Well, if this is the case, then Debian should put its disclaimer some where to state that their package is not responsible for its clone and only for the origrinal. Where is the disclaimer as such?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Again, it's a logical puzzle > > > > If both are credible, it won't mess up the system, > > would it? > > It has nothing to do with credibility. Xandros is > not pure Debian. They > have made significant modifications to their > packages. And I don't > mean this as a bad thing. The program you are trying > to install expects > the OS to behave in a certain way. But Xandros is > not Debian and it will > behave differently. The results are unpredictable. > > You are mixing apples with pears and expecting to > get grape wine. Linux > distros can be very different and packages built for > one will not work > for the other. > > Andrei > -- > If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand > it well enough. > (Albert Einstein) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
