> From: "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Steve wrote:
>> It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as >> good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most >> pros use a professional page layout app like Quark because it truly is >> WYSIWYG and almost no one writes their own postscript anymore. =) >> >> Why? Because it's faster and makes fewer mistakes, in business time is >> money. >> >> That's why most pros now do use a quality html layout app like DreamWeaver >> UltraDev, because it does the whole enchilada and is really very good. >> >It's certain that purely hand-editing a large site wastes a lot of >time. But the thing left out of this discussion is templating systems It's not "certai" at all. >like Template Toolkit. They can get rid of all your redundant hand >editing. Like copy and paste. >And HTML generation is easy to automate with one of those, where I'm >sure postscript wouldn't be, so the above analogy doesn't really extend >to those. > >Not saying UltraDev isn't good. I rather liked the standard >DreamWeaver, but I have no interest in a WYSIWYG tool now. http://freshmeat.net/browse/751/
