On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 07:12:18AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > I understand what you said but in this case we would have Debci > blocking the migration to testing, which will avoid any issue to our > users anyway. The maintainer/uploader of the package causing the issue > will notice at some point (hopefully) and sort it out in some way. If > we think this approach is the best, we would need to schedule the ci > pipeline of all packages we maintain instead of just a small set of > packages, which would use too much resources from salsa-ci.
Sure. I'm also fine with dropping the scheduled runs entirely. But it was not me who put them in place. :-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
