hi all, someone recently mentioned in a java related thread that it was necessary to compile libc or glibc to get Java2 to run, if i remember correctly. is that the case?
i'm running "testing", and installed J2SDK1.3.1 from blackdown without any apparent problems. some java applications work, including, incredibly, most of the java3d demos, but some fail. this is what i get when i try to run Eclipse: Exception in thread "main" java.util.zip.ZipException: No such file or directory at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.<init>(ZipFile.java:110) at java.util.jar.JarFile.<init>(JarFile.java:115) at java.util.jar.JarFile.<init>(JarFile.java:57) as J2SDK 1.3.1 seems *very* standard to me, i gotta admit i was kind of shocked to find out it doesn't run although the installer doesn't complain. actually, i had switched from "stable" to "testing" in the hope that would make it work. would it help to switch to "unstable"? the machine is a purely development & fun machine, so i don't need maximum stability. or is it sufficient to do that glibc recompilation? i would appreciate any hints on that, as i'm a newbie to compiling stuff on linux. lukas __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]