Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

nly radeon, amdgpu, i915, xe & nouveau. > no need to keep fbdev, vesa, intel > and nouveau x-server driver packages on the system (as well as ati, amd, > radeon...)? No real need, unless something breaks WRT using the modesetting that can be worked around by using another. For th

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On 2/24/25 22:25, Felix Miata wrote: Chris Jölly composed on 2025-02-24 21:52 (UTC+0100): modestting is the X display driver required by either the in use Intel 530 GPU or the inactive NVidia GPU. Ok, so modesetting is the X display driver, not how I expected the intel or nouveau driver

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On Thu Feb 27, 2025 at 2:23 PM GMT, Greg wrote: On 2025-02-27, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Tue Feb 25, 2025 at 1:38 PM GMT, Greg wrote: Did I read somewhere that the maintainer of the nouveau driver resigned due to the toxic atmosphere among the kernel developers, or did I dream that? The

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On 2025-02-27, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Tue Feb 25, 2025 at 1:38 PM GMT, Greg wrote: >> Did I read somewhere that the maintainer of the nouveau driver >> resigned due to the toxic atmosphere among the kernel developers, or >> did I dream that? > > The lead of t

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On Tue Feb 25, 2025 at 1:38 PM GMT, Greg wrote: Did I read somewhere that the maintainer of the nouveau driver resigned due to the toxic atmosphere among the kernel developers, or did I dream that? The lead of the Asahi project (providing support for Apple-silicon Macs) recently resigned

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On 2025-02-24, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> Shouldnt one of intel or nouveau drivers get loaded? > > No, because it's using modeset (for the Intel device at least). > Did I read somewhere that the maintainer of the nouveau driver resigned due to the toxic atmosphere among th

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

Chris Jölly composed on 2025-02-24 21:52 (UTC+0100): > I have a Lenovo Thinkpad P50, which has the following setup: > chris@laptop:~$ inxi -Gaz --za > Graphics: >   Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 530 vendor: Lenovo driver: i915 i915 is the kernel module (hardware driver) required b

Re: Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 21:52:43 +0100, Chris Jölly wrote: > chris@laptop:~$ inxi -Gaz --za > Graphics: >   Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 530 vendor: Lenovo driver: i915 v: kernel >     arch: Gen-9 process: Intel 14n built: 2015-16 ports: active: eDP-1 >     empty: none bus-ID: 00:02.

Debian Trixie: xorg with fb instead of intel or nouveau driver

Hello, I have a Lenovo Thinkpad P50, which has the following setup: chris@laptop:~$ inxi -Gaz --za Graphics:   Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 530 vendor: Lenovo driver: i915 v: kernel     arch: Gen-9 process: Intel 14n built: 2015-16 ports: active: eDP-1     empty: none bus-ID: 00:02.0 chip-ID

Re: Re: nvidia driver not loaded after install

Thanks Dan, I disabled Secure Boot and sure enough, the driver was loaded. I actually decided to make a clean install of Debian on this machine and left Secure boot disabled. I tried multiple times and was unable to get the driver to load. This is strange however because it did work before. I

Re: nvidia driver not loaded after install

On Jan 15, 2025, Anil F Duggirala wrote: > I am trying to install the Nvidia driver on my Dell XPS 9550 fresh > Debian 12 machine. > > [ 16.905450] Loading of module with unavailable key is rejected > ... > > Can anyone please help me out. Getting Debian to work in this la

nvidia driver not loaded after install

I am trying to install the Nvidia driver on my Dell XPS 9550 fresh Debian 12 machine. I followed all instructions in https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#Debian_12_.22Bookworm.22 including: apt install linux-headers-amd64 Including the extra instructions given here: https

Re: SSL error:FFFFFFFF80000002:system library::No such file or directory: ../crypto/bio/bss_file.c:67 when I'm trying to sign the nvidia driver on Debian 12.

On 11/26/24 12:59, Mario Marietto wrote: 2) # apt install nvidia-detect nvidia-driver You first did an `update`. Also the wiki at [1] suggest to install other PKGs. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/1h08w9v/ssl_error8002system_libraryno_such/?rdt=41730 -- John Doe

SSL error:FFFFFFFF80000002:system library::No such file or directory: ../crypto/bio/bss_file.c:67 when I'm trying to sign the nvidia driver on Debian 12.

Hello. I'm using Ubuntu 24.04 right now,but what I'm trying to do is to virtualize Debian 12 as a vm using qemu + kvm + virt-manager and I want to passthru my gpu from Ubuntu to Debian. And infact this is what I did. Debian is running now,but I'm facing a problem with the nvidia

NVIDIA driver 555.58 released and Wayland Explicit Sync

yland. Others posting have indicated they are using Nvidia GPUs. I often wonder how that is going for them, and how they achieve the installation (as I have failed). >From my reading (via the Internet) the NVIDIA driver 555 and 560 drivers are only beta, and have yet to be included into Arch o

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

David writes: > Hi, for your information, this wiki page: > https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian > has some information related to your question, I sometimes wonder if the deb-multimedia repo counts as a Frankendebian making thingy since the wiki page is ambiguous in my opinion. I sometimes

strange behavior with Nvidia driver on Bookworm (12)

Since I installed a GTX 970 and the Nvidia driver on my Bookworm (12) system, I've noticed some odd behavior. I'll start with the most obnoxious. I'm open to any ideas. Well, not _any_ any. 1. Last night before I went to bed I suspended my computer at 2:24:55. The next log mes

usermod video,audio (was: Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970)

On 16/08/2024 06:15, George at Clug wrote: usermod -a -G video,audio [myusername] It should not be necessary. Udev and systemd-logind "uaccess" feature grants permissions to the current active user through ACLs.

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

I'll poke around in the OSD and see if there's an obvious cause. I just ran glmark2 to compare it to the previous card. Old score: 2063, new score: 19521. An order of magnitude improvement is not insignificant. Oh, another hint: You can also try the tesla driver (it is something 470

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 15:46, George at Clug wrote: > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? Hi, for your information, this wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian has

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

-a -G video,audio [myusername] dpkg --add-architecture i386 aptitude update && aptitude install steam I guess I would install backports before doing this? And what backports do you install, just linux-image-amd64, or also nvidia-detect and whatever video driver nvidia-detect suggests?

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Friday, 16-08-2024 at 03:57 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 00:48:20 +1000, George at Clug wrote: > > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? > > No. Back

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

Le 15/08/2024 à 19:17, e...@gmx.us a écrit : [...] > Aug 15 12:57:24 cerberus lightdm[1085]: Error getting user list from > org.freedesktop.Accounts: > GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name > org.freedesktop.Accounts was not provided by any .service files [...] didier@hp-

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

> > You don't get security updates for backport kernels, so I'd strongly > oppose it if you're running an exposed server. But for a desktop system > in a normal kind of setup (behind a firewall, or on a private network) > it should be within reasonable expectations of security. Huh, this is an

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 00:48:20 +1000, George at Clug wrote: > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? No. Backports are reasonably safe. Installing one doesn't break all your dep

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

the driver discovers it. But you might get false results. Also you my try not to connect tu HDMI port, if your carrd oor your monitor has VGA or DVI, try these, too. My card has HDMI and DVI, and I am using a cable with HDMI on one side, the other has DVI. Prior I was running another monitor

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

> What Steam games do you have working under Nvidia? I have watched people on > YouTube play some interesting and modern games using Nvidia + Linux and > with ray-tracing, but they have to do a lot of customisation from what I > could tell. From my experience basic distribution installations do not

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

lized, major device number 242 [ 13.871494] nvidia :01:00.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=io+mem [ 13.986728] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 535.183.01 Sun May 12 19:39:15 UTC 2024 [ 14.679162] nvidia-modeset: Loading NVIDIA Kernel Mode

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

I am currently running in X with the GTX. Only two of three monitors are connected. The right one currently has a VGA cable which doesn't work with this card. In the console, the left (sideways, DVI) worked but the center (HDMI) didn't until "startx". How can I fix that, or is the DVI one the

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On 8/15/24 05:05, Hans wrote: Hi Ebon, I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a charme. No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and everything elese is working great. FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. Proba

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

-backports linux-image-amd64 # apt install -t bookworm-backports nvidia-detect # apt install -t bookworm-backports nvidia-driver Do you need to make any other modifications? Thanks, George. # apt show linux-image-amd64 -a Package: linux-image-amd64 Version: 6.9.7-1~bpo12+1 Priority: optional

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

install libnvidia-pkcs11-openssl3:amd64 install libnvidia-ptxjitcompiler1:amd64 install libnvidia-ptxjitcompiler1:i386 install nvidia-alternative install nvidia-cuda-mps install nvidia-driver

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

: 07:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation GM206 [GeForce GTX 960] [10de:1401] (rev a1) Checking card:  NVIDIA Corporation GM206 [GeForce GTX 960] (rev a1) Your card is supported by all driver versions. Your card is also supported by the Tesla 440 drivers series. Your card is als

nvidia driver for GTX 970

Short version: Please help me install the Nvidia drivers for a GTX 970 on a Bookworm system. Is there a Q&D guide that doesn't assume I'm an idiot, or is it easy enough to explain? Long version: Yes, I'm the same guy who was considering the Nouveau driver a while back. I

Avoid APT::Default-Release (was: Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size)

On 04/08/2024 06:24, Van Snyder wrote: Then, to avoid sucking anything more from unstable, I added /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/my-default containing APT::Default-Release "stable"; It prevents installing security updates

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On Sat, 2024-08-03 at 23:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2024-08-01 12:12:31 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > Should I switch to the proprietary nvidia driver on these > > > machines? > > > >

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-02 14:55:31 +0200, Franco Martelli wrote: > Sorry but have you read that bug report (#1076561)? Some users has posted > solutions to make smaller the initrd file: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076561#10 > and > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 12:12:31 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Should I switch to the proprietary nvidia driver on these machines? > > Without NVidia's graphics accelerator, using software rendering with > nouveau is painful

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 01/08/24 at 17:46, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69879473 2024-07-19 02:11:58 initrd.img-6.7.12-amd64 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 112644015 2024-08-01 13:01:40 initrd.img-6.9

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. > And the initrd siz

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 11:32:10 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 17:18 (UTC+0200): > > > On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> the bug fix should trim initrd size considerably before > >> too long. > > > What do you mean? > > After package containing b

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 17:18 (UTC+0200): > On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> the bug fix should trim initrd size considerably before >> too long. > What do you mean? After package containing bug fix is installed, newly generated initrds will be considerably sma

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): > > > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > > > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > > proprietary nvid

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. > And the initrd size is reason

nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. And the initrd size is reasonable: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 66937544 2024-07-30 11:27:32 initrd.img-6.9.12

Re: change video driver

On 2024-07-07 09:36, mick.crane wrote: On [cough] Trixie, just how do I change the video driver. I'm using driver xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-tesla-470 on older kernel There must have been a reason, likely the available resolution. With kernel 6.9.7-amd64 have to "startx" and the

change video driver

On [cough] Trixie, just how do I change the video driver. I'm using driver xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-tesla-470 on older kernel There must have been a reason, likely the available resolution. With kernel 6.9.7-amd64 have to "startx" and then the available displays in Xfce are

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

follow the instructions precisely correctly. I had been unable to install the NVidia drivers available as nvidia- driver. After doing the steps outlined at https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#Debian_12_.22Bookworm.22,  the response was "you have held broken packages." None of the

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

actualise the package lists. Hope, this helps. Best Hans > at least KDE, and now it won't enter run level 5. I added > nouveau.modeset=0 to the "linux" line in grub.cfg, but it's still > running the nouveau driver, or at least that's what inxi -G reports: >

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 01:24:21PM -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 23:24 +0200, Hans wrote: > > Hi van Snyder, > > > > I believe I got a solution. However, you may not be happy with it, > > but maybe it will work. > > The solution did indeed

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 23:24 +0200, Hans wrote: > Hi van Snyder, > > I believe I got a solution. However, you may not be happy with it, > but maybe it will work. The solution did indeed allow to install the driver. But it removed at least KDE, and now it won't enter run

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

] sid main contrib non-free non-free-firmware then do apt update apt install nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree This should install all necessary files and build the kernel module. Here it did work. However, I had to use 390xx instead of 340xx, but both built here fine. After

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:29:43AM -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 08:03 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Resolve never to buy Nvidia again :) > > 1) On my brother's antique Dell Vostro 1700 laptop, the NVidia G68M > (GeForce 8400M GS) is soldered to the motherboard. > As abo

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree This should install all necessary files and build the kernel module. Here it did work. However, I had to use 390xx instead of 340xx, but both built here fine. After it, reboot and try again if it is working. Sometimes, nvidia-detect says, use

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 08:03 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Resolve never to buy Nvidia again :) 1) On my brother's antique Dell Vostro 1700 laptop, the NVidia G68M (GeForce 8400M GS) is soldered to the motherboard. 2)I'm running NVidia in two desktops because my erstwhile SA gave them to me wh

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

; > been able to install the driver, and had no trouble. I made the mistake > > of installing Debian 12.5 on the same partition, so I don't have the > > Debian 10 install anymore. It freezes so completely that the keyboard > > doesn't work, so I can't switch to

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Van Snyder composed on 2024-06-07 13:29 (UTC-0700): > Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in > Debian 12? > The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." It should have said more. Some of what it should have included

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Hans: Thanks for the note. It seems that nouveau is a bit more stable in Debian 12.5 than it had been in Debian 10.1. At least I hope it is. So far, it hasn't crashed. MfG, Van On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 10:11 +0200, Hans wrote: > No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prio

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

> In real life no one wants to care of it! Nvidia not, because this > costs money and the developers not, because this is Nvidia and > proprietrary (what is not quite correct, because the kernel-module, > which is the part, that can not be build, is open-source). Since you say it's "open source

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prior posted. However, I have a GF-119 in my Lenovo T520, where nvidia-detect says, it needs 340xx. But, although I got 340xx compiled for the kernel, it did not start. I then build 390xx, which worked like a charm. This happened on my notebook

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

p no further and for the bad news, but do > > > nottry too much - I fear, you will fail! > > > > So far, this is the best advice, so don't apologize. > > I had assumed that when NVidia said I need 340 that it is > > undoubtedlytrue. I'll try 390. &g

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

, this is the best advice, so don't apologize. > > I had assumed that when NVidia said I need 340 that it is undoubtedly > true. I'll try 390. > Have you tried "nvidia-detect" package? This tells you what driver you need. In my machine, I installed nvdia-tesla-470-driver and it works fine.

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On 08/06/2024 03:29, Van Snyder wrote: Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? I am not aware of current state of affairs. Several years ago it was possible to rebuild the .deb package (that uses DKMS) with additional patches to make the code compatible

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you need 340.xx, but > this is not always true. My card (with th eolder kernel) was running 390.xx, > although th esystem told me, I have to use 340.xx. 390.xx was running like a > charm, 340.x

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Am Freitag, 7. Juni 2024, 22:29:30 CEST schrieb Van Snyder: Hi! Sadly to tell, that I treid hard to get 340.xx running in Bookworm. The problem is: You can not get it build with the actual kernel sources. I checked and the developers missed some dependencies, the NVidia driver needs at build

NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." But I seem to have trouble with nouveau. When I was running Debian 10 on a Dell Vostro 1700 laptop with NVidia GeForce 8400M graphics,

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

e. It may > be directed to fixing other bugs. If you can compare Debian and upstream > kernels you may get the issue fixed quicker. Direct communication with > driver developers may be more effective. Indeed; that's why I suggested trying the vanilla kernels of the same versions, compile

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 16/05/2024 22:53, piorunz wrote: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ will they be interested in Debian specific error? I don't use vanilla kernel so maybe it's Debian only problem. If you *find* a similar report there then it is likely an upstream issue. (Developers of specific driv

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 16/05/2024 12:35, Max Nikulin wrote: On 16/05/2024 17:35, piorunz wrote: As much as I would like to try vanilla kernel, I don't want to break my system. I use Debian Stable, don't know if things would just work with vanilla kernel. You may try bookworm-backports kernel 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 Yo

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 16/05/2024 17:35, piorunz wrote: As much as I would like to try vanilla kernel, I don't want to break my system. I use Debian Stable, don't know if things would just work with vanilla kernel. You may try bookworm-backports kernel 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 You may check https://bugzilla.kernel.org/

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 15/05/2024 20:55, Michael Kjörling wrote: You made this bug report less than 48 hours ago. While I can certainly understand that you would like to see it fixed, that's not an inordinate amount of time to wait. What probably _would_ be helpful is to see whether you can recreate the same scena

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 15 May 2024 20:40 +0100, from pior...@gmx.com (piorunz): > I have reported a regression in latest Linux kernel in Debian Stable: > > segfault at amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071080 You made this bug report less than 48 hours ago. While I can

Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

Hello, I have reported a regression in latest Linux kernel in Debian Stable: segfault at amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071080 It throws a lot of errors related to AMD GPU every day. I also experienced full desktop hang, where I had to restart my

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

ccount Manager for Red Hat. No, this is not necessarily a kernel bug. It can be a hardware bug and it is plausible it can not be solved with a driver work-around. You are hitting a problem and you want someone else to fix it for you. The answer may simply be that you need to replace the NIC with

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:05:29AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > It has been known to happen that drivers implement workarounds for issues > > in the hardware itself, so that hardware bugs do not get tripped (or are > > tripped less often). > > 🙂 > > You make it sound like it's a rare occurren

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

> It has been known to happen that drivers implement workarounds for issues > in the hardware itself, so that hardware bugs do not get tripped (or are > tripped less often). 🙂 You make it sound like it's a rare occurrence, but it's actually quite common. Most of it is discrete so you'll rarely b

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

In days of yore (Tue, 16 Apr 2024), Sirius thus quoth: > In days of yore (Mon, 15 Apr 2024), Jamie thus quoth: > > So  there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card > > driver. Doing some reading turned up a Proxmox thread about the issues with these Int

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

In days of yore (Mon, 15 Apr 2024), Jamie thus quoth: > So  there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card > driver. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/05480/ethernet-products.html notes that MSI interrupts may be problematic on some systems. Worth diggin

Re: Help to report a bug related to a usb3 lan adapter driver

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:57:00 +0200 user7415 same wrote: > I had a discussion in stack exchange related to the problem that is > well explained here: > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/774594/debian-12-all-of-sudden-my-usb3-lan-adapter-get-assigned-random-mac-address-ea > > For what I und

e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

So  there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card driver. I am running Debian 12 Bookworm. You will get the message "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" and then the network card just stops working. This is a built in NIC  on the computer The computer is a is a HP Prodesk 600 G4 M

Help to report a bug related to a usb3 lan adapter driver

Hello, I'm not very skilled in what concerns to kernel patching and compiling. I had a discussion in stack exchange related to the problem that is well explained here: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/774594/debian-12-all-of-sudden-my-usb3-lan-adapter-get-assigned-random-mac-address-ea F

Re: Where to report print driver bug

Am Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:47:41 -0500 schrieb James Klaas : > "Generic PCL 6/PCL XL Printer Foomatic/pxlcolor (recommended)" Do you know the file that provides that? If so, you apt-file search "file" to find the package that provides it.

Where to report print driver bug

ackage the bug is in, please contact debian-user@lists.debian.org for assistance. I have a Dell 2130cn, which is a PCL6 compatible printer. CUPS/Print manager says "Generic PCL 6/PCL XL Printer Foomatic/pxlcolor (recommended)" is the recommended driver and the only PCL6 driver that ac

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt remove *nvidia* -s Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only simulates). Give it a try to nouveau driver, here it works very well with kernel 6.1.55 the only drawback I have is to restart the windows compositor when I

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

On 3/1/24 18:36, Thomas Anderson wrote: I will upgrade Debian to 12 within the next month or so...but before I do, want to clean up my current system. I am running Debian 12 with the nvidia driver. It's mostly OK but I recently had to reboot as the Xorg process had taken around 70%

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Thanks a lot, Macro! it worked. Sorry for delay, I got side tracked with "my day" =) On 03/01/2024 12:03, Marco Moock wrote: Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: Here is the output. Wow, a lot. All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt rem

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

> dpkg-reconfigure nvidia-kernel-dkms > Hi all, I am using a NVidia card, which is using the Tesla-driver version (525.147.XX) and used the 470.XXX version before. Both could not be installed by using the above package. But it got installed using package module-assistant. Suggestio

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

ithout -s (-s only > simulates). nvidia-driver is the actual top level metapackage so removing that is likely the thing. Although I'm not sure that makes much sense if Thomas gets just a blank screen when booting the kernel without the nvidia drivers. Also I think fixing the drivers for bot

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > Here is the output. Wow, a lot. All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt remove *nvidia* -s Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only simulates).

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

available) un nvidia-alternative-legacy-96xx (no description available) un nvidia-cuda-mps (no description available) un nvidia-current (no description available) un nvidia-current-updates (no description available) ii nvidia-detect 418.226.00-3 amd64 NVIDIA GPU detection utility ii nvidia-driver

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Am 03.01.2024 um 11:36:03 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > Key information: > I am aware that there are two different installation paths for the > nvidia driver, either through the repos or from nvidia downloads. > I think I did the later, but I have misplaced, lost, and cannot &g

Nvidia driver on Debian 10

418.226.00   Driver Version: 418.226.00   CUDA Version: 10.1     | |---+--+--+ |GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC | |Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util

Re: Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

te: > > The only place I found that had the driver required me to install > > more content from online (which I can't access, due to the laptop > > not having an Ethernet port, as well as no wireless). > > It is not unusual for computers (especially laptops) with newer &

Re: Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

Hi, Again ignoring your more non-constructive complaints… TL;DR: Try USB networking like by plugging in your phone or a USB ethernet/wifi dongle. On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 07:39:20PM +, Richard Smith wrote: > The only place I found that had the driver required me to install > more c

Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

ce in a Debian support venue. > I'm trying to learn about how to compile a driver (if I can find > one for Debian 12) - if anyone can assist, that would be great! I have a laptop with an RTL8852be which runs Debian 12. I had to install a DKMS module to get support for it. I reported

Re: Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

t had the driver required me to install more content from online (which I can't access, due to the laptop not having an Ethernet port, as well as no wireless). When one couples the above with the Debian site being horrible organized (seriously: it gives me the impression that people don

Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

ion > what constitutes as "awesome" in some people's eyes... > > I'm trying to learn about how to compile a driver (if I can find one for > Debian 12) - if anyone can assist, that would be great! Is this an X-Y problem, and you don't really want to compile one, but just find it. Cheers, David.

Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 12:21:28 + Richard Smith wrote: > I find the issue with Debian weird, as I was able to use this same > computer (Lenovo IdeaPad I7, with a Realtek b52 controller) with > Ubuntu, Kali, and Tails, without an issue! What exactly is your problem? Please show error messages, a

Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

hours trying to install it to my laptop, I'm beginning to question what constitutes as "awesome" in some people's eyes... I'm trying to learn about how to compile a driver (if I can find one for Debian 12) - if anyone can assist, that would be great! signature.asc Des

More printers in the Brother printer-driver-brlaser package

Greetings, There are drivers for more Brother laser printers in the package printer-driver-brlaser . One doesn't have to put up with Brother's atrocious install script to set up the DCP-1610W. The driver package from the Debian repository doesn't produce the extraneous squi

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >