On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:15:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 03:21:04PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I am resuming the work for ruby 3.3 transition. I started rebuilding all
> > reverse dependencies again, the latest results can be found here:
> > 
> > https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/debian/ruby3.3/
> > 
> > I did not have time yet to triage the build failures and try to identify
> > common patterns, that will be the next step. As usual, help is very welcome
> > :)
> > 
> > If you are willing to join this effort, we can coordinate some work here or
> > via IRC.
> 
> FWIW, the following packages in the failing group in your last rebuild
> are not in testing and can safely be ignored for now:
> 
> ctioga2
> epic5
> gitaly
> gitlab
> quickml
> raspell
> robot-testing-framework
> ruby-batch-loader
> ruby-behance
> ruby-celluloid-io
> ruby-clockwork
> ruby-devise-two-factor
> ruby-distribution
> ruby-eb
> ruby-faraday-middleware
> ruby-faraday-middleware-multi-json
> ruby-feature
> ruby-gd
> ruby-gh
> ruby-gitlab-markup
> ruby-gon
> ruby-gruff
> ruby-gsl
> ruby-hdfeos5
> ruby-influxdb
> ruby-integration
> ruby-jekyll-github-metadata
> ruby-mmap2
> ruby-nfc
> ruby-premailer
> ruby-prometheus-client-mmap
> ruby-rack-session
> ruby-rackup
> ruby-redis-activesupport
> ruby-redis-rack
> ruby-rjb
> ruby-rollout
> ruby-roxml
> ruby-ruby-magic-static
> ruby-rubydns
> ruby-serialport
> ruby-timeliness
> ruby-tioga
> ruby-uconv
> samizdat
> subtle

IMO in future rebuilds, we could just ignore from the start any packages
that are not in testing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to