Re: Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread Andrei Popescu
Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:46, formless void wrote: > > Well, if this is the case, then Debian should put its > > disclaimer some where to state that their package is > > not responsible for its clone and only for the > > origrinal. Where is the disclaimer as

Re: Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread Mike Bird
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:46, formless void wrote: > Well, if this is the case, then Debian should put its > disclaimer some where to state that their package is > not responsible for its clone and only for the > origrinal. Where is the disclaimer as such? Debian is not responsible for use of thei

Re: Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread formless void
Well, if this is the case, then Debian should put its disclaimer some where to state that their package is not responsible for its clone and only for the origrinal. Where is the disclaimer as such? --- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ag

Re: Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread Andrei Popescu
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, it's a logical puzzle > > If both are credible, it won't mess up the system, > would it? It has nothing to do with credibility. Xandros is not pure Debian. They have made significant modifications to their packages. And I don't mean this as a bad

Re: Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Sunday 16 April 2006 07:29, formless void wrote: > If both are credible, it won't mess up the system, > would it? Sorry, this thread has been painful to read, but I can't let this one pass: > In any computer language > > A = false, B = false, A + B = false > A = false, B = true, A + B = false

Re: Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread formless void
Again, it's a logical puzzle If both are credible, it won't mess up the system, would it? In any computer language A = false, B = false, A + B = false A = false, B = true, A + B = false A = true, B = false, A + B = false A = true, B = true, A + B = true Who doesn't know what he/she is doing?

Re: Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:49:06 -0700 (PDT) formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrei, > > Your message is voicing like > > "Do not use other Operating System than Microsoft > Windows" > > "Microsoft Windows is perfect and only Microsoft > Developers outsie are pathetic" > > Hah hah ... A

Re: Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread Linas Žvirblis
formless void wrote: > Hah hah ... Am I right? ^___^ No you are not. That is not what he is saying. Please stop this pointless discussion as you clearly lack the knowledge to understand what is being said. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Fwd: Re: Another bug of debian package --- Validation issue

2006-04-16 Thread formless void
Andrei, Your message is voicing like "Do not use other Operating System than Microsoft Windows" "Microsoft Windows is perfect and only Microsoft Developers outsie are pathetic" Hah hah ... Am I right? ^___^ Note: forwarded message attached. __