Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 29/12/2017 à 18:27, Andrew W a écrit :
>>
>> On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>>> Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
>>> packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
>>> your firewall/NAT Gateway?
Le 29/12/2017 à 18:27, Andrew W a écrit :
On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
your firewall/NAT Gateway?
Thanks for this tip. Looking into it I
On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
your firewall/NAT Gateway?
Thanks for this tip. Looking into it I discovered TCP seems to be
recommened fo
Andrew Wood wrote:
Hi,
> I have a server which acts as a DNS server for our LAN. All our internal
> servers have A records on it using a .local domain and it forwards all
> other requests out to the root servers using the in built list provided
> with BIND. All clients on the LAN have this ma
Andrew W wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone have any ideas please?
>
I had the same experience - I think (after trying this and that) the
solution was ntp (time was behind on the server), but I am not really 100%.
I was thinking first it has something to do with ipv6 or firewall, but after
updating the
I have a server which acts as a DNS server for our LAN. All our internal
servers have A records on it using a .local domain and it forwards all
other requests out to the root servers using the in built list provided
with BIND. All clients on the LAN have this machine set as their only
DNS serve
I have a server which acts as a DNS server for our LAN. All our internal
servers have A records on it using a .local domain and it forwards all
other requests out to the root servers using the in built list provided
with BIND. All clients on the LAN have this machine set as their only
DNS serve
In , Andre' John
wrote:
>I am running a VMWare Server 2 on Ubuntu Jaunty and 2 Debian (testing)
>clients in it, which get their IP address automatically (and variably)
>through DHCP. The latter does work without a clitch. Unfortunately, I
>cannot access the two clients through hostname, even thoug
Hi there
I am running a VMWare Server 2 on Ubuntu Jaunty and 2 Debian (testing)
clients in it, which get their IP address automatically (and variably)
through DHCP. The latter does work without a clitch. Unfortunately, I
cannot access the two clients through hostname, even though they are
prov
On 2009-06-25, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I updated my testing system, as usual, this morning, but then
> suspended my machine (so everything worked as it had been all day).
> This evening, I rebooted, and suddenly no sites could be found.
> (Other machines on my network did not have the problem.)
I updated my testing system, as usual, this morning, but then
suspended my machine (so everything worked as it had been all day).
This evening, I rebooted, and suddenly no sites could be found.
(Other machines on my network did not have the problem.) Putting the
IP addresses of the nameservers as
Another thing.
And what's been happening usually is that when I'm browsing I brake in
the following URL with nothing printed on the screen:
http://domains.googlesyndication.com/apps/domainpark/domainpark.cgi?client=ca-dp-mdnh&ref=http%3A%2F%2F
[field1]&s=mynewslink.com&ip=[field2]&kw_type=br
Hi!
It's a really strange problem, and my network skills are not the best
ones. Sometimes when I'm browsing something it suddenly redirects me to
/?dl=1 of where I am.
That gives me an annoying message: The document you requested was not
found. May we suggest our home page?
Sometimes apt,
Jeff D on 10/08/07 04:07, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
How exactly would I set the domain name on the machine - the name I
thought I'd chosen when setting up the system from CD?
At the moment on this machi
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients.
However it
doesn't recognise any internal net
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hos
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fq
On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Something is rewriting my resolv.conf at least every minute. I
suspected it must be dnsmasq attempting to do the DNS but I just
stopped dnsmasq, and yet resolv.conf is still being updated. I had
a look over my ps output but dont see anything tha
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't
recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Unknown host
isengar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't
recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Unknown host
isengard:~# nslookup gondor
Server: 194
> I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of
> 4
> PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
> browsing,
> ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
>
> Now I am trying to get DNS to work for local machines but it won't co-
> operate. I
> spent the la
David Brodbeck on 06/08/07 19:11, wrote:
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty on 06/08/07 14:27, wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> >>I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
> >>of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everyth
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Please send us your /etc/hosts file. Every box needs a minimal
/etc/hosts file with at least its own hostname (though I'v never used
DHCP). The box running dnsmasq should have all the hosts on your
network listed in /etc/hosts for dnsmasq to read.
Douglas Allan Tutty on 06/08/07 14:27, wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
browsing, ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
N
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
> of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
> browsing, ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
>
> Now I am trying to get DNS to work for l
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network of 4
PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet browsing,
ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
Now I am trying to get DNS to work for local machines but it won't co-operate. I
spent the last couple of ho
Hello,
try entering your IPS's dns servers in the file:
/etc/resolv.conf
i.e.
echo "nameserver xx.yy.zz.ww" > /etc/resolv.conf
where xx.yy.zz.www is the nameserver your ISP provides
for you.
It is strange however, that irc and pings work ...
Maybe that is a temporary error, or someone within
y
Hi everyone,
Nslookup/ping work, irc works, & i can connect to most websites but
having trouble with certain websites such as google/gmail, says can't
find host, then after refresh same error, after many refreshes it
works, for each refresh it generates an error in /var/log/syslog
saying "ICMP me
On 10/30/05, marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Purser said...
> > On 10/29/05, marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have three machines in a small network: one XP, two Linux - let's call
> > > them xp, tux1 and tux2. xp connects to the Internet via a dial-up modem.
> > > Internet Connection
On 10/29/05, marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have three machines in a small network: one XP, two Linux - let's call
> them xp, tux1 and tux2. xp connects to the Internet via a dial-up modem.
> Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) is enable and works fine. ICS forces
> xp's IP to be 192.168.0.1, so
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:47:50PM -0800, RituRaj wrote:
> I have DNS problem. THe mails from our company sent
> outside have started buncing with following error. It
> was working till yesterday...
>
> ... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
> >>> MAIL From:<[
I need to see the Bind configuration files to resolve your problem.
Regards,
Eriberto
RituRaj escreveu:
... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=3535954
<<< 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain
I have DNS problem. THe mails from our company sent
outside have started buncing with following error. It
was working till yesterday...
... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
>>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=3535954
<<< 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address
[EMAIL PRO
--- David Piniella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> in mozilla (you don't specify version) type "about:
> config" in the
> address bar and from there you may be able to see if
> there's a
> "CheckHostIP" (or similar) option.
>
> -d.
Thanks for the suggestion. The only option I could see
that looked
in mozilla (you don't specify version) type "about: config" in the
address bar and from there you may be able to see if there's a
"CheckHostIP" (or similar) option.
-d.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded the kernel from 2.4.26 to 2.6.3.
Everything works, but Mozilla is now unusable. Wh
I recently upgraded the kernel from 2.4.26 to 2.6.3.
Everything works, but Mozilla is now unusable. When I
go to a URL, it just sits there with (e.g.)
Resolving host login.yahoo.com
at the bottom in the status frame, for about 40
seconds. Thinking I maybe had some DNS setup problem,
I tried typi
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:11:31PM -0800, J Y wrote:
> I am off
> the list again. I can't always check my mail every couple of hours. Most
> of the problem is the swen. ( I must get a hundred and fifty messages
> that look like they're from microsoft, daily)
Well, you'll still need to check your m
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:11:31PM -0800, J Y wrote:
> Thank you all. You folks are TOPS!! I did an apt-get remove diald and
> manually removed /var/cache/diald and it works!! my shell knowledge is
> at a fledgling level so thamks for all the help. I hope I wasn't too
> much of a bother. I went to
Thank you all. You folks are TOPS!! I did an apt-get remove diald and
manually removed /var/cache/diald and it works!! my shell knowledge is
at a fledgling level so thamks for all the help. I hope I wasn't too
much of a bother. I went to the archives to look at the thread. I am off
the list again.
J Y writes:
> Oct 13 23:56:29 deblnx pppd[1302]: not replacing existing default route
> to tap0 [0.0.0.0]
This is your problem. You've got diald installed. Purge it.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 at 04:27 GMT, J Y penned:
> Hi, Yeah I thought of that (resov.conf being a directory rather than a
> file) but it is a file. I meant to include that in the post and
> forgot. I'll run the command just to be sure though. You have the
> command as ls-ld /etc/resov.conf is the 'd'
I changed some permissions but it didn't fix the problem. I did notice
that pon highstream.net doesn't produce anything-no modem dial. kppp
does get the modem to dial. The following output is too long and I
didn't know what might be relevent.
deblnx:~# ls -l /etc/resolv.conf
-rw-r--r--1 ro
ls-l.
Quoting Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:01:57AM -0800, J Y wrote:
> > Hi, After getting grub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
> > than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
> > seeing-basically
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:01:57AM -0800, J Y wrote:
> Hi, After getting grub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
> than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
> seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
>
ub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
> > than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
> > seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
> > exit status 1; I put exit 0 in the 6 scripts in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d
&
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> Hi, After getting grub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
> than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
> seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
> exit status 1; I put
Hi, After getting grub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
exit status 1; I put exit 0 in the 6 scripts in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d
If you want the networking info from winxp just do this.
Start->Run->cmd
then when the command prompt window pops up type
ipconfig /all
it will print all windows networking info. Voila you have your nameservers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
"Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just spent a couple of hours diagnosing a DNS lookup problem, but I
> have no clue what's causing the problem. If I do a
>
> host junker.whatever.gov
>
> it's trying to do a lookup over the loopback interface. This times out
> eventually. If I d
I just spent a couple of hours diagnosing a DNS lookup problem, but I
have no clue what's causing the problem. If I do a
host junker.whatever.gov
it's trying to do a lookup over the loopback interface. This times out
eventually. If I do a
host junker.whatever.gov 134.xxx.xxx.xxx
Hello
Martin Reid (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2003 8:47 am, Jörg Johannes wrote:
>
>> My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
>> available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to
>> get my Linux laptop connected to the net w
Good evening (or perhaps morning where you are),
* J?rg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030902 16:56]:
> There are only two IP's listed in the details field. My own one
> (Client-IP) and the dial-in server's (Server-IP). No DNS listed :(
>
> But anyhow: I have set some "important" IP adresses to
Damien Solley schrieb:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 17:47, Jörg Johannes wrote:
Hi everybody.
My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to get
my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am at home is to let XP
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 17:47, Jörg Johannes wrote:
> Hi everybody.
>
> My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
> available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to get
> my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am at home is to let XP dial
> in and
On Monday 01 September 2003 8:47 am, Jörg Johannes wrote:
> My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
> available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to get
> my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am at home is to let XP dial
> in and share the
...
> the net with their IP adress, but I can not get the name resolution to
> work. I don't know which DNS server Windows uses, it is assigned
> dynamically wehn the connection is established, and I don't know how to
> get the adress...
> Any idea how to make surfing the net possible with such
Hi everybody.
My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to get
my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am at home is to let XP dial
in and share the connection to my Linux box. I have tried the "Inter
Basic troubleshooting steps:
1. Use traceroute or tcptracroute to a known IP address. Make sure
your internet connection is really alive. If not, you have other
problems...
2. Make sure your nameservers are where you think they are. Try
doing:
host www.debian.org
3. After dialing up
Hello,
I've tried configuring my dialup accounts using pppconfig, however
when I try to fetch a web page Mozilla sits there forever 'resolving
host foo.bar.com...' When I try to use ping, it also just sits there
trying to resolve the host.
The same happens when I try to configure wvdial. Both d
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:06:19AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:09:27PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > * Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
> > > I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
> > > kernel 2.4.18) placed between
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:09:27PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
> > I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
> > kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
> > system works perfectly with t
* Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
> I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
> kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
> system works perfectly with the computers on the LAN using Woody or
> Testing but I have been unab
I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
system works perfectly with the computers on the LAN using Woody or
Testing but I have been unable to use Netscape from a computer using
Windows ME. I can acc
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Rob Weir wrote:
> How do your logs look? Do they give any more info about wht postfix is
> bouncing it? Are you running a spamfilter or something that's a little
> overzealous?
>
I am running spamassassin (if you have a public mail server you've got to
nowadays.) but postfi
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:04:56AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Again this appears to be the only site which is having any problems but
> it's a big one. Before I begin the arduous process of finding a clueful
> human at Yahoo to talk to, can anyone spot mistakes in my setup which
> could be ca
I run a mailing list related to Hinduism at the domain
lists.advaita-vedanta.org and recently list members who use Yahoo mail
have been complaining about their posts bouncing. This is the kind of
message they get:
>--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Message from yahoo.com.
> Unable to deliver messag
:
Static IP Address - 192.168.1.10
Dynamic Pool - 192.168.1.20 - 192.168.1.100
Hope that helps
Craig
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Drees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: dhcp-dns problem
> DN
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 6:40 am, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with what BOOTP is.
> All I know is that it allows a computer to get an IP address and some
> basic network information.
in my understanding, bootp is mostly usefull for giving a machine an ip
addres
.net]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. November 2002 07:41
> An: debuser
> Betreff: dhcp-dns problem
>
>
> I've been working on setting up dhcp-dns on my system so that
> I can get
> automatic name entries from DHCP. I've run into a problem, however.
> First, on the DHC
Alex Malinovich, 2002-Nov-12 00:40 -0600:
> And finally, I keep seeing references to BOOTP while looking around for
> information. Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with what BOOTP is.
> All I know is that it allows a computer to get an IP address and some
> basic network information. It sounds
I've been working on setting up dhcp-dns on my system so that I can get
automatic name entries from DHCP. I've run into a problem, however.
First, on the DHCP side.
Some of the computers on the network have static leases set up so that
they'll always get the same IP address. Since installing dhcp-
See thread "Woody IPv6 problem finally, really, solved".
On Monday 23 September 2002 19:39, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm having an annoying problem with exim every time "exim -q" is run by
> cron. Exim then causes two DNS query's to my local nameserver, namely for:
> - galadriel.fjphome.nl (the correct
See thread "Woody IPv6 problem finally, really, solved".
On Monday 23 September 2002 19:39, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm having an annoying problem with exim every time "exim -q" is run by
> cron. Exim then causes two DNS query's to my local nameserver, namely for:
> - galadriel.fjphome.nl (the correct
On 24 Sep 2002, 23:42:10, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have checked everything again with your suggestions, but when I do
> "sudo -u mail exim -q" (to emulate crontab) I still get the following in
> querylog on my nameserver:
> XX+/10.19.66.21/galadriel.fjphome.nl//IN
> XX+/10.19.66.21/galadriel/
Frans Pop writes:
> I also get the second line when I do "dig galadriel -t ". Could it be
> Exim does not request "galadriel" but looks explicitly for "galadriel."?
> I get nothing in querylog when I do "ping galadriel". So it may also be
> that ping gets resolved locally (through files), but
Doug (and anybody else...),
Thnx for your reply to my questions and for your suggestions.
That's what I thought! I've been playing around with these settings for
several weeks now, reading docs and configfiles, but no go.
I have checked everything again with your suggestions, but when I do
"sud
I'm having an annoying problem with exim every time "exim -q" is run by cron.
Exim then causes two DNS query's to my local nameserver, namely for:
- galadriel.fjphome.nl (the correct fully quallified name)
- galadriel (unqualified!)
The first query gets solved by my DNS, but the second does not
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:25:49AM -0800, John Shepherd wrote:
> All,
>
> . I previously listed my machine's local network
> IP address (192.168.1.1) as the "gateway address"
> when setting up the network. I left gateway
> address blank this time.
That was probably it, not that I read your prev
All,
Thanks to all who responded to my question
yesterday about my PPP setup.
I corrected the problem last night. The
problem was one of three things. Since my debian
installation is so new that I have no personal
data or customized settings, I just ran through
the initial installa
"John" == John Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I can ping the remote IP number successfully. When I
John> attempt to ping a server by name, it just hangs. I am able
John> to 'telnet' to one rutgers server by ip number only as well.
John> Lynx is unable to br
hat starting a new thread works
better than hi-jacking someone elses thread.
2. As there are 3 current versions of Debian, we may need to know which
one you are using to be able to help you. Do less /etc/debian_version.
Ok, to your problem. If you can do everything using IP's and not host
na
Yes, absolutely numeric form. No insult, thanks
for trying to help.
~John
--- Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I missed the original post. To the original
> poster: Did you put the
> nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf in numeric
> form?
> I hope my question did not insult your
> intelligen
OK.
I'll do that tomorrow after collecting it this
evening.
As best I recall, it is like below. I don't
recall the ip numbers, though, so just putting
x.x.x.x:
# /etc/resolv.conf
domain rutgers.edu
nameserver x.x.x.x
nameserver x.x.x.x
Thanks,
John
--- John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I missed the original post. To the original poster: Did you put the
nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf in numeric form?
I hope my question did not insult your intelligence, but I have seen
people put their nameservers in textual format and for obvious reasons,
that does not work.
--
Andrew
O
John writes:
> /etc/resolv.conf has two nameserver entries and I have verified with my
> ISP (rutgers university) that they are correct.
Please post the _exact_ contents of /etc/resolv.conf.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Hi,
I've been making some progress with this
first attempt at GNU/Linux and am really learning
a lot. I have hit a bit of a problem with
getting an internet connection going, though. I
hope someone can help.
I seem to be succesfully making a PPP
connection with wvdial. (I haven't got
> whatever address on the internet from my client, BUT... the client is
> unable to resolve the names (I can ping 195.110.96.65 but not
> www.dada.it).
> What should I do?
Have you defined nameservers (DNS)?
At /etc/resolv.conf you should have something like this:
nameserver 123.123.123.123
names
Hi,
On one of my client's machine I installed debian potato Release 3 from the
3 CD set. However with the kernel 2.2.19-prex version there seems to be
some problem.
What happens is for the first time when I connect to the net everything is
working. nslookup, dns. But as soon as the connect is ter
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 03:02:54PM -0700, Dean A. Roman wrote:
> For future reference, I was using an alias for the NS name in my
> database records.
yep, you can't use a CNAME for an NS record. like MX records, NS records
can only point at A records.
btw, i strongly recommend using a subdomain f
Craig,
I believe I answered my own questions.
For future reference, I was using an alias for the NS name in my database
records. nsupdate barfs when it encounters this and won't do the update. I was
getting "res_nupdate: res_findzonecut failed (0)" error on stderr when I ran
nsupdate by
Craig,
Another tidbit of info. to help out...
After running the nsupdate command by hand with what dhcp-dns had created,
here is what I got.
There is a "res_findzonecut failed (0)" message. Does this mean anything to
you?
Thanks,
---Dean.
srfs1:/var/lib/dhcp-dns# nsupdate -d ./n
Craig,
I did find this error in /var/log/messages and looked it up, the mails I've
read seem to indicate that the name server can't find this domain?
However, everything(nslookup) seems to work fine. The messages log file is
listed below if you feel like looking at it.
===>>> "Sep 8 0
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:47:10PM -0700, Dean A. Roman wrote:
>Will turning this "feature??" off in Win2K allow the dhcp-dns scripts in
> linux to update bind?
>How do I fix the problem of dhcp-dns not updating bind? Is it related to
> the
> win2K "feature??"
Are you saying that the dhc
> Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:17:04AM -0700, Dean A. Roman wrote:
> > > I'm a bit confused, and it is probably because I don't totally
> > > understand how the dynamic dns updates work.
> >
> > if the rejected updates are coming from a W2K machine then it has
> > noth
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:47:10PM -0700, Dean A. Roman wrote:
> Will turning this "feature??" off in Win2K allow the dhcp-dns scripts
> in linux to update bind?
no, it's unrelated. it'll just stop the w2k clients from attempting to
update the dns server.
> How do I fix the problem of dhcp-dns n
Craig,
Thanks for all the info. It's amazing what Microsoft will try to pass off as
a feature while the whole time opening up your entire DNS structure to the whims
of any user out there.
Anyway, back to the problem at hand:
Will turning this "feature??" off in Win2K allow the dhcp-dns sc
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:17:04AM -0700, Dean A. Roman wrote:
> I'm a bit confused, and it is probably because I don't totally
> understand how the dynamic dns updates work.
if the rejected updates are coming from a W2K machine then it has
nothing to do with dhcp-dns. it's a fault with W2K.
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:34:34 -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>> Should update requests be coming from a dhcp client?
>
>Yes. Who else would they come from.
Well, the update requests could ALSO come from the dhcp server itself. Whenever
a DHCP request arrives on the DHCP server it could return an I
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
