On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 02:12:32PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 23/04/2025 1:49 pm, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > The thought process with the name is that this package is only useful > > to rails. It can’t be used generally by other Ruby packages. > > > > Upstream is propshaft inside of the rails project. > > Only golang follows that convention because you have to also import by full > url. But every rubygem the name is unique and every other ruby gem package > only adds ruby- to gem name. Only when there is fork and two different gems > by close enough gems we add the repo name. > > This is already established naming standard used for all rubygems as > codified in gem2deb. > > > https://github.com/rails/propshaft > > > > However, if there is a general consensus that this should be named > > ruby-propshaft I am not opposed to changing it.
AFAICT there is no strictly technical reason to name it ruby-propshaft, but following the established convention makes it simpler for us humans.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
