Never mind, he's just a troll. Even the subject is designed to be
inflammatory.
Kind Regards,
B.Hoffmann
Linux User #398054
-Foresight Linux- -Ubuntu- -Debian (Sarge)-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If one has a heart to run free servive, people will
> aprreciate it
>
> If one run a free service with a cheating, it is not
> moral
You still have to prove the cheating part. You haven't been very
convincing so far.
> Let's have a look at one example
If one has a heart to run free service, people will
appreciate it
If one run a free service with a cheating, it is not
moral
Let's have a look at one example
Imagine a street seller sold food to the people who
passed by. One of them ate it and got an allergy.
He/she died in the hospital. The
If one has a heart to run free service, people will
appreciate it
If one run a free service with a cheating, it is not
moral
Let's have a look at one example
Imagine a street seller sold food to the people who
passed by. One of them ate it and got an allergy.
He/she died in the hospital. The
If one has a heart to run free servive, people will
aprreciate it
If one run a free service with a cheating, it is not
moral
Let's have a look at one example
Imagine a street seller sold food to the people who
passed by. One of them ate it and got an alergy.
He/she died in the hospital. The s
If one has a heart to run free servive, people will
aprreciate it
If one run a free service with a cheating, it is not
moral
Let's have a look at one example
Imagine a street seller sold food to the people who
passed by. One of them ate it and got an alergy.
He/she died in the hospital. The s
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:52:25AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is no excuse for volunatary org not to run
> > professionally.
> >
> > Imagine Red Cross, if they are not running in
> > professional way, what would the world be?
>
> While it'
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no excuse for volunatary org not to run
> professionally.
>
> Imagine Red Cross, if they are not running in
> professional way, what would the world be?
While it's flattering to compare the Debian project and the Open Source
Community with the
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 01:43 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> "B.Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:50 -0700, formless void wrote:
> > > LinuxWorld has got a business registration number
> > > (ISSN) to show that they are in business
> > >
> > > Where is the equivale
--- "B.Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:50 -0700, formless void
> wrote:
> > LinuxWorld has got a business registration number
> > (ISSN) to show that they are in business
> >
> > Where is the equivalent from DistroWatch?
> >
>
> This one is easy. LinuxWorld see
"B.Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:50 -0700, formless void wrote:
> > LinuxWorld has got a business registration number
> > (ISSN) to show that they are in business
> >
> > Where is the equivalent from DistroWatch?
> >
>
> This one is easy. LinuxWorld seems to be
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 04:58 -0700, formless void wrote:
> I'm bothering with this site, as I mentioed that there
> is no registration details with it's governing body
I'm afraid I'll soon have to put this down as a case of don't feed the
troll.
Kind Regards,
B.Hoffmann
Linux User #398054
-Fore
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:50 -0700, formless void wrote:
> LinuxWorld has got a business registration number
> (ISSN) to show that they are in business
>
> Where is the equivalent from DistroWatch?
>
This one is easy. LinuxWorld seems to be a business, Distrowatch is not,
it's an organisation, pr
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 16:00 -0700, formless void wrote:
> You say:
> Distrowatch has been around for long enough to have
> been thoroughly
> looked at, and is more or less universally accepted as
> a good
> *indicator* of where things are going.
>
> I would ask:
> Do they tell you how they did st
I'm bothering with this site, as I mentioed that there
is no registration details with it's governing body
--- Ladislav Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 17 April 2006 07:00, formless void wrote:
> > Do they tell you how they did stats? Do you know
> > their method of stats?
> >
> >
On Monday 17 April 2006 07:00, formless void wrote:
> Do they tell you how they did stats? Do you know
> their method of stats?
>
> People know how NASDAQ indicator works. Do you know
> how distrowatch indicator works?
Yes, the details can be found here:
http://distrowatch.com/stats.php?section=
On Monday 17 April 2006 07:00, formless void wrote:
> I would ask:
> Do they tell you how they did stats? Do you know
> their method of stats?
>
> People know how NASDAQ indicator works. Do you know
> how distrowatch indicator works?
Yes, the details can be found here:
http://distrowatch.com/st
formless void wrote:
> Do they tell you how they did stats?
Yes.
> Do you know their method of stats?
Yes.
> Do you know how distrowatch indicator works?
Yes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[quote http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/]
Code of conduct
When using the Debian mailing lists, please follow these rules:
[snip]
# Try not to flame; it is not polite.
[/quote]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
[quote http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/]
Code of conduct
When using the Debian mailing lists, please follow these rules:
[snip]
# Try not to flame; it is not polite.
[/quote]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:46, formless void wrote:
> > Well, if this is the case, then Debian should put its
> > disclaimer some where to state that their package is
> > not responsible for its clone and only for the
> > origrinal. Where is the disclaimer as
formless void wrote:
> LinuxWorld has got a business registration number
> (ISSN) to show that they are in business
Well good for them.
> Where is the equivalent from DistroWatch?
If that is such a great issue for you, try asking this guy:
Name: Ladislav Bodnar
Physical Address: 8F, No 54, A
You say:
Distrowatch has been around for long enough to have
been thoroughly
looked at, and is more or less universally accepted as
a good
*indicator* of where things are going.
I would ask:
Do they tell you how they did stats? Do you know
their method of stats?
People know how NASDAQ indicator
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:46, formless void wrote:
> Well, if this is the case, then Debian should put its
> disclaimer some where to state that their package is
> not responsible for its clone and only for the
> origrinal. Where is the disclaimer as such?
Debian is not responsible for use of thei
LinuxWorld has got a business registration number
(ISSN) to show that they are in business
Where is the equivalent from DistroWatch?
--- Ladislav Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:19, formless void wrote:
>
> > I can pretty know who is LinuxWorld, but I can't
> tell
Well, if this is the case, then Debian should put its
disclaimer some where to state that their package is
not responsible for its clone and only for the
origrinal. Where is the disclaimer as such?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ag
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 06:03, formless void wrote:
> I believe that the parent has to be validated before
> child is done. This is a logical approach. Until the
> debian pakckage is approved to be inocent, there is
> always a suspect of a guilty
Yes Formless One. You are exactly right. Please r
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 16:49 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
> > > formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Xandros has the reputa
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, it's a logical puzzle
>
> If both are credible, it won't mess up the system,
> would it?
It has nothing to do with credibility. Xandros is not pure Debian. They
have made significant modifications to their packages. And I don't
mean this as a bad
On Sunday 16 April 2006 07:29, formless void wrote:
> If both are credible, it won't mess up the system,
> would it?
Sorry, this thread has been painful to read, but I can't let this one pass:
> In any computer language
>
> A = false, B = false, A + B = false
> A = false, B = true, A + B = false
On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:19, formless void wrote:
> I can pretty know who is LinuxWorld, but I can't tell
> who is Distrowatch which even doesn't have a physical
> address to contact Web Credibility (google it)
DistroWatch has a contact email address listed on every single page and a
full
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
> > formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning
> > from
> > > Linux World and this is true if you
Please take the conversation off list. This is OT for this list.
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > formless void wrote:
> >
> > > Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning
> > from
> > > Linux World and this is true if you goo
Again, it's a logical puzzle
If both are credible, it won't mess up the system,
would it?
In any computer language
A = false, B = false, A + B = false
A = false, B = true, A + B = false
A = true, B = false, A + B = false
A = true, B = true, A + B = true
Who doesn't know what he/she is doing?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning
> from
> > Linux World and this is true if you google it
> >
> > http://www.xandros.com/news/press/release5
--- Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void wrote:
>
> > Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning
> from
> > Linux World and this is true if you google it
>
> How this is relevant?
Well, it is a proof of their credibility, isn't it?
>
> There is nothing Debian pe
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrei,
>
> Your message is voicing like
>
> "Do not use other Operating System than Microsoft
> Windows"
>
> "Microsoft Windows is perfect and only Microsoft
> Developers outsie are pathetic"
>
> Hah hah ... A
formless void wrote:
> Hah hah ... Am I right? ^___^
No you are not. That is not what he is saying. Please stop this
pointless discussion as you clearly lack the knowledge to understand
what is being said.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning from
> Linux World and this is true if you google it
>
> http://www.xandros.com/news/press/release56.html
What is that Linux World. Googeling for it shows a few si
formless void wrote:
> Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning from
> Linux World and this is true if you google it
How this is relevant?
> and they suggest that Debian need to issue an digital
> signature to its developer to make sure that their
> packages are authentic
They do not su
Andrei,
Your message is voicing like
"Do not use other Operating System than Microsoft
Windows"
"Microsoft Windows is perfect and only Microsoft
Developers outsie are pathetic"
Hah hah ... Am I right? ^___^
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning from
Linux World and this is true if you google it
http://www.xandros.com/news/press/release56.html
Have a look at the comment at
http://forum.xandros.com/viewtopic.php?t=22532&sid=1751ea601e936cda0b5089f65de3defe
and they suggest that Debian nee
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This package is the stable version but has got this
> kind of bug. Has anyone else tried on that to see if
> it comes with the same problem that I have got?
It is stable but it was *not* meant to be installed on
This package is the stable version but has got this
kind of bug. Has anyone else tried on that to see if
it comes with the same problem that I have got?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The package xfree86-common (4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1)
> [security] is not relavant to the fact sheet at
>
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/x11/xfree86-common
>
> When I was trying to do installation under Xandros
The package xfree86-common (4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1)
[security] is not relavant to the fact sheet at
http://packages.debian.org/stable/x11/xfree86-common
When I was trying to do installation under Xandros
Network, it mentions the package as hpijs instead of
xfree86. All the dependents are print sc
46 matches
Mail list logo
