Wait a minute Forget all this. I read the documentation for a generic
install from the blackdown site and forgot about the debian installation
process.
I deleted the manual installation I did.
I did
apt-get install java-package
I then did the fakeroot command:
[EMAIL
From: "Michael Fothergill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: problem making symbolic link to blackdown (fixed) but a now a
new problem..
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:56:12 +
From: "Michael Fothergill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Michael Fothergill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: problem making symbolic link to blackdown amd64 java plugin
library file...
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:17:32 +
Dear Debianists,
I use Etch 4.0 (r0) AMD64 version on a AMD64 box.
Dear Debianists,
I use Etch 4.0 (r0) AMD64 version on a AMD64 box. I use Iceweasel.
I removed the gcj java plugin from my browser I had been using because it
could not run applet properly .
I then downloaded the amd64 version of blackdown j2re-1.4.2-03.
I then followed the
Hal Vaughan thresholddigital.com> writes:
> My understanding, though, is that this while AWT has some work done, Swing is
> still undone. When I write in Java, I'm working on a client program for my
> business that receives data and prints it. Since it goes on subscriber's
> computers, it *h
On Sunday 26 June 2005 18:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > make it work. In the long run, I'd love it if I could compile my program
> > for Linux, OSX, and Windows, with all executable and library files in one
> > or a few directories on an install CD, and easily copy that directory
> > tree over
On Sunday 26 June 2005 08:21 am, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:37:05PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > make it work. In the long run, I'd love it if I could compile my program
> > for Linux, OSX, and Windows, with all executable and library files in one
> > or a few directories on
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:37:05PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> make it work. In the long run, I'd love it if I could compile my program for
> Linux, OSX, and Windows, with all executable and library files in one or a
> few directories on an install CD, and easily copy that directory tree over to
On Friday 24 June 2005 07:13 pm, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hal Vaughan thresholddigital.com> writes:
> > Blackdown, and all the other FOSS implementations of Java are noble
> > undertakings and I look forward to the day I can use a completely FOSS
> > version of Java on Lin
Hal Vaughan thresholddigital.com> writes:
> Blackdown, and all the other FOSS implementations of Java are noble
> undertakings and I look forward to the day I can use a completely FOSS
> version of Java on Linux, OSX, and the Redmond OS.
Unfortunately, Blackdown is neither Free
Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 17:21 -0400, Tong a écrit :
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:56 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
>
> > Obviously all this from standard debian packages if that is possible
>
> I've noticed that many of the answers for this thread suggest to avo
Tong wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:56 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
Obviously all this from standard debian packages if that is possible
I've noticed that many of the answers for this thread suggest to avoid the
blackdown. Any justification for that?
The reason I'm asking
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 05:21 pm, Tong wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:56 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > Obviously all this from standard debian packages if that is possible
>
> I've noticed that many of the answers for this thread suggest to avoid the
> blackdown. Any
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:01:56 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> Obviously all this from standard debian packages if that is possible
I've noticed that many of the answers for this thread suggest to avoid the
blackdown. Any justification for that?
The reason I'm asking is that I as
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 21:20, VSJ wrote:
> Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> > I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
> > solve it. I do so.
> >
> > I want to download and install this wonderfull environment now.
> >
> >
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:27:06 -0600, Rich Wellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wim De Smet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I must say I think that every user that uses this operating system should
> > have the basic capabilities to do this stuff. If you do not, maybe it is
> > time for you to lea
Wim De Smet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I must say I think that every user that uses this operating system should
> have the basic capabilities to do this stuff. If you do not, maybe it is
> time for you to learn them. You need to learn how to use the system you
> have, not try to dumb everythin
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:49:55 +, Pedro M (Morphix User)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jules Dubois escribió:
>
>
>
> >On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:10:03 +, Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> >>VSJ escribió:
> >>>Read these instructions:
> >>>http://serios.net/content/debian/java.php
> >>>to build y
On Nov 11 2004, Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> So, the solution are the forks.
> We need the best forks.
> A message to Sun : or an easy Linux installation or we are going to
> promote Java forks only ;)
The Java environments that come with sarge are getting better all the time
and they may be e
Jules Dubois escribió:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:10:03 +, Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
VSJ escribió:
Read these instructions:
http://serios.net/content/debian/java.php
to build you own up to date Debian Java packages.
So we would find a single step package that would install Java i
Juha Siltala escribió:
On 2004-11-10, Pedro M (Morphix User) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jules Dubois escribió:
I think that's what the 'java-package' package is designed to do: Make a
Debian package from Blackdown or Sun JRE.
If so, I think for newbbie
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:10:03 +, Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> VSJ escribió:
>
>>Read these instructions:
>>http://serios.net/content/debian/java.php
>>to build you own up to date Debian Java packages.
>>
> So we would find a single step package that would install Java in Debian
> and in th
On 2004-11-10, Pedro M (Morphix User) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jules Dubois escribió:
>>I think that's what the 'java-package' package is designed to do: Make a
>>Debian package from Blackdown or Sun JRE.
> If so, I think for newbbies is very intere
Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> So we would find a single step package that would install Java in Debian
> and in the browsers at the same time.
>
> Where can I find it (easy for neophyte, this is one single apt-get
> install package).
>
I've made some Java .deb packages, which can easily be in
Jules Dubois escribió:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:07:11 +, Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
But I like blackdown, becuase making an apt-get install, it installs
automatically in Mozilla (in a similar way to Macromedia Flash Debian
Package ).
I think that's what the 'java-package&#
VSJ escribió:
Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
solve it. I do so.
I want to download and install this wonderfull environment now.
Regards.
Blackdown isn't wonderfull at all:
- Debian packages outdated
- Java doesn&#
On Nov 09 2004, Jules Dubois wrote:
> How about Kaffe? It's Free and already packaged, it seems.
Yes, not only that, but Kaffe is also in testing, which means that it has
passed the "testing sieve". And also sablevm seems to be as good for my
purposes as Kaffe.
Both of them now are able to run p
Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
> solve it. I do so.
>
> I want to download and install this wonderfull environment now.
>
> Regards.
Blackdown isn't wonderfull at all:
- Debian packages outdated
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:07:11 +, Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> But I like blackdown, becuase making an apt-get install, it installs
> automatically in Mozilla (in a similar way to Macromedia Flash Debian
> Package ).
I think that's what the 'java-package' package i
Wim De Smet escribió:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 13:44:52 +, Pedro M (Morphix User)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
solve it. I do so.
I want to download and install this wonderfull environment now.
the blackdown jre
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 13:44:52 +, Pedro M (Morphix User)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
> solve it. I do so.
>
> I want to download and install this wonderfull environment now.
the blackdown jre is not
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 13:44:52 +, Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
> solve it.
What is the actual error message?
> I do so.
This is basically a mailing list for discussions by users; your message,
althoug
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:06:11PM +, Pedro M (Morphix User) wrote:
> The problem is with DEBIAN and the package for unstable.
> Can anybody test install again this package in the unstable version ?..
No, the problem, if there is one, is Blackdown's. Debian does not ship a
non-free JRE. Ther
Andrea Vettorello escribió:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 13:44:52 +, Pedro M (Morphix User)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
solve it. I do so.
I want to download and install this wonderfull environment now.
It's a
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 13:44:52 +, Pedro M (Morphix User)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
> solve it. I do so.
>
> I want to download and install this wonderfull environment now.
>
It's a Debian or
I cannot apt-get blackdown JRE. The program says: report the problem to
solve it. I do so.
I want to download and install this wonderfull environment now.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Oct 24, 2004:
> There are debs for 1.4.2 which take care of setting up the plugin, etc.
> I just have to integrate them into the pool on ftp.tux.org somehow,
> are any tools to generate a pool structure?
I think dpkg-scanpackages (dpkg-dev) might do w
ch take care of setting up the plugin, etc.
I just have to integrate them into the pool on ftp.tux.org somehow,
are any tools to generate a pool structure?
Juergen
--
Juergen Kreileder, Blackdown Java-Linux Team
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/java2-status/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
The j2re1.4 Debian package available from BlackDown (e.g.,
deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian unstable main non-free) is not as
current as other versions available from BlackDown. It's over two years
old. Judging from the fact I couldn't get it to work with mozilla
firefox 0.9.3-5
l-Shawaf wrote:
> > I'm having a problem getting java to run. I tried to use sun's java.
> > That would just crash firebird. Then, I installed blackdown java. Now
> > firebird doesn't crash, but java just shows up as a gray frame in the
> > browser. I'
Mustafa Taha Al-Shawaf wrote:
> I'm having a problem getting java to run. I tried to use sun's java. That
> would just crash firebird. Then, I installed blackdown java. Now firebird
> doesn't crash, but java just shows up as a gray frame in the browser. I'm
&g
I'm having a problem getting java to run. I tried to use sun's java. That
would just crash firebird. Then, I installed blackdown java. Now firebird
doesn't crash, but java just shows up as a gray frame in the browser. I'm
pulling my hair out trying to solve this, bu
directory]
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/jre/plugin/i386/mozilla/javaplugin_oji.so
[/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/jre/plugin/i386/mozilla/javaplugin_oji.so: undefined
symbol:
GetGlobalServiceManager__16nsServiceManagerPP17nsIServiceManager]
I am running blackdown java
anyone
I am having run-time link problems with my java app. I am using the
Blackdown 1.4 Java SDK on testing. When I try to run my app, I get:
$ ./jvm_dump_system_property
./jvm_dump_system_property: error while loading shared libraries: libjava.so: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or
I am having run-time link problems with my java app. I am using the
Blackdown 1.4 Java SDK on testing. When I try to run my app, I get:
$ ./jvm_dump_system_property
./jvm_dump_system_property: error while loading shared libraries: libjava.so: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:08:24:15:04:53-0400] scribed:
> On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 11:42, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Short summary:
> > What's the deal here? Has anyone gotten the Blackdown Java Plugin to
> > work with Mozilla 1.4?
>
> deb http://jo
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 11:42, martin f krafft wrote:
> Short summary:
> What's the deal here? Has anyone gotten the Blackdown Java Plugin to
> work with Mozilla 1.4?
deb http://jopa.studentenweb.org/debian ./
apt-get install j2re1.4 j2se-common
There you are.
--
greg, [E
-browse 1.4-2 Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
> ii j2re1.41.4.0.99beta-1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2 Runtime
> Environment, St ii j2sdk1.4 1.4.0.99beta-1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2
> SDK, Standard Edition
>
> Java works, Mozilla works, but the plugin does not. j2r
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 09:41, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Rich Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.08.24.1833 +0200]:
> > Short answer, no. According to http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux.html
> > mozilla needs 1.4.2. I got it from sun's site and it does work.
>
> Why does it then not work w
also sprach Rich Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.08.24.1833 +0200]:
> Short answer, no. According to http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux.html
> mozilla needs 1.4.2. I got it from sun's site and it does work.
Why does it then not work with Mozilla 1.3? Same restrictions?
--
Please do not CC me w
also sprach Rich Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.08.24.1833 +0200]:
> Short answer, no. According to http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux.html
> mozilla needs 1.4.2. I got it from sun's site and it does work.
So I got to wait for blackdown to release 1.4.2 if I want to stay
wit
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:42:37PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Short summary:
>
> MozillaJRE Works?
> ==
> 1.2.1-2.bunk j2re1.3 YES
> 1.2.1-2.bunk j2re1.4 unknown
> 1.3-5
ozilla-browse 1.4-2 Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
> ii j2re1.41.4.0.99beta-1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, St
> ii j2sdk1.4 1.4.0.99beta-1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition
> What's the deal here? Has anyone gotten the Black
1.4-2 j2re1.3 NO
1.4-2 j2re1.4 NO
Why? And how to fix?
I am trying hard to get Java to work with Mozilla:
ii mozilla-browse 1.4-2 Mozilla Web Browser - core and browser
ii j2re1.41.4.0.99beta-1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2 Runtime
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 09:31, Ed Lawson wrote:
> Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown for my
> unstable box. When doing so I get a message requiring that
> I accpt the Sun license, but there seems to be no way to do
> this and certainly cannot click on any options
On Friday 25 Jul 2003 17:32, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Actually it is 'yes' ;) but it should by obvious what to type once Ed
> gets there...
OK, OK, its been a while.
> Sorry for nitpicking,
You're forgiven ;)
Tom
--
^__^ Tom Badran
(oo)\__Imperial College
(__)\
Hello Tom!
At Friday 25 July 2003 18:00 Tom Badran wrote:
> On Friday 25 Jul 2003 15:31, Ed Lawson wrote:
>> Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown for my
>> unstable box. When doing so I get a message requiring that I accpt
>> the Sun license, but there see
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 10:31, Ed Lawson wrote:
> Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown
> for my unstable box. When doing so I get a message
> requiring that I accpt the Sun license, but there seems
> to be no way to do this and certainly cannot click on any
> opti
On Friday 25 Jul 2003 15:31, Ed Lawson wrote:
> Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown for my unstable box.
> When doing so I get a message requiring that I accpt the Sun license, but
> there seems to be no way to do this and certainly cannot click on any
> options
Just went to install the 1.4 Java debs from Blackdown for my unstable box. When doing
so I get a message requiring that I accpt the Sun license, but there seems to be no
way to do this and certainly cannot click on any options as sugested. This hangs the
install.
Anyone else encountered
--- Christian Schoenebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi!
>
> I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails:
>
> Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ...
> update-alternatives: unable to make
> /
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:24:17PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails:
>
> Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ...
> update-alternatives: unable to make
> /usr/lib/mozi
Hi!
I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails:
Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ...
update-alternatives: unable to make
/usr/lib/mozilla-cvs/plugins/javaplugin_oji.so.dpkg-tmp a symlink to
/etc/alternatives/javaplugin_oji
Hi,
I'm using woody/stable and I'm having some problems with java utilities
such as jar, rmic etc.
I try removing and reinstalling but the problem persists. It seems that
the symbolic links such as the following are broken:
/usr/bin/jar -> /etc/alternatives/jar -> /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/bin/jar
It
the Binary from Blackdown must be faulty.
Then again, that seems hardly possible because most Java applications
come as a *.jar so it would surely have been detected.
Considering all this, a problem with a library (*.so) that is used by
the JVM (libjvm.so) seems to make most sense. That could conceivably b
when used with libc6 2.3.1 (which is now
in sid), but blackdown have released fixed versions of both 1.4 and 1.3.
It was *not* a problem with libc, it was an issue with the JDK; thus a
recompile of libc would not help.
>
> i'm running "testing", and installed J2SDK1.3.1 from
hi all,
someone recently mentioned in a java related thread that it was
necessary to compile libc or glibc to get Java2 to run, if i remember
correctly. is that the case?
i'm running "testing", and installed J2SDK1.3.1 from blackdown without
any apparent problems.
some java ap
[Didn't you already post this message, and get an answer from Colin?]
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:39:35PM +0100, Jan Krupa wrote:
> Which distribution do you mean is better?
'Better' is relative.
> from sun j2sdk1.4.1_01 (j2sdk1.3.1) or from blackdown
> j2sdk-1
Which distribution do you mean is better?
from sun j2sdk1.4.1_01 (j2sdk1.3.1) or from blackdown
j2sdk-1.4.1-beta-linux-i586.bin (j2sdk1.3.1-linux...) or from something
else?
Which is the most complete? What is the difference between j2sdk1.4.1_01
and j2sdk-1.4.1-beta-linux-i586.bin ? (One is
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:48:18PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
1.3 works on unstable "out-of-the-box". At least version 1.3.1.02b-2
does. I think the blackdown folks may have fixed the __libc_wait()
(or whatever the function's name was) problem I saw discussed
quot;out-of-the-box". At least version 1.3.1.02b-2
> does. I think the blackdown folks may have fixed the __libc_wait()
> (or whatever the function's name was) problem I saw discussed earlier.
>
> -D
Thanks for the side note - i have been looking for a way to run some
ll, and i dont know whether or not 1.4 works on woody.
|
| 1.3 _can_ work on unstable, but you must rebuild glibc.
1.3 works on unstable "out-of-the-box". At least version 1.3.1.02b-2
does. I think the blackdown folks may have fixed the __libc_wait()
(or whatever the function's
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:14:46PM +, Tom Badran wrote:
Then install : j2re1.3 j2sdk1.3 if using woody, or j2re1.4, j2sdk1.4 if using
unstable. 1.3 wont work on stable, although it will probably install, and i
dont know whether or not 1.4 works on woody.
1.3 _can_ work on unstable, but yo
not work in Woody, based simply on the fact that
if it did, Blackdown would have put it in thier woody directory.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system
* Bruce Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021203 13:36]:
> Hello all,
>
> Just exactly what is blackdown java? Is this java2 from sun? I installed
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/docs/support/faq-release/FAQ-java-linux-1.html#ss1.1
What is Blackdown Java?
The term "Blackdown Jav
On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 9:43 pm, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On 2002.12.03 16:35 Bruce Park wrote:
> > Just exactly what is blackdown java? Is this java2 from sun? I
> > installed j2sdk1.3 when I was in Redhat but since I converted, I'll
> > need to install the appropriate
English is read from the top down, not random order. Please adjust
your quoting habits accordingly.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:17:26PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I running Woody and I have apt-get Java stuff for Woody:
> only the version 1.3 seems to be available.
j2re1.4 is only available in
ich one is more compliant?
[comparing Blackdown and Sun's JVM distributions]
I believe that the two releases are the same. Several years ago the
Blackdown people signed NDAs with Sun so they could get the source
code and port it to linux. Now Sun provides a tarball on their own
web site,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 05:40:15PM -0500, Bruce Park wrote:
| Darryl,
|
| So which one is more compliant?
[comparing Blackdown and Sun's JVM distributions]
I believe that the two releases are the same. Several years ago the
Blackdown people signed NDAs with Sun so they could get the s
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bruce Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: blackdown java
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:43:26 -0500
On 2002.12.03 16:35 Bruce Park wrote:
Just exactly what is blackdown java? Is this java2 from sun? I installed
j2sdk1.3 when I was in Redha
On 2002.12.03 16:35 Bruce Park wrote:
Just exactly what is blackdown java? Is this java2 from sun? I
installed j2sdk1.3 when I was in Redhat but since I converted, I'll
need to install the appropriate software.
Any help or suggestion is greatly appreciated.
Sun has their implementation o
Hello all,
Just exactly what is blackdown java? Is this java2 from sun? I installed
j2sdk1.3 when I was in Redhat but since I converted, I'll need to install
the appropriate software.
Any help or suggestion is greatly appreciated
On 19 Oct 2002 13:54:19 -0500 Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Colin> Make sure you have 'main' listed as well as 'non-free' for
> Colin> the repository from which you got j2re1.3.
>
> Thank you. Though I'm not the or
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 17:37, Ben Thompson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to install blackdown java package j2re1.3 on my sarge system,
> but I got an error message from apt saying that it it depended on
> j2se-common which could not be installed. Can anyone advise how to get
> aroun
"Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Colin> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 08:37:27AM +0100, Ben Thompson
Colin> wrote:
>> I tried to install blackdown java package j2re1.3 on my sarge
>> system, but I got an error message from apt sa
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 10:15:52AM +0200, Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka wrote:
> apt-get -f install
> Vlada
How is this going to help him, when what he has is a missing package? Why
does everyone automatically offer this, like it fixes anything and
everything?
--
Marc Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 08:37:27AM +0100, Ben Thompson wrote:
> I tried to install blackdown java package j2re1.3 on my sarge system,
> but I got an error message from apt saying that it it depended on
> j2se-common which could not be installed. Can anyone advise how to get
> around
apt-get -f install
Vlada
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 09:37, Ben Thompson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to install blackdown java package j2re1.3 on my sarge system,
> but I got an error message from apt saying that it it depended on
> j2se-common which could not be installed. Can anyone ad
Hello,
I tried to install blackdown java package j2re1.3 on my sarge system,
but I got an error message from apt saying that it it depended on
j2se-common which could not be installed. Can anyone advise how to get
around this?
Thanks, Ben Thompson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
I'm running woody, the newest balckdown jdk, and apache jserv.
The problem is the jdk just stops working, or it could be the jserv. but there
are no errors in the log files. does anyone have anysuggestions on how to
troubleshoot this?
Wayne
Hi ,
I am writing you because I can't make the java debugger jdb to work on
"potato"- java VM is working fine.
What I am trying to do is to debug a very simple file ; what happends is
that debugger get "locked".
==
> threadlocks
Internal
-jar jswat.jar" this is the
answer:
Cannot find the JPDA package!
Make sure jpda.jar or tools.jar is in your CLASSPATH.
Can anybody please clarify if JDPA is enabled on Blackdown Java and where is
located because I was unsuccsesfull to identify it.
Thank you for participation,
Floreti
UPDATE!
--==++==--
When we last visited Bob, he was struggling with starting
communicator-smotif...
Bob Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- begin nfg snip ---
>
> INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: Could not load
> /usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libjavaplugin_oji.so: l
I finally put a bullet in my teeth and dist-upgraded a potato system to woody.
In potato I had been running communicator-smotif with the Blackdown Java
plugin. Here's what I have now, post-upgrade:
communicator-base 4.73-19Communicator base support
communicator-nethelp-473
Hi,
I'm trying to get a JDK working with CorelLinux.
CorelLinux has libc_2.0.7.19981211_6.deb.
JDK needs libc2.1.2.
I tried CorelUpdating/dpkg with libc6_2.1.2-11.deb,
but it complains about a dependency problem between libc6 and something
else.
It may be because it can't take the jump from 20
95 matches
Mail list logo
