On Sunday 16 April 2006 07:29, formless void wrote: > If both are credible, it won't mess up the system, > would it?
Sorry, this thread has been painful to read, but I can't let this one pass: > In any computer language > > A = false, B = false, A + B = false > A = false, B = true, A + B = false > A = true, B = false, A + B = false > A = true, B = true, A + B = true What is your + operator supposed to be here? If it's either ADD or OR, then: A=false, B=false, A+B=false A=false, B=true, A+B=true A=true, B=false, A+B=true A=true, B=true, A+B=true What you described is an AND function, which is never represented by a "+" in *any* computer language, in Boolean mathematics, nor in any field of formal logic. > Who doesn't know what he/she is doing? ... -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
pgpo1mAEFFg4i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
