debian-reference packa
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:44:49AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have some questions about how to do certain maintenance tasks in
> Debian that I do routinely in gentoo.
>
> I've read man apt-get, but didn't find answers to these questions.
> What I&
Brian wrote:
On Fri 03 Jan 2014 at 08:44:49 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
I have some questions about how to do certain maintenance tasks in
Debian that I do routinely in gentoo.
eix-sync
to synchronizes the local repo with the online one
Is there a decent manual describing basic maintenance
Sven Hartge writes:
> Depending on which version of Debian you installed, you will rarely get
> any updates at all. Wheezy (7.x) is stable and only get security updates
> and major bug fixes via point releases about every two months:
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases
Don't wai
On Fri 03 Jan 2014 at 08:44:49 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> I have some questions about how to do certain maintenance tasks in
> Debian that I do routinely in gentoo.
>
> eix-sync
> to synchronizes the local repo with the online one
apt-get update
> eix packagename
>
Tanstaafl wrote:
> In gentoo, I routinely perform pretend updates to see what updates are
> available, so a process like:
Depending on which version of Debian you installed, you will rarely get
any updates at all. Wheezy (7.x) is stable and only get security updates
and major bug fix
On 2014-01-03 8:43 AM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 03 Jan 2014 at 07:29:52 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
Since I've configured eth0 for a static IP, why are these DHCP
requests even happening? I've looked in /etc/init.d and don't see
anything about a DHCP client. And most importantly, how do I stop
them? I
Hello all,
I have some questions about how to do certain maintenance tasks in
Debian that I do routinely in gentoo.
I've read man apt-get, but didn't find answers to these questions. What
I'm looking for is the equivalent commands in debian to achieve the same
things.
On Fri 03 Jan 2014 at 07:29:52 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Since I've configured eth0 for a static IP, why are these DHCP
> requests even happening? I've looked in /etc/init.d and don't see
> anything about a DHCP client. And most importantly, how do I stop
> them? I know I could probably uninstall
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 07:29 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> (Debian and FreeBSD being the top contenders)
There's a Debian BSD port too:
https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD
And Arch Linux provides a FreeBSD port like approach:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Build_System
I made bad
Hello all,
First posting to the list. I'm a long time Gentoo user, but I'm playing
with my first Debian system since many years ago.
I've been considering a wholesale change to another distro (Debian and
FreeBSD being the top contenders) for some time now due to some of th
On 20 May 2007, at 10:04, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[2007.05.20.0038 +0200]:
I am not sure if the installer will automatically recognize an
existing
RAID and set it up for you while preserving the data. If it does
not,
you can jump over to a
also sprach Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.20.0038 +0200]:
> I am not sure if the installer will automatically recognize an existing
> RAID and set it up for you while preserving the data. If it does not,
> you can jump over to another VT, manually start the array and then tell
>
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 04:53:55PM +0100, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not subscribed, so can any responses be CC'd directly to me? But,
> down to the point: I have a Gentoo 'box running their modified 2.6.17
> kernel, which has /home as a software
Hi,
I'm not subscribed, so can any responses be CC'd directly to me? But,
down to the point: I have a Gentoo 'box running their modified 2.6.17
kernel, which has /home as a software RAID5. If I'm to move over to
Etch, what would be the best way to move over while keepin
o.
IF your sources can be compiled easyly with "./configure"
and "make" then it is realy easy to build YOUR OWN Debian
packages of YOUR software.
The most important thing is:
apt-get install build-essential fakeroot
> I discarded Gentoo for being so unstable.
;-)
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Rickardo Branco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060911 08:34]:
> > I'm a FreeBSD/NetBSD user wanting to run Linux using
> > the same sources that I'm using on these two systems.
> &g
Hi!
* Rickardo Branco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060911 08:34]:
> I'm a FreeBSD/NetBSD user wanting to run Linux using
> the same sources that I'm using on these two systems.
> I discarded Gentoo for being so unstable.
>
> Is it possible to use the tarballs I have for
I'm a FreeBSD/NetBSD user wanting to run Linux using
the same sources that I'm using on these two systems.
I discarded Gentoo for being so unstable.
Is it possible to use the tarballs I have for running
Debian ?
Thanks in advance anyone.
___
On 1/27/06, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu 26 Jan 2006 20:45, Ivan Neto wrote:> In the new version of iptables Debian doesn't use the init script anymore.Did anything replaced ?
Yes. Take a look at /usr/share/doc/iptables/README.Debian.gz
Regards,
On Thu 26 Jan 2006 20:45, Ivan Neto wrote:
> In the new version of iptables Debian doesn't use the init script anymore.
Did anything replaced ?
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
pgpi1fJJpgRzW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
In the new version of iptables Debian doesn't use the init script
anymore. Anyway, you can find the old init script in
/usr/share/doc/iptables/examples . Just copy it to /etc/init.d .
Hope it helps.On 1/26/06, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,In
Hello,
In Gentoo, the iptables package installs a simple script
in /etc/init.d/iptables that is capable of saving and restore a set of
iptables using iptables-save and iptables-restore. Is there something like
that on Debian ? I don't want a full featured firewall nor to write scripts
m
Tony wrote:
Attempting to speed up my laptop Pentium II emerges. Set up distcc as
specified in the Gentoo guide:
Bear in mind that this is a _debian_ list.
Now, back to gentoo. I personally speeded up my emerges by switching to
debian and apt-get.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi all,
Attempting to speed up my laptop Pentium II emerges. Set up distcc as
specified in the Gentoo guide:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/distcc.xml
Installed distcc on the Debian (galaxy) machine and started the daemon.
Kicked off the emerge, and got the following:
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
Tomek Gruca wrote:
>
> "David Van Mosselbeen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Try to install the gnome-destop-environment
>>
>> 'apt-get install gnome-destop-environment'
>>
>
> I doesn't install too, requires (each 'wont be installed'):
> gnomemeeting (>= 1.2
inotify doesn't seem to work with GNOME; with kernel 2.6.11,
GNOME locks up my entire machine after only a few seconds if
I move the mouse. If I don't move the mouse, a lockup takes
longer, if it happens at all. If I use the kernel option
'noinotify', the lockup doesn't happen at all.
All of this
Hi, this is the mlmmj program managing the mailinglist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have tried to post from this email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But this address is not subscribed, and only subscribers can post to
the list.
If You believe you are subscribed, please check the email address
You subscr
ions in the Makefile to get it to work. What do you change to
> what? I have looked at the Makefile and am no wiser for the look.
What are you trying to do? Install a source package from Debian on
Gentoo?
The make install error is because the make didn't work. The make
probably did
Hi,
The readme.linux instructions are (after unpacking) to make which gives
these errors:
/lib/libreadline.so: undefined reference to tgetnum, tgoto, tgetflag,
BC, tputs, PC, tgetent, UP, tgetstr and it exits with error 1 and error2.
When I "make install" I get three errors:
cp cannot stat bible
On Sunday 06 June 2004 14:00, charlie derr wrote:
> Adam Funk wrote:
>> I'm sure one could even find some stupid posts here (after an
>> exhaustive search).
>>
>>
>
>
> Doesn't even require an exhaustive search -- for instance
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00091.html (and
Adam Funk wrote:
On Saturday 05 June 2004 13:20, Nicholas Lativy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:33:46PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
...and they're tied with AOL users.
http://funroll-loops.org/
All that page does is quote a few stupid things that *some* Gentoo
users have said. Considerin
gt; All that page does is quote a few stupid things that *some*
> > Gentoo users have said. Considering the vast number of posts on
> > the Gentoo Forums it's inevitable that some of them will be
> > factually incorrect
> >
> > or simply ignorant. As Larry Wall said[1]:
On Saturday 05 June 2004 13:20, Nicholas Lativy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:33:46PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> ...and they're tied with AOL users.
>> http://funroll-loops.org/
>
> All that page does is quote a few stupid things that *some* Gentoo
> use
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:33:46PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> ...and they're tied with AOL users.
> http://funroll-loops.org/
All that page does is quote a few stupid things that *some* Gentoo
users have said. Considering the vast number of posts on the Gentoo
Forums it's inev
...and they're tied with AOL users.
http://funroll-loops.org/
--
Paul Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.
pgpUlUb4EOH98.pgp
Description: PGP signature
TongKe Xue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> * Is there some way I can access the laptop HD (2.5" I think,
> don't remember exact specs) ... I need is some hardware so
> that I can mount the HD under linux, and I can take care of
> the rest. (Perferably USB, I'm not familiar with
Em Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:07:50 -0600, Kent West escreveu:
>>>"lspci -v" shows the controller the same way as in Suse and the
>>>others...
>>>
>> What does lspci or cat /proc/pci says about Ethernet controllers?
>>
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but the Axel already answered the first
> part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 03:28:22PM +0100, Axel Burwitz wrote:
> my Dell onboard ethernet controller can't be configured in Debian Sarge but
> runs smoothly in Suse, Fedora an Gentoo-Live and Knoppix...
>
> and I cannot find or get h
Hi Kent !
Thanks for help !
With a hint from another newsgroup, to use "e100" driver, I finally managed
to set up network and internet connection (after some hurdles with
DHCP..) !! Happy now !
I answer your questions below..
Regards and merry christmas
Axel
Kent West wrote:
> Leandro Gu
>>
>> I don't believe it:
>>
>> my Dell onboard ethernet controller can't be configured in Debian
>> Sarge but runs smoothly in Suse, Fedora an Gentoo-Live and Knoppix...
>>
>> and I cannot find or get help in Usenet and via google ??
>>
>&g
proper configuration
information.
regards,
Robert
> Hi,
>
> I don't believe it:
>
> my Dell onboard ethernet controller can't be configured in Debian
> Sarge but runs smoothly in Suse, Fedora an Gentoo-Live and Knoppix...
>
> and I cannot find or get help in Usenet
Hi Leandro,
thanks for help.
Meanwhile I got hint in a German newsgroup, to use "e100" driver, and with
that one (after some hurles with DHCP) I managed to get network set up and
internet connectio via router running !! Happy now ...
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra wrote:
> Em Seg, 2003-
Axel Burwitz wrote:
Hi,
I don't believe it:
my Dell onboard ethernet controller can't be configured in Debian Sarge but
runs smoothly in Suse, Fedora an Gentoo-Live and Knoppix...
take a look at which driver they use and use the same driver in debian.
erik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corcete Dutra wrote:
Em Seg, 2003-12-22 Ãs 12:28, Axel Burwitz escreveu:
installed , for my first Debian try, Debian Sarge from the "LinuxUser"
magazine's DVD. After some hurldles it worked but:
did'nt configure any network card, (and following eth0 etc.)
Which ker
Em Seg, 2003-12-22 Ãs 12:28, Axel Burwitz escreveu:
> and I cannot find or get help in Usenet and via google ??
That's why this list exists.
> Come on, debian community: take that chalenge !
Cut short the crap, please.
> installed , for my first Debian try, Debian Sarge from t
Hi,
I don't believe it:
my Dell onboard ethernet controller can't be configured in Debian Sarge but
runs smoothly in Suse, Fedora an Gentoo-Live and Knoppix...
and I cannot find or get help in Usenet and via google ??
Come on, debian community: take that chalenge !
installed , fo
Tom wrote:
> The second part is understandable but ultimately not defensible: there
> really is no correlation between the cost of software and its value, so
> you always end up in these stupid situation where you've spent $100,000
> for software and you're pulling 36-hour shifts to keep it runn
>> I suspect that all these attacks are not unrelated. Someone is
>> out to get us.
I blame "crazy willy" Lets get him *biff*
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:18:00AM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> and in my book, gpl licenses should be changed anyway ... now's a
> good time .. :-0 to tighten its reins too
There are two aspects to GPL: "just show me the source dumbass" and "how
dare you charge me $50,000 for this shitty softwar
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, David Palmer. wrote:
> > Once is happenstance.
> > Twice is coincidence.
> > Three times is enemy action.
> >
> > I suspect that all these attacks are not unrelated. Someone is out to
> > get us.
>
> I've been certain of this for a while.
> It's not just the distributions
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, John Hasler wrote:
> Flo writes:
> > But even worse, about the Savannah crack
>
> Once is happenstance.
> Twice is coincidence.
> Three times is enemy action.
>
> I suspect that all these attacks are not unrelated. Someone is out to get
> us.
quick .. close the gates
:-)
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:18:28AM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> You watch, The GPL will be invalidated next.
I agree with this (unfortunately). Has the ACLU ever expressed an
opinion on Free software?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 14:15:50 -0600
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Flo writes:
> > But even worse, about the Savannah crack
>
> Once is happenstance.
> Twice is coincidence.
> Three times is enemy action.
>
> I suspect that all these attacks are not unrelated. Someone is out to
> get u
Flo writes:
> But even worse, about the Savannah crack
Once is happenstance.
Twice is coincidence.
Three times is enemy action.
I suspect that all these attacks are not unrelated. Someone is out to get
us.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UN
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:02:34AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:42:37AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> >
> > I didn't know of a particular security issue with Gentoo, actually.
> >
> > And since you haven't provided a reference or a link to any a
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:42:37AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:29:34PM -0800, Tom wrote:
Gentoo has now had a security issue too (as I'm sure you know).
I didn't know of a particular security issue with Gentoo, actually.
And since you haven't provided a refe
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:42:37AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:29:34PM -0800, Tom wrote:
>
> > Gentoo has now had a security issue too (as I'm sure you know).
>
> I didn't know of a particular security issue with Gentoo, actually.
>
>
Replying to the message sent by ScruLoose on Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:42:37
-0500, received at 16:55:09 on 04/12/2003. ScruLoose wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:29:34PM -0800, Tom wrote:
>
>> Gentoo has now had a security issue too (as I'm sure you know).
>
>I didn't k
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:29:34PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> Gentoo has now had a security issue too (as I'm sure you know).
I didn't know of a particular security issue with Gentoo, actually.
And since you haven't provided a reference or a link to any actual
information, I can'
Gentoo has now had a security issue too (as I'm sure you know).
I feel guilty about playing chicken little all week.
Somebody asked if I was evil earlier; no, I just know karma.
The universe does this to nice people when they're nice.
Karma has an upside, later, after the bad stu
El Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:21:36 -0500 Rthoreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> If someone can show a nice chart showing the speed increase compared
> to stability of Gentoo vs Debian, I would be more than happy to put
> Gentoo on a box.
gentoo itself doesn't search to
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> Volunteers needed!
> http://debtoo.org
>
What you can do is add some sort of benchmarking of important packages
(xfree, gnome, kde, etc.) so you or your users can get the best
compilation flags for each processor/system.
That way each package compilat
s.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=227&page=1
>
Be that as it might be - obviously those guys didn't even know that
gentoo applies a patch to xfree with a newer driver for sis from
http://www.winischhofer.net when it ge
seems like this site and
review had Debian on top, Debian was only compiled with I386.
Please excuse the long url:
http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=227&page=1
Also Isn't Gentoo starting to introduce binari
El Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Chris de Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Volunteers needed!
> http://debtoo.org
are you going to implement a USE flag equivalent?
(note: I don't like USE a lot)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:47:50 -0700 (PDT),
Chris de Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Volunteers needed!
> http://debtoo.org
.."* This website sucks." Toss it in http://validator.w3.org/ ;-)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with
Volunteers needed!
http://debtoo.org
=
/dev/idal
"GNU/Linux is free freedom" --Me
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Volunteers needed!
http://debtoo.org
=
/dev/idal
"GNU/Linux is free freedom" --Me
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 09:58:37AM +0800, csj wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:02:41 +1100,
> Russell wrote:
> >
> > Pigeon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:19:20 +1100, bob parker
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Docs are very much a personal-preference item, but I must say
csj wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:02:41 +1100,
Russell wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:19:20 +1100, bob parker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Same applies to the HOWTOs, though otherwise I quite like
them.
Dead trees, unfortunately, have it, at least until it's easy to get
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:02:41 +1100,
Russell wrote:
>
> Pigeon wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:19:20 +1100, bob parker
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > Docs are very much a personal-preference item, but I must say
> > I find the info pages awkward. Jumping about between nodes in
> > a
Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:19:20 +1100, bob parker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:39, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
Hi,
For instance, a lot of man pages for me don't really
help me. They give me a clue yes, but do not provide
all the help i need.
I'm using Woody and
- Original Message -
From: "bob parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Debian vs Gentoo (discussed in newsletter)
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:39, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > Hi,
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:19:20 +1100, bob parker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:39, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> Hi,
>> For instance, a lot of man pages for me don't really
>> help me. They give me a clue yes, but do not provide
>> all the help i need.
>>
>I'm using Woody and the
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:39, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hi,
> For instance, a lot of man pages for me don't really
> help me. They give me a clue yes, but do not provide
> all the help i need.
>
I'm using Woody and there seems to be an info page for
most commands which generally is more helpful than
- Original Message -
From: "Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:39 AM
Subject: [OT] Debian vs Gentoo (discussed in newsletter)
> Hi,
>
> i just saw the topic raised in the newslet
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
