Re: ruby-rails-propshaft: package name should be ruby-propshaft

2025-04-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 02:12:32PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 23/04/2025 1:49 pm, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > The thought process with the name is that this package is only useful > > to rails. It can’t be used generally by other Ruby packages. > > > > Upstream is propshaft inside of the

Re: Forcing bundler to rebuild all native gems for bookworm to trixie update

2025-04-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:33:19AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 4/17/25 2:21 AM, Ananthu C V wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I do not know what the problem that's causing this is, but from a quick > > lookup it seems a "gem pristine --all" can rebuild all native > > extensions, if manually track

Re: Debian Ruby team BoF in this year's DebConf

2025-04-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 05:17:17PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 00:31 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I would be happy if there was a Ruby BoF again at DebConf this year, > > especially since I am going to attend in person this time after > > havin

Re: Debian Ruby team BoF in this year's DebConf

2025-04-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:56:58AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to ask if people are interested on a BoF to discuss anything > team related at DebConf. In the previous years, we had a not very good > attendance and if people are not willing to participate I will not be > su

Re: RFS: ruby-gsl 2.1.0.3+dfsg1-6, Fix two FTBFS(1076659, 1075462)

2025-04-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 03:54:38PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > Hi, folks > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded. > I'm just DM, not DD. Please sponsor the upload. > > package: ruby-gsl > VCS: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gsl > - Fix two FTBFS > - https://bugs.debia

Re: Redmine sometimes fails reproducibility due to language variance

2025-03-31 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:55:44PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > Redmine is periodically failing reproducibility due to variation in > the language environment. > > Failure: > ProjectAdminQueryTest#test_project_statuses_values_should_return_all_statuses > [test/unit/project_admin_query_test.rb:

Re: Redmine - Stop Supporting Multi-Tenancy ( was Re: Redmine 500 Internal Server Error)

2025-03-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:54:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > Valentin, > > On Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:20:56 AM Mountain Standard Time > Valentin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We found an issue in the way plugin assets were handled after the > > upgrade to redmine 6. > > > > In the process

Re: bacon has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/bacon

2025-03-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 01:46:23PM +, Blair Noctis wrote: > On 17/03/2025 16:37, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 05:30:21PM +, Blair Noctis wrote: > (...) > > > Thanks. I assume that counts as some sort of approval from Team RWBY? > > >

Re: bacon has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/bacon

2025-03-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 05:30:21PM +, Blair Noctis wrote: > On 14/03/2025 15:34, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:49:31PM +, Blair Noctis wrote: > > > Thus I suggest: > > > > > > 1. Update d/control of ruby-faraday, ruby-rack

Re: Redmine - Stop Supporting Multi-Tenancy ( was Re: Redmine 500 Internal Server Error)

2025-03-15 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:00:57PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: 2. We remove multi-tenancy support from the package. Although I really like the idea of the multi-tenancy feature, I don’t like making changes to Debian packages that diverge this much from upstream, precisely because they are ha

Re: bacon has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/bacon

2025-03-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:49:31PM +, Blair Noctis wrote: Thus I suggest: 1. Update d/control of ruby-faraday, ruby-rack, ruby-em-spec, ruby-temple to remove obsolete B-D 2. Update ruby-rack-cache to latest/newer version (1.2 in Debian, 1.17 upstream) 3. Patch and/or ask upstream of ruby-a

Re: Test failure "all pooled connections were in use (ActiveRecord::ConnectionTimeoutError)” on Rails7

2025-03-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 05:07:44PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: I am trying to troubleshoot the following bug in ruby-with-advisory-lock. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095888 The test is failing with because of a connection timeout. ParallelismTest#test_doesn't_create_mult

Re: rails 7 transition tracking

2025-03-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 10:24:45AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: debci is another key package that has regressions identified by autopkgtest: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/debci/unstable/amd64/58300406/ debci is fixed is git for a while, nobody needs to worry about it. signature.asc Descr

Re: Upload of ruby-mini-magick 5.1.2 to experimental.

2025-02-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:20:52PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I have uploaded ruby-mini-magick 5.1.2-1 to experimental. The > current version in unstable is 4.13.1-1. Redmine 6 needs a newer > version of ruby-mini-magick, but as this is such a large jump I > thought it would be safer to ta

Re: rails 7 transition tracking

2025-02-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:38:33PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 2/11/25 9:29 AM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 10/02/2025 16:35, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > Hi team, > > > > > > Now that ruby 3.3 migrated to testing and rack 3 close to migration, > > > we can look at rails 7 t

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha 2 transition

2024-12-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Vivek, On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 10:51:21PM +0530, Vivek K J wrote: > Hey, > > I've updated the following 12 packages for fixing FTBS bugs related to > ruby-mocha 2 transition. > > - ruby-actionpack-action-caching > - ruby-feedparser > - ruby-fuzzyurl > - ruby-gelf > - ruby-metriks > - ruby-mob

Re: Ruby 3.3 transition

2024-12-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 03:21:04PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi, > > I am resuming the work for ruby 3.3 transition. I started rebuilding all > reverse dependencies again, the latest results can be found here: > > https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/debian/ruby3.3/ > > I did not have time

Re: Ruby 3.3 transition

2024-12-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:15:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 03:21:04PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am resuming the work for ruby 3.3 transition. I started rebuilding all > > reverse dependencies again, the lates

Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 07:12:18AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > I understand what you said but in this case we would have Debci > blocking the migration to testing, which will avoid any issue to our > users anyway. The maintainer/uploader of the package causing the issue > will notice at some po

Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 02:45:36PM +0530, Ananthu C V wrote: > Hello, > > I write this mail to ponder about something that has been bugging me since > a long time now. If any of you follow the #debian-ruby-changes irc channel, > you'd have noticed the recurring ci results of a few select packages.

Re: Package puma failing in arch:ppc64el

2024-11-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 07:39:03AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote: > Hi, > > Package puma is not migrated to testing due to build failure[1] in > arch:ppc64el . Though the last version of puma seems successfully > built in this arch. `$ getbuildlog puma 6.4.2-6 ppc64el` > > I am not sure if its a tempo

Re: Plans for the next sprint

2024-11-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:33:53AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > And then comes the question about where and when. Let's start with the > "when", Daniel offered to contact the release team to see if we can do it in > January without disrupting any freeze period too much, so far, it seems that > w

Re: Request for review of ruby-with-advisory-lock

2024-10-21 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:21:25PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I have packaged the with_advisory_lock gem, which is a dependency of the new > version of Redmine. > > https://salsa.debian.org/soren/ruby-with-advisory-lock > > This was mostly done using gem2deb. As this is my first Ruby gem pa

Re: Request for assistance updating the Redmine package

2024-09-21 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 04:33:49PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I am attempting to update the Redmine package. After updating to the latest > upstream and adjusting the patches I am able to start the build process, but > it fails when running a database test. > > cp debian/database.test.yml i

Re: corner case for versioned dependencies with gems shipped by ruby

2024-09-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 06:17:59PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:21:51PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been looking at the gem dependency failure with nanoc > > https://people.debian.org/~boutil/ruby3.3/m

Re: corner case for versioned dependencies with gems shipped by ruby

2024-08-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:21:51PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi, > > I have been looking at the gem dependency failure with nanoc > https://people.debian.org/~boutil/ruby3.3/mass-rebuild/builds/10/nanoc/nanoc_4.13.0-1+rebuild1724942411_amd64-2024-08-29T14:40:12Z.build > > nanoc-core.gemsp

Re: I stepped down some ruby package uploader

2024-08-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:14:27AM +0900, d...@debian.org wrote: > Hi all, > > I stepped down below packages uploader for personal reasons (health issues): Thanks for everything you have done, and I wish you a good recovery. > * itamae > * ruby-formatador > * ruby-gnome > * ruby-guard > * ruby-

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-liquid-c is marked for autoremoval from testing

2024-08-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:44:03PM -0500, Piper McCorkle wrote: > On Thursday, 22 August 2024 23:39:07 CDT Debian testing autoremoval watch > wrote: > > ruby-liquid-c 4.1.0-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-09-04 > > > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > > 1077072: ruby-liquid-c:

Re: Ruby 3.3 transition

2024-07-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 01:48:26PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > Thanks for your efforts on that! > > I was wondering if you had a personal Debian repository with the > arch:any packages which successfully built with 3.3 we could add to your > sbuild receipe, or at least if you

Re: Pass command line parameters from dh_ruby to extconf.rb

2023-10-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 05:07:30PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hello, > > Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed. > > I am building a package with Ruby bindings. My debian/rules has the > following: > > execute_after_dh_auto_install: > dh_auto_install --buildsystem ruby > > I noti

Re: name transition of an application implemented in Ruby

2023-10-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:25:30PM +0200, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > Dear Antonio, > > Initially, package `ruby-gem` was assembled by `gem2deb` which is why I assume > it were acceptable to retain a name reflecting the language of implementation > in the name of the repository. Meanwhile, the RFS on

Re: name transition of an application implemented in Ruby

2023-10-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 07:56:23PM +0200, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > > Dear subscribers, > > I seek assistance to rename an application in Ruby, especially the sequence to > file a RFS. > > Just prior to the freeze of Debian bookworm, I packaged `ruby-mdl` from > rubygems with `gem2deb`. Though it

Re: RFS: ruby-health-check 3.1.0

2023-10-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 09:38:44PM +0200, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 15:07:10 +0100 > Oyindamola Olatunji wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > > points listed on > > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Req

Re: Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

2023-08-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 01:46:11AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 08:07:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > FWIW, I have been maintaining vagrant in Debian for several years. > > BTW, thank you for having done that, it's been much appreci

Re: Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

2023-08-22 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 06:46:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > This license change is so disappointing... > > On 18/08/23 at 08:07 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Plan B. > > > > > > - Drop vagrant because of that changed licence

Re: Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

2023-08-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, FWIW, I have been maintaining vagrant in Debian for several years. Thank you for raising this as I have been too lazy to push this discussion. I am copying the Debian Ruby team plus all the people that I could find listed as maintainer or uploader of vagrant related packages (mostly plugins,

Re: RFC: rails: bookworm-pu: ruby-activerecord vs ruby-arel [was: RFC: ruby-arel: obsolete, remove?]

2023-08-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 01:49:23PM +, Georg Faerber wrote: > Dear team, > > Any comments on the mail below? > > Thanks, > Georg > > On 23-07-29 13:00:20, Georg Faerber wrote: > > Dear team, > > > > I recently uploaded rails 2:6.1.7.3+dfsg-2 to unstable [1] with the > > following change: > >

Re: RFC: ruby-arel: obsolete, remove?

2023-06-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:20:17AM +, Georg Faerber wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that #1038935 is happening if ruby-arel is installed. > > Looking at ruby-arel: > > Upstream tells, since 2018/04/24 [1]: > > Arel is now bundled in the Active Record gem, and maintained in the > rails/r

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-i18n-data 0.13.0

2023-03-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 02:42:58PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 28 2023 at 07:49:16 PM -03:00:00 -03:00:00, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 01:00:15AM +0530, Vinay wrote: > > > Hello Team, > > &

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-i18n-data 0.13.0

2023-02-28 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 01:00:15AM +0530, Vinay wrote: > Hello Team, > Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-i18n-data [1] required for > GitLab 15.7.6 > > Have updated it to the version 0.13.0 > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-i18n-data Note that we are in the middle

Re: ruby-faraday-middleware and its dependency on ruby-safe-yaml

2023-01-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:03:39AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > some packages are scheduled for autoremoval due to ruby-faraday-middleware > FTBFS. The FTBFS was easy to fix, unfortunately it introduces a dependency on > ruby-safe-yaml. That is suboptimal because I don't think that we ca

Re: Help Needed: ruby-aws-sdk-core

2023-01-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 07:30:01PM +0530, Vivek K J wrote: > Hi Team, > >         For fixing #1028285 in stable version, I created a proposed > update(#1028396) for uploading fixed version 3.104.3-3+deb11u1 to bullseye. > But after taking the debdiff between this version and previous stable > vers

Re: jekyll

2023-01-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:20:57AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.01.2023 um 10:42 +0100 schrieb Cédric Boutillier: > > > > When reading the email from the release team this morning, I realized > > that the deadline to (re)introduce new packages in testing is just a > > coupl

Re: Why does my package (apt-listbugs) FTBFS in bookworm?

2022-12-27 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 04:15:52PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > What's not clear to me is: why does it attempt to run the test suite > for ruby3.0 in bookworm, but not in unstable? It's an artifact of how binNMUs work. The binNMUs done to drop the support for ruby3.0 have migrated to testing bef

Re: Speedbump while running tests for ruby-omniauth-rails-csrf-protection

2022-10-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 09:43:13PM +0530, Abraham Raji wrote: > and why we are running tests for two different versions of Ruby. Because we are about to switch to ruby3.1 as default, and that process includes having both versions in the archive during some time so the transition can happen. sign

Re: [RFS] -- redmine

2022-09-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 07:04:16PM +0530, Vivek K J wrote: > Hi, > >     I've updated redmine package for using ruby-rouge version 3.30.0 instead > of 3.28.0. The updated package is available > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/redmine/. With this, ruby-rouge 3.30.0 > can be migrated to unstable

Starting ruby3.1 transition: important bugs now marked as serious

2022-09-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
severity 1015305 serious severity 1015309 serious severity 1015310 serious severity 1015322 serious severity 1015327 serious severity 1015328 serious severity 1015329 serious severity 1015334 serious thanks Hi, We are about to start the ruby3.1 transition. I will coordinate this with the release

Re: RFC: dropping Ruby-Versions fields

2022-08-28 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 01:45:38PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hello, > > Today, we have XS-Ruby-Versions and XB-Ruby-Versions: fields in our > source packages. There are two fields: > > - XS-Ruby-Versions is required by gem2deb to even build the package, and > is

Re: RFS emails missing the actual intent of the request

2022-08-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:47:14AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > Thanks for all your work in the past weeks but all (or at least most) > of your emails are missing an important aspect of the RFS mail: the > main intent behind the work. For instance, you say package X is > updated and is l

RFC: dropping Ruby-Versions fields

2022-08-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello, Today, we have XS-Ruby-Versions and XB-Ruby-Versions: fields in our source packages. There are two fields: - XS-Ruby-Versions is required by gem2deb to even build the package, and is supposed to indicate which Ruby versions the package _should_ be built for. For native (arch: any) pack

Re: RFS: ruby-http-form-data 2.3.0-1

2022-08-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 04:56:24PM +0100, 'Tunji wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated the package ruby-http-form-data from version 2.2.0-2 to > 2.3.0-1 > > > kindly check it out at > https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-http-form-data > > > Could you please sponsor it? > > > ruby-http-fo

Re: RFS: ruby-will-paginate 3.3.1

2022-08-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 08:45:29PM +0100, Caleb Adepitan wrote: > > Hi, > > I just updated ruby-will-paginate from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1 > > https://salsa.debian.org/calebpitan/ruby-will-paginate > > Could you please sponsor them? > > ruby-will-paginate 3.3.1 > > Thank you! You forgot to push the

Re: RFS: ruby-http-cookie 1.0.5-1

2022-08-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 04:15:12PM +0100, 'Tunji wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated the package ruby-http-cookie from version 1.0.3-2 to 1.0.5-1 > > > kindly check it out at https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-http-cookie > > > Could you please sponsor it? > > > ruby-http-cookie 1.0.5-1 U

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

2022-07-21 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 06:53:06PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 09:52:17PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > > > On വ്യാ, ജൂൺ 2 2022 at 08:58:37 വൈകു -03:00:00 -03:00:00, Antonio Terceiro > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022

ruby3.1 transition

2022-07-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:48:37AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi everyone, > > DebConf is approaching (some of you might be already enjoying DebCamp) > and I'd like to ask for ideas of topics to be discussed during our BoF. > It is scheduled to next Friday (22nd of July) at 12:00 UTC if I am

Re: faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together

2022-07-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:58:56 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Package: faker,ruby-faker > > Severity: serious > > Tags: sid bookworm > > User: trei...@debian.org > > Usertags: edos-file-overwrite > > Control: found -1 0.9.3-0.1 > > C

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

2022-06-06 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 09:52:17PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On വ്യാ, ജൂൺ 2 2022 at 08:58:37 വൈകു -03:00:00 -03:00:00, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 06:03:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > > Em 01/06/2022 15:42, Pirate Praveen es

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

2022-06-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 06:03:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Em 01/06/2022 15:42, Pirate Praveen escreveu: > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 08:59:18 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum > > wrote: > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > > > on amd64. > > > > > > > > > Relevant p

Bug#1011239: RM: ruby2.7 -- ROM; obsolete, superseded by ruby3.0

2022-05-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org Please remove ruby2.7 from unstable, as we have completed the switch to ruby3.0. As of today there will be 2 dependencies broken by this, but that's because the failed the transition are currently broken. When the

Re: Ruby team BoF at DebConf 22

2022-04-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:22:24PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Should we submit our regular BoF to DebConf this year? Are people > planning to attend in-person? Are there people willing to attend remotely? Yes. I should be there. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

2022-01-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:32:02AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Montag, dem 24.01.2022 um 01:46 +0530 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > > On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:09:19 വൈകു +0100 +0100, > > Daniel Leidert wrote: > > [..] > > > But could we make it the default? Maybe with the current > > > debhelp

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

2022-01-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 03:18:36PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:20:38 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Cédric Boutillier > wrote: > > Hi Praveen, > > > > Thanks for all the converted packages! > > > > So many packages just for gitaly, and I think gitlab will have even more > packa

Re: Ruby 3.0 is the default in experimental

2022-01-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:16:46PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 02.12.2021 um 16:57 -0300 schrieb Lucas Kanashiro: > > > > FYI I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0~exp1 to experimental, and now > > ruby3.0 is the default and ruby2.7 support was removed. In unstable no > > cha

Re: webgen again

2022-01-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 01:24:58PM +0100, Klaumi Klingsporn wrote: > Hi, > > over a year ago I started my attempt to bring webgen and > the packages it depends on back into Debian. Last year in > march the new webgen package (thanks to Daniel) was > finally uploaded into the Debian new queue - but

Re: Ruby 3.0 is the default in experimental

2021-12-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 04:57:52PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi, > > FYI I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0~exp1 to experimental, and now > ruby3.0 is the default and ruby2.7 support was removed. In unstable no > change was made. FWIW I installed ruby, ruby-dev and ruby-all-dev from experi

Re: Rails 6.1 transition

2021-12-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 08:53:00AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > This is a short information about the status: > > - puma was blocked by an issue in ruby-async-rspec/ruby-rspec-memory, but I > think I got this fixed yesterday > > - there was another block due to ruby-warnings not having

Bug#1000140: ruby-moneta: FTBFS: mysqld fails to start

2021-11-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-moneta Version: 1.0.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org Hi, ruby-moneta fails to build from source. This is a recurring problem. We have a ton of scritps to start mysql for running tests, they are all slightl

Re: RFH: Skripts in /usr/bin relying on version specific extensions and shebang line in these scripts

2021-11-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 01:14:49PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi there, > > while working on ruby-byebug I came across a question I cannot answer myself. > So in case of this package there is a script with a shebang line like > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > This line at the moment will lead to t

Re: the sorted_set problem

2021-10-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 07:52:07AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Le Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:51:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro a écrit : > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:10:12PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am packaging sorted_set, a

Re: the sorted_set problem

2021-10-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:10:12PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi, > > I am packaging sorted_set, as it was extracted from the standard library > as an independent gem for ruby3.0. I stumbled on the following issue: > > - sorted_set depends on set >= 1.0 > - set is available as an independe

Re: ruby-webrick and ruby2.7

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 11:16:14PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > The list of packages containing files with either > require "webrick" > or > require 'webrick' > > is > > avro-java > bazel-bootstrap > cgit > drkonqi > git > gitaly > gitlab > gitlab-shell > global > hiki > ifetch-tools > j

Re: Ruby 3.0 enabled in unstable

2021-10-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 04:36:43PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is just a FYI that ruby3.0 is now enabled by ruby-defaults in unstable. > From now on, building packages in unstable will trigger tests and build > extensions for both, 2.7 and 3.0. > > I'll be rebuildin

Re: ruby:Depends and epoch in rails

2021-10-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 02:13:11AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > This issue [1] is open for a while, but since lintian now recommends using > ruby:Depends we are seeing this issue in more cases (since even packages > that were not using ruby:Depends now starts using it). > > https://sals

Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add

2021-10-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. Ben file: title = "ruby3.0-add"; is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|r

Re: RFC: Revoke membership for janitor bot

2021-10-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:34:22PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 1 October 2021 7:30:23 am IST, Daniel Leidert wrote: > >Hi there, > > > >most of you know that janitor/jenkins is committing to our repositories > >directly. However, I recently saw that it starts to commit changes targette

Re: Bug#993829: Please ship nokogiri.h header file

2021-09-22 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:48:47PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Le Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:13:59PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit : > > Am Sonntag, dem 19.09.2021 um 17:31 +0200 schrieb Cédric Boutillier: > > > I have been looking at the bugs on ruby-nokogiri before trying to up

Re: RFH: Make ruby-jekyll-data tests find the test-theme

2021-09-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
the locations up > via > the Gemfile when running "bundle exec rake". Any idea? > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-jekyll-data You can use a custom Gemfile, plus an extra option to the test run command. See the attached patch. From 7ee664cb3a6852880b166679b35fbf0

Re: ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require

2021-08-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 01:35:43AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:12 am, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > [copying debian-ruby list] > > > > On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 22:08:39 +0530 Akshay S Dinesh > > wrote: > > > Package: ruby-google-protobuf > > > Version: 3.17.3-1 > > > Severi

Re: Should we drop ruby-interpreter dependency from all packages which ships a ruby script?

2021-07-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 06:20:38AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:26:08AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is reported against asciidoctor but probably affects more packages. > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Re: Should we drop ruby-interpreter dependency from all packages which ships a ruby script?

2021-07-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:26:08AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > This is reported against asciidoctor but probably affects more packages. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=991015 Yes. Even better, we should migrate to using ${ruby:Depends}, which already d

Re: Is there a way to specify test-only dependency for autodep8 tests?

2021-04-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 06:54:14PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > > At present it looks like the autodep8 tests (which is run via > gem2deb-test-runner) takes in the package, installs dependencies and > runs the upstream tests as autopkgtests - great! > > However, is there a way to specify ex

Re: Bug#986742: unblock: ruby2.7/2.7.3-1

2021-04-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
618744303&raw=0 I just uploaded -2 with the following fix: ----8<8<8<- From: Antonio Terceiro Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:50:12 + Subject: Revert "Make host_* values consistent with target_*" See https://bugs

Re: CVE-2021-28965

2021-04-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:22:24PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:05:29 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff > wrote: > > https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/04/05/xml-round-trip-vulnerability-in-rexml-cve-2021-28965/ > > > > Why is there a separate package duplicating rexml from src

Re: plan for cinc, chef and ohai and some of its components packaging

2021-04-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 02:26:29PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:47 pm, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We had to remove chef due to trademark issues, details here > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963750 > > > > Now gitlab from 13.10.0

Re: webgen (finally)

2021-03-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:33:23PM +0100, Klaumi Klingsporn wrote: > Hi team, > > after all needed packages for webgen are at least in > unstable now I started finishing the webgen package itself. > > It didn't built with ruby 2.7 and tests enabled (and I had > some trouble using it for my person

Re: ruby-vcr: DFSG violation (Hippocratic license)

2021-03-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 02:50:18PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2021, മാർച്ച് 8 1:24:48 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: [...] > >I don't think that will be needed. I reverted to 5.0.0 locally, added a > >few patches, and at least all of our reverse depen

Re: ruby-vcr: DFSG violation (Hippocratic license)

2021-03-07 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > [adding release team] > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:49 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > Hi Praveen, > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Pirate Praveen > > wrote: > > > It looks like we will have to remove ruby-vcr and we will ha

Re: newbie questions while packaging webgen

2021-02-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 07:09:38PM +0100, Klaumi Klingsporn wrote: > Hi team, > > While working on my webgen package I ran into 3 questions: > > 1. > While working on my first update of the ruby-cmdparse > package Daniel Leidert advised me to add the line > > export DH_RUBY = --gem-install > >

Re: Mass rebuild against ruby 3.0

2021-01-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:45:39AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi team, > > I have done a mass rebuild of all ruby reverse dependencies against ruby > 3.0, and here are the results: > > https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/ruby3.0/builds/ > > Please check it out, and let's try to file bugs a

Re: FYI: NMUs to expect for packages missing builds on buildds

2020-12-31 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 02:40:15PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > Holger Levsen announced in d-devel around 3000 NMUs to do source-only uploads > for packages which are missing binary builds on our buildds. With the release > of buster it became mandatory to build all binary packages on ou

Re: RFC: Split autopkgtest-pkg-ruby

2020-11-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Daniel, On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:12:35AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi there, > > I'd like to propose a minor change to how the automatic tests are created and > run in autopkgtest. By adding Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby we enable some > automatically created autopkgtests. These are d

Re: Bug#973731: ITP: ruby-launchy -- helper class for launching cross-platform applications

2020-11-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:45:34AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Sent back to the list and CC to Antonio > > Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2020, 07:54 +0530 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > > On 2020, നവംബർ 4 7:05:29 AM IST, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Severity: wishlist > > >

Re: ${ruby:Depends}

2020-10-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:23:22AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Samstag, den 03.10.2020, 23:23 +0200 schrieb Cédric Boutillier: > > Dear Team members, > > > > I had a couple of questions about packaging workflow, which are maybe > > naive. Hopefully, answers will be useful for others too! > >

Re: [Reminder] Ruby team meeting tomorrow (04-09-2020) at 1630 UTC

2020-09-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:58:45PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > We have a Ruby team meeting tomorrow, 04th September at 1630 UTC. Thanks for organizing. > This will *not* be *yet another* meeting, we'll try to be more > interactive, perhaps a Jitsi call (with, of course, discussions on

Re: Rails 6 transition - current status and blockers

2020-08-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:13:10PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:03:41AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As discussed in today's ruby team BoF, I'm sending the list of current > > blockers for rails 6 transition. >

Re: Rails 6 transition - current status and blockers

2020-08-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:03:41AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed in today's ruby team BoF, I'm sending the list of current > blockers for rails 6 transition. > > 1. node-yarnpkg blocked by node-babel removal (need to port to node-babel7) > - via ruby-webpackager which is cur

Re: no ri docs for packages outide of core ruby?

2020-08-06 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 08:34:10PM -0400, salew...@att.net wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Is it intentional that 'ri' documentation is not provided for ruby-foo > packages? If so, what is the rationale? I often use ri for getting help about core classes, and wholehartly agree that it would be nice to hav

Re: Triaging rails 6 rebuild/autopkgtest failures and ruby team online sprint proposal

2020-07-25 Thread terceiro
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:39:16PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 01:19, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > This sprint is mainly to file bugs before we upload to unstable. So > > should be before August, if weekend on 25th is better we can do that. In > > August we can do a

Re: Change whitelist and black list environment variables in gem2deb

2020-07-19 Thread terceiro
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 07:37:36PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should change these two variables in gem2deb/dh_ruby > > DH_RUBY_GEM_INSTALL_WHITELIST_APPEND > > DH_RUBY_GEM_INSTALL_BLACKLIST_APPEND > > I think WHITELIST_APPEND can be changed to INCLUDE and BLACKLIST_APPEND

Re: Triaging rails 6 rebuild/autopkgtest failures and ruby team online sprint proposal

2020-07-15 Thread terceiro
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:43:39PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > I have documented the steps to triage failures and categorize it at > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rails/-/wikis/Transition-to-Rails-6-for-Debian-Bullseye#todo > > Any help is welcome. I was thinking about an online s

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >