> From: "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:26:11PM -0800, Richard Taylor wrote:
>
>> And... then, you got the Gnome Office stuff... www.gnome.org
>
>The most recently is at Ximian, www.ximian.com. Abiword is ma
> From: Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sorry for the ignorance but how does this template system work ?
>I can't imagine the benefits from this kind of approach.
I thought you knew Dreamweaver.
It's just copy and paste... you build a basic form for the page.
When you want a new page
> From: "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote:
>> Richard Taylor wrote:
>> > There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect
>> > and so forth.
&
> From: "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Steve wrote:
>> It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as
>> good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most
>> pros use a professional page layout app like Quark because it truly is
>> WYSIWY
> From: "Eric G. Miller"
>On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote:
>> Would that be the Latext system? Considered professionally acceptable?
>
>LaTeX is nice, but it is *not* a desktop publishing programming like
>Quark.
There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel st
This may help you as well.
http://www.securityportal.com/lasg/
http://www.cert.org/
>> Steve here,
>>
>> Well first, I repent of calling Linux 7: Redhat 7. Yes I am new. I have
>> been maintaining my own box from a su level for about 3 months. That is why
>> I was calling in an expert to insta
> From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote:
>
>> >Nothing in opensource is going to be close to DreamWeaver of course -yet
>> >anyways.
>>
>> That depends on whether you hand write your code or let a
>> wys
> From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, William Leese wrote:
>> mmm, i'll give it a try. Just hope someone will come along with a good
>> WYSIWYS-editor for linux (GPL-ed.. ofcourse, unlike Bluefish) some time.
>
>Give Amaya a tryout, done by the w3 folks.
Amaya's really good...
> From: Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> The s1834
>> is a little faster and uses the via apollo pro133a chipset. The
>> s1832 uses the intel 440bx chipset.
>
>I just ordered an 1834 for a box at work. I looked around for a while
>and it seemed the best choice for what I wanted to do.
I'm
-- Original Email --
>Bye
>Romain
>
>PS in case you encounter a problem here is a patch: "format c:" :-)
Wouldn't that be d:?
...
Ok... where did I put my damnable cigarettes!
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
>If you can't be helpful, be silent.
>On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Veit Waltemath wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:49:06PM -, Pat Woolley wrote:
>> > I use mandrake 7 and I am very happy with it. However I
} would like to be able to install debian packages on my system
} As I se
Sorry folks, my brain must have suffered a power-outage,
I have posted the preceding message to the wrong list.
Sorry.
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:31:30AM -0700, Rando Christensen wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Richard Taylor wrote:
>
> > ObDisclaimer: IANADD
> >
> > First off, I would like to apologize if this is not the right list to ask
> > this question, and secondly, I would
that matter? I mean, being stuck to 2.2.17 is not
going to be satisfactory for much longer.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Richard Taylor
at it means.
Thanks
---------
Richard Taylor: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: 16952744
-
.
-
Richard Taylor: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: 16952744
-
gt; pull everything from the net.
>
Thanks.
I never had an internet connection on the machine I use for Debian
before, so all this setting up the internet, and apt-get is very new to
me...
-
Richard Taylor: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: 16952744
-
>Pardon me for being dense, folks, but due to some advice that I
>received from this list I decided to try Woody out. Now: where are
>the install floppy images. I tried
>ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/disks-i386
>and a couple of the mirror sites just to check, and well, came up
>dr
. So back to my original point: Am I being dense, or how do you
install woody? Do ya have to do an upgrade from potato?
-
Richard Taylor: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: 16952744
-
Nick Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: staroffice:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, David Teague wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jun 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > > StarOffice is a bloated stuck pig. It handles MS file formats fairly
> > > well though.
> It may be the only use for SO, take a Wo
Jonathan Markevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I think the best comment over the emacs thing was; someone said "it's
not an
> editor, it's a virtual machine" Now that makes great sense! Now
someone
> needs to come up with something as clever to explain vi... :)
It's just an editor?
Lance Hoffmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding finding which
packages installed:
> What package can I use to determine which packages I have installed
and
> a description of what they do? How would I use this package?
Use dselect.
{Which reminds me... How does one patent copyrighted mate
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: Emacs - was Re: Mail/news
software:
> >>>>> "Richard" == Richard Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard> Win hasn't required an autoexec.bat since '95. -- My
> Richard>
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > "Pat" == Pat Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pat> For me, Linux makes me think. For others, windows may make
> Pat> them think. For still others, something else (not computer
> Pat> related) may make them think. If linux makes you think
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Monday, May 01, 2000, 11:59:24 AM, Richard wrote:
> > Emacs is far more useful than that... It's still the best
> > mailer/newsreader/text based office program in existence.
> That is highly debated, esp. for people who prefer not to have
huge
I've
Graeme Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: Re[2]:
Emacs
> Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ snipped ... ]
> > Simply stated, anything which requires Emacs to run
> > is instantly lower than something that requires Windows to run because
at
> > least it /IS/ an OS and not a
"Kovacs Istvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(snip)
> Emacs, vi, development tools are fine for developers (I also decided
to
> learn Emacs and vi -- not at the wizard level, but to be able to use
> them when needed), and it's reasonable not to expect the masses to use
> them, but it's not the same c
Felix Natter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: are there any good free 3d modeling tools?:
> Chris Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Blender (www.blender.nl) is a very good tool for
3D-modelling/animation.
> It is free (as in beer) and not open-source, but version 2.0 will
probably
> be.
Felix Natter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: are there any good free 3d modeling tools?:
> Chris Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Blender (www.blender.nl) is a very good tool for
3D-modelling/animation.
> It is free (as in beer) and not open-source, but version 2.0 will
probably
> be
"tristan misseri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> You told about mounting different fs on both systems : linux and
win98. How
> can U mount ext2 partitions on win98?
http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/
--
My other computer's running Debian. {www.debian.org}
On 4/21/2000, 1:27:40 PM, "Irish, Jon D"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Is there a comprehensive list somewhere, of all of the available
Debian
> packages, that describes them in detail? Being new, sometimes I am not
too
> sure what exactly I need to install to acomplish what I want to do
(vague,
On 4/7/2000, 10:00:40 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: no
wonder...:
> > What could be more intuitive?
> Something that works. Your statement highlights the reason that when I
ask
> for directions on how to drive somewhere, I will NOT ask someone that has
> lived there all their life
On 4/7/2000, 10:56:59 PM, "loki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: no wonder...:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 08:48:18AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Richard Taylor wrote:
> > > My mileage varies. I find that the program simplifies what ca
On 4/7/2000, 1:41:56 PM, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: no
wonder...:
> Richard Taylor wrote:
> > On 4/6/2000, 9:03:41 PM, Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re:
> > > On 5 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > No
On 4/7/2000, 5:26:43 AM, Chanop Silpa-Anan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: Mutt questions
> Once upon a time, I heard Richard Taylor say
> > On 4/6/2000, 7:31:18 PM, Chanop Silpa-Anan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Once upon a time, I heard Viktor Rosenf
On 4/6/2000, 7:31:18 PM, Chanop Silpa-Anan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
> Once upon a time, I heard Viktor Rosenfeld say
> > I recently switched my working environment from Windows to Debian only
> > and I've been using Netscape Mail so far. And I *hate* it!
> Me too, it's too slow!
:} Tried 6?
On 4/6/2000, 9:03:41 PM, Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re:
no
> On 5 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > No wonder people say that Debian is the most difficult
> > Unix-clone distro to install and use...
> ...
> > Another thing, is the dselect program: it is quite
> > difficult to
On 4/4/2000, 8:55:45 PM, "Eric G . Miller" wrote
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 06:41:30PM -0700, Bart Friederichs wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While reading a page on X, I was wondering, should it be possible to
> > kick out Microsoft's window system and run Windows (??) 98 with X? It
> > says it is portabl
39 matches
Mail list logo
